What Were Robespierre’s Pronouns?

We often make historical parallels here. History doesn’t repeat itself but it does rhyme, as clever people say. And sometimes it hiccups. Here is a hiccup.

We start with the moral and political catastrophe that was the French Revolution. It was more a nationwide psychotic break than a revolt—a great nation at its own throat, swept by a spirit not only of regicide but suicide. For 10 years they simply enjoyed killing each other. They could have done what England was doing—a long nonviolent revolution, a gradual diminution of the power of king and court, an establishment of the rights of the people and their legislators so that the regent ended up a lovely person on a stamp. Instead they chose blood. Scholars like to make a distinction between the Revolution and the Terror that followed, but “the Terror was merely 1789 with a higher body count.” From the Storming of the Bastille onward, “it was apparent that violence was not just an unfortunate side effect. . . . It was the Revolution’s source of collective energy. It was what made the Revolution revolutionary.”

That is from Simon Schama’s masterpiece “Citizens,” his history of the revolution published in 1989, its 200th anniversary. It is erudite, elegant and heroically nonideological.

John Adams, across the sea in America, quickly understood what was happening in France and voiced alarm. In contrast his old friend Thomas Jefferson egged on the revolution and lent it his moral prestige. Faced with news of the guillotines, he reverted to abstractions. He was a genius with a true if hidden seam of malice, and rarely overconcerned with the suffering of others.

The revolution had everything—a ruling class that was clumsy, decadent, inert; a pathetic king, a queen beyond her depth, costly wars, monstrous debt, an impervious and unreformable administrative state, a hungry populace. The task of the monarchy was to protect the poor, but the king had “abdicated this protective role.” Instead of ensuring grain supplies at a reasonable price, Mr. Schama notes, the government committed itself to the new modern principle of free trade: “British textiles had been let into France, robbing Norman and Flemish spinners and weavers of work.” They experienced it as “some sort of conspiracy against the People.”

One does see parallels. But they’re not what I mean.

It was a revolution largely run by sociopaths. One, Robespierre, the “messianic schoolmaster,” saw it as an opportunity for the moral instruction of the nation. Everything would be politicized, no part of the citizen’s life left untouched. As man was governed by an “empire of images,” in the words of a Jacobin intellectual, the new régime would provide new images to shape new thoughts. There would be pageants, and new names for things. They would change time itself! The first year of the new Republic was no longer 1792, it was Year One. To detach farmers from their superstitions, their Gregorian calendar and its saints’ days, they would rename the months. The first month would be in the fall, named for the harvest. There would be no more weeks, just three 10-day periods each month.

So here is our parallel, our hiccup. I thought of all this this week because I’ve been thinking about the language and behavioral directives that have been coming at us from the social and sexual justice warriors who are renaming things and attempting to control the language in America.

There is the latest speech guide from the academy, the Inclusive Communications Task Force at Colorado State University. Don’t call people “American,” it directs: “This erases other cultures.” Don’t say a person is mad or a lunatic, call him “surprising/wild” or “sad.” “Eskimo,” “freshman” and “illegal alien” are out. “You guys” should be replaced by “all/folks.” Don’t say “male” or “female”; say “man,” “woman” or “gender non-binary.”…..

https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-were-robespierres-pronouns-11564095088

  1. When major universities (i.e. social engineering central of the empire) claim a sudden concern for universal inclusion and human rights, check your wallet.
  2. When such concerns converge on a supposed desire to tear down the empire itself, check your belief system.   There are cracks in the foundation.
  3. When the same banner is taken up and carried by the ultimate WMD, the genocidal media of the empire itself, better check on your children.    The implications for their future are nightmarish.

The psychopathic luciferian elite have no nationality, no ideology and certainly no  humanity.   They wear such disguises like a mailed fist wears a velvet glove.  All they have is money and lots of it.   Enough to market social movements to people who are too young or distracted to see the historical patterns.

Everything you were taught about the world is wrong.   Seriously.   There are invisible threads of control which puppet virtually every institution to one degree or another, mostly by blackmail, sometimes by bribes, threats, murder or intergenerationally-imposed mind control.

Even diehard atheists would be hard pressed to deny this quote from the bible:

For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.  Ephesians 6:12

“Motivation” is normally associated with individuals, corporations or nations, and (usually) acts in some way to service or perpetuate such entities.   But there is an entity which transcends all of these, which is accountable to none of them, not even to its human puppets.   The central banking cabal.    And its “mind” is totally colonized by a motivation which will ultimately destroy them, it, and possibly the rest of us as well.

Culturecide: Sweden May Use Police to Force Homeschoolers into Public School

Cultural Engineering in Sweden

Cultural Engineering the USA: Migration of Honduran Refugees from US Corporate Plunder

Mind Control on the Left

error

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.