Discussion of Wikileaks or “Hacked Information” Banned Under New YouTube Rules

Social media giant YouTube announced yesterday a host of new measures it says are aimed at preventing any interference in the upcoming presidential elections. Chief among the list it wrote on its blog, is “removing content that contains hacked information, the disclosure of which may interfere with democratic processes, such as elections and censuses.” An example it gives, would be deleting “videos that contain hacked information about a political candidate.”

It also promised to “raise up authoritative voices” when it comes to current events and politics by changing its algorithm to show users more credible channels and “reduce the spread of harmful misinformation and borderline content.” Example channels that produce authoritative content, it tells readers, includes Fox News and CNN. It also noted it would expand information panels underneath videos.

There are a number of reasons this new policy could concern users of its platform. Firstly, the great majority of leaked information — the lifeblood of investigative journalism — is anonymous. Often, like in the cases of Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning or Reality Winner, whistleblowers face serious consequences if their names become attached to documents exposing government or corporate malfeasance. But without a name to go with a document, the difference between leaked data and hacked data is impossible to define. Thus, powerful people and organizations could claim data was hacked, rather than leaked, and simply block all discussion of the matter on the platform. Hearing the news, some feared already existing content from investigative journalists would be subject to removal under the new guidelines….

https://www.mintpressnews.com/discussion-of-wikileaks-or-any-hacked-information-banned-under-new-youtube-rules/270435/

CDC Admits Hospital Incentives Drove Up COVID-19 Deaths

It’s hard to resist those big bucks for COVID diagnoses. I think they call it fraud. I think it’s illegal. The medical industry is a for-profit industry and profits trump patients.

Story at-a-glance

  • In April 2020, Minnesota state senator and family physician Scott Jensen came out with a strong critique against the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s guidance for how doctors were to certify COVID-19 fatalities on the death certificate
  • In July, Jensen came under investigation by the state medical board and faced disciplinary action and loss of his medical license after an anonymous complaint was filed against him, alleging he had been spreading misinformation about how death certificates are categorized during the pandemic
  • July 28, 2020, Jensen announced the Minnesota Medical Board had dismissed the allegations against him
  • CDC director Robert Redfield recently admitted that financial policies likely have resulted in artificially elevated hospitalization rates and death toll statistics. Brett Giroir with the U.S. Health and Human Services Department also told lawmakers the COVID-19 death statistics the HHS has been receiving from states “are over-inflated”
  • Perhaps the most egregious misrepresentation of reality is the media’s conflating a positive test result with the actual disease, COVID-19. “COVID-19” refers to a clinical diagnosis of someone who exhibits severe respiratory illness characterized by fever, coughing and shortness of breath. If you test positive but are asymptomatic, you do not “have COVID-19” and should not be counted as a “COVID-19 case”

More at https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/08/20/hospital-incentives-drove-up-covid-19-deaths.aspx

An Introduction to ‘Q’

Who is Q? What is Q? And, perhaps most importantly, why is Q? 

Q and the ever-growing worldwide movement it’s inspired have been the objects of fascination, mockery and hatred, but of surprisingly little serious analysis.

Q first appeared in October 2017 on an anonymous online forum called 4Chan, posting messages that implied top-clearance knowledge of upcoming events. More than 3,000 messages later, Q has created a disturbing, multi-faceted portrait of a global crime syndicate that operates with impunity. Q’s followers in the QAnon community faithfully analyze every detail of Q’s drops, which are compiled here and here.

The mainstream media has published hundreds of articles attacking Q as an insane rightwing conspiracy, particularly after President Trump seemed to publicly confirm his connection to it.  At a North Carolina rally in 2019, Trump made a point of drawing attention to a baby wearing a onesie with a big Q.

In recent weeks, the tempo of Trump’s spotlighting of Q has accelerated, with the President retweeting Q followers twenty times in one day. Trump has featured Q fans in his ads and deployed one of Q’s signature phrases (“These people are sick”) at his rallies. The President’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, has also retweeted Q followers.

Q has noted that the media never asks Trump the obvious question: What do you think of Q? To Q followers, the reason they don’t ask is obvious. They’re afraid of the answer.

In the meantime, Q’s influence continues to spread. Protestors in Hong Kong, Iran, and France have held up Q signs and chanted Q quotes. Q’s revelations are uniting people all over the world who want freedom…

More at https://www.zerohedge.com/political/introduction-q

What Was Fauci’s Role in Funding Tuskgegee-Like AIDS Experiments on Foster Children in Seven U.S. States?

by Faith Dyson, June 20, 2020

In 2004 – investigative journalist, Liam Scheff, exposed the fact that hundreds of Foster children at Incarnation Children’s Center [ICC] in NYC were used and abused as lab rats for unsupervised and unrestricted AIDS research and Vaccine studies by Big Pharma and The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID].

Years later in separate investigations – 13,878 children were discovered to have been made subject of the same fate during the 1980’s and 1990’s in six other states: Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, North Carolina, Colorado and Texas.

The other reports validated what Scheff had uncovered: there was no one watching the activities – but those who stood to gain from the torturous atrocities happening behind the closed doors of zealous profiteers where most illegal procedures were done without any parental permission, any outside oversight from an independent committee or child welfare agency.

Eventually a Congressional Hearing was held on the matter. (See link #1 below in the References for Liam Scheff’s exposé, link #2 for the documentary: ‘Guinea Pig Kids: ARV-Babies in New York City’, link #3 for more reports from The AP and The Washington Post, and link #4 for the record from The Congressional Hearing.)

As Scheff stated in his report:

“This former convent houses a revolving stable of children who’ve been removed from their own homes by the Agency for Child Services [ACS]. These children are black, Hispanic and poor. Many of their mothers had a history of drug abuse and have died.

Once taken into ICC, the children become subjects of drug trials sponsored by NIAID (National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease, a division of the NIH), NICHD (the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) in conjunction with some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies – GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Genentech, Chiron/Biocine and others.

The drugs being given to the children are toxic – they’re known to cause genetic mutation, organ failure, bone marrow death, bodily deformations, brain damage and fatal skin disorders.

Note the Skull and Bones on the label of these ‘Black Box’ drugs.

If the children refuse the drugs, they’re held down and have them force fed. If the children continue to resist, they’re taken to Columbia Presbyterian hospital where a surgeon puts a plastic tube through their abdominal wall into their stomachs. From then on, the drugs are injected directly into their intestines. Continue reading What Was Fauci’s Role in Funding Tuskgegee-Like AIDS Experiments on Foster Children in Seven U.S. States?

Cancer Researcher Killed During Morning Run

Successful or too successful? Science is a “cutthroat” business – especially when it involves the billion-dollar cancer industry.

A successful cancer research scientist and mother-of-two was murdered and her body dumped in a creek while on her daily run in Texas this past weekend.

Sarmistha Sen, 43, of Plano, was found dead near a creek at Legacy Drive and Marchman Way Saturday morning less than two hours after she went out on her regular run along the Chisholm Trail. A passerby found the victim’s body about 20 to 25 feet below the trail near the creek at around 7 a.m…

RELATED STORIES:

https://www.healthnutnews.com/cnn-cancer-researcher-killed-during-her-regular-morning-run/

How to end blind faith in medicine once and for all

But it requires facing what happened to you and your loved ones  before you could defend yourself, or even before you can remember.   Can you do it?   Are you willing to do it to expose this satanic medical monster for what it is and save future generations?

This is the ticket out of this nightmare.   Mass exposure would severely test and probably overthrow the legal principle of medical impunity, if people see how it and they have been abused.    But if you’re like most people to date, you’ll avoid it and continue cooperating with the march to slavery, which is why we are where we are today.

If this gets the exposure it deserves, there will be no more AMA, no more AAP, no more ACOG.   And certainly no more forced vaccines.

Have they neutered and enslaved your mind as rockefeller intended or not?    Your choice of whether to be a slave was never in their hands.   It’s entirely up to you.

The kids have been wondering where the adults went for a long time, before they became used to the idea that they’re on their own, as you did when you were a kid.

http://members.tranquility.net/~rwinkel/MGM/primer.html

Also search for the unmentionable term on this site.   But brace yourself.   This is satanic ritual abuse.

2013: Tetanus Vaccine Causes New Disease: New Vaccines Worse?

Author: Heidi Stevenson (RIP) of now-defunct Gaia-Health.com.

The tetanus vaccine causes a new disease known both as Hughes syndrome and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). It’s an autoimmune condition that can attack any part of the body, though is best noted for heart attacks and killing fetuses. It’s likely that APS will become more common with the new generation of vaccine adjuvants now being produced.

The sufferers of (APS) are mostly women, and its diagnosis is often made as a result of multiple pregnancy losses. As is typical of new diseases, research is focused on finding a genetic cause, in spite of the fact that the connection with vaccines is well known and documented.

As the name implies, APS is a condition in which phospholipids, natural and necessary substances required by every part of the body, is seen as an infectious agent by the immune system. So, this substance that exists in every cell becomes subject to attack. Symptoms include:

  • Blindness
  • Cardiovascular:
    • Deep vein thrombosis (clots in veins)
    • Phlebitis
    • Thrombocytopenia (deficiency of blood platelets, causing bleeding & bruising)
    • Atherosclerosis
    • Pulmonary embolus (clots in the lungs)
    • Heart valve abnormatilies
    • Stroke
  • Headaches & migraines
  • Miscarriages
  • Neurological disorders:
    • Epilepsy
    • Chorea (sudden uncontrollable jittery movements)
    • Transverse myelitis (inflammation of the spinal cord)
    • Multiple sclerosis
    • Cognitive dysfunction
  • Skin disorders, including mottling, ulcers, and necrosis

APS can also be diagnosed—more accurately, misdiagnosed—as lupus erythematosus, which is another vaccine-induced condition.

APS and Vaccines

One study calls Hughes syndrome the “classical antiphospholipid syndrome”[1]. That study refers to similarities between plasma protein beta-2-glycoprotein-I (β2GPI), which is attacked in APS, and the tetanus vaccine. That is, the tetanus antigen has parts that are virtually identical to β2GPI, which is found virtually everywhere in the body.

Another study documents how APS can be induced in laboratory animals with tetanus vaccination[2]. Many large number of other studies document and investigate the connection between vaccines and antiphospholipid syndrome[3,4,5,6,7,8].

These studies leave little doubt that APS is caused by vaccines. That should come as little surprise, since it was first identified as a disease during the 1980s. If this disease existed prior to vaccines, it was so rare that it was unknown. Now, it can take its place among a growing list of vaccine-induced conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, macrophagic myofasciitis, multiple sclerosis, autism, and siliconosis. The list keeps growing and many believe that all these conditions should be included under a single name, autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants, or ASIA.

Article Addendum

In a rather humorous exchange, the head of the APS Foundation of America objected to the use of their website as a reference—though it was, as it was heavily referenced for the effects of APS, though not for its focus on anything but vaccines as the cause. I removed the reference, as demanded, but a new one to the site is now going up. It’s number 9 in Sources. She offered it as proof that APS goes back to 1906, so therefore could not be caused by vaccines. So what does the article state?

In discussing the history of APS, the article states that in 1906 Wasserman and coworkers “developed serological reactions for the diagnosis of syphilis utilizing phospholipid-rich tissues as antigens[9]“. In other words, they developed symptoms as a result of the injection of phospholipids in 1906. It now stands as the earliest proof of the likely causal link between vaccines and APS. 

A tip of the hat to the head of the APS Foundation of America, unintentional though the offer of documentation is!

Why New Generation Vaccines Are Especially Worrisome

Phospholipids are a primary part of your body, forming part of the membrane of every cell, among other functions. They’re under attack in APS. As can be seen with regard to tetanus vaccine, APS can be induced by the antigen when the epitope—the part of the antigen forming the pattern that autobodies are designed to attack—is similar to a particular part of the body.

What’s frightening is that phospholipids are becoming a primary ingredient of vaccines in the form of a new generation of adjuvants made via recombinant DNA by diddling with a part of pathogenic bacteria called outer membrane vesicles (OMVs). You can read more about them in New Generation of Vaccine Adjuvants: Worst Ever?

OMVs allow for designer vaccine antigens and adjuvants. OMV adjuvants are, of course, being promoted as the safest ever developed. That safety claim is based on the fact that they’re so much like the body already. This is the same claim that’s been used to promote squalene, which, as we’ve recently seen with the tragic cases of narcolepsy in children after the squalene-laced flu vaccine, Pandemrix, was unleashed in Europe, can devastate lives. Gaia Health explained the issue in How the Flu Vaccine Causes Narcolepsy.

Squalene is a lipid. That’s what makes it so dangerous. OMVs are even more precisely analogous to human tissue, because they are not only lipids, they are phospholipids—which are precisely what the body attacks in APS. Therefore, we can anticipate that there will be ever-more cases of APS as we see the approval of ever-more OMV-based vaccines, which are in the pipeline now.

Have no doubt: these vaccines will be approved. The first one, Cervarix, is already out there—and it’s been deemed safe, in spite of evidence to the contrary.

People with APS are suffering from phospholipid antibodies that are erroneously destroying parts of the eye, cardiovascular system, brain, nerves, skin, reproductive system—in short, any part of the body. This self-destruction is induced by vaccine technologies. These technologies are presumed safe without adequate, if any, testing. Just how many people must suffer before this travesty is ended? When will the clearly mad purveyors of these technologies step back and question what they’re doing?

The fact is that there are not just one, but several generations of people who don’t even know what good health is. Worse, each successive generation is growing sicker than the previous one. And worst of all, the vaccine junta is not only unconcerned, it’s massively gearing up this vaccine arms race against the human race.

Sources:

  1. When APS (Hughes syndrome) met the autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA)”Lupus, M Blank, E Israeli, Y Shoenfeld, doi: 10.1177/0961203312438115.
  2. Vaccine model of antiphospholipid syndrome induced by tetanus vaccineLupus, L Dimitrijević, I Živković, M  Stojanović, V Petrušić, S Živančević-Simonović, doi: 10.1177/0961203311429816.
  3. β2 glycoprotein 1 (β2GPI), the major target in anti phospholipid syndrome (APS), is a special human complement regulatorBlood, Katharina Gropp, Nadia Weber, Michael Reuter, Sven Micklisch, Isabell Kopka, Teresia Hallström and Christine Skerka, doi:10.1182/blood-2011-02-339564.
  4. Anti-β2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI) autoantibodies recognize an epitope on the first domain of β2GPIPNAS, G. Michael Iverson, Edward J. Victoria, and David M. Marquis.
  5. Anti-phospholipid antibodies following vaccination with recombinant hepatitis B vaccineClinical and Experimental Immunology, J Martinuč Porobič, T Avčin, B Božič, M Kuhar, S Čučnik, M Zupančič, K Prosenc, T Kveder, and B Rozman, doi:  10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02923.x
  6. Immunomodulatory and physical effects of phospholipid composition in vaccine adjuvant emulsions.
  7. ‘ASIA’ – autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants.
  8. Infections and vaccines in the etiology of antiphospholipid syndrome.
  9. The Antiphospholipid Story, from the APS Foundation of America website
  10. Hughes Syndrome Foundation
  11. Antiphospholipid syndrome
  12. Learning About Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS)
  13. The antiphospholipid syndrome (Hughes’ syndrome)

Vaccines cause autoimmune disorders!

Aluminum and vaccines: Current state of ignorance

The role of ALUMINUM adjuvants in vaccines raises issues that deserve independent, rigorous and honest science

Guillemette Crépeaux, François-Jérôme Authier, Christopher Exley, Lluís Luján ,Romain K Gherardi

“In their recent review on aluminum and vaccines [1], JP Goullé & L Grangeot-Keros described general knowledge on aluminum (Al) exposure, kinetics and toxicity but made very little effort to delineate the scientific questions specifically related to Al adjuvants in vaccines. Instead of representing the bulk of their review, the subject of Al adjuvants covered no more than one third of the 3 page-text. Numerous important papers on the topic were omitted, i.e. 20 years of scientific publications in clinical, post-mortem, in vitro and in vivo experimental studies published by independent research teams, worldwide experts in this topic were simply omitted.

For instance, in 2018, a critical analysis of reference studies on Al adjuvant toxicokinetics revealed their extreme paucity, several major methodological weaknesses, and profound misconception of the fate of injected Al adjuvants [2]. The Goullé and Grangeot-Keros review suffers from the same fundamental misunderstanding of the question. Specialized Al toxicologists have now recognized that comparing toxicological properties of different forms of Al (soluble vs particulate) administered by different routes (oral vs intramuscular (im) or intravenous) is incorrect [3]. In the case of Al adjuvants such comparisons are misleading and therefore inadmissible [2]. Goullé and Grangeot-Keros stated that, similarly to lead for instance, “only biologically measurable excessive levels of aluminium in the organism can be potentially toxic”. Such a sweeping statement of classical toxicology may be in line with the “dose makes the poison” paradigm but does not correspond to the true situation when, for example, i) particulate forms of metals are considered; ii) specific intracellular capture is involved.

Moreover Al in vaccines do not represent low doses, especially for babies [4,5]. Let us ironically state that a man shot dead by a lead bullet does not die from saturnism (lead toxicity!). In contrast to soluble dietary Al reaching the blood across the intestinal barrier and excreted in urine, Al hydroxide adjuvant particles are nearly insoluble at pH 7.35 [2]. They are rapidly phagocytosed after injection, and selectively concentrate with very long residence time in immune cells which represent a very small but highly reactogenic cell compartment (for review see [6]). Isotopic 26Al hydroxide adjuvant studies indicate that a single vaccine dose administered through im injections to an adult rabbit will induce a small increase of 0.8% in plasma concentration, masked by the Al background, with cumulative Al excretion becoming quasi-flat a few days after injection [7]. This is due to the insolubility of Al hydroxide and explains why increased Al is not found in blood and hair of vaccine recipients [8]. This represents a legitimate reason of concern since instead of being efficiently eliminated the insoluble crystalline particulate adjuvant persists intra-cellularly. In contrast to the opposite contention made by Goullé and Grangeot-Keros, it has been repeatedly shown, in both mouse and sheep, that Al particles exit the injection site to reach the draining lymph nodes and spleen and more distant organs like the central nervous system [9-14]. There is no reason to believe that the adjuvant particles translocated beyond the vaccine injection site lose their immunogenic properties and are non-toxic.

Goullé and Grangeot-Keros focused on the lack of detectable increase of Al plasma levels following Al adjuvant injections and so apparently ignored that increased Al tissue levels
have been indeed repeatedly reported following Al adjuvant or adjuvanted vaccines injections, in rabbit brains [7], in mouse brains [11], in rat bones and brains [15], and in sheep draining lymph nodes and spinal cord [13,14]. This was observed despite a marked dilution effect linked to the selective distribution of Al particles to a limited microglial cell compartment.

Other “reassuring” claims of Goullé and Grangeot-Keros were related to clinical studies. They dismissed the fact that Al-containing vaccines may be associated with myalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome and cognitive impairment typically observed in patients with Al hydroxide induced macrophagic myofasciitis [16,17], on the grounds of an ANSM study on HPVvaccine that excluded these symptoms from the survey [18]. Moreover, they ignored that these symptoms have been significantly and uniquely associated with immunization in US military personnel undeployed during the Gulf War II [19], and an array of cognitive and behavioral changes have been naturally observed and experimentally reproduced in sheep repetitively inoculated with Al-containing vaccines [20,21]. Furthermore, growing evidence offers clues as a putative role of Al early exposure in the marked increase of neurodevelopmental disorders in humans [22-30].

In the light of these elements, we thus agree with the conclusion of Goullé and GrangeotKeros that health authorities should design specific multidisciplinary experimental protocols to clarify Al adjuvants toxicokinetics and hazards, instead of accept the use of Al-adjuvants as
placebos in clinical trials [31]. It will be of particular importance to map the fate and effect of particles of Al adjuvant beyond the vaccine injection site. A similar effort by relevant health agencies should be made epidemiologically, considering the complete lack of populationbased studies specifically evaluating associations between clinical outcomes and Al adjuvants. According to the CDC, though feasible, such studies have not been conducted until now [32].

Finally, in this inherently incomplete review on Al adjuvants, several dozens of papers from the first signal of alert concerning Al adjuvants biopersistency and toxicity are purely
and simply excluded! Altogether, these rigorous and complementary available published studies show biopersistence and toxic effects of Al salts, both in human and in various animal models, and allow a better understanding of the behavior of these molecules after injection due to in vitro approaches. Such scientific data should be used by public health policies to assess the risk of Al-adjuvants, instead of relying on this widespread misinformation about the presumed safety of these molecules.

Furthermore, on the Goullé & Grangeot-Keros paper, apparent refusal to debate on this issue citing rationales such as “irrational polemics” and “one cannot question the safety of Al
salts contained in vaccines” is not acceptable from scientists. Scientific debate should always be encouraged, especially in a topic where long-term safety studies are notoriously lacking in both adults and children. We believe that an issue as crucial to public health as the safety of vaccines, on which optimal vaccine coverage depends, deserves more than a subjective publication of badly documented personal opinion and should be addressed in the light of all available scientific studies, in an honest, rigorous and objective manner.
While reaffirming our position in favor of vaccination, we claim that the safety of aluminum-based vaccine adjuvants, like that of any environmental factor presenting a risk of neurotoxicity and to which the young child is exposed, must be seriously evaluated without further delay, particularly at a time when the CDC is announcing a still increasing prevalence of autism spectrum disorders, of 1 child in 54 in the USA (2020 figure for 2016) [33].”

[1] “Aluminum and vaccines: Current state of knowledge” Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0399077X18308448?via%3Dihub

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343380610_The_role_of_aluminum_adjuvants_in_vaccines_raises_issues_that_deserve_independent_rigorous_and_honest_science