New Zealand in Tyranny: How could this happen?

Freedom-loving and free-thinking New Zealanders are dismayed by the results of the country’s recent general election. The southern hemisphere country has just re-elected a socialist Government with an increased vote, giving it a “mandate” to further take away freedom during a crisis of Covid-19 madness. Why would a country re-elect a nanny state Government promising more socialist tyranny? It is almost beyond belief.

The result of the US 2020 election stalemate is nervously awaited by New Zealanders. Some see a Biden win as a coup for the Left worldwide and a result that is likely to strengthen the New Zealand socialist agenda. The NZ government and media seem to dislike current US President Donald Trump, his actions, comments, and policies, and are excited about the potential for a Biden win. The American Democrats are apparently excited to embrace a communist-type, totalitarian, socialist government for Americans. They seem to be cheering on another “leader” who is willing to bow to climate change mantras and Covid hysteria, just like New Zealanders. The media in both countries have played a large part is promoting these tyrannical agendas. A.

During the New Zealand election, a freedom movement called Advance New Zealand formed a new political party which was quickly censored, maligned, slandered, and laughed at. Its leaders were labeled “conspiracy theorists” because they dared to challenge the official narrative. Voters largely ignored Advance New Zealand, preferring to go with the two usual left and right parties but predominantly leaned toward the left socialists. If nothing is done to stop the country’s direction, New Zealanders will one day wake up to “conspiracy facts” with more than a tinge of regret. Citizens around the world should take heed of this sort of apathy before it is too late.

This is what the majority of the electorate voted for:

  • A government prepared to use rolling lockdowns to eliminate a virus with a fatality rate similar to a bad influenza season….until a vaccine is available.
  • A government that ran one of the strictest lockdowns in the world despite a low case number. It credits the lockdown for keeping the death rate at 24 even though more and more evidence shows lockdowns do not solve pandemics.
  • A government that introduced draconian laws of overreach due to the Covid-19 “pandemic”, including the powers to remove people from their homes to detention centers.
  • A government that legislated and passed some of the most liberal abortion laws in the world and is introducing euthanasia.
  • A government targeting farmers in the name of “climate change, making it hard for them to survive.
  • A government that has provisions for mandatory vaccination and plans to possibly link returning to work with vaccination status.
  • A government that has made suicide stats hard to find
  • A government that has increased the national debt to alarmingly high levels through its response to the pandemic.
  • A government that handed out money to the mainstream media to keep them afloat during the pandemic and an election campaign.
  • A government that allocated public funding for a documentary which was nothing more than a vicious smear attack on the co-leader of one of the minor political parties speaking the truth and trying to hold the current government to account.
  • A government treating its citizens like children in a nanny state in the midst of Covid-19 madness.
  • A government that allowed parts of the country to be sold to China.
  • A government committed to implementing the globalist socialist Agenda 21 and 30 plans.

Why would people re-elect this Government during a time of Covid-19 madness?

Maybe some votes were swayed by the handouts such as job subsidies and business tax breaks, which held the unemployment statistics down and helped people get by. It could have been the propaganda pumped out day and night by the mainstream media who seemed to idolize leader Jacinda Ardern and relish being her government’s PR arm. Perhaps some people loved being “looked after” and “kept safe” by their government. Perhaps most were too busy to do their own research.

But to thinking, freedom-loving discerning New Zealanders, the result of the country’s October 17 election holds great concern. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says her Government now has a “clear mandate from the people” to keep rolling out its harsh programs, using the word “accelerate” in her victory speech.

How could the people of New Zealand choose this? Could election-fraud be the cause of her victory, similar to what we are seeing in US elections? I have worked in two previous elections and been involved in vote-counting. In my experience, the system is very robust and there are many checks and balances in place to avoid tampering. However, the results are puzzling…

Methinks the level of unaccountable power, blackmail and money flows in the world have made (self-)organized crime into the biggest transnational corporate interest in history.   It’s a shame she hasn’t had recent election experience, but it’s getting to the point where it wouldn’t matter anyway.   Election machines are steadily eroding human involvement in the nuts and bolts of the process.  Intelligence agencies, secret societies ( ) and mega-corporations seem to be in control.

Admittedly the following links will be intimidating to newcomers but this appears to be reality.   Ignore it at your peril.   At least check the last link if you want to get motivated.

She doesn’t say anything about self defense, but the Christchurch false flag a few years ago should have been even more foreboding to her:

Similar events in australia, the UK and the USA imply a transnational element to the whole process.

Babies breastfed for longer gain emotional benefits

Children who are breastfed for three months or more develop fewer behavioural difficulties than those who are not, research suggests.

They are less prone to social and emotional setbacks such as bouts of anxiety, struggles forming friendships, or problems with concentration, the study found.

This was the case even allowing for other influencing factors such as maternal education, maternal psychological distress and family socio-economic status.

Behavioural development

Babies being breastfed for less than three months has been linked to a range of behavioural difficulties but previous studies—mostly focused on early childhood—have been inconclusive.

This new research—the first to track behaviour into adolescence—offers fresh evidence that breastfeeding is linked to later behavioural . …

“The  of breastfeeding on children’s physical development is well known but, the effect on their social and  is less understood. Having identified that there are potential behavioural benefits, our study strengthens the case for  that promote breastfeeding, where possible,” says Lydia Speyer, lead author, from the University of Edinburgh’s School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences.

Normal people see this kind of research and think it’s a no-brainer.   Why does it need proving that BF should continue as long as both parties want it to continue?  Why is the medical establishment constantly trying to reinvent the wheel when the human Ferrari is already miles up the road?

Because it will be forgotten as soon as it’s convenient to forget, because the medical establishment is largely controlled by disaster capitalists, the most wealthy demographic of all.   And you can see the profit opportunities which would be lost to them if the disease, misery and poverty caused by decades of socially isolating and feeding toxic junk food to babies ( ) gives way to empowered, happy, healthy, fully mammalian human beings.   Healthy people also tend to reproduce, and tend to be difficult to control as well.

It is clearly not in the interests of the puppeteers of our medical industry to allow people to become fully human.   And so no meaningful legislative or regulatory efforts will be made on behalf of babies, while medical “syence” continues to go through the motions of looking busy in order to keep up appearances (and funding) and nothing actually changes for the children.   This is how it’s been for decades (they only started putting FATTY ACIDS into “formula” about 12 years ago) and I expect it will continue to be so.

Naturally, the same applies to the vaccination industrial complex.   They know exactly what they’re doing.

Another conveniently forgotten lesson:

Medical Research Rediscovers Harm of Immediate Cord Clamping

and a lesson well learned which will not be forgotten:

Reality: Neurologically, MGM is the same as FGM

The Blizzard of Bogus Journalism on COVID

This game of hunt-and-kill Covid cases has reached peak absurdity, especially in media culture. 

Take a look at Supermarkets are the most common place to catch Covid, new data reveals. It’s a story on a “study” assembled by Public Health England (PHE) from the NHS Test and Trace App. Here is the conclusion. In the six days of November studied, “of those who tested positive, it was found that 18.3 per cent had visited a supermarket.”

Now, if the alarm bells don’t go off with that one, you didn’t pay attention to 7th grade science. If the app had also included showering, eating, and breathing, it might have found a 100% correlation. Yes, the people who tested positive probably did shop, as do most people. That doesn’t mean that shopping gives you Covid and it certainly doesn’t mean that shopping kills you.

Even if shopping is a way to get Covid, this is a very widespread and mostly mild virus for 99.8% percent of the population with an infection fatality rate as low as 0.05% for those under 70. Competent infectious disease experts have said multiple times that test, track, and isolate strategies are nearly useless for controlling viruses such as this….

The New York Times pulled a mighty fast one with this piece: “States That Imposed Few Restrictions Now Have the Worst Outbreaks.” This would be huge news if true because it would imply not only that lockdowns save lives (which no serious study has thus far been able to document) but also that granting people basic freedoms are the reason for bad health outcomes, an astonishing claim on its own.

The piece, put together by two graphic artists and seemingly very science-like, speaks of “outbreaks,” which vaguely sounds terrible: packed with mortality. It’s odd because anyone can look at the data and see that New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Connecticut lead the way with deaths per million, mostly owing to the fatalities in long-term care facilities. These were the states that locked down the hardest and longest. Indeed they are locking down again! Deaths per million in states like South Dakota are still low on the list.

How in the world can the NYT claim that states that did not lock down have the worst outbreaks? The claim hinges entirely on a trivial discovery. Some clever someone discovered that if you reflow data by cases per million instead of deaths per million, you get an opposite result. The reasons: 1) when the Northeast experienced the height of the pandemic, there was very little testing going on, so the “outbreak” was not documented even as deaths grew and grew, 2) by the time the virus reached the Midwest, tests were widely available, 3) the testing mania grew and grew to the point that the non-vulnerable are being tested like crazy, generating high positives in small-population areas.

By focusing on the word “outbreak,” the Times can cleverly obscure the difference between a positive PCR result (including many false positive and perhaps half or more asymptomatic cases) and a severe outcome from catching the virus. In other words, the Times has documented an “outbreak” of mostly non-sick people in low-population areas.

There are hundreds of ways to look at Covid-19 data. The Times picked the one metric – the least valuable one for actually discerning whether and to what extent people are sick – in order to generate the result that they wanted, namely that open states look as bad as possible. The result is a chart that massively misrepresents any existing reality. It makes the worst states look great and the best ones look terrible. The visual alone is constructed to make it looks as if open states are bleeding uncontrollably….

Covid and Medical Mind Control

Here’s some wild speculation for you.   I’ve been trying to understand the obtuseness of doctors and nurses who insist on following obviously bogus official guidance on covid even to the point of actively killing the patient via intubation.    Likewise it seems public “health” officials seem oblivious to the fact that covid is no worse than a bad flu season, easily treatable with cheap conventional methods and that the toxicity of shutting down the economy is far worse than that of the virus itself.   Of course there are many other issues involved, but one would think those alone would be sufficient to cause resistance within the medical establishment.   Yet there seems to be a robotic adherence to “authority” to the exclusion of all else.    Either medical brainwashing is more effective than I thought, or something else is going on.  Understand this is just a hypothesis.

I used to hypnotize friends when I was in high school.   I was pretty good at it.  And I can see how it would be very easy to get someone to do something totally against their character.   In other words, the establishment has been lying about this aspect of hypnosis for a very long time, probably in order to numb the population to the possibilities it raises.

The links below summarize what I know about mind control.  With drugs such as scopolamine available to initiate the process, MK techniques could readily be used to effect mind control in a subset of a population as pliable and brainwashed as the cult of medicine already is.    Successful “recruits” could be selectively promoted to positions of authority using standard infiltration techniques.    Just a thought.

Covid-19 Patients Being Purposefully Murdered, Says Whistleblower Nurse

Scopolamine: Instant Mind Control

“Return to Oz” : A Creepy Disney Movie That is Clearly About Mind Control

Is your neighbor mind controlled?

Interview with Mind Control Victim Used to Blackmail Politicians as a Child

Interview with Mind Control Victim Trained to Kill

The Takeover: Totally crazy unsubstantiated rumor that might well be absolutely true

Fulton County Poll Manager Susan Voyles Recounts Election Improprieties in Georgia Recount

A Georgia woman who submitted a sworn affidavit regarding election improprieties has recorded a new video detailing her experience assisting in Georgia’s recount of the 2020 election ballots.

Susan Voyles is a veteran Georgia elections poll manager who submitted a sworn affidavit in a Trump campaign lawsuit against Georgia’s Secretary of State. She recounts some of the most significant improprieties she witnessed participating in the recount of Georgia’s election, which Joe Biden supposedly won by around 13,000 votes.

Trending: Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

Voyles, who has done elections work for twenty years, describes counting an unusual “pristine” batch of absentee ballots that were cast 98% for Joe Biden. She states that the packaging containing these absentee ballots was unlabeled by the Secretary of State.

We came to one batch- it was surprising, it was stark- having done this for years, I’m very familiar with how the ballots work, how they fold, how they feel, their general appearance- these ballots appeared as though the first one had been bubbled in by a person and all of them were replicated, exactly the same.

We were further alarmed that in our count 98% of these ballots were for Joseph R. Biden. Two were for Donald Trump.

That’s a very odd count. My coworker agreed with me that there was something very unusual about these ballots.”

Voyles even suspects that the unusual ballots she counted in the recount were filled out with a marking device.

Every single ballot was absolutely identical, and they appeared to be printed with some sort of marking device.

Unfortunately, it’s very difficult for elections integrity monitors to verify the veracity of these supposedly pristine absentee ballots. They’ve been separated from the envelopes that contain the supposed legal information of the voters that cast them, and they can’t be reunited with them.

Pandemics Are Over When the Public Decides They’re Over

In Colorado, reported cases and hospitalizations of Covid-19 patients are at higher levels than ever before. And yet politicians are worried that if they issue new stay-at-home orders, the public won’t obey them. For instance the Denver Post last week reported Colorado Democrats admitted the public isn’t listening very closely anymore:

[State Senator Steve] Fenberg and many other state leaders are worried … about whether a stay-at-home order would even work this time around. People have grown accustomed to certain freedoms since the spring, and already there are some in the population resistant even to the least oppressive rules, such as wearing masks.

“They don’t want to have restrictive orders that people just entirely ignore,” Fenberg said. “Once you cross that line, that seriously, then it really starts to unravel, when people completely check out from following the orders.”

We’ll ignore the creepy framing of the issue around how citizens have lamentably “grown accustomed to certain freedoms” like being able to leave one’s home. But Fenberg is right to think the public is unlikely to be nearly as compliant this time around.

And what happens if Americans start acting as if there is no pandemic? Then, the pandemic is at a de facto end, even if “experts” insist that it is still a de jure reality.

Medical Pandemics vs. Social Pandemics

In other words, government agencies may issue declarations of when Pandemics end, but as noted in The New York Times last May,

pandemics typically have two types of endings: the medical, which occurs when the incidence and death rates plummet, and the social, when the epidemic of fear about the disease wanes….

Unfortunately it’s likely this was just a practice simulation.   But at least when our satanic overlords release the real killer, which they certainly have waiting in the wings, they can’t use plausible deniability any more.   The pattern is too clear.   Their cover is blown.

Shocking New Figures Show How Just Much the US is Fueling the Violence in Yemen

Despite presenting itself as a force for good and peace in the Middle East, the United States sells at least five times as much weaponry to Saudi Arabia than aid it donates to Yemen. The State Department constantly portrays itself as a humanitarian superpower with the welfare of the Yemeni people as its highest priority, yet figures released from the United Nations and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) show that since the war in Yemen began, the U.S. government has given $2.56 billion in aid to the country, but sold over $13 billion in high-tech weapons to Saudi Arabia, the leader of the coalition prosecuting a relentless onslaught against the country.

Figures like these are always debatable. What constitutes legitimate “aid” is a question everyone would answer differently. Furthermore, the $13 billion figure does not include the enormous weapons deal Saudi Arabia signed with Donald Trump in 2017, which will reportedly see the Kingdom purchase $350 billion over ten years.

SIPRI is skeptical of the size of these numbers, but if they prove to be correct, once the orders begin arriving, they will make the paltry aid donations seem like small change by comparison. Sales include all manner of military equipment, from radar and transport systems to F-15 fighter jets, TOW missiles, Abrams tanks, and Paladin howitzers.

While the Saudis pay in petrodollars, Yemenis pay in blood. Four years ago, the Saudi Air Force bombed a well-attended funeral in Yemen’s capital, Sanaa. It was a bright, clear day. The Saudis used a “double tap” airstrike to ensure maximum carnage. 240 people were killed, and like with the 2018 Saudi attack on a school bus that killed 40 children, the bombs that did the damage were 500-pound (227 kilogram) MK 82’s, built and supplied by Lockheed Martin, America’s largest weapons contractor.

“Making billions from arms exports which fuel the conflict while providing a small fraction of that in aid to Yemen is both immoral and incoherent. The world’s wealthiest nations cannot continue to put profits above the Yemeni people,” said Muhsin Siddiquey, Oxfam’s Yemen Country Director.

CHD: How to Resist Governments’ COVID Vaccine Campaigns

In the latest episode of This Week with Mary & Polly, Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense’s vice chair and general counsel, and Polly Tommey, co-producer of “Vaxxed,” discuss why we must push back against mass COVID vaccinations … and more.


  • The latest news from Pfizer and Moderna on how “preliminary analysis” shows their vaccines are more than 90% effective is not science, it’s public relations.
  • Media are reporting that people with developmental disabilities will be among those first in line to get these experimental COVID vaccines. “You don’t target the most vulnerable people, including those who can’t exercise informed consent,with experimental medical products. That’s arguably going after the weakest in the herd.”
  • AstraZeneca’s COVID vaccine (still in the trial phase) has ingredients we know are correlated with brain injury.
  • Governments have signed deals with vaccine makers to buy billions of dollars worth of COVID vaccines, so they’ll want to use them — so they’re programming us with messaging about fear, altruism and patriotism.
  • In Denmark, people took to the streets to fight back against vaccine mandates — and won.
  • Updates on Children’s Health Defense lawsuits against Facebook, University of California and New York mandates.

Watch here:

FEC Chairman Trey Trainor Confirms There Was Election Fraud – Points to Several Instances

Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor went on with Newsmax this week to discuss the 2020 election.

Trainor confirmed there was voter fraud this year. The FEC Chairman pointed to the double voters in Nevada and the liberal election officials who blocked conservatives from observing their fraud during the vote counting process.

Transparency in all things