Former KGB Agent on Psychological Warfare and Subversion

You don’t have to agree with everything he says to see there is a science to what he is talking about.    The science of eliminating a culture’s indigenous knowledge base of a homegrown autonomous system which works and substituting something else which is dependent on and subservient to your own interests.   The  USA’s puppet masters are well versed in these techniques.   That’s why they never impose popular governments in foreign countries.   Such a government wouldn’t need arms imports and “security assistance” in order to survive.   The idea is to create a dependent and controlled government to facilitate looting.   See

Substitute “banker agent” for “communist” here and you’ll be closer to the truth.   Ideology has nothing to do with it.   Follow the money.

What A Democratic Socialist Convention Is Like

Disaster socialism and the Cloward-Piven Strategy

Congressional Investigator Norman Dodd on Corporate Foundations’ Agenda for Public Education

Common Core’s Recipe for Imposed Ignorance

Anthony Sutton: Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler and Communism

OAN: The Story Behind The Impeachment Nothingburger

EXCLUSIVE: Watch the unraveling of the biggest political scandal in US history.  Travel with OAN’s Chanel Rion and Rudy Giuliani to Budapest and Kiev to capture explosive first-hand interviews with key Ukrainian officials highlighting DNC collaborated foreign interference into the 2016 presidential election.  Hear the shocking first hand testimony of former Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin on why he was fired and what corruption he uncovered.

Watch all 3 parts FREE below.

OAN Investigates Part 1

Part One
OAN Investigates Part 2

Part Two
OAN Investigates Part 3

Part Three

Trump Exposes Pelosi And Son’s Ties To Ukraine-Linked Energy Group

… Shortly after his mother became the first woman speaker, Paul Pelosi Jr., was hired by InfoUSA for $180,000 a year as its vice president for Strategic Planning.

Nancy Pelosi’s son Paul is also on the board of an energy company.

As Patrick Howley reports, Nancy Pelosi’s son Paul Pelosi Jr. (who went to Ukraine in 2017) was a board member of Viscoil and executive at its related company NRGLab, which did energy business in Ukraine!

And Speaker Pelosi even appears in the company’s video commercials…

And Howley confirms NGRLabs links to Ukraine



Of course, while there is no allegations of wrongdoing in the Pelosi case (and certainly no political intervention which we know Biden admitted publicly), it does make you wonder just how deep the cookie jar goes in Ukraine…

Most americans would be surprised to learn that this is all a tempest in a teapot compared to the human tragedy unleashed by the obama administration’s bloody overthrow,  looting and devastation of ukraine in 2014, which allowed inside operators like biden and pelosi through the back door of the ukrainian energy industry to begin with.   This is the real story of impeachment-gate: establishment war crimes of the highest order.   Yet another story you won’t hear about in our “free press.”

Even the CFR is having second thoughts on the US coup in Ukraine

Obama’s Ethnic Cleansing Operation in Ukraine

The EU and IMF Rape of Ukraine Agriculture

US Stole Ukraine’s Gold After Coup

Continue reading OAN: The Story Behind The Impeachment Nothingburger

Venezuela Is Fast Becoming World’s Biggest Refugee Crisis

According to UN dataVenezuela is fast becoming the world’s biggest refugee crisis. By the end of 2020, 6.5 million Venezuelans are expected to have been forcibly displaced outside of their home country.

Infographic: Venezuela Is Fast Becoming World's Biggest Refugee Crisis | Statista

You will find more infographics at Statista

This is up from just 300,000 in 2017. Syria, the biggest global refugee crisis to date, reached its height in 2018 with 6.7 million displaced people. With resettlement programs ongoing, that number is expected to have been reduced to 5.6 by the end of 2019 and might further fall in 2020.

While the number of Syrian refugees and those in a refugee-like situation had been rising since 2011, Statista’s Katharina Buchholz notes that Venezuelan refugee numbers jumped up quickly, testing the preparedness of humanitarian organizations in the region.

Infographic: Escape from Venezuela | Statista

Last December 16 both houses in the US approved the appropriation bill to be signed by president Trump. Aside from the mind-boggling amount of $1.4 trillion that was approved in total our interest was in looking at the details concerning Venezuela.

press releaseissued by the organization Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) is quite misleading in its over optimism suggesting that the appropriations bill “rejects the use of force in Venezuela and endorses a negotiated solution to the countrys crisis”. Another interpretation may be more realistic.

The full billof 1773 pages includes a section about Venezuela. The first reference to the country is to state that “not less than $30 million shall be made available for democracy programs for Venezuela” and that the funds “shall be made available for assistance for communities in countries supporting or otherwise impacted by refugees from Venezuela, including Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Curacao, and Trinidad and Tobago”. It is not possible to know if this is above the previously reported$52 million announced by Mark Green, the administrator of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) last September. To make it more confusing the same report states that this “is in addition to hundreds of millions of dollars already committed by the US to support the more than 4 million vulnerable Venezuelans who have fled the country’s crisis.”

The 50-page-long section of the bill that codifies legislation about Venezuela is titled ‘‘Venezuela Emergency Relief, Democracy Assistance, and Development Act of 2019’’ or ‘‘VERDAD Act of 2019’’.

The legislation co-sponsored by senators Robert Menendez and Marco Rubio, was introduced last April in the Senate, and later referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. That same April self-appointed interim president Juan Guaidó staged (another) coup at La Carlota air base in eastern Caracas and called for the military to rise up against Maduro in the hope that the military would defect in mass and join him. The timing of the legislation and the attempted coup may have been carefully planned to coincide, but the coup never happened.

Aside from the $30 million for democracy programs, the VERDAD Act authorises a whopping $400 million for fiscal year 2020 to carry out “humanitarian relief” activities such as humanitarian assistance to individuals and communities in Venezuela and humanitarian aid to Venezuelans and hosting communities in neighboring countries. The US Secretary of State is mandated to provide within 180 days an update to the Venezuela humanitarian assistance strategy in coordination with USAID. Aside from this proviso, the allocation of the expenditures is very vague and leaves the door open to any interpretation or act of faith. For instance, it is not obvious that humanitarian assistance from the US can be provided within Venezuela. What then?

The legislation with the misnomer VERDAD, which means TRUTH in Spanish, is a repetition of untruths to justify the need to provide humanitarian relief. It has the standard US government recognition for the president of the National Assembly Juan Guaidó who was “sworn in” (read, self-appointed) as interim president on January 23, 2019 following the “fraudulent” (read, not suitable to the US) election of May 20, 2018. It further states the US full support for the International Contact Group on Venezuela (European Union, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Sweden, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Ecuador, Costa Rica, and Uruguay), the OAS and the Lima Group (Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, and Saint Lucia). Relevant comparison here is the almost 120 countries that have recognised the Maduro government.

Moreover, the VERDAD Act calls for new presidential election in Venezuela that complies with international standards” (read, accepted by the US), with international observers like the OAS (read, the organization that contributed to the military coup in Bolivia), and boosting “independent media outlets” (read, corporate media). To carry out this activity the bill grants an extra $17.5 million to the office of the Secretary of State.

In a nutshell we can safely say that the US government will make large amounts of US tax payers money available for regime change in Venezuela under the guise of “humanitarian relief” for a crisis that the US government created to start with….

The business model is pretty predictable and widespread.

Cultural Engineering in Sweden

MSM silence on OPCW scandal ‘ridiculous’, says journalist gagged by Newsweek after scandalous leak

The refusal of almost every Western media outlet to cover the leaks implicating the chemical weapons watchdog of doctoring its Syria report has become ridiculous, says a journalist who was barred from reporting it by Newsweek.

“These documents are very conclusive in what they show,” Tareq Haddad told RT after the latest release of internal emails from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) on Friday. The latest batch indicated an effort by the OPCW management to silence dissenting voices and cover up the very fact that there was evidence contradicting the West-favored narrative about the April 2018 incident in Douma, Syria….

Epstein and Prince Andrew Accuser Posts Chilling Tweet: “I Am Not Suicidal”

Virginia Giuffre accused Jeffrey Epstein of sex trafficking and Prince Andrew of having relations with her while she was a minor. She recently posted a tweet saying: “I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape or form am I suicidal.”.

Virginia Giuffre is the most visible and prominent accuser in the cases of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew. She’s been in and out of court on several occasions and has appeared in TV interviews to make her story public.

Virginia Guiffre with Prince Andrew when she was 17 years old. On the right is Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s “girlfriend” who is said to be the Madam in his sex trafficking organization.

On December 11th, Giuffre posted a chilling tweet warning the world that she is not suicidal. Here’s the full tweet:

Guiffre’s fears of being “suicided” are rather understandable. Jeffrey Epstein – who was set to go through a trial that could have exposed the occult elite – died by “suicide” in his jail cell. And, as made people observed, everything about that suicide was suspicious (read my article Was Jeffrey Epstein Murdered?“), prompting the widespread meme “Epstein didn’t kill himself”.

Guiffre now lives in Australia and recently gave an interview to the BBC program Panorama where she claimed that she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew in the U.S., the U.K. and on Epstein island. She also explained her first meeting with Prince Andrew which took place at the Tramp nightclub in London:

“He is the most hideous dancer I’ve ever seen in my life. His sweat was like it was raining basically everywhere. In the car Ghislaine tells me that I have to do for Andrew what I do for Jeffrey and that just made me sick.”.

Later that evening, she had sex with Prince Andrew at Maxwell’s house in Belgravia.

The interview ended with an appeal to the public:

“I implore the people in the U.K. to stand up beside me, to help me fight this fight, to not accept this as being OK. This is not some sordid sex story. This is a story of being trafficked. This is a story of abuse and this is a story of your guys’ royalty.”

Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell have categorically denied all accusations. Andrew even claimed that he was at a “pizza restaurant” the night of the alleged abuse. Strange.

Exactly Like Natacha Jaitt

Guiffre’s ominous tweet is highly reminiscent of the tweet posted by pedophile whistleblower Natasha Jaitt … a few months before her death.

In 2018, the Argentinian model accused a number of well-known public figures – including politicians, journalists, entertainers, and sports stars – of being involved in underage prostitution earlier on live TV. She is also believed to have implicated a close friend of Pope Francis in the alleged pedophile ring.

In April 2018, Jaitt posted on Tweeter a warning:

“WARNING: I am not going to commit suicide, I am not going to take too much cocaine and drown in a bath, or shoot myself. So if this happens, IT WASN’T ME. Save this tweet”

On February 23, 2019, Jaitt was found dead and naked following a house party in Buenos Aires. Local media quickly reported that Jaitt had consumed “excessive amounts of cocaine, LSD and champagne”. Autopsy results showed Jaitt suffered multiple organ failure with no sign of violence. She effectively predicted her own death and the fact that it would be blamed on drugs….

Access to Homeopathy Threatened by Latest FDA Action

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently announced a new guidance that could lead to the end of homeopathy in America in less than three months

The consequential action taken by the FDA involves the elimination of the administrative framework for homeopathy that the agency used for 30 years, one that allowed manufacturers of homeopathic remedies to thrive while ensuring the quality and purity of homeopathic medicines. We are referring to the withdrawal of Compliance Policy Guide (CPG) 400.400, which has served the industry and consumers well.

Homeopathic medicines are now in real danger. The newly revised Draft Guidance, if adopted as currently written, will be a recipe for the destruction of homeopathy as we know it in America.

Under the new guidance, ALL homeopathic medicines will be considered illegal. This is because the Draft Guidance declares all homeopathic medicines to be “new drugs” which have not undergone the agency’s pre-market approval process known as a New Drug Application (NDA). This “new drug” designation makes this new guidance particularly damning for homeopathy. Homeopathic medicines cannot be patented and therefore cannot justify the enormous expenditures that an NDA entails. If the FDA insists that a homeopathic medicine be put through the NDA process, the agency will essentially be issuing a potential  ban on that medicine in the United States.

If the Draft Guidance is adopted unchanged — and especially if the designation of all homeopathic medicines as “new drugs” is allowed to stand — consumers will likely begin to see homeopathic medicines disappear from store shelves and practitioners’ offices as the FDA takes aim at one homeopathic medicine after another.

What’s more, if the Draft Guidance is finalized, the FDA will have little trouble defending its actions in any administrative procedure or court. The danger is real because the designation of homeopathic medicines as “new drugs” makes all of them illegal, and the FDA can remove any illegal drug from the marketplace without notice and without additional justification merely because it is illegal.

It would be a simple matter for the American Institute of Homeopathy to produce evidence showing that homeopathy is extremely safe, with excellent clinical results backed by an extensive medical literature, including hundreds of clinical trials which demonstrate its safety and effectiveness.  We could also point to the very real public health emergency around antibiotic resistance and the immense potential for homeopathy to save lives as reason alone to protect homeopathy.

Sadly, none of that will matter if those who support and rely on homeopathy do not immediately unite to seek a better framework from the FDA.

If you’d like to do your part to protect your access to this extraordinary system of medicine in America, please take these steps immediately:

1. Submit a comment to the FDA docket about homeopathy telling the agency that we need a 180-day extension in order to respond adequately to the FDA’s latest proposed rules. When you’re ready to do that, click here:

2. Encourage all of your contacts, patients, and family members to also submit a comment to the docket by sending them a copy of this email.

We can and must save homeopathy in America, but we must act now.

The Board of the American Institute of Homeopathy

Such a ban would almost certainly include or grow to include all herbal or non-pharma remedies for the economic reasons outlined above.    The notion that the FDA or NIH are concerned about human health is ludicrous.   Their supposed benevolence and expertise is a form of gaslighting.  They might as well be closed down for all the “healing” they’ve inflicted on this country.

Information sharing among the peasants is a far more reliable source of medical guidance than our authority puppets, for the same reason that the american cancer society abhors any potential cure for cancer.   It would put them out of business.

‘Because You’d Be in Jail!’ The Real Reason Democrats Are Pushing Trump Impeachment?

In the time-honored tradition of Machiavellian statecraft, all of the charges being leveled against Donald Trump to remove him from office – namely, ‘abuse of power’ and ‘obstruction of congress’ –are essentially the same things the Democratic Party has been guilty of for nearly half a decade: abusing their powers in a non-stop attack on the executive branch. Is the reason because they desperately need a ‘get out of jail free’ card?

Due to the non-stop action in Washington of late, few believe that the present state of affairs between the Democrats and Donald Trump are exclusively due to a telephone call between the US leader and the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. That is only scratching the surface of a story that is practically boundless.

Back in April 2016, before Trump had become the Republican presidential nominee, talk of impeachment was already in the air.

“Donald Trump isn’t even the Republican nominee yet,” wrote Darren Samuelsohn in Politico. Yet impeachment, he noted, is “already on the lips of pundits, newspaper editorials, constitutional scholars, and even a few members of Congress.”

The timing of Samuelsohn’s article is not a little astonishing given what the Department of Justice (DOJ) had discovered just one month earlier.

In March 2016, the DOJ found that “the FBI had been employing outside contractors who had access to raw Section 702 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) data, and retained that access after their work for the FBI was completed,” as Jeff Carlson reported in The Epoch Times.

That sort of foreign access to sensitive data is highly improper and was the result of “deliberate decision-making,” according to the findings of an April 2017 FISA court ruling (footnote 69).

On April 18, 2016, then-National Security Agency (NSA) Director Adm. Mike Rogers directed the NSA’s Office of Compliance to terminate all FBI outside-contractor access. Later, on Oct. 21, 2016, the FBI and the DOJ’s National Security Division (NSD), and despite they were aware of Rogers’s actions, moved ahead anyways with a request for a FISA warrant to conduct surveillance on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The request was approved by the FISA court, which, apparently, was still in the dark about the violations.

On Oct. 26, following approval of the warrant against Page, Rogers went to the FISA court to inform them of the FBI’s non-compliance with the rules. Was it just a coincidence that at exactly this time, the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter were suddenly calling for Roger’s removal? The request was eventually rejected. The next month, in mid-November 2016 Rogers, without first notifying his superiors, flew to New York where he had a private meeting with Trump at Trump Towers.

According to the New York Times, the meeting – the details of which were never publicly divulged, but may be guessed at – “caused consternation at senior levels of the administration.”

Democratic obstruction of justice?

Then CIA Director John Brennan, dismayed about a few meetings Trump officials had with the Russians, helped to kick-start the FBI investigation over ‘Russian collusion.’ Notably, these Trump-Russia meetings occurred in December 2016, as the incoming administration was in the difficult transition period to enter the White House. The Democrats made sure they made that transition as ugly as possible.

Although it is perfectly normal for an incoming government to meet with foreign heads of state at this critical juncture, a meeting at Trump Tower between Michael Flynn, Trump’s incoming national security adviser and former Russian Ambassador to the US, Sergey Kislyak, was portrayed as some kind of cloak and dagger scene borrowed from a  John le Carré thriller.

Brennan questioning the motives behind high-level meetings between the Trump team and some Russians is strange given that the lame duck Obama administration was in the process of redialing US-Russia relations back to the Cold War days, all based on the debunked claim that Moscow handed Trump the White House on a silver platter.

In late December 2016, after Trump had already won the election, Obama slapped Russia with punitive sanctions, expelled 35 Russian diplomats and closed down two Russian facilities. Since part of Trump’s campaign platform was to mend relations with Moscow, would it not seem logical that the incoming administration would be in damage-control, doing whatever necessary to prevent relations between the world’s premier nuclear powers from degrading even more?

So if it wasn’t ‘Russian collusion’ that motivated the Democrats into action, what was it? …..

Joe Biden wouldn’t comply with Senate subpoena in Trump impeachment

Former Vice President Joe Biden confirmed Friday he would not comply with a subpoena to testify in a Senate trial of President Donald Trump.

The Democratically controlled U.S. House of Representatives impeached Trump earlier this month alleging Trump abused his presidential power by tying foreign aid approved by Congress to a politically motivated investigation into a company on which Biden’s son Hunter Biden served on the board.

Leaders in the House and Republican leaders in the GOP-controlled U.S. Senate are trying to come to terms for an impeachment trial. Biden said in early December he wouldn’t comply with a subpoena by the Senate, and confirmed that statement Friday in an interview with the Des Moines Register’s editorial board. He has not been subpoenaed, but Trump’s allies have floated the idea….

Biden Threatened Ukraine to Fire Prosecutor Investigating His Son