“Hide and Seek”: The Most Blatant Movie About Monarch Mind Control Ever?

“Hide and Seek” is a 2005 thriller movie that did not get great reviews at the time of its release. However, chances are, most critics did understand its symbolism and its underlying theme which is all about Monarch Programming. In fact, “Hide and Seek” is probably one of the most blatant movies about Monarch Mind Control in Hollywood’s history. We’ll look at the hidden meaning of the movie.

Hide and Seek is not going down in history as Robert De Niro’s most memorable movie. It was bashed by movie critics for its derivative nature and because its ending was deemed “nonsensical”. While it is true that the plot of Hide and Seek has a fair share of logical fallacies, the movie simply cannot be fully understood without knowing about the key element at its core: Trauma-based Mind Control. From the first frame to the last, almost every line and every symbol found in the movie directly refers to concepts associated with mind control, specifically Monarch Programming.

In this particular brand of mind control, children are subjected to trauma so intense that it causes them to dissociate from reality. The slave’s handlers can then program into the children’s minds alter personas that can be triggered at will (for more information about Monarch Mind Control, read the article entitled Origins and Techniques of Monarch Mind Control). In a symbolic and theatrical way, Hide and Seek describes the horrible procedure behind Monarch Programming and hints to the more sadistic aspects of it. The fact that Monarch butterflies appear in key parts of the movie confirms that the whole storyline is based on Monarch Mind Control.

Further, when one understands the handler/slave relationship that is happening in the movie, the “nonsensical” ending becomes a little more “sensical” as it fits precisely with the way Monarch Programming works.

Let’s look at the story of Hide and Seek and the MK symbolism it contains.

Brief Summary

Warning: Gigantic spoilers ahead.

After witnessing the apparent suicide of her mother, a young girl named Emily Callaway (played by Dakota Fanning) displays symptoms of severe trauma. Her father David Callaway (played by Robert De Niro) attempts to help his daughter snap out of her trauma by leaving his job as a psychologist and by moving to a small town outside of New York. …


Is your neighbor mind controlled?

Judge Releases Dominion Audit Report: System ‘Designed’ to ‘Create Systemic Fraud’

This article is a month old, so it goes to show how uninterested the mainstream media, the alphabet agencies and Congress are, in telling the truth about the 2020 election. Remember, folks, this is not “vote fraud” – individuals voting twice, for instance – it’s “election fraud” – a system of criminals on foreign government and corporate computers shuffling votes to make the count come out the way they prefer.

A Michigan judge has released the bombshell report on the audit of Dominion Voting Systems, revealing that the machines and their software were “designed” to “create systemic fraud.”

The report covers the forensic audit of Dominion’s machines in Michigan’s Antrim County — which received national attention after it was discovered that 6,000 votes for President Donald Trump were “flipped” to Democrat Joe Biden due to an “error.”

13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin Elsenheimer ordered the report’s protective order to be lifted on Monday night, allowing the details of the audit to be unsealed and released to the public…

Read more at https://neonnettle.com/news/13586-judge-releases-dominion-audit-report-system-designed-to-create-systemic-fraud-

‘Q-Anon’ Bears Striking Resemblance to Bolshevik Psy-Op From 1920s Known As ‘Operation Trust’

“Operation Trust” was a Bolshevik counterintelligence operation run from 1921 to 1926 aimed at neutralizing opposition by creating the false impression that a powerful group of military leaders had organized to stop the communists’ takeover.

Here’s an except on the “Trust” operation from pages 13-14 of Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn’s book, “New Lies for Old”:

(Click to enlarge)

The similarities with the Q-Anon “Trust The Plan™” psy-op are remarkable.

(Click to enlarge)

The similarities with the Q-Anon “Trust The Plan™” psy-op are remarkable.

From Wikipedia’s article on Operation Trust:

Operation Trust was a counterintelligence operation of the State Political Directorate (GPU) of the Soviet Union. The operation, which was set up by GPU’s predecessor Cheka, ran from 1921 to 1926, set up a fake anti-Bolshevik resistance organization, “Monarchist Union of Central Russia”, MUCR, in order to help the OGPU identify real monarchists and anti-Bolsheviks. The created front company was called the Moscow Municipal Credit Association.

[…] The one Western historian who had limited access to the Trust files, John Costello, reported that they comprised thirty-seven volumes and were such a bewildering welter of double-agents, changed code names, and interlocking deception operations with “the complexity of a symphonic score”, that Russian historians from the Intelligence Service had difficulty separating fact from fantasy.

That sounds like the Confucius-style nonsense put out by Q-Anon.

Is General Flynn our General Brusliv?


Q-Anon made Trump supporters who were right to be angry over the criminal nature of our ruling class delude themselves with fantasies that “White hats” in the military were going to save us while Attorney General William Barr was busy covering-up the Jeffrey Epstein case and the Kushner administration was busy pardoning fraudsters who donated to the Aleph Institute and releasing traitor Jonathan Pollard from parole to “make aliyah” in Israel. ….


DNI Ratcliffe details how China influenced the 2020 election while the intel community deep state worked to cover it up

It should be patently obvious by now that the swamp creatures that inhabit the deep state and the bowels of government not only want to punish Donald Trump for daring to win an election and keep his promise to clear them out, they want to ruin him, his family and his businesses for good.

That’s what the second impeachment is about. It’s what trying to convict him as he is set to walk out of the White House is about (so he can’t ever run for a second term). That’s what deplatforming him from all social media (despite taking losses of billions of dollars in valuation) is about. It’s what ending long-standing business relations is about.

Donald Trump never told his supporters to ‘storm’ the U.S. Capitol Building. Reread his speech or listen to it online; he even used the word “peacefully” when describing how he wanted supporters to behave when the arrived at the Capitol.

But this is all being done to get rid of the biggest threat to the existence of the deep state and their ability to maintain control of their fiefdoms and power centers — and to prevent our rightful president from fully exposing what actually happened during the November election.

The few loyal constitutionalists remaining on Trump’s skeleton staff are doing their best to show their allegiance not to him but to all of us and the founding document that is supposed to guide our elected officials and the bureaucracy that they built. One of them is Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe.

In a memo titled, “Views on Intelligence Community Election Security Analysis,” Ratcliffe made it clear that China, not Russia (Russia! Russia! Russia!, the deep state yelled) was far more heavily involved in disrupting our election — but the #NeverTrump faction within the intelligence community has hid their involvement in order to get rid of a commander-in-chief they have never liked.

“From my unique vantage point as the individual who consumes all of the U.S. government’s most sensitive intelligence on the People’s Republic of China, I do not believe the majority view expressed by the Intelligence Community (IC) analysts fully and accurately reflects the scope of the Chinese government’s efforts to influence the 2020 U.S. federal elections,” Ratcliffe wrote.

“The majority view expressed in this ICA [Intelligence Community Assessment] with regard to China’s actions to influence the election fall short of the mark for several specific reasons,” he added, noting that IC guidelines require assessments to be free of political bias, though in Ratcliffe’s view, the China portion of the election analysis wasn’t. (Related: Pompeo issues sanctions against communist China, Venezuelan election corporation.)

“China analysts were hesitant to assess Chinese actions as undue influence or interference. These analysts appeared reluctant to have their analysis on China brought forward because they tend to disagree with the administration’s policies, saying in effect, I don’t want our intelligence used to support those policies,” the IC Ombudsman found. “This behavior would constitute a violation of Analytic Standard B: Independence of Political Considerations.”

This politicization of intelligence has been happening since Donald Trump beat the deep state’s favorite (and corrupt) candidate, Hillary Clinton.

How do you think mainstream newspapers got a hold of incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn’s phone conversation with a Russian diplomat? That stuff isn’t public record.

And how about the ‘whistleblower’ complaint regarding the bogus claim of a Trump “quid pro quo” from the Ukrainian president, which led to the president’s first bogus impeachment? Trump even tried to head off the fake narrative by releasing a transcript of his phone call — but that didn’t matter because impeachment had been spoken of openly since before he took office.

As for the Chinese, if we have U.S. intelligence community analysts going easy on the ChiCom regime, then that can only mean Beijing has found many inroads into our most sensitive intelligence agencies.

World War III can’t be far off.


Circumcision & Human Behavior

The emotional & behavioral effects of circumcision
by George Hill

Psychologists now recognize that male circumcision affects emotions and behavior. This article discusses the impact of male circumcision on human behavior.



Medical doctors adopted male circumcision from religious practice into medical practice in England in the 1860s and in the United States in the 1870s. No thought was given to the possible behavioral effects of painful operations that excise important protective erogenous tissue from the male phallus. For example, Gairdner (1949) and Wright (1967), both critics of male neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision, made no mention of any behavioral effects of neonatal circumcision.[1] [2]

The awakening
Other doctors, however, were beginning to express concern about the behavioral effects of male circumcision.

Levy (1945) studied the behavioral effects of various operations, including circumcision, on young children.[3] He found that children who had undergone operations experienced an increase in anxiety and various fears, including night terrors, fear of physicians, nurses, and strange men. The oldest age group exhibited greater hostility and aggression. Levy compared their behavior to that of soldiers who suffered from what was then called “combat neurosis,” and now recognized as post-traumatic stress disorder. Anna Freud (1952) pointed out that operations on the genitals, such as circumcision, would cause “castration anxiety.”[4]

Cansever (1965) tested Turkish boys before and after circumcision.[5] Cansever reported severe disturbances in functioning, including regression in behavior, and withdrawal of the ego as protection against outside threats. Cansever also observed various anxieties, including castration anxiety. Foley (1966) noticed that circumcised men are more likely to be biased in favor of circumcision.[7] Moreover, he said that circumcised men are more likely to engage in “problem-masturbation” but non-circumcised men were equally unlikely to engage in “problem-masturbation.” Grimes (another critic of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision) (1978), apparently unaware of the research described above, sounded an alarm:

“In contrast to the sometimes dramatic somatic responses of the neonate to operation without anesthesia, the psychological consequences of this trauma are conjectural. Psychoanalyst Erik Erickson has described the first of eight stages of man as the development of basic trust versus basic mistrust. For the baby to be plucked from his bed, strapped in a spread eagle position, and doused with chilling antiseptic is perhaps consistent with other new-found discomforts of extrauterine existence. The application of crushing clamps and excision of penile tissue, however, probably do little to engender a trusting, congenial, relationship with the infant’s new surroundings.”[8]


Microbiome has immune memory

Scientists studying the body’s natural defenses against bacterial infection have identified a nutrient—taurine—that helps the gut recall prior infections and kill invading bacteria, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kpn). The finding, published in the journal Cell by scientists from five institutes of the National Institutes of Health, could aid efforts seeking alternatives to antibiotics.

Scientists know that microbiota—the trillions of beneficial microbes living harmoniously inside our gut—can protect people from bacterial infections, but little is known about how they provide protection. Scientists are studying the microbiota with an eye to finding or enhancing natural treatments to replace antibiotics, which harm microbiota and become less effective as bacteria develop .

The scientists observed that microbiota that had experienced prior infection and transferred to  helped prevent infection with Kpn. They identified a class of bacteria—Deltaproteobacteria—involved in fighting these infections, and further analysis led them to identify taurine as the trigger for Deltaproteobacteria activity….


See the wikipedia page on nutritional sources of taurine.   As usual, infants are held hostage to blithe medical ignorance re: the value of breast milk.