1 Apr 2020: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention restored full operating capability to all U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) labs at Fort Detrick, Maryland, last week following a shutdown last July of some high-level facilities out of safety concerns.
The CDC cleared USAMRIID’s Level 3 and 4 laboratories — those where the world’s most dangerous pathogens are studied — for full operations March 27. The labs had been operating under partial capacity since last November, following a cease-and-desist order issued last July by the CDC over lapses in biosafety standards.
Army officials said the biosafety lapses could be attributed to “failure of Fort Detrick’s steam sterilization plant.”
USAMRIID has a new chemical system for treating laboratory wastewater.
The clearance allows the laboratories, where researchers have conducted groundbreaking research on deadly viruses such as Ebola and Marburg, to resume a “full scope of research on infectious diseases,” according to Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Maryland, who issued a news release Tuesday announcing the CDC decision.
“USAMRIID conducts vital research on the spread and containment of infectious diseases. As we continue to battle the coronavirus outbreak, ensuring their ability to work at full capacity is more important now than ever,” Van Hollen said.
Army officials said April 1 that the shutdown did not have any impact on the institute’s research on the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, which causes the COVID-19 illness.
They added that work continues at USAMRIID and elsewhere in the Army to study countermeasures for the novel coronavirus.
“U.S. Army researchers were critical during the SARS epidemic, the Zika virus and the Ebola outbreak as they helped develop antivirals and vaccines,” Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said. “They’ve done it before, and they will do it again.”
USAMRIID is the Defense Department’s lead research facility on biological defense, supporting the Defense Threat Reduction Agency’s Joint Science and Technology Office for Chemical and Biological Defense.
Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Maryland, called the CDC’s decision to grant the labs full operational capability “a relief.”…
Enough is enough. Common sense supports specificity. Who exactly did what? Who exactly is “at risk”? Who exactly orchestrated the plandemic? No country or racial group pulled off this vast bullying spree… a few very naughty people did. A few from here, a few from there… not all people from any one country. Now we can assess those few who are at risk and protect them by isolating them only; not all of us. Bring them groceries and let them stay out of the marketplace… but there is no need to lock down entire countries and destroy jobs, businesses and entire economies.
Dr. Scott Atlas, the former chief of neuroradiology at Stanford University Medical Center and a senior fellow at Stanford’s Hoover Institution, made a Friday night Fox News appearance to defend his viral column about why the ongoing coronavirus panic, and the ensuing government-enforced shutdowns, should end.
- Fact 1: The overwhelming majority of people do not have any significant risk of dying from COVID-19.
- Fact 2: Protecting older, at-risk people eliminates hospital overcrowding.
- Fact 3: Vital population immunity is prevented by total isolation policies, prolonging the problem.
- Fact 4: People are dying because other medical care is not getting done due to hypothetical projections.
- Fact 5: We have a clearly defined population at risk who can be protected with targeted measures.
As a registered nurse with a master’s degree in biology/clinical nutrition and having been in private practice as an orthomolecular nurse-nutritionist, I am well familiar with successful nutrient treatment holistic protocols — now applied to rescuing COVID19 patients. This knowledge needs to be shared world-wide as such treatments benefit many health conditions including infectious diseases….
Many physicians treat acute viral infections, with 4-days of very large daily doses of Vitamins A (100,000 IU) and D (50,000 IU), also using zinc along with Vitamin C, the latter of which should be continued indefinitely while symptomatic and for 36-48 hours after symptoms subside–as in the Cathcart bowel-tolerance dosing protocol.1 That treatment has also been used with COVID-19, and along with nebulized iodine and food grade peroxide diluted to 3.5% for lung symptoms. Other nutrients—including selenium and NAC (n-acetyl cysteine) are often used, as well as additional oxygen therapies of injectable ozone or delivered rectally or vaginally. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has also been reported as helpful.
Vitamin D3 has recently been identified as extremely important for infectious disease immunity, including SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome).2
Very large dosing intravenously (IV) with vitamin C has also been used successfully around the world in the treatment of toxins and viruses.3 including COVID19. Note that there are various forms of vitamin C, such as acidic and non-acidic available in tablets or powders as well as lyposomal forms that some researchers tout as more effective than IV. The Orthomolecular Medicine News Service article “hot off the press” entitled Vitamin C Evidence for Treating Complications of COVID-19 and other Viral Infections serves as a reading guide for the most relevant sources on vitamin C and D for prevention and treatment of complications from COVID-19 and other viral infections.
I’ve added additional valuable Vitamin C reference links at the end of the article….
Bill Gates, Andrew Cuomo, and others are calling for mass vaccinations against the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), even though a vaccine for the novel virus doesn’t yet exist, as a condition for release from lockdown. But a 2015 study reveals that any vaccine for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) would actually create more viruses inside people’s bodies, making the situation worse than it already is.
An honest perusal of this study will more than likely lead you to one conclusion: That there’s never actually going to be a vaccine released for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) because making a truly effective one would never work. Of course, one could still be released that’s claimed to be effective, but any genuine look at it by regulators would surely reveal that it’s bogus, resulting in its rejection.
What this all means for the release of Americans from lockdown remains to be seen, and certainly doesn’t look promising. But the more we can get the following information out to the general public, the better our chances of blowing the lid on the vaccine charade that’s now quite literally keeping people as prisoners inside their own homes.
If you read through this paper, which was actually published in a journal called Coronaviruses, you’ll notice that one of the stated requirements for an effective coronavirus vaccine is to make it live attenuated, meaning it would have to contain live, yet weakened, bits of the actual virus. As you may recall, they already tried this with the so-called swine flu vaccine, which caused horrific side effects in those who received it.
Seasonal flu vaccines are also generally live attenuated, which explains why so many of the people who receive them end up still getting sick from the flu. Whenever you’re dealing with live viruses, weakened or otherwise, in other words, you’re playing with fire, which is exactly what the coronavirus vaccine mafia is doing under the threat of indefinite containment of Americans under government-imposed house arrest.
What you really need to know about live attenuated viruses is that they have the potential to recombine in human hosts, meaning they can create more novel viruses. This is a serious problem because it means that a coronavirus vaccine could spread new coronaviruses, sparking more outbreaks and possible pandemics.
“… coronaviruses are also known for their ability to recombine using both homologous and nonhomologous recombination,” the study explains. “The ability of these viruses to recombine is tied to the strand switching ability of the RdRp.”
“Only limited options are available to prevent coronavirus infections,” it further adds. “Vaccines have only been approved for IBV, TGEV, and Canine CoV, but these vaccines are not always used because they are either not very effective, or in some cases have been reported to be involved in the selection of novel pathogenic CoVs via recombination of circulating strains.”
In other words, trying to vaccinate against any type of coronavirus, including the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) is risky business, to say the least. It runs the risk of generating new coronaviruses that will then have to be addressed, presumably with more vaccines, and on and on it goes forever….
It’s worth noting that developing a vaccine for coronavirus was already tried with the SARS variety. According to this study, multiple vaccines for SARS were, in fact developed, but none of them were ever approved because of the serious risks involved.
“These vaccines include recombinant attenuated viruses, live virus vectors, or individual viral proteins expressed from DNA plasmids,” the study reads, noting that live attenuated vaccines “would be the most efficacious in targeting coronaviruses.”
The problem, once again, is that recombination threatens to make an already bad situation even worse by “rendering the vaccine useless and potentially increasing the evolution and diversity of the virus in the wild.” Such vaccines, because of the ingredients they contain, can also “enhance disease,” the study reveals….
The risk of recombination isn’t confined to CV vaccines.
Thanks to Environmental Health Trust for highlighting scary new legislation that was recently introduced by an American legislator who seems to be in-the-pocket of the Telecom Industry or just bat-shit crazy.
An industry friendly bill has been introduced in the US House of Representatives that says the FCC does not need to perform any environmental review for 5G and cell antenna deployment under the National Environmental Policy Act.
The bill, HR 6488, will undo last year’s historic ruling that vacated the FCC’s decision to do away with NEPA review of small cell deployments. Representative John Shimkus of Illinois introduced the bill which has now been referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources.
This bill would directly reverse the August 2019 decision by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit which halted the efforts of the Federal Communications Commission to expedite the deployment of 5G technology. The FCC had issued an order in March 2018 eliminating environmental and historic preservation review of so-called 5G cell towers. The FCC had reasoned that even though the industry planned to deploy as many as 800,000 of these 50-foot (possibly taller) towers in neighborhoods and historic districts around the country by 2026, it was not in the public interest to review their potential impacts. The Natural Resources Defense Council, several Native American Tribes and Environmental Health Trust’s attorney appealed this regulation and won. In 2019 the Court found that the FCC had failed to adequately address possible harms of its deregulatory efforts and the benefits of environmental and historic preservation review. Read EHT’s press release here.
This 2020 bill seeks to reverse that historic win.
What can you do?
Take action and contact your representative. Tell your representative what you think about stripping environmental review from the 5G deployment process.
Here’s the link to the bill:
H.R.6488 – To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide that the Federal Communications Commission is not required to perform any review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 or division A of subtitle III of title 54, United States Code, as a condition of permitting the placement and installation of a communications facility, and for other purposes.
This could go beyond 5G. There are schemes for deploying solar energy harvesting satellites that would beam high powered microwaves to receivers on the earth. Solaren is one. Of course nothing could go wrong.
After Monday’s anti-quarantine protests at the California State Capitol building and across many other cities in the state, California’s Highway Patrol (CHP) will no longer grant permits to demonstrators on state property, reported The Sacramento Bee.
“Permits are issued to provide safe environments for demonstrators to express their views,” the CHP said in a statement. “In this case, the permit for the convoy was issued with the understanding that the protest would be conducted in a manner consistent with the state’s public health guidance.”
The decision to ban future protests on state property was in the public safety and health interests of all Californians, the CHP said, adding that it wasn’t pleased with protesters who neglected to follow Governor Gavin Newsom’s social distancing rules…
The FBI is conducting a raid at Allure Medical in Shelby Township. Police confirm to 7 Action News they are assisting the feds with the raid.
The FBI said it is a task force operation with the Department of Health and Human Services and the FBI. Agents participating in the raid are wearing special protection because of possible risk of exposure to coronavirus.
They’re gathering boxes of evidence, documents, etc. Agents arrived just after 8 a.m.Allure has recently promoted that it is treating COVID-19 patients who aren’t hospitalized using intravenous vitamin C therapy “with great results.”
In a press release sent out to news stations last week, Allure said that Dr. Charles Mok, the founder of Allure Medical, is providing the high-dose intravenous vitamin C therapy to all essential workers in Michigan, saying that it is being used in hospitals around the country….
Tim Dillon has on journalist Whitney Webb to discuss Epstein, Bill Gates, China, and America becoming a surveillance state. Whitney, with permission from Maria Farmer, plays small clips from a 3.5 hour interview recently recorded, that in Whitney’s opinion changed her perspective on the Epstein case.