“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” — Amendment 1, United States Constitution
Raleigh, NC — The state of North Carolina is one of the least affected states in the country with regard to the current COVID-19 outbreak. With just over 5,000 confirmed cases and only 108 deaths related to the virus, many citizens are growing wary of the state’s lockdown order and are demanding things go back to normal.
On Tuesday, more than 100 protesters took the the city streets of Raleigh, North Carolina to voice their desire to reopen the the state’s economy. They were quickly met with police action but the well-organized protesters stood their ground through multiple threats.
According to the News and Observer, the protest was organized by ReopenNC, a private Facebook group organized last week that wants people to make their own stay-at-home decisions to avoid exposure to COVID-19 as the worldwide pandemic continues. The group surpassed 28,000 members on Tuesday afternoon.
When the protest began, the Raleigh police department put out a tweet that is sure to go down in history books as they declared the Constitutional right to peaceably assemble, otherwise known as the First Amendment — “non-essential.”…
By now, those following the novel coronavirus epidemic are familiar with Event 201, the pandemic simulation staged by Johns Hopkins University in conjunction with the World Economic Forum, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Johnson & Johnson, and other ruling-class heavy hitters in October. The media establishment has already picked the story clean, set up and eviscerated a straw man (“No, Bill Gates didn’t cause the coronavirus epidemic, silly conspiracy theorists!”), and convinced the group itself to issue a statement denying their exercise was meant to predict the behavior of the actual virus to follow.
But few are aware that the epidemic playing out in China and two dozen other countries, including the US, is unfolding in line with a decade-old simulation titled “Lock Step” devised by the Rockefeller Foundation in conjunction with the Global Business Network. The scenario, one of four included in a publication called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” in 2010, describes a coronavirus-like pandemic that becomes the trigger for the imposition of police-state controls on movement, economy, and other areas of society.
The Lock Step scenario describes “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.” In “2012” (i.e. two years after the report’s publication), an “extremely virulent and deadly” strain of influenza originating with wild geese brings the world to its knees, infecting 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million people in just seven months – “the majority of them healthy young adults.” It devastates global economies and ruptures international trade. But not everyone, the Rockefeller Foundation makes clear, is hit equally.
Countries of Africa, southeast Asia, and central America suffer the worst “in the absence of official containment protocols” – it wouldn’t be the Rockefeller Foundation if someone wasn’t licking their lips at the thought of a mass die-off in the Global South – but western “democracies” also pay the ultimate price. “The United States’ initial policy of ‘strongly discouraging’ citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the US but across borders,” the report warns. But remove such obstacles as ‘individual rights’ and you have a recipe for surviving, even thriving in the event of a pandemic, the Foundation gushes:
“A few countries did fare better – China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing-off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.”
The message is clear – police state good, freedom bad. And other governments rapidly get the message, according to the simulation. First and third world nations alike follow suit by “flexing their authority” and imposing quarantines, body-temperature checks, and other “airtight rules and restrictions” – most of which, the report is careful to note, remain in place even as the pandemic recedes into the past. “In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems – from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty – leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”
This global power-grab is facilitated by a frightened citizenry who “willingly gave up some of their sovereignty – and their privacy – to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability…tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight.” Everything from tighter biometric identification to stricter industrial regulation is welcomed with open arms. It takes over a decade for people to “grow weary” of the authoritarian controls imposed in the wake of the pandemic, and hints that even the civil unrest that ultimately manifests is focused on the developed world. After all, a popular uprising in the technocratic police state envisioned by the simulation would be all but impossible – as it will be in real life once 5G makes real-time total surveillance of all cities a reality….
Hidden away in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act is a series of Republican tax cuts that will save the ultra-wealthy $90 billion in 2020 alone. According to a report from the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), a nonpartisan congressional body, almost 82 percent of the benefits of the tax breaks will go to just 43,000 Americans who make over $1 million annually. In contrast, less than three percent will go to the great majority who earn less than $100,000 per year….
Around the world, children are far more likely than ever before to develop food allergies.
Inquiries into the deaths of British teenagers after eating buttermilk, sesame and peanut have highlighted the sometimes tragic consequences. In 2018, a six-year-old girl in Western Australia died as the result of a dairy allergy.
The rise in allergies in recent decades has been particularly noticeable in the West. Food allergy now affects about 7% of children in the UK and 9% of those in Australia, for example. Across Europe, 2% of adults have food allergies.
Life-threatening reactions can be prompted even by traces of the trigger foods, meaning patients and families live with fear and anxiety. The dietary restrictions which follow can become a burden to social and family lives.
While we can’t say for sure why allergy rates are increasing, researchers around the world are working hard to find ways to combat this phenomenon.
What Causes an Allergy?
An allergy is caused by the immune system fighting substances in the environment that it should see as harmless, known as allergens.
These innocent substances become targets, leading to allergic reactions.
Symptoms range from skin redness, hives and swelling to – in the most severe cases – vomiting, diarrhoea, difficulty breathing and anaphylactic shock.
Some of the most common foods for children to be allergic to are:
- Tree nuts (eg walnuts, almonds, pine nuts, brazil nuts, pecans)
- Shellfish (eg crustaceans and molluscs)
Where Are Food Allergies Most Likely to Occur?
The frequency of food allergy has increased over the past 30 years, particularly in industrialised societies. Exactly how great the increase is depends on the food and where the patient lives.
For example, there was a five-fold increase in peanut allergies in the UK between 1995 and 2016.
A study of 1,300 three-year-olds for the EAT Study at King’s College London, suggested that 2.5% now have peanut allergies.
Australia has the highest rate of confirmed food allergy. One study found 9% of Australian one-year-olds had an egg allergy, while 3% were allergic to peanuts.
The increase in allergies is not simply the effect of society becoming more aware of them and better at diagnosing them.
It is thought that allergies and increased sensitivity to foods are probably environmental, and related to Western lifestyles.
We know there are lower rates of allergies in developing countries. They are also more likely to occur in urban rather than rural areas.
Factors may include pollution, dietary changes and less exposure to microbes, which change how our immune systems respond.
Migrants appear to show a higher prevalence of asthma and food allergy in their adopted country compared to their country of origin, further illustrating the importance of environmental factors.
Some Possible Explanations
There is no single explanation for why the world is becoming more allergic to food, but science has some theories….
To their credit, they point out the sorry state of vitamin D levels in the industrialized world. In any case, vaccines are certainly a prime suspect.
Vaccine-induced autoimmunity: the role of molecular mimicry and immune crossreaction
Abstract: Since the early 1800s vaccines have saved numerous lives by preventing lethal infections. However, during the past two decades, there has been growing awareness of possible adverse events associated with vaccinations, cultivating heated debates and leading to significant fluctuations in vaccination rates. It is therefore pertinent for the scientific community to seriously address public concern of adverse effects of vaccines to regain public trust in these important medical interventions. Such adverse reactions to vaccines may be viewed as a result of the interaction between susceptibility of the vaccinated subject and various vaccine components. Among the implicated mechanisms for these reactions is molecular mimicry. Molecular mimicry refers to a significant similarity between certain pathogenic elements contained in the vaccine and specific human proteins. This similarity may lead to immune crossreactivity, wherein the reaction of the immune system towards the pathogenic antigens may harm the similar human proteins, essentially causing autoimmune disease. In this review, we address the concept of molecular mimicry and its application in explaining post vaccination autoimmune phenomena. We further review the principal examples of the influenza, hepatitis B, and human papilloma virus vaccines, all suspected to induce autoimmunity via molecular mimicry. Finally, we refer to possible implications on the potential future development of better, safer vaccines….
Hepatitis B Virus vaccines: potential mimickers of myelin components…
The first report of neurologic adverse events following HBV vaccines was produced in a postmarketing surveillance issued by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the manufacturer.51 The authors could not detect a conclusive association between any neurologic adverse event and the vaccine. Nevertheless, they relate to their significant limitations in calculating a precise relative risk for the various events reported, due to variations in diagnostic classification of the cases, estimates of the size of the vaccinated population, background incidence of the diseases and the definition of a hypothetical at-risk interval. They further refer to their inability to assess underreporting of adverse effects. Following this publication, several interesting case reports were published regarding central nervous system demyelination arising after HBV immunization. One noteworthy such report published in the Lancet dates back to 1991, when Herroelen et al.52 described two patients developing central nervous system demyelination 6 weeks after receiving the vaccine….
“After reviewing the literature, we observed that complications seen after Hepatitis B vaccination are sudden infant death syndrome, multiple sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, vasculititis optic neuritis, anaphylaxis, systemic lupus erytymatosus, lichen planus and neuro-muscular disorder.”…
For the United States there are three different influenza vaccine production technologies approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)external icon:
- egg-based flu vaccine, …
… Which bovine derived materials are used in vaccine manufacture?
Microorganisms for vaccine manufacture are grown under controlled conditions in media which provide the nutrients necessary for growth. Cow components are often used simply because cows are very large animals, commonly used for food, and thus much material is available. Animal-derived products used in vaccine manufacture can include amino acids, glycerol, detergents, gelatin, enzymes and blood. Cow milk is a source of amino acids, and sugars such as galactose….
Even small amounts of breastmilk strongly influences the accumulation of viral populations in the infant gut and provides a protective effect against potentially pathogenic viruses, according to researchers who examined hundreds of babies in a study from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
The findings expand upon prior research that suggests that breastfeeding plays a key role in the interaction between babies and the microbial environment. This latest research could influence strategies for the prevention of early gastrointestinal disorders, and encourage mothers to feed babies breastmilk even when mixed with formula. The findings are published in Nature….
Babies are too complicated. We need to go back to square one so we can avoid mom’s messy milk and inject the right vaccines. Start with a block of carbon and a beaker of formaldehyde….
by Wayne Allyn Root
Mr. President, I’m one of your biggest supporters. Few have worked harder or longer to elect, support and re-elect you. Every day I praise you to my large and growing audience following me on national radio and TV, and reading my nationally-syndicated newspaper columns. My audience loves and supports you. We have your back!
Do you know who doesn’t have your back? The Ivy League eggheads; DC Swamp-dwelling politicians and bureaucrats; and Deep State doctors surrounding you. No one elected President Fauci. No one elected Dr. Birx, Surgeon General Adams, or hapless Fed Chief Powell as President either. And for good reason. They care only about being loved by the media, using big government to solve every problem, and never saying anything for which they might be blamed.
But, they’re not my President…YOU ARE!
The academics and deep-staters just pass the buck. They have scared Americans to death with worthless, flawed worst-case computer models that never work in the real world. Thank goodness, the buck stops with you.
As anyone with common sense can see, the doctors and bureaucrats are giving you bad advice. The sad truth is they don’t care if their advice destroys this economy, country, and the great American middle class. Most are big government-loving, liberal Democrats who don’t understand the US economy, or appreciate the brave business owners of America.
I have simple advice…
Dr. Andrew Kaufman is a clear-thinking, straight-talking, evidence-based, medical doctor – and forensic psychiatrist. If you search for him on the www, you will find several interesting videos and articles. This is the man I’d like to see working on the COVID-19 issue with President Trump. He has no vested interests in vaccines or psych meds.
On Tuesday, a 2-1 majority rejected an appeal from one of the victims of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein which would have thrown out a non-prosecution agreement that provided immunity to Epstein, his aides, and unnamed “co-conspirators.”
Epstein’s escapades became front page news in the summer of 2019 when he was arrested and faced charges for abusing dozens of young girls at his homes in Florida, New Mexico, New York, and Paris. Epstein died of an alleged suicide on August 2019 while in custody on new sex-crime charges filed in New York.
The latest attempt to overturn Epstein’s arrangement with Florida prosecutors was filed by Courtney Wild, who says she was sexually abused by Epstein at his Palm Beach mansion at the age of 14. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Wild’s appeal, stating that despite the government’s attempts at shielding Epstein from harm, the Crime Victims’ Right Act (CVRA) does not allow for relief for victims who are mistreated by prosecutors prior to a formal charge being filed.
Courthouse News reports:
“Claiming rampant violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act, women abused by Epstein in their youth have been fighting in court since 2008 to overturn his and his aides’ federal immunity, to obtain grand jury records and hold Florida public hearings where they can air their grievances against the Justice Department.
‘Despite our sympathy for Ms. Wild and others like her, who suffered unspeakable horror at Epstein’s hands, only to be left in the dark—and, so it seems, affirmatively misled—by government lawyers, we find ourselves constrained to deny her petition,’ U.S. Circuit Judge Kevin Newsom, an appointee of President Donald Trump, wrote for the majority.”
After the decision, Courtney Wild stated, “The government intentionally misled the victims but found a way to get away with it by working with a child molester to get around the law. The judges ruled in their favor. How?”
The two judges who ruled against Wild claimed that overturning the original non-prosecution agreement could potentially infringe on prosecutors and law enforcement officials decision making process if they feel their decisions may be later overturned. Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Frank Hull, the one dissenting vote, said the other judges decisions ignores the terms of the CVRA. “The majority’s contorted statutory interpretation materially revises the statute’s plain text and guts victims’ rights under the CVRA. Nothing, and I mean nothing, in the CVRA’s plain text requires the majority’s result,” she wrote.
Wild’s attorney Paul Cassell told Courthouse News that it’s “clear that the [Act] as written by Congress can apply even before an indictment is filed.” Cassell said that Wild plans to file for an en banc rehearing before the full 11th Circuit. If that rehearing is rejected, the claim could eventually make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Despite rejecting Wild’s appeal, the judges acknowledged that, “mysteries still exist about how Epstein and his co-conspirators escaped federal prosecution for multiple sex-trafficking crimes against over 30 minor girls in Florida.”…
The judges should look in a mirror if they’re still mystified.
The original story was aired by NPR:
… FOLKENFLIK: In 2013, Fincher’s husband, Michael Forsythe was a reporter for Bloomberg News in Beijing. Bloomberg had already published his team’s investigation into the wealth of the families of Communist Party leaders. The Chinese ambassador had warned the company against publishing. Death threats followed. Fincher and Forsythe moved to Hong Kong, yet the team kept reporting.
FINCHER: He continued to do an investigation. And it was that story, this story on Wang Jianlin, China’s wealthiest man, and his ties to senior Chinese Communist leaders, including Xi Jinping.
FOLKENFLIK: Xi had just become president of China.
FINCHER: And I saw these emails from the editors praising it…
FOLKENFLIK: Meaning the reporting.
FINCHER: …Saying that, yeah, it’s – we’re really excited about this. We can’t wait to, you know, move it forward.
FOLKENFLIK: Three former Bloomberg journalists verified this account. After that, however, radio silence. The story never ran.
FINCHER: So Mike…
FOLKENFLIK: Her husband.
FINCHER: Mike and some of the other reporters and editors who had been working on this story just were asking for answers about why was this story killed.
FOLKENFLIK: The famously intense founding editor in chief of Bloomberg News finally weighed in – that’s Matthew Winkler. Back then, two editors told me the story needed work. That’s not the reason Winkler cited for killing it.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
MATTHEW WINKLER: It is, for sure, going to, you know, invite the Communist Party to, you know, completely shut us down and kick us out of the country. So I just don’t see that as a story that is justified.
FOLKENFLIK: NPR obtained this recording of Winkler on an October 2013 conference call. Winkler praised the team but warned about covering the Chinese regime, which he called…
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
WINKLER: The Nazis who are in front of us and behind us everywhere. And that’s who they are, and we should have no illusions about it….
I don’t think we the people should have any illusions about it either, or any illusions about the fate of the american peasantry if the satanic cult that installed the chinese oligarchy and transferred most of the US industrial infrastructure to them should succeed in their plans for creating a new world order. Nor should we have any illusions about the nature of a “free press” which managed to turn this story into an “investigative” piece about bloomberg while ignoring the import of Winkler’s insights into the culture of china’s elites.
This glimpse into the realities of china’s oligarchy is all too rare and thus it could be somewhat misleading to extrapolate, but the historical pattern is far too coherent to ignore.
The most dangerous epidemic raging on this planet for the past century is the plague of the malthusian eugenicist fascist robber baron nazis who continue puppeting the world and spreading their satanic philosophy and practices from the shadows of wall street and european financial centers. After financing the installation of the bolsheviks in russia, the nazis in germany and the fascists in italy, and their near overthrow of FDR it seems they’ve successfully cloned their satanic cult onto China’s elites while neutering any semblance of a free press here.
One dollar = one vote in the real power structure. By that measure, the overwhelming majority of humanity is literally insignificant in determining the future. Satan rules on this plane and the opportunities for escape from the system are rapidly closing off, especially with this new “plandemic” and its forced and final “solution”. At some point the only defense remaining will be through organized non-participation via mass psychic liberation. This is why satan’s slaves promote atheism. It’s also why obstetrical and circumcision trauma are a cornerstone of the american status quo. Imprinted satanic abuse causes the mind to retreat from the world and construct a “safe zone” within, to the detriment of psychic empathic connections which would promote grassroots organizing and the ability to visualize and actualize alternatives. Thus the need to export our toxic obstetrical practices to unsuspecting chinese parents. The “dumbing down” of the peasants is happening on an emotional level as well as an intellectual level.
By Kent Heckenlively, Author, Plague of Corruption
When I asked Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to write the foreword to my new book with Dr. Judy Mikovits called PLAGUE OF CORRUPTION I wasn’t expecting it to happen. After all, Kennedy seemed to be the busiest man on the planet, saving the Earth’s air, water, animals, and children, so he probably wouldn’t even have time to read my book.
Plus there is little doubt we have different temperaments.
To take an example from the 1960s, I compare Kennedy to Martin Luther King, Jr., while I am more of a firebrand, like Malcolm X. I don’t mind upsetting people, while Kennedy tries for a different, smoother approach.
I think the situation is like the story I’d read about his father, Senator Kennedy, who as he was preparing his run for the Presidency, met with a group of black activists in a Park Avenue apartment in New York City. The activists didn’t think the senator appreciated their concerns and berated him the entire time for his lack of understanding.
Of course, Senator Kennedy, being a sensitive human being, was initially a little offended by the encounter. But then he did something remarkable. Kennedy continued to meet with this group who had berated him. And they became some of his strongest supporters.
About my book and views
Let me be clear about PLAGUE OF CORRUPTION. It is a Malcolm X book. It is not a Martin Luther King, Jr. book.
I think the entire public health system needs to be torn down and rebuilt. This is MUCH bigger than a remodel.
While I understand and support the questions that Kennedy and others are asking about mercury, aluminum, and other chemicals found in vaccines and the environment, it seems like an incomplete argument to me. I want to add more to the conversation.
For instance, I question whether the use of animal tissue and aborted human fetal tissue in our therapeutics are unleashing a plague of vast proportions. Could the mixing of animal and human tissue in culture promote not only the expression of both animal and human viruses, but also allow them to promiscuously recombine into deadly pathogens which are robbing our children of their vitality and future?
Would Kennedy do it or was a rejection coming?
I was worried when I submitted my book to Kennedy because I had two competing thoughts in my head.
The first was that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is, in my opinion, the bravest public figure in our country. Nobody had more to lose, and yet when he was convinced of a certain course of action, he took it.
The second was that the ideas in our book might seem so out of left field to him that he’d dismiss the book entirely, and might actively campaign against it.
I sent the request then held my breath and waited. All I was asking was for him to write a three to four-page foreword.
To my great surprise, instead of a three to four-page foreword, Kennedy wrote a twelve-page foreword. And he decided to make PLAGUE OF CORRUPTION the inaugural book in his Children’s Health Defense imprint at Skyhorse Publishing.
Some leaders understand that new ideas can benefit everybody. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is one of those leaders. He has my deepest gratitude.