Georgia Woman Witnesses Shredding Company at Election office, Photographs Trashcan Full of Absentee ballots

Attorney Lin Wood posted photos and video on Friday of alleged Shredding Company truck leaving elections office in Cobb County Georgia.

Two Georgian women filmed the shredding company trucks picking up the “trash” from the Jim R. Miller Park election office in Cobb County.

One woman said she saw the employees shredding evidence.

The woman Susan Knox filmed the truck picking up the trash from the elections office.

Susan says in the video she witnessed the Shredding Company destroying evidence from the Cobb County election center.

If you download the photo in the last tweet and magnify it, you can clearly see the words “absentee ballot” in one of the piles.

Vodaphone Whistleblower Reveals 5G Killing People, Not Coronavirus

[When you hear the word “virus” below, think exosomes, which are very similar in morphology to viruses and are excreted by cells under stress, the kind of stress that would be caused by calcium overload.   Then see Martin Pall’s lecture about 5G and “voltage gated calcium channels” below.    Personally I think there’s a synergistic toxicity between 5G and whatever virus is circulating at any given time, including this lab-created, ultra-contagious but not ultra-lethal virus.   In other words, we’re dealing a binary weapon. -rw]

A former head of Vodaphone’s 5G department blows the whistle revealing that Coronavirus is being used to cover up the fact that it’s actually 5G frequency radiation that’s causing cell poisoning and killing people.

No “vaccine” will protect people from 5G. Hopefully the Luciferian-Satanic diabolical plans will come to naught.

A Mass Vax False Flag in the Making: “The Flu” and “Microwave Sickness” Share Many of the Same Symptoms

Wuhan City Launched 5G Network Around Oct 2019

NYC ICU Doctor: COVID-19 A Condition of Oxygen Deprivation, Not Pneumonia

Possible mechanism for synergistic G5 – covid toxicity

Barrie Trower speech on 5G and WIFI

5G and the IOT: Overview of Health Risks and Social Control

MORE PROOF OF FRAUD: 16 of 17 Bellwether Counties Went for Trump – HAS NEVER HAPPENED in 36 Years!

Some claim that Joe Biden won the election for President of the USA, but the historic “bellweather counties” – very accurate predictors of elections – do not support that claim. This is fascinating information:

Read more about the bellweather counties here – Some of the counties have over a century of voting results that correlated with the U.S. Presidential election. Note that:

From 1984 through 2016, spanning presidential elections, seventeen US counties in several states ad voted for the winning presidential candidate in an astounding 148 of 153 times including 100% five times for five different presidents…

In 2020, amid widespread accusations of Democrat cheating, these bellwethers were not even close — checking in at a mind-blowing 6%!

Only 1 of 17 bellwether counties went for Biden this year!…

More at

“Bones” Kerry Says Great Reset is Needed to Stop Rise of Populism

Former Secretary of State John Kerry attended a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum during which he asserted that a great reset was urgently needed to stop the rise of populism.

Kerry vowed that under a Biden administration, America would rejoin the job-killing Paris Climate Agreement but that this was “not enough.”

“The notion of a reset is more important than ever before,” Kerry said. “I personally believe … we’re at the dawn of an extremely exciting time.”

The former Senator made it clear that this “reset,” which is merely a re-branding of the same new world order that has faced stiff resistance for the past two decades, is necessary to extinguish populism.

“I think Europe has to look at that with Brexit and the rising national populism — nationalistic populism,” said Kerry. “Which is really one of the priorities that we all have to address. You can’t dismiss it.”…

What he’s talking about is imposing the shock doctrine as a tool of political control to fend off rising awareness of the nightmare he and his accomplices are trying to impose on us.

As far as nationalism, the standard examples of toxic nationalism are the french revolution, hitler and mussolini, which all just happen to have been orchestrated by the secret society mafia that he’s a member of.   Global government is the fire under the frying pan.

The Obvious Problem With Secret Societies

Anthony Sutton: Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler and Communism

The National Plan to Vaccinate Every American

By Barbara Loe Fisher

Scientists at the National Institutes of Health are working with a biotech company to quickly start clinical trials of an experimental messenger RNA vaccine and fast track it to licensure. 1 The FDA has not yet licensed messenger RNA vaccines that use part of the RNA of a virus to manipulate the body’s immune system into stimulating a potent immune response. 2 3  It looks like the coronavirus vaccine will be the first genetically engineered messenger RNA vaccine to be fast tracked to licensure, just like Gardasil was the first genetically engineered virus-like particle vaccine to be fast tracked to licensure. 4 5

There likely will be lots of questions about whether the fast tracked coronavirus vaccine was studied long enough to adequately demonstrate safety, especially for people who have trouble resolving strong inflammatory responses in their bodies and may be at greater risk for vaccine reactions.6 7 8 9 10 However, there is no question about what will happen if the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) 11 12 recommends that all Americans get the newly licensed coronavirus vaccine.

The government has a National Vaccine Plan. It is a Plan designed to make sure you, your child and everyone in America gets every dose of every vaccine that government officials recommend now and in the future….

Blast Off With the Rocket Scientists at the CDC

Obama: The Internet is ‘The Single Biggest Threat to Our Democracy’

Big Tech needs to ramp up their authoritarian censorship and thought-policing or else our democracy will not “work,” so says former President Barack Hussein Obama.

From Vox, “Obama: The internet is ‘the single biggest threat to our democracy'”:

[Obama’s] latest critique comes in a new interview between Obama and Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg, and before we go any further we should put it in full context: Obama was discussing a media landscape dominated not just by Facebook but by Fox News that allows Americans to choose their own distorted reality. Which means, he says, we no longer have a shared set of facts.

[…] Obama: Now you have a situation in which large swaths of the country genuinely believe that the Democratic Party is a front for a pedophile ring…I was talking to a volunteer who was going door-to-door in Philadelphia in low-income African American communities, and was getting questions about QAnon conspiracy theories.

[Atlantic editor Jeffrey] Goldberg: Is this new malevolent information architecture bending the moral arc away from justice?

Obama: I think it is the single biggest threat to our democracy.


Later in the interview, Obama makes it quite clear that much of his concern is specifically about the internet — which he is also quite clear isn’t “going away” — and the big platforms that sort and distribute most of the internet for most people:

Obama: I don’t hold the tech companies entirely responsible, because this predates social media. It was already there. But social media has turbocharged it. I know most of these folks. I’ve talked to them about it. The degree to which these companies are insisting that they are more like a phone company than they are like The Atlantic, I do not think is tenable. They are making editorial choices, whether they’ve buried them in algorithms or not. The First Amendment doesn’t require private companies to provide a platform for any view that is out there. At the end of the day, we’re going to have to find a combination of government regulations and corporate practices that address this, because it’s going to get worse. If you can perpetrate crazy lies and conspiracy theories just with texts, imagine what you can do when you can make it look like you or me saying anything on video. We’re pretty close to that now…

Goldberg: It’s that famous Steve Bannon strategy: flood the zone with s**t.

Obama: If we do not have the capacity to distinguish what’s true from what’s false, then by definition the marketplace of ideas doesn’t work. And by definition our democracy doesn’t work. We are entering into an epistemological crisis.

If globalist media outlets can’t control all human information and decide what is or isn’t “true” or a “fact,” democracy doesn’t work.

That’s his argument….

The Real Election Hack: Black Box Voting

Franklin Coverup: The White House Call Boy Ring

Lawsuit Challenges Georgia’s Secretary of State’s Dark Unconstitutional Agreement with Hillary Attorney Marc Elias

The country is just being introduced to Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger.  We are also beginning to uncover the corrupt actions he has taken to steal the 2020 election for the Democrats.  Soon the whole country will know him and his actions.

On March 6, 2020 the Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, signed off on a secret legal agreement with the Democratic Party of Georgia, the Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee, and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee to alter absentee ballot procedures in Georgia. The Democrats’ attorney for this secret deal was Marc Elias from Perkins Coie, the consigliere of Hillary Clinton who has been busy managing other secretive Democratic election operations all across the country. (In Appendix A of Lin Wood filing yesterday is a copy of the agreement – See below.)

Attorney L. Lin Wood, Jr. who is a resident and legal voter of the state of Georgia, filed a legal complaint yesterday against not only Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, but also against the members of the Secretary of State’s State Board of Elections for getting into this agreement…..

Wood tweeted about his lawsuit yesterday against the Georgia Secretary of State and Election Board based on their unconstitutional actions in the election:

The lawsuit filed by Wood argues that the Secretary of State and the Election Board changed the manner in which absentee ballots were counted which they had no right to sign…..

The right to change election processes lies with the legislature and not the Secretary of State or the Judiciary:…

Wood argues in his lawsuit that given that Raffensperger had no legal authority to sign this legal document, Wood is asking of the Court, in his Prayer For Relief, the following:

(a) That, as a result of Defendants’ violations of the United States Constitution and violations of other federal and state election laws, this Court should enter an order, declaration, and/or injunction that prohibits Defendants from certifying the results of the 2020 general election in Georgia on a statewide basis;

(b) Alternatively, that, as a result of Defendants’ violations of the United States Constitution and violations of other federal and state election laws, this Court should enter an order, declaration, and/or injunction prohibiting Defendants from certifying the results of the General Elections which include the tabulation of defective absentee ballots, regardless of whether said ballots were cured;

(c) Alternatively, that, as a result of Defendants’ violations of the United States Constitution and violations of other federal and state election laws, this Court should enter an order, declaration, and/or injunction that the results of the 2020 general election in Georgia are defective as a result of the above-described constitutional violations, and that Defendants are required to cure said deficiencies in a manner described in the Litigation Settlement; and

(d) Any and other such further relief that this Court or the Finder of Fact deems equitable and just.

President Trump tweeted about this agreement this morning:

It’s clear that Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger signed an agreement which permitted the state of Georgia to have its election tampered with which would swing the election to the Democrats.  This corrupt deal with Hillary’s attorney Elias is now being uncovered.  It never should have been signed in the first place.

WHO Vaccine Safety Summit: Excerpts for State Lawmakers

Someone was kind enough to excerpt the most important parts of  Highwire’s coverage of the leak of the proceedings of the 2019 WHO vaccine safety summit.   This should be presented to state lawmakers, who are the primary targets in the lobbying campaign to enforce mandatory covid vaccination.


This 56-minute video is condensed from Highwire for easy sharing with your state Representatives, Senators, and US Congressmen and women. Markers are below for skipping ahead.

Thank you to Highwire for exposing this conference! Please become a $20/month ICAN supporter:

2:00 Dr. Heidi Larson, PhD, Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project says the biggest factor in vaccine hesitancy is vaccine safety.

4:26 Dr. Larson: doctors and nurses are “very wobbly” and “starting to question the safety of vaccines,” and it’s a “huge problem.”

6:20 Dr. Larson: doctors don’t have confidence in vaccine safety to stand up to mothers asking questions. Doctors only got a “half day of vaccine instruction in medical school.”

8:06 Dr. Larson: the WHO’s issue with social media is not vaccine “misinformation,” but that the information “seeds doubt.”

10:24 Dr. Larson admits that global health replaced natural immunity with dependence on vaccine-induced immunity on the “assumption that populations would cooperate.” People got the 6 vaccines in the 1960s-1980s, but now it’s a problem. But since they got the world dependent on vaccines, global health has no choice but to continue pushing vaccines.

13:10 Dr. Larson: there is a lot of safety science needed, they can’t keep repurposing old science that isn’t relevant to the new problem that vaccines are causing.

16:04 Dr. Marion Gruber, FDA, admits that vaccines NEED to have safety monitoring specifically tailored to the one vaccine under consideration. Risk management plans WILL NEED to take into account all of the safety evidence they have. (These safety measures do not exist.)

19:40 Dr. Martin Howell Friede, WHO, cautions vaccine makers against using adjuvants because they cause adverse events. If makers must use an adjuvant, they should use an old one with a “history” (that allows the vaccine maker to say the adverse event wasn’t the adjuvant). The new adjuvants will be accused of causing adverse events, but there will be no new vaccines without adjuvants. His solution is to build confidence, not make them safer.

25:15 Professor Stephen Evans says “It seems that adjuvants multiply the immunogenicity of the antigens they’re added to; they multiply the reactogenicity, so it’s not unexpected they multiply the adverse reactions. Is my thinking is correct?”

27:22 Dr. Friede: the “major health concerns they see are the long term effects of vaccines,” not the sore knot on your arm. Adjuvants act differently with every antigen, and impurities. We need larger studies and we need to measure the appropriate things.

31:28 Dr. Friede: it’s necessary that we figure out how adjuvants work so they can start to assess how plausible it is that adjuvants are causing the major health concerns.

31:38 Dr. David Kaslow, Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access admits that they do their studies on very small groups of people. Says that “one of the things they need to invest in” are better biomarkers and mechanistic understanding of how adjuvants work so they can understand the adverse events.

32:25 Dr. Gruber: one issue that complicates the safety evaluation is the length of follow-up because the longer you study the group, the more “coincidental” adverse events pop up. Giving adjuvants to the elderly may do nothing, but be reactive in younger people.

38:13 Dr. Kaslow: “Coming down the pike relatively quickly is a new target population for us in vaccines: maternal immunization. We don’t have a strong pharmaco-epidemiologic baseline in that target population to say ‘is this an expected adverse event due to pregnancy, or is this the vaccine?’ We need an investment in that study so we don’t derail our pregnancy vaccines as they go into low-resource settings.”

40:07 CDC ACIP meeting vaccinating pregnant women is “off-label.”

41:24 The FDA admitted they have no studies about vaccines and pregnancy.

41:55 Nigerian doctor asks if there are any safety studies on injecting multiple vaccines, from multiple makers, with multiple adjuvants, into a child at once.

44:12 ACIP meeting, the CDC admits they have no data on injecting multiple adjuvants at once, but they recommend it anyway, in different limbs.

45:22 Dr. Robert Chen admits no, they don’t have data on injecting multiple adjuvants at this time, they need to link databases together to “start to answer these types of questions.”

50:01 Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Chief Scientist with the WHO, says in a commercial that vaccine safety tracking is robust, and examining the data lets them promptly address problems. They are “thoroughly monitored.”

52:40 Dr. Swaminathan in the WHO meeting, admits, “We really don’t have very good safety monitoring systems in many countries. We can’t give answers about the deaths. We need to put mechanisms in place to monitor what’s going on. With many drugs, we only learn about adverse events after they are introduced to the populations.”

NEJM Reveals Strategy for Heading Off Covid Vaccine Mandates

Entire highwire segment:

Vaccines: Highwire: Who is Lying to You?