Hillary Clinton possesses a book featuring handmade glass devils in explicit, sexually erotic poses, a photo shared by the former Secretary of State shows.
The 2018 book, “Erotics,” by artist Lucio Bubacco, appeared in a photo uploaded to social media by the former First Lady taken in her study as she announced her new podcast “You and Me Both.”
The book’s cover features a winged female demon with exposed breasts and high heels smoking from a long pipe.
According to a description on Amazon, the hardcover book, which runs anywhere from $50 to $70, reportedly contains art depicting “carnavalesque orgies, crystalline incubi and erotic fantasies in glass.”
Other works by Bubacco found via Google show a woman performing bestiality with a swan, two male devils fornicating, devils drinking cups of what appears to be blood and other glass art with satanic references. …
“Science” has finally caught up with “conspiracy theory” – at least about the danger of electromagnetic radiation. This article explains it well and also gives good information about how to protect yourself from EMFs in your daily life.
According to DARPA:17
“Current cockpits are flooded with radio frequency (RF) noise from on-board emissions, communication links, and navigation electronics, including strong electromagnetic (EM) fields from audio headsets and helmet tracking technologies.
Pilots often report minor cognitive performance challenges during flight, and from 1993 to 2013, spatial disorientation in U.S. Air Force pilots accounted for 72 Class A mishaps, 101 deaths, and 65 aircraft lost.
It has been hypothesized that the cockpit RF and EM fields may influence cognitive performance including task saturation, misprioritization, complacency and spatial disorientation.
However, EM fields and radio waves in cockpits are not currently monitored, little effort has been made to shield pilots from these fields, and the potential impacts of these fields on cognition have not been assessed.
Recent DARPA-funded research has demonstrated that human brains sense magnetic fields, like those used by animals for navigation, and that this process is ‘jammed’ (i.e., disrupted) by radio waves (RF), impacting brainwaves and behavior.
Furthermore, recent findings were the first to show that even weak RF fields and ‘earth strength’ magnetic fields have measurable, reproducible effects on human brainwaves and unconscious behavior in a controlled environment. Current tactical audio headsets project magnetic fields up to 10 times earth strength, the effects of which can now be measured experimentally in a similar controlled environment”…
A recent study has drawn a link between vitamin D deficiency and a greater risk of diabetes-related death. This link, the researchers from the Medical University of Vienna noted, was especially pronounced in younger and middle-aged people.
Vitamin D also called the sunshine vitamin, is best known for keeping bones healthy by promoting calcium absorption. It also helps regulate cell growth, immune and neuromuscular function, and glucose metabolism. People can obtain vitamin D through food, supplementation and sun exposure.
For the study, the team examined how low levels of vitamin D may contribute to all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a large cohort that covered all age groups. They found a strong association between vitamin D deficiency and increased mortality risk.
“This association is most pronounced in the younger and middle-aged groups and for causes of deaths other than cancer and cardiovascular disease, especially diabetes,” wrote the researchers.
Their findings were presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes in Spain.
Higher mortality risk for younger populations with vitamin D deficiency
The researchers drew data from the records of more than 78,000 participants with a mean age of 51 years who had their vitamin D levels measured at the General Hospital of Vienna between 1991 and 2011. With this data in hand, they then combed through the Austrian national registry to look for cases of death, omitting those who died within the first three years of undergoing a vitamin D test. They then followed up on the participants for an average of 10.5 years.
In the study, participants with blood levels of vitamin D at 50 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L) were considered deficient in the vitamin. Meanwhile, low and high levels were considered at 10 nmol/L and 90 nmol/L, respectively.
Results showed that a person’s risk of death increased by two to three times with low levels of vitamin D. The association was strongest among participants aged 45 to 60 years. Meanwhile, all-cause mortality was reduced by 30 to 40 percent with high levels of the vitamin, with the association also strongest in participants aged 45 to 60 years. The team, however, observed no significant association between vitamin D levels and mortality among participants over 75 years old.
When it comes to cause-specific mortality, diabetes-related death drew the strongest association with vitamin D deficiency. Participants deficient in the vitamin had a 4.4 times greater risk of diabetes-related death compared to those with healthy levels of the vitamin. Again, the association was strongest among participants aged 45 to 60 years. This age group was also seen as the most susceptible to death caused by conditions other than cancer and cardiovascular disease.
The team added that having higher levels of vitamin D did not show a significant link to mortality risk resurgence, pacifying concerns raised by previous studies suggesting it poses a negative effect.
”Our findings strengthen the rationale for widespread vitamin D supplementation to prevent premature mortality,” wrote the researchers. (Related: Vitamin D reduces inflammation caused by Type 2 diabetes.)
Link between vitamin D and Type 2 diabetes
More and more studies are linking vitamin D to Type 2 diabetes.
One such study, published in the European Journal of Endocrinology, examined the effect of consistent vitamin D3 supplementation on insulin sensitivity in people with newly-diagnosed Type 2 diabetes or at high risk of developing the disease….
Medical megascandals such as their decades of militantly willful vaccine assaults and injuries of children, their racially targeted suppression of vitamin D, their profitable exploitation and battery of birthing and domestically abused women and of course their wholesale sexual torture, forcible amputation and lobotomy of innocent american boys under false pretexts remain virtually unknown to the public, while these mercenaries for hire continue rampaging across the countryside with total impunity.
A more open and shut case of institutional bigotry, racism, sexism and child abuse can hardly be imagined than that practiced by the proud eugenicists of american medicine, yet liberals obsess over statues of long-dead civil war generals and conservatives worry about prayer in schools. Meanwhile these betray-o-matic predator drones are pushing us ever closer to economic catastrophe, after which their tyrannical reign can continue indefinitely. Outlawing vitamin D supplements would be first on their agenda. This is mind control.
No doubt these doctors’ privileged position in society precludes familiarity with the realities faced by commoners, such as the inside of prison cells. They need a more “liberal” education than what they received in medical school.
A paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine has called for mandating a coronavirus vaccine, and outlined strategies for how Americans could be FORCED to take it.
The paper warns that an immediate mandate for the vaccine would spark too much resistance and backlash, so the writers suggest that at first it should be voluntary.
However, it suggests that if not enough people are willing to get the vaccine within the first few weeks of it’s availability, it should be transformed into an obligation, with penalties put into place for refusal.
The paper outlines “six trigger criteria” that need to be met before the vaccine is made mandatory, and that it should be rolled out to specific demographics of the population first.
“Only recommended groups should be considered for a vaccination mandate,” initially, according to the paper, which cites “high risk groups” as the first set of people.
“[T]he elderly, health professionals working in high-risk situations or working with high-risk patients…persons with certain underlying medical conditions,” as well as those in “high-density settings such as prisons and dormitories” should be mandated to get the jab, the paper says.
It also suggests that active-duty military service members should be among the first that are forced into the vaccination.
The paper proclaims that “noncompliance should incur a penalty” and notes that it should be a “relatively substantial” one.
It suggests that “employment suspension or stay-at-home orders,” should be issued, but that fines should be discouraged because they can be legally challenged, and “may stoke distrust without improving uptake.”
The paper also suggests that government health authorities should avoid making public their close relationship with vaccine manufacturers, to quell public mistrust.
Jon Rappoport joins The Alex Jones Show to break down the rollout of total medical tyranny in America.
The prospect of denying freedom of movement to those who refuse to vaccinate has been floated recently in the UK, where government health officials have also suggested that the jab should be made mandatory.
In the US, calls have been made to make any vaccination mandatory with the likes of the New York Times expressing concern that half of Americans would refuse to take it.
In Canada, a poll recently revealed that 60 per cent think that when a vaccine for coronavirus becomes available it should be made mandatory.
In addition, Canada’s current Chief Public Health Officer appeared in a recently resurfaced 2010 documentary in which she advocated using mandatory “tracking bracelets” for people who refuse to take a vaccine after a virus outbreak.
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”
— Dr. Marcia Angell, 2009 http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2009/jan/15/drug-companies-doctorsa-story-of-corruption/
“The case against science is straightforward: Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, â€œpoor methods get resultsâ€. The Academy of Medical Sciences, Medical Research Council, and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council have now put their reputational weight behind an investigation into these questionable research practices. The apparent endemicity [i.e. pervasiveness within the scientific culture] of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of â€œsignificanceâ€ pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale. We reject important confirmations. Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent, endpoints that foster reductive metrics, such as high-impact publication. National assessment procedures, such as the Research Excellence Framework, incentivise bad practices. And individual scientists, including their most senior leaders, do little to alter a research culture that occasionally veers close to misconduct.”
— Richard Horton, editor in chief of Lancet http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2960696-1.pdf
“Cruelty in Maternity Wards: Fifty Years Later
“Fifty years have passed since a scandal broke over inhumane treatment of laboring women in U.S. hospitals, yet first-person and eyewitness reports document that medical care providers continue to subject childbearing women to verbal and physical abuse and even to what would constitute sexual assault in any other context. Women frequently are denied their right to make informed decisions about care and may be punished for attempting to assert their right to refusal. Mistreatment is not uncommon and persists because of factors inherent to hospital social culture. Concerted action on the part of all stakeholders will be required to bring about systemic reform.
Keywords: abuse of childbearing women, dysfunctional hospital social systems, patient safety, post-traumatic stress disorder
“Cruelty in Maternity Wards” was the title of a shocking article published just over 50 years ago in Ladies’ Home Journal in which nurses and women told stories of inhumane treatment in labor and delivery wards during childbirth (Schultz, 1958). Stories included women being strapped down for hours in the lithotomy position, a woman having her legs tied together to prevent birth while her obstetrician had dinner, women being struck and threatened with the possibility of giving birth to a dead or brain damaged baby for crying out in pain, and a doctor cutting and suturing episiotomies without anesthetic (he had once nearly lost a patient to an overdose) while having the nurse stifle the woman’s cries with a mask.
“The article shook the country and triggered a tsunami of childbirth reform that included the founding of the American Society for Psychoprophylaxis in Obstetrics, now known as Lamaze International. Nonetheless, as Susan Hodges (2009) recently noted in her guest editorial published in The Journal of Perinatal Education, despite enormous differences in labor and delivery management, decades later, inhumane treatment remains distressingly common. American childbearing women still suffer mistreatment at the hands of care providers, ranging from failure to provide supportive care to disrespect and insensitivity to denial of women’s right to make informed decisions to common use of harmful medical interventions to outright verbal, physical, and even sexual assault. Furthermore, the more extreme examples are not aberrations but merely the far end of the spectrum. Abuse, moreover, results from factors inherent to the system, which increases the difficulties of implementing reforms.
“ABUSE IN CHILDBIRTH: PARALLELS WITH DOMESTIC ABUSE
“According to domesticviolence.org (an online resource devoted to helping individuals recognize, address, and prevent domestic violence), domestic violence and emotional abuse encompass “name-calling or putdowns,” “keeping a partner from contacting their family or friends,” “actual or threatened physical harm,” “intimidation,” and “sexual assault” (“Domestic Violence Definition,” 2009, para. 2). In all cases, the intent is to gain power over and control the victim. One could add that perpetrators, obstetric staff or otherwise, feel entitled to exert this control on grounds of the victim’s inferior position vis-a-vis the perpetrator as the following illustrate: …” — J Perinat Educ. 2010 Summer; 19(3): 33-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2920649
A group of over 500 medical doctors in Germany called ‘Doctors for Information’ made a shocking statement during a national press conference: (1)
‘The Corona panic is a play. It’s a scam. A swindle. It’s high time we understood that we’re in the midst of a global crime.’
This large group of medical experts publishes a medical newspaper on 500,000 copies every week, to inform the public about the massive misinformation in the mainstream media. They also organize mass protests in Europe, like the one on August 29, 2020 where 12 million people signed up and an estimated one million actually showed up.
Why do these 500+ medical doctors say the pandemic is a global crime?
What do they know, that we don’t?
Hundreds of Spanish medical doctors say the pandemic is planned
In Spain a group of 600 medical doctors called ‘Doctors for Truth’, made a similar statement during a press conference.
‘Covid-19 is a false pandemic created for political purposes. This is a world dictatorship with a sanitary excuse. We urge doctors, the media and political authorities to stop this criminal operation, by spreading the truth.’ (2)
Germany and Spain are just two examples. Similar large groups of hundreds of medical experts exist in countries across the world.
In the USA a documentary called PLANDEMIC, which exposes COVID-19 as a criminal operation, is supported by over 27,000 medical doctors!
Why are these thousands of medical professionals worldwide saying the pandemic is a crime? What information do they have access to, that we are not getting from the mainstream media?
I invite you to look at the following facts with an open mind and then come to your own conclusions…
Millions of COVID-19 test kits
sold in 2017 and 2018
As we know the new COVID-19 disease appeared in China towards the end of 2019. Therefore it was named COVID-19 which is an acronym for Corona Virus Disease 2019. Data from the World Integrated Trade Solution, however, shows something astonishing:
in 2017 and 2018 – two years before COVID-19 – hundreds of millions of test kits for COVID-19 were distributed worldwide.
‘Quick! Hide it!!’
This baffling data was discovered by someone on September 5, 2020, who posted it on social media. The next day it went viral all over the world. On September 6 the WITS suddenly changed the original designation ‘COVID-19’ into the vague term ‘Medical Test Kits’.
Using general terms is not allowed in trade, you always have to be specific. There are many types of test kits for different diseases.
The fact that they removed the specification ‘COVID-19’, after this data became known worldwide, proves that they don’t want anyone to know about it. They however forgot to delete one detail: the product code for these ‘Medical Test Kits’ is 300215 which means: ‘COVID-19 Test Kits’
Their cover up came too late: this critical information was uncovered and is being revealed by millions worldwide. You can download a PDF that shows the original data of this website….
Rothschild patented a COVID-19 testing method back in 2015
A Dutch government website for patenting inventions also shows something interesting. Richard A. Rothschild from the United Kingdom patented a system for testing COVID-19, back in 2015.
The priority date of the submission of this invention is October 13 of 2015! Again people may argue that it was first a general testing method, and later got the label COVID-19, but that doesn’t change the fact that this Rothschild did submit an invention that is specifically for COVID-19….
CNN has published an article asserting that people need to accept that things are never “getting back to normal” and that mandatory coronavirus restrictions such as wearing face masks will become “permanent”.
In a piece titled ‘There is no getting ‘back to normal,’ experts say. The sooner we accept that, the better’ – CNN international security editor Nick Paton Walsh writes, “Things are most likely never going “back to normal.”
Walsh says that the pre-corona world is now mere nostalgia and that the public needs to “come to terms with it.”
Along with other social distancing measures, Walsh says that the mandatory wearing of masks will become “permanent” and “just part of life.”
In other words, “now we have the power, we’re not giving it back.”
Citing comments by Thomas Davenport, professor of information technology and management at Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts, Walsh says that, “Those who refuse to wear masks may be guilty of normalcy bias, since they perceive this intrusion into lives as a passing fad they don’t need to embrace.”…