Solomon Samuel Simone (aka RAZ from CHAZ or CHOP) is the proclaimed warlord of CHAZ, the multi-block area located in Seattle. Raz hates America but owns multiple guns, luxury automobiles, millions in real estate. More importantly, Raz is supported by the Islamic government in Dubai….
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA was charged for conspiring to fix prices for generic drugs, the Department of Justice announced today.
The charge, filed today in the U.S. District Court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, alleges that Glenmark conspired with other generic drug companies, including a company with its principal place of business in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, and Apotex Corp., to increase and maintain prices of pravastatin and other generic drugs beginning in or around May 2013 and continuing until at least in or around December 2015. Pravastatin is a prescription medication that reduces cholesterol, helping to prevent heart attacks and strokes. The charge alleges that the gain to the conspirators, and the loss to the victims, was at least $200 million.
“By cheating through fixing prices, generic drug companies artificially raised prices even though prescription drug costs were already sky high,” said Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “As today’s charge shows, the Antitrust Division will not hesitate to charge these companies, and litigate where necessary, particularly where their crimes resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in overcharges for life-saving medications.”
“During these difficult times, it is more important than ever that our pharmaceutical companies conduct business with the well-being of the consumer in mind,” said Deputy Special Agent in Charge Steven Stuller, U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General. “When generic drug companies conspire to artificially increase prices, they do so to the detriment of many who depend on these medications to maintain good health. Along with the Department of Justice Antitrust Division and our partners at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the USPS Office of Inspector General will remain committed to investigating those who would engage in this type of harmful conduct.”…
The number one question in the U.S. right now is who is going to stop all this lawlessness from coast to coast? This is a multipronged approach at destabilizing our country to take it over. And whereas there are definitely some well overdue changes needed in this country, lighting a path for its destruction is not one of them. It’s time to get real before real gets us.
If it’s not already crystal clear that what is being orchestrated on a global scale is an attempt for the UN to carry out their one world governance plan, then you’ve missed the writing on the wall. Recently, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres tweeted, “as we mark the 75th anniversary of the UN Charter, we must reimagine the way nations cooperate. We need an effective multilateralism with scale, ambition and teeth.” As Breitbart reported, Guterres claimed in the 21st century, governments are no longer the only political and power reality, adding “we need an effective multilateralism that can function as an instrument of global governance where it is needed.” The UN also has a dedicated page for their response to COVID-19, which includes, “coming out of this crisis will require a whole-of-society, whole-of-government and whole-of-the-world approach driven by compassion and solidarity.”
The coronavirus, masks, vaccines, contact tracing, riots and protests, removing history, and altering legislation are all part of their game plan, and the US is taking an enormous hit in these areas right now, primarily in Democratic states where the elected officials are allowing this destruction. The Washington Post made the case when illustrating that 19 out of 20 of the cities with the most violent crime in the US were in Democratic states, while trying to debunk President Trump’s claim that there were 20. They are coming from every angle, throwing fuel on every fire, to intimidate the population so as to control the narrative, remove our president, and take over the government. The Black Lives Matter corporation co-founder is a trained Marxist, while Hawk Newsome, the president of Greater New York Black Lives Matter recently told Fox News host Martha MacCallum, “if this country doesn’t give us what we want, then we will burn down this system and replace it. Alright? And I could be speaking figuratively. I could be speaking literally. It’s a matter of interpretation.” Is it? There’s been an awful lot of burning.
Sadly, many college students across the country have no clue what they are truly partaking in, nor do they understand the magnitude of the situation, and just how long this has been planned. They are under the impression these are grassroots movements trying to create change. They too are being manipulated and used for this insurgency. If only they would see with clarity, they could help to turn this all around. If socialism and one world governance wins, they will soon see the reality of what they were fighting for, and realize they gave up every last freedom.
Despite the abundant visual proof, arrests, and Antifa’s own playbook, destruction by the Antifa terrorist organization continues with physical brutality toward police and citizens, and the destruction of businesses and monuments, yet House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) still claims it is all “imaginary.” This is how far they are willing to take this to overthrow a president. The UN is party to these falsehoods as well, tweeting out that “UN Human Rights experts express profound concern over a recent statement by the US Attorney-General describing Antifa and other anti-fascist activists as domestic terrorists, saying it undermines the rights to freedom of expression and of peaceful assembly in the country.” That’s right – they consider the burning of buildings, removal of monuments, and beating of citizens “peaceful assembly.”
The Democratic run House just voted and passed a bill in the hopes to make the District of Columbia the 51st state so they can install two more Democratic senators and one congressman while establishing territory on all sides of the Whitehouse and taking over control of the police force in the area. Just imagine. They are once again fueling racism as a tactic to push this through. However, the Senate majority is Republican and it will most likely not see the light of day. These are the kind of tactics going on behind the scenes while rioting remains at the forefront. What the younger generation fails to see is that Biden is just a frontman, and the socialist, Marxist, communist orchestrators would be running the show if he were ever to become President…..
I feel compelled to reiterate that marxism and communism are not authentic political ideologies. They are trojan horses created and promoted behind the scenes by the financial elites specifically to create centralized, dysfunctional and controllable societies in order to facilitate financial harvesting. See:
…it also looks really stupid when there’s a “Black Lives Matter” protest and not one black person to be found – just a bunch of white people standing around holding signs.
That’s exactly what happened when Republican Trump supporter Benji Irby and his wife, who were just out and about visiting state capitols, happened upon a Black Lives Matter protest [at the North Carolina State Capitol] with NO BLACK PEOPLE.
Benji and his wife had a good laugh over it…
- Forbes’ June 7, 2020, article on a Norwegian report that claims to present proof that SARS-CoV-2 is a laboratory creation was almost immediately altered to reflect the opposing view
- The 180-degree turnaround is being justified by citing “scientific consensus on COVID-19” — a consensus that does not exist
- There are many reasons for protecting the narrative that SARS-CoV-2 is of a natural origin. If it is proven to be a lab creation, the public may demand biosafety/biowarfare research into dangerous pathogens be stopped
- Thousands of scientists involved in such research would lose their jobs if funding came to a halt and biosafety level 4 laboratories were to be shut down. Many could also potentially face life in prison for violating the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989
- American scientists and health organizations would also be responsible, and the U.S. doesn’t want to implicate its own agencies in the creation of SARS-CoV-2
If you need further proof that the mainstream media is censoring truthful news, look no further than Forbes’ June 7, 2020, article on a Norwegian report that claims to present proof that SARS-CoV-2 is a laboratory creation.
The article was initially published with the headline “Norway Scientist Claims Report Proves Coronavirus Was Lab-Made.”1,2 Shortly thereafter, that headline was altered to “Controversial Coronavirus Lab Origin Claims Dismissed by Experts.”3
Forbes Pulls a 180
As revealed in the side-by-side screenshots below, the 180-degree turnaround is being justified by citing “scientific consensus on COVID-19” — a consensus that most certainly does not exist as of yet — and evidence showing SARS-CoV-2 is lab-created is being roundly dismissed as “rumor and conspiracy.” If this doesn’t show you just how complicit the media is driving a pre-established narrative, I don’t know what will.
Here’s a sample of the changes. The original article states:4
“The study from Sørensen and British professor Angus Dalgleish show that the coronavirus’s spike protein contains sequences that appear to be artificially inserted. They also highlight the lack of mutation since its discovery, which suggests it was already fully adapted to humans.”
The updated article now reads:5
“The authors of a British-Norwegian vaccine study6,7 — accepted by the Quarterly Review of Biophysics — claim that the coronavirus’s spike protein contains sequences that appear to be artificially inserted.
In their paper, the Norwegian scientist Birger Sørensen and British oncologist Angus Dalgleish claim to have identified ‘inserted sections placed on the SARS-CoV-2 spike surface’ that explains how the virus interacts with cells in the human body. Virologists, however, note that similar sections appear naturally in other viruses.”…
The imposition of the nationwide lockdowns required elite consensus. There’s no way that a project of that magnitude could have been carried out absent the nearly universal support of establishment elites and their lackeys in the political class. There must have also been a fairly-detailed media strategy that excluded the voices of lockdown opponents while– at the same time– promoting an extremely dubious theory of universal quarantine that had no basis in science, no historical precedent, and no chance of preventing the long-term spread of the infection. All of this suggests that the lockdowns were not a spontaneous overreaction to a fairly-mild virus that kills roughly 1 in 500 mainly-older and infirm victims, but a comprehensive and thoroughly-vetted plan to impose “shock therapy” on the US economy in order to achieve the long-term strategic ambitions of ruling class elites. As one sardonic official opined, “Never let a crisis go to waste.”
It was clear from the beginning, that the lockdowns were going to have a catastrophic effect on the economy, and so they have. As of today, 30 million people have lost their jobs, tens of thousands of small and medium-sized businesses have been shuttered, second quarter GDP has plunged to an eye watering -45.5 percent (Atlanta Fed), and the economy has experienced its greatest shock in history. Even so, pundits in the mainstream media, remain steadfast in their opposition to lifting the lockdowns or modifying the medical martial law edicts that have been arbitrarily imposed by mainly-liberal governors across the country. Why? Why would the so-called “experts throw their weight behind such a sketchy policy when they knew how much suffering it was going to cause for ordinary working people? And why has the media continued to attack countries like Sweden who merely settled on a more conventional approach instead of imposing a full-blown lockdown? Swedish leaders and epidemiologists were unaware that adopting their own policy would be seen as a sign of defiance by their global overlords, but it was. Elites have decided that there can be no challenge to their idiotic lockdown model which is why Sweden had to be punished, ridiculed, and dragged through the mud. The treatment of Sweden further underscores the fact that the lockdown policy (and the destruction of the US economy) was not a random and impulsive act, but one part of a broader plan to restructure the economy to better serve the interests of elites. That’s what’s really going on. The lockdowns are being used to “reset” the economy and impose a new social order.
But why would corporate mandarins agree to a plan that would shrink their earnings and eviscerate short-term profitability?
Over the years, we have periodically reported of the occasional gold bar discovered as counterfeit in Manhattan’s Diamond District which instead of containing the yellow precious metal would be filled with gold-plated tungsten or in some cases copper. The news would spark a brief wave of outrage, prompting physical gold holders to run ultrasound spot checks of their inventory, at which point interest would wane and why not: buyer, after all, beware in gold as in every other market, and if someone is spending thousands to buy fake gold, well that’s Darwinism in action.
Yet one market which seemed stubbornly immune to any counterfeiting was that of physical gold in China, which was odd considering that over the past decade China had emerged as the world’s biggest counterfeiter of various, mostly industrial metals used to secure bank loans, better known as “ghost collateral“, and which adding insult to injury, would frequently be rehypothecated meaning often several banks would have claims to the same (fake) asset.
All that is about to change with the discovery of what may be one of the biggest gold counterfeiting scandal in recent history. And yes, not only does it involve China, but it emerges from a city that has become synonymous for all that is scandalous about China: Wuhan itself…
…at least some of 83 tons of gold bars used as loan collateral turned out to be nothing but gilded copper…
The news sent shockwaves through Kingold’s creditors. China Minsheng Trust – another shadow banking company and one of Kingold’s largest creditors – obtained a court order to test collateral before Kingold’s debts came due. On May 22, the test result returned saying the bars sealed in Minsheng Trust’s coffers are also copper alloy.
And with authorities investigating how this happened, Kingold chief Jia flatly denies that anything is wrong with the collateral his company put up. Well, what else could he say…
“I am a 32-year-old woman from Finland, which has a neonatal circumcision rate of zero. I have been following Your Whole Baby for several months now and would like to tell you why. Last summer something happened for the first time in my life:
“I saw a circumcised penis.
“I met a non-European guy and I really liked him. The feeling was mutual and he was hoping I could be his girlfriend.
“The first time we had sex, though, I was shocked when I saw his penis. I actually asked him what was wrong with it. I know it was not the nicest thing to say, but the words just came out of my mouth. Of course, I then immediately realized that he was circumcised.
(Circumcision is mentioned to us at school only when we are being educated about different religions, like Judaism. That is pretty much all we know regarding circumcision, since we don’t practice it here.)
“I was very sad to see he didn’t have his foreskin, which is absolutely the best part! I had no idea how I could please him. It was too difficult without the foreskin, and I kept thinking his penis felt incomplete.
“I had sex with him, but it was really awkward and very uncomfortable, at least for me. He was so rough that it almost hurt. I guess the roughness was due to the fact that he had lost so much sensitivity. Each time we had sex this happened. With intact partners, I have never experienced pain during sex.
“I did not want to have sex with him anymore, and eventually I did not want to see him anymore. I knew I couldn’t be in a relationship like this. I couldn’t keep having sex that was painful every time. I knew that sex could feel really amazing and I was not willing to give that up.
“His circumcision became a deal breaker.
“After that, I started searching the internet for information about circumcision. I had to know why this happened because it did not make any sense to me. Of course, it still does not make sense. However, I was delighted to find there are people fighting against routine infant circumcision. Educating people is the key.
“I still can’t believe how many lies Americans are told — even by medical professionals — about circumcision.
“I wanted to share this story in order to remind you all that an intact penis is the normal and natural penis. Almost all of the men in Europe are intact.
“Best wishes from intact Finland!” ~Jonna
While every death is a tragedy and there have been many due to the Covid virus, almost 3 million Americans die in a year from all sources, based on in 2017 CDC numbers. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm
However, we still do not know with certainty the actual number of Covid cases or deaths for multiple reasons: 1) Testing was not available from the start of the epidemic, 2) Statistics are based on diagnosis, which include non proven “assumed infections’, 3) Hospitals are paid tens of thousands of dollars to “up-code” (incentivizing such declarations and assumptions) by including Covid19 on as a diagnosis when possible, while influenza/pneumonia deaths are the 7th leading cause of death in the USA (roughly 56,000/year) and most drug overdoses (the most recent pre-covid “epidemic”) appear as respiratory deaths and these seem to have disappeared from the media horizon, 4) it remains unclear to what extent repeated positive tests continue to be counted as “new cases”.
Corona viruses cause 20% of common colds predominantly in the “cold and flu season” and mix in with flu infections and associated deaths, with Covid 19 possibly now compounding these deaths. Flu deaths themselves typically ranging from 30-60,000 EACH YEAR. The 3,400 average number of deaths per week from pneumonia occurred in years 2013-19. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm
The CDC does track excess deaths at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm and this may be the best index of the USA’s Covid 19 dangers overall. CDC’s US data’s Covid related peak occurred during the week ending April 11,2020, which has steadily declined and recently disappeared, with a total of around 90K excess deaths to date.
Information from the United Kingdom separates these excess deaths and indicates that not all such “excess deaths” truly are Covid deaths. https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-uk-excess-deaths-down-to-lowest-level-since-beginning-of-pandemic-12003325
Also, “researchers say the number of excess deaths isn’t necessarily attributable directly to COVID-19, but it could include people who were too frightened to seek treatment for unrelated illnesses due to the pandemic.” https://www.healthline.com/health-news/excess-deaths-from-covid19-pandemic
The media continues to exclaim a resurgence and possible second wave of covid 19 based on “new cases” and neglects that the deaths have been typically in older, sicker baseline patients, who may have likely died in the next 10-20 weeks of other causes. While young people can go out and demonstrate, they too can go to work.
Because Corona viruses are transmitted like the flu, and this covid 19 episode has traveled much like a severe flu season. It is very possible that the “common cold” virus has now mutated and become a flu like syndrome, which will not disappear and may recur yearly like the flu. To continue treating Covid like a “one time” event, to be contained by closing down the economy and allowing media to fear monger by daily publication of total cases and death is simply untenable and we have already had Covid occurrences in 2003 (SARS) and 2012 (MERS)…..
At the Presidential Briefing on Apr 30, Dr. Anthony Fauci announced early results, prior to peer-review, of one clinical trial using remdesivir, an intravenous (IV) experimental antiviral medicine in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. At the “warp speed” currently in vogue for the Fauci-led push to a new vaccine, the very next day the FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EAU) for remdesivir to be used in seriously ill hospitalized patients. To announce the emergency approval, President Trump met with the CEO of the drug’s manufacturer, Gilead Sciences, in the Oval Office.
Such rapid authorization is quite unusual with the FDA. Unlike the experimental remdesivir with no prior FDA approval, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) required two months from reports of successful use in China and South Korea to get the Mar 28 FDA EUA for use in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. HCQ was approved in 1955 for malaria, and later for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. Over the last 65 years, hundreds of millions of prescriptions have been written for HCQ worldwide.
The EUA for HCQ did not, however, expand its availability but imposed restrictions to prevent non-hospitalized patients from accessing the government’s stockpile of the drug. Democrat Governors Cuomo (NY), Sisolak (NV), and Whitmer (MI), then imposed restrictive orders on outpatient use, and all but four states have followed their lead.
In decades of widespread use, HCQ has an impressive safety record. Irregular heart rhythm or damage to the retina occur rarely, usually with high doses used long term. FDA shows only 62 cardiac deaths attributed to HCQ out of more than 50 million prescriptions, or 0.000124 percent (1.2 out of each 1 million Rx). Rheumatology guidelines for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis do not even require baseline electrocardiograms before prescribing HCQ, since the risk is minimal.
Approximately $70 million in U.S. taxpayer funding began Gilead’s partnership with the U.S. Army, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and National Institutes of Health (NIH) to develop remdesivir. Initially for treating Ebola, it failed to show benefit and was shelved. If remdesivir is used to treat COVID-19, Gilead shareholders, not the taxpayers, will profit.
Early results of the first clinical trial of remdesivir against placebo in coronavirus were announced at the White House Apr 30, and showed modest benefits, according to The New York Times. Surviving patients given remdesivir were discharged 4 days sooner than patients given placebo, though no criteria were given for determining improvement. Death rates were not significantly different. About 25 percent of patients receiving remdesivir had potentially severe side effects, including multiple organ dysfunction, septic shock, acute kidney injury, and low blood pressure. Another 23% showed evidence on lab tests of liver damage.
Gilead’s own press release revealed the side effect of acute respiratory failure in 6 percent of patients in the remdesivir 5-day treatment group, and 10.7 percent of patients in the 10-day treatment group, clearly ominous findings with a drug designed to treat respiratory failure caused by COVID-19.
Dr. Steven Nissen, Cleveland Clinic cardiologist who has conducted dozens of clinical trials, explained to The New York Times: “The disclosure of trial results in a political setting, before peer review or publication, is very unusual. Scientists will need to see figures on harms associated with the drug in order to assess its benefits…. This is too important to be handled in such a sloppy fashion.”
Dr. Michele Barry, a global health expert at Stanford University, expressed concern about Dr. Fauci’s overly enthusiastic praise for remdesivir: “It is unusual to call a drug the ‘standard of care’ until peer review of data and publication, and before studies have shown benefit in mortality.”
The leading communicable disease specialist in France, Professor Didier Raoult, asked about another odd aspect of the remdesivir trial: “Could Anthony Fauci explain why the investigators of the NIAID remdesivir trial did change the primary outcome during the course of the project?” Death as the primary outcome was moved to a secondary outcome, and days to recovery became the primary trial outcome. Changing the primary outcome before trial results are completed is highly unusual and suggests “p-hacking”—manipulating the data to get a statistically significant “p value.”
In contrast, the multi-country compilation of evidence on HCQ and azithromycin in treatment of COVID-19 (updated Apr 27, 2020) has consistently shown that these older medicines prevent infections, significantly reduce severity of illness, reduce viral load and duration of infectivity, reduce number of hospitalizations, reduce ventilator use, and markedly reduce deaths. The data is far beyond “anecodotal,” as Dr. Fauci dismissively called it.
Money appears to be trumping medical wisdom in the recent enthusiasm for remdesivir based on just one study with modest results. One naturally wonders whether this may have anything to do with the fact that the “world’s largest asset manager,” BlackRock, owns the largest share of all Gilead stock at 8.4%. BlackRock’s influence in Washington, D.C., is legendary, and it recently was awarded the financial crown jewel of administering the Federal Reserve’s $4.5 Trillion COVID-19 loan bail-out program….