By Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO AOBNMM, ABIHM
Correction: The geographic location first described in this article was incorrect. These events are not occurring in American Samoa, but in Samoa, an independent territory and member of the United Nations. The correction has been made. The timeline and the actual events are the same. I apologize for the inaccuracy and for any confusion.
The speed at which the pro-vaccine forces are working to stomp out freedom of speech, freedom to learn, and freedom of choice is simply staggering. Hijacking the mainstream media and censoring all social media platforms to take complete control of the message shows how far they are willing to go to censure information not in lockstep with the Healthy People 2020 agenda. The plan is to vaccinate everyone, with few exceptions, and to eliminate even the difficult to obtain medical exemptions.
Samoa, known as Western Samoa until July 4, 1997, is a country consisting of two main islands and four smaller islands. Samoa is a sovereign state and a member of the Commonwealth of Nations and is a member of the UN. As of fall 2019, the population of Samoa is approximately 197,500 people.
For those who have – or have not – been following the travesty happening in Samoa, here is a timeline that captures the measles hysteria occurring in these far off islands:
- July 2018: Two infants died immediately after receiving the MMR vaccine
- Instead of examining the faulty vaccine or seeking to understand why the babies died, two nurses were blamed and charged with manslaughter
- They were later sentenced to five years in jail for negligently preparing the vaccines, using a muscle relaxant instead of water to reconstitute the shots
- After the incident, WHO and UNICEF estimated the Samoan vaccination rate for measles and overall immunization coverage fell from 74% to 31%
- April 2019: Samoa reinstitutes MMR vaccination
- June 2019: Robert Kennedy Jr. and Taylor Winterstein, the wife of an Australian rugby player, met in Samoa, just months before the outbreak begins
- by Oct 1: UNICEF had delivered 115,500 doses of measles vaccines and diluents
- Mid-Oct: First child reported to have died from measles
- Nov 15: The Government of Samoa officially declares a state of emergency over measles
- Nov 26: A national Measles Vaccination Campaign begins, using mobile outreach vaccination teams and special vaccine booths
- Nov 30: An additional 100,000 doses of MMR shipped from New Zealand.
- Dec 1: Facilitated via social media, 200 packages of vitamins, probiotics, and superfoods are sent to Samoa. Individuals given “alternative” treatment of vitamin C and vitamin A recover.
- Dec 5-6: Door-to-Door vaccination begins. Every man, woman, and child was ordered to receive an MMR vaccination, regardless of previous infection or vaccination status. Only the police and mobile vaccination teams were allowed on public roads.
- Dec 5: The UN calls for more social media censorship to “protect the public.”
- Dec 6: Those who voiced an anti-vax sentiment or wished to provide holistic care were threatened or jailed.
- Samoa’s most prominent activist, Edwin Tamasese, was arrested by police for discouraging conventional medical treatments such as antibiotics and paracetamol (a Tylenol-equivalent).
- Dec 6: The Prime Minister requested US$10.7 million from the UN for training and surveillance against future measles outbreaks.
So, let’s sum up and review this timeline. There are certainly unanswered questions:
According to ReliefWeb, UNICEF delivered a total of 115,500 doses of measles vaccines to Samoa since October 1, including the required diluent, syringes and safety boxes, as well as sufficient supplies of Vitamin A. Vaccinations started, with the first death from measles occurs on October 15. Within a month, hundreds of cases of measles were reported and the government declared an emergency on November 15, leading to mass vaccination of everyone, irrespective of age, vaccination status or previous recovery. And then, the government requested USD$10.7M from the UN to prevent “future outbreaks.”
- Now that everyone has been vaccinated, or revaccinated, including adults, another outbreak should not happen for at least the next ten or so years, right?
- And why did they need 215,000 doses of measles vaccine when the entire population of the country is less than 198,000 and the population of Samoan children, aged 0 to 5 years (which would be given two doses of MMR) is only 22,555?
- And why do they need all that money after-the-fact?
The book, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals written by Saul Alinsky, was published in 1971. The 10 rules he puts forth for ‘community activism’ have been used by many modern politicians to guide their socialist aspirations. Alinsky’s Rule #9 is “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”
Capitalizing on this rule in 2011, Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, expanded on this premise by saying, “First of all, what I said was, never allow a good crisis to go to waste when it’s an opportunity to do things that you had never considered, or that you didn’t think were possible.”
Could armies of vaccinators have been mobilized to innoculate an entire country over two days if were it not for instituting an overwhelming fear of measles?
Certainly, measles is being portrayed as an infection more deadly than rabies. Much has been written about how measles went from a common, rite-of-passage infection to an uncommon rash and fever after the introduction of the MMR vaccine in 1963.
But when the MMR vaccine became accepted as a routine part of childhood, along with the administration of many more vaccines – the current schedule includes 69 doses of 16 vaccines – rather than accepting an occasional outbreak of infection, eradication of these pathogens became the goal. Radical responses to a few cases of a so-called vaccine-preventable illness have become the norm.
Alinsky’s Rule #9 is used effectively with each reported case. And the general community falls for the hysteria every time.
As for not letting a good crisis go to waste? The WHO declared “anti-vaxxers” to be one of the top 10 global health threats in 2019. Now, every opportunity to create chaos and blame the unvaccinated for an outbreak, regardless of size, is capitalized on by the CDC, WHO, UNICEF, and of course, GAVI.
Vitamin A instead of Vaccination
Outbreaks of vaccine-preventable infections draw a lot of attention. The media whips the population into a frenzy. Dramatic mass vaccination campaigns are initiated. Global organizations launch offensives. Proclamations are made. Deaths are magnified and those who recover uneventfully are ignored.
The problem is, it takes at least 10 days from the time a vaccine is administered for an antibody response to develop. The antibody is the end-game of vaccination, performed to ostensibly to protect from illness and prevent viral spreading. That’s about the same length of time it takes for measles, and most other viral infections, to run its course. By the time everyone is vaccinated, the natural outbreak is mostly over. But, of course, mass vaccination is given the credit for bringing the crisis under control.
Scientific evidence abounds that children who are given vitamin A before or during an episode of measles have a less severe course and recover more quickly. The potential benefit of vitamin A therapy for measles was first reported in 1932. Even 26 years ago, in 1993, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the WHO and UNICEF advocated for giving vitamin A to children who were experiencing measles. This full-text article describes the following:
Several recent investigations have indicated that vitamin A given to children with measles in developing countries has been associated with reductions in morbidity and mortality. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) issued a joint statement recommending that vitamin A be administered to all children diagnosed with measles in communities where vitamin A deficiency (serum vitamin A less than 10 µg/dL) is a recognized problem and where mortality related to measles is greater than 1%.
The WHO explained to doctors – in detail – how to clinically identify a vitamin A deficiency without blood testing:
One of the most common signs of vitamin A deficiency are ophthalmologic (eye) signs which include: night blindness, Bitot’s spots, grayish-white deposits on the conjunctiva next to the cornea, and xerophthalmia (extremely dry eyes).
Leaving nothing to chance, the WHO gives specific dosage regimens for vitamin A deficiency during measles:
The recommended regimen is 100,000 IU by mouth at the time of diagnosis for infants younger than 12 months of age, and 200,000 IU for older children. The dose should be repeated in 24 hours and again 4 weeks later. There is little concern about vitamin A toxicity until the cumulative dose is greater than 1,000,000 IU, which is only seen when high doses are taken over several weeks.
The WHO is so aware of the significant health issues associated with vitamin A deficiency and its consequences, that it recommends giving two rounds of high-dose vitamin A supplementation per year prophylactically to significantly reduce mortality and morbidity in areas where measles is endemic. The periodic supply of vitamin A has proven to reduce mortality by up to 23% overall, and by up to 50% in acute cases.
For the last twenty years, UNICEF has also advocated an annual vitamin A supplementation program in 80 countries for children up to 5 years of age, and even states in its vitamin A publication, “It is inexcusable that vitamin A deficiency is still contributing to the loss of children’s lives.”
Each dose consists of two drops of concentrated, high-dose retinol costing less than USD$0.04. In very poor countries, even that cost is underwritten by the WHO or UNICEF. These annual campaigns are advocated to reduce the incidence of childhood diarrheal disease and measles. Most importantly, vitamin A supplementation can improve a child’s chance of survival by 12 to 24 percent.
Given this information on vitamin A, was the UN lax in its global health agenda? Were Samoan children provided the twice-annual vitamin A supplement recommended by the WHO and UNICEF? Are the unvaccinated really the cause of the deaths within this outbreak, or was it the lack of vitamin A that lead to a crisis that has been capitalized on by the mainstream for the benefit of the pro-vaccine agenda? Could this travesty have been avoided by giving a pennies-a-day supplement over the last several years? Could the USD$10.7million flowing into Samoa be a form of blood money?
I hope the answers to these questions – and many more – will be forthcoming over the next several months. I also hope that reports of vaccine-injured children – and adults – will not be the next epidemic arising from Samoa.
Malnutrition + live measles vaccine = severe measles and sometimes death. See bottom.
12/18/2019 – Originally posted on Facebook by the Savali Newspaper
THE “LAW OF LOVE”
By Nanai Taofiga Laveitiga Tuiletufuga & RNZ
From next month, it will be compulsory for every child in Samoa to be vaccinated against measles when they reach the eligible age of six months. [RNZ]
It’s now a binding law, vaccination for any Samoan child from birth is compulsory as prescribed by the Infants Amendment Bill 2019 passed by Parliament yesterday.
Calling the Bill – O le Tulafono ole Alofa, (Law of Love) the Prime Minister Tuilaepa Sailele Malielegaoi says that Government has decided to have their concerns addressed in and by the highest decision making authority of the land – Parliament.
And its Government’s response to the measles outbreak and insurance that Samoa will not be left vulnerable to any future epidemics.
The legislation has far reaching consequences bringing together a number of key government sectors and the community stakeholders to play a leading role in the execution and implementation of the new law which comes with stiff fines as well as denying any child who does not meet the requirement an education.
“Government will no longer be standing on the side lines,” says the Prime Minister in tabling the legislation that includes amendments to the Infants Ordinance 1961, the Education Act 2009, the Village Fono Act 1990, the Internal Affairs Act 1995, and the Ministry of Women Affairs Act 1990.
And by incorporating amendments from the five different legislations, it speaks audible volumes to the Government’s message that they mean serious business.Paramount to Government is to ensure a whole of society approach to, and a holistic implementation of this policy, the relevant laws are also amended.
For instance, it is now mandatory for parents or carers to ensure their child is vaccinated from birth.
Non-compliance attracts a penalty of up to $10,000.
But that is just the tip of the iceberg. The Bill now requires a certified copy of a complete, vaccination and immunisation record of a child from birth, is now a prerequisite for school enrolment.
Failure to provide this certified copy of a complete, vaccination and immunisation record of a child from birth, means the child cannot be accepted in a school (primary or secondary).
And parents or carers should also take note because if they willfully or recklessly provides false information in lieu of a certified copy of a complete, vaccination and immunization record of a child from birth, they are liable to a fine up to $10,000.
School Principals will also suffer similar repercussions should they accept a child for enrolment without the fulfilment of the prerequisite of a certified copy of a complete, vaccination and immunisation record of a child from birth. The fine is up to $10,000.
And it is a must for all schools, whether government, church, private or village, early childhood education centres to have vaccination policies that complies with the Ministry of Health requirements.
For those schools which have registered before the commencement of the Education Act 2009, they have 6 months to produce a policy. Failure to do so, may be a ground for de-registration.
Village Councils are now required by law to develop health related policies, including vaccination and immunisation policies.
In addition, effective 1st January 2020, it will be the duty of the Sui o le Nuu or Sui o le Malo, to require the vaccination and immunisation of children born in respect of his village, pursuant to the requirements of the Ministry of Health, and to develop a system to monitor and ensure this is carried out. The law binding mandate also applies to the respective Sui Tamaitai o le Nuu,
And yesterday Parliament endorsed the “Law of Love” with little fuss.
When presented with a choice between improving public sanitation and nutrition (the real reason for the huge reduction in infections and mortality during the 20th century) vs profiting from chronic vaccine-induced illness in a malnourished, filth-ridden and dwindling population, laboring under fake IMF debt austerity and carbon taxes, which option would you expect our satanic overlords to choose? This is a no brainer. And why not if the peasants accept it?
Immunization is a global health and development success story, saving millions of lives every year. We now have vaccines to prevent more than 20 life-threatening diseases, helping people of all ages live longer, healthier lives. Immunization is the foundation of the primary health care system and an indisputable human right. It’s also one of the best health investments money can buy. Yet despite tremendous progress, far too many people around the world – including nearly 20 million infants each year – have insufficient access to vaccines. In some countries, progress has stalled or even reversed, and there is a real risk that complacency will undermine past achievements.
With the support of countries and partners, WHO is leading the co-creation of a new global vision and strategy to address these challenges over the next decade, to be endorsed by the World Health Assembly. IA 2030 envisions a world where everyone, everywhere, at every age, fully benefits from vaccines to improve health and well-being….
Dr. Judy Mikovits is a modern-day Rosalind Franklin, a brilliant researcher shaking up the old boys’ club of science with her groundbreaking discoveries. And like many women who have trespassed into the world of men, she uncovered decades-old secrets that many would prefer to stay buried.
From her doctoral thesis, which changed the treatment of HIV-AIDS, saving the lives of millions, including basketball great Magic Johnson, to her spectacular discovery of a new family of human retroviruses, and her latest research which points to a new golden age of health, Dr. Mikovits has always been on the leading edge of science.
With the brilliant wit one might expect if Erin Brockovich had a doctorate in molecular biology, Dr. Mikovits has seen the best and worst of science. When she was part of the research community that turned HIV-AIDS from a fatal disease into a manageable one, she saw science at its best. But when her investigations questioned whether the use of animal tissue in medical research were unleashing devastating plagues of chronic diseases, such as autism and chronic fatigue syndrome, she saw science at its worst. If her suspicions are correct, we are looking at a complete realignment of scientific practices, including how we study and treat human disease.
Recounting her nearly four decades in science, including her collaboration of more than thirty-five years with Dr. Frank Ruscetti, one of the founders of the field of human retrovirology, this is a behind the scenes look at the issues and egos which will determine the future health of humanity.
The comments under this video are worth reading. One woman wrote,
“I am a person with a scientific background. I have been warning about this for 15 years, or more. This is a wonderful interview.. a real knowledge of RNA DNA.. and what these Devil’s are doing to the babies and the rest of us.. Thank you.”
One has to wonder how much money it would take for the New York Fed to throw at Wall Street before the New York Times reports to its readers on the biggest Wall Street bailout by the Fed since the financial crisis.
Last Thursday, December 12, the New York Fed announced that over the next month it would shower the trading houses (primary dealers) on Wall Street with a total of $2.93 trillion in short-term loans. The money is for a Wall Street liquidity crisis that has yet to be explained in credible terms to the American people and yet the New York Times does not appear to have an investigative reporter assigned to investigate what’s really going on just 11 years after those same trading houses blew themselves up in the biggest financial crash since the Great Depression and took the U.S. economy along for the ride.
The New York Fed’s repo (repurchase agreement) loan program began on September 17 when repo loan rates spiked from approximately 2 percent to 10 percent – meaning either liquid funds were not available to loan or the mega banks on Wall Street were backing away from lending to certain counterparties. Repo loans are typically between banks, hedge funds and money market funds on an overnight basis and are made against good-quality collateral. Since that time, the New York Fed has been making these loans to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars weekly.
The New York Times covered the subject in September. Then an eerie silence took hold in October and November as the Fed continued to pump out over $3 trillion in cumulative loans to Wall Street’s trading houses. On December 8 and December 12, the New York Times simply ran articles by Reuters on the Fed’s loans, which are the first of their kind since the financial crisis. Continue reading New York Fed Plans to Throw $2.93 Trillion at Wall Street’s Trading Houses Over Next Month as NYT Remains Silent