Of course there are good people in government just as there are good people in medicine, but that’s not who’s actually in control. The cult-like behavior arises with the delegation of personal responsibility for ones’ own actions. Much easier to trust autority.
Independent journalist Tim Pool was leaked an email showing Slate journo April Glaser appearing to threaten Chase Bank with negative press if they don’t deplatform the right-wing activist group The Proud Boys….
Pool’s analysis was on the money. The key line is Glaser saying: “The Proud Boys are designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a hate group and members have engaged in group violence in Portland and New York City.”…
Does it ever occur to starry eyed “liberals” how easy it would be for social manipulators to create a self-described “authority” on “hate groups” and call it “mom and apple pie law center” or some other such gibberish? As far as I can tell the SPLC is an intelligence operation which has been connected with the OKC false flag bombing via deployed agents at elohim city. Who knows who controls them, but the most direct source of information about any given group such as those targeted by SPLC is obviously that group itself. But lazy people tend to follow the leader, and they often resort to short-circuiting the political process by undermining cash flows to targeted groups. Usually this is associated with a lack of integrity and a total ignorance of the issues in question.
I know nothing about the “proud boys” but if I had the time I’d start with their very accessible web site at http://proudboysusa.com/ .
After skimming the home page I have misgivings about their “camouflage” logo and apparent ignorance of the history of western foreign and financial policy in the “3rd world”, but that’s just my opinion and you’re welcome to yours. You see, I actually believe in freedom and democracy because I trust the intelligence of informed, independent human beings, unlike the control freaks who write “history” books and have seemingly taken over the “left.”
Engineering mass ignorance in order to orchestrate conflict between otherwise like-minded groups is a major tool of social control. Of course this applies to both SPLC and TPB. As always, try to follow the money, although that’s increasingly difficult: http://www.fortune.com/2018/07/17/irs-nonprofit-donor-disclosures/
Here’s a very brief and narrow but relevant introduction to western foreign policy:
And something else related:
Why would taxpayer-funded “officials” want to restrict american’s human rights based on false pretexts like 9/11? Because “public safety” is a cover story for another agenda.
E-Verify is the federal government’s attempt to create an electronic national identification system. It is capable of checking government databases to verify information—often including a photo—on every U.S. resident. Right now, the system monitors only employment and is only mandatory in some states, ostensibly to deter illegal immigration, but nothing would prevent lawmakers from expanding E-Verify to monitor identity or legal status in any other domain and restrict access based on other criteria they want.
Numerous federal, state, and local laws already require people to identify themselves or prove their immigration status, and lawmakers continue to propose many additional laws. The more areas that E-Verify is used to monitor, the more it will create a digital record of Americans’ lives—a record that lawmakers can draw upon to add further requirements for access to jobs, health care, banks, gun sales, housing, and much else.
Once E-Verify becomes fully mandatory for employment nationwide, proponents will seek to use it to enforce other laws. In 2015, the GOP-controlled House Judiciary Committee even voted down an amendment to a mandatory E-Verify bill that would have banned using E-Verify for purposes other than employment. This is a harbinger that the E-Verify system, if mandated federally, could be used to monitor much more than just American’s employment choices. Congress would need only make a few tweaks to the system to make it serviceable for other goals beyond jobs.
Here are a few likely targets:…
Ultimately, E-Verify doesn’t identify illegal immigrants very well at all, and its errors already harmed hundreds of thousands of legal workers attempting to obtain jobs. But the problem with E-Verify is more fundamental. It is the first-step toward a permission-slip society. Creating the infrastructure that is capable of not only monitoring but instantly restricting access to all manner of private activities will hand the government power to control the lives of Americans in ways otherwise unimaginable.
Once E-Verify use becomes ubiquitous, the federal government (and perhaps state and local governments as well) would have the power to shut down people’s lives overnight for almost any reason. A flip of switch could stop their access to jobs, housing, bank accounts, driver’s licenses, and transportation. No free society should stand for such control.
It’s very strange how any political group can be steered to support or condemn any particular political position simply by manipulating cash flows and PR spins. This isn’t the “left” that I once knew. It’s been adopted by the bankers.
Whatever you think about Trump, the genocidal media’s treatment of him should certainly raise eyebrows, especially in the context of Obama’s largely unknown over-the-top prosecutions of whistleblowers and covert legislative manipulations to favor criminal bankers and the police state. His teflon suit spoke volumes about secret alliances in the establishment. Such covert alliances and their media PR orifices are the real toxic power in washington.
(Natural News) In response to a coordinated, heavily-funded smear campaign against Natural News and myself, the Health Ranger, Facebook has now permanently banned Natural News from posting content. The channel name that has been banned is Facebook.com/healthranger, which was our primary channel reaching over 2.5 million people.
This is on top of the permanent bans of Natural News content from Twitter, YouTube, Pinterest, Google News, Apple and other techno-fascists that now represent the greatest threat to human freedom the world has ever seen.
The techno-fascists, including Wikipedia, have decided that no speech that questions any official narrative will be allowed on any platform. Anyone who questions the safety of toxic vaccines, 5G cell towers, geoengineering, chemotherapy or glyphosate weed killer chemicals is now maliciously attacked, smeared and de-platformed. You’re not even allowed now to talk about nutrition, anti-cancer foods or nutritional supplements without being labeled a “vitamin” website accused of pushing fake cures. (That’s right: The left-wing authoritarian tyrants are now anti-nutrition on top of everything else.)
Every website or individual who expresses any view of dissent against the corrupt scientific establishment is immediately labeled “fake news,” even as the left-wing media routinely pushed total fabrications about President Trump and anyone who supports Trump.
As I have repeatedly pointed out, the tech giants and their CEOs are truly enemies of humanity.
Remember: As all this censorship is taking place, the tech giants somehow claim they aren’t censoring anyone at all. They claim to have a monopoly on “facts” or “truth” and proclaim themselves to have the King’s unique right to decide who gets to speak and who must be silenced. These criminals like Zuckerberg, Dorsey and Cook are un-elected, subject to zero transparency and offer no mechanism for due process whereby channels who are banned might defend themselves against unfair, dishonest smears or fake news attacks run by left-wing journo-terrorism hacks.
In essence, the entire internet is now run by the most lawless evil war criminals imaginable, and they have zero respect for human rights, human dignity or free speech.
I have posted a video response to the Facebook ban on Brighteon.com, the video platform we created following YouTube’s de-platforming of natural health and conservative channels.
The Internet was originally promoted as a completely free and uncensored mechanism for people everywhere to exchange views and communicate, but it has been observed by many users that that is not really true anymore. Both governments and the service providers have developed a taste for controlling the product, with President Barack Obama once considering a “kill switch“ that would turn off the Internet completely in the event of a “national emergency.”
President Donald Trump has also had a lot to say about fake news and is reported to be supporting limiting protections relating to the Internet. In May, a “net neutrality” bill that would have prevented service providers from manipulating Internet traffic passed in the House of Representatives, but it is reported to be “dead on arrival” in the Senate, so it will never be enacted.
Social networking sites have voluntarily employed technical fixes that restrict some content and have also hired “reviewers” who look for objectionable material and remove it. Pending European legislation, meanwhile, might require Internet search engines to eliminate access to many unacceptable old posts. YouTube has already been engaged in deleting existing old material and is working with biased “partners” like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to set up guidelines to restrict future content. Many users of Facebook will have already undoubtedly noted that some contacts have been blocked temporarily (or even permanently) and denied access to the site….
There are alternatives to fb based on the diaspora open source social networking platform such as https://share.naturalnews.com . http://gab.com also has a reputation for non-censorship. But to the degree the population converges on a “favorite” business like fb or walmart, we’re vulnerable to social control via spontaneously created monopolies.