By Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD, Professor of Epidemiology Yale School of Public Health Newsweek, July 23, 2020
As professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, I have authored over 300 peer-reviewed publications and currently hold senior positions on the editorial boards of several leading journals. I am usually accustomed to advocating for positions within the mainstream of medicine, so have been flummoxed to find that, in the midst of a crisis, I am fighting for a treatment that the data fully support but which, for reasons having nothing to do with a correct understanding of the science, has been pushed to the sidelines. As a result, tens of thousands of patients with COVID-19 are dying unnecessarily. Fortunately, the situation can be reversed easily and quickly.
I am referring, of course, to the medication hydroxychloroquine. When this inexpensive oral medication is given very early in the course of illness, before the virus has had time to multiply beyond control, it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.
On May 27, I published an article in the American Journal of Epidemiology (AJE) entitled, “Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients that Should be Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to the Pandemic Crisis.” That article, published in the world’s leading epidemiology journal, analyzed five studies, demonstrating clear-cut and significant benefits to treated patients, plus other very large studies that showed the medication safety.
Physicians who have been using these medications in the face of widespread skepticism have been truly heroic. They have done what the science shows is best for their patients, often at great personal risk. I myself know of two doctors who have saved the lives of hundreds of patients with these medications, but are now fighting state medical boards to save their licenses and reputations. The cases against them are completely without scientific merit.
Since publication of my May 27 article, seven more studies have demonstrated similar benefit…
Dr Coleman is a general practitioner principal and a former Professor of Holistic Medical Sciences at the International Open University in Sri Lanka. He has an honorary DSc. He has given evidence to the House of Commons and the House of Lords. He has written over 100 books that have been translated into 25 languages and sell in over 50 countries.
CNN created an online campaign to bombard conservative broadcast company Sinclair over an interview it was scheduled to broadcast with Dr Judy Mikovits, the author and creator of the ‘Plandemic’ film and book, and it worked as Sinclair eventually agreed to pull the interview.
Mikovits, who contends that the Coronavirus outbreak is being inflated and used to push vaccines on people, had already filmed the interview with ‘America This Week’ host Eric Bolling, but the interview did not air this weekend as planned.
Tammy K. Herrema Clark, 20 Year OSHA* Director and Instructor, is executive director of Stand Up Michigan. In this video, she clarifies the argument some make, that surgeons wear masks all day long, so they have to be safe. Tammy says that the oxygen level in the operating theater is amplified, to make it safe for surgeons and nurses to wear masks. However, in schools, businesses, etc, oxygen levels are inadequate to make masks safe for everyone to wear. She is a most articulate speaker and this video is extremely informative. The website is rich in content… more videos, articles, news, a petition, etc.
[And then there’s 5G, which destroys oxygen in the atmosphere.]
Join and support the movement: https://www.standupmichigan.com
If you don’t live in Michigan, you can still apply what you learn from Stand Up Michigan to your own local community.
*OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, is an agency of the United States Department of Labor.
Oh, dear. Dr. Mike Adams, a pro-life University of North Carolina-Wilmington faculty member and columnist went head to head in a public debate with an abortionist, essentially accusing him of murdering thousands. Adams influenced young people to think for themselves. He won a $500,000 legal case against UNCW. He wrote intelligent, independent thoughts in his columns and on social media.
All these things are “sins” and dangerous in these “don’t make any waves and color within the lines” times.
The police do not yet know if there was foul play. It will be interesting to see what comes to light in the future. But, hmm… just a thought… does Dr. Adams’ death mean that the University will not have to pay the half million dollar settlement?
In the video below, Dr. Adams said,
My first premise is that it is wrong to intentionally kill an innocent human being. My minor premise is that abortion does intentionally kill an innocent human being… and my conclusion is that therefore, abortion is wrong.