Ongoing Catastrophe at Southern Border

A medical professional on the border in Texas told Big League Politics that the crisis is reaching fever pitch, with three individuals now quarantined at a privately-owned hospital in El Paso with an unknown disease. The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has not even been able to identify the disease the three migrants have, as the military guards the quarantine area.

“There were some Congolese people caught crossing the border, it was suspected they had Ebola. In one facility there are three patients being held because they don’t know what they have. The CDC have been here to assess them. They are isolated, they only have certain specialists who can see them,” the medical professional tells Big League Politics.

“We’ve had an outbreak of mumps over here.”

“What scares me is what happens if someone comes over here with Ebola. We only need one person, and there’s a pandemic.”

“There was a female, 10 years old, who was found with 20 different types of semen inside her body. She was dispatched to a family member. The girl who was with her who was supposedly a family member was not really a family member, just someone who bought her from her family in Guatemala. These are real problems that exist here on the border. There are some people who are trying to leave jugs of water out here for them. A lot of these people come to this country needing help,” the professional stated.

Migrants are obtaining “Rent-A-Kids,” and since Border Patrol cannot perform DNA tests to determine if children are related to adults most of the human traffickers get into our country.

“In Juarez, there is a huge influx of Cubans right now. They have taken over the streets and started a prostitution ring among them. The Cubans cannot cross here. If they have Cuban citizenship, they cannot cross here.”

“There are a lot of people who come here from El Salvador, Guatemala who are in acute renal failure, they cannot walk. There are some who have come with cirrhosis of the liver. I’ve seen some patients who are almost at the point of dying with the cirrhosis that they have,” the medical professional stated. “The time and resources it takes up to treat them is massive.”,,,

Renal failure is associated with roundup exposure.  Glyphosate is a strong chelator and it’s combined with heavy metals in roundup which are toxic to the kidneys.   How could this possibly be an accident?

Roundup Killing Kidneys in Central America, India, Sri Lanka

Roundup Killing Kidneys in Central America, India, Sri Lanka

Facing political opposition and questions about its scientific evidence, Sri Lanka’s government has placed on hold its decision to ban the top-selling Monsanto herbicide glyphosate based on the weed killer’s alleged role in a deadly epidemic of kidney disease.

The delay represents a setback to efforts by some scientists and health officials, primarily in Sri Lanka and El Salvador, to remove the herbicide for its potential link to the mysterious kidney disease that has killed tens of thousands of agricultural workers.

Monsanto, other agrochemical producers and Sri Lankan officials, including Registrar of Pesticides Anura Wijesekara, have pushed back, noting that the ban rests on a theory that has not been proven.

“It is an interesting hypothesis, but we don’t have any evidence for it,” said Dr. Wijesekara, a consistent skeptic of curbs on agrichemicals. Banning glyphosate, he said, “will affect the tea plantations and also the [rice] paddy cultivation drastically.”

For more than two years, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists has examined a rare form of kidney disease devastating agricultural workers in Central America, Sri Lanka and India. Scientists suspect the malady is caused by a combination of factors including chronic dehydration from hard labor in tropical heat, and exposure to toxins such as pesticides.

As death tolls mount, the disease’s origins have yet to be fully uncovered. Now, the search for a cause has triggered a scientific back-and-forth spanning continents, with potential international repercussions.

On March 12, a Sri Lankan minister announced that President Mahinda Rajapaksa, after receiving a scientific report that “revealed that kidney disease was mainly caused by glyphosate,” was banning the herbicide. The decision followed publication of a scientific paper that laid out a new theory attributing widespread kidney failure among farmers to the popular herbicide. The study did not include new scientific data; its authors say they have original data supporting their conclusion, and are working to publish that information.

Since the announcement, Sri Lanka’ government-sponsored Pesticide Technical Committee, Monsanto and agrochemical industry groups have objected – and the ban has been placed on hold. Officials opposing the ban are seeking further meetings with the president, according to a report in the Sri Lankan daily The Island.

The office of Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa has not responded to interview requests.

The glyphosate theory

Sri Lanka is not the first country to target glyphosate for its alleged role in chronic kidney disease. El Salvador’s Legislative Assembly approved a ban on 53 agrichemicals including glyphosate last year, but it was not signed into law by the country’s president.

Recently Sri Lanka has drawn international attention for singling out glyphosate as a cause of the epidemic, based largely on a theory presented by the scientist Channa Jayasumana.

Under Dr. Jayasumana’s hypothesis, glyphosate bonds with toxic heavy metals in the environment such as cadmium and arsenic, forming stable compounds that are consumed in food and water and do not break down until reaching victims’ kidneys. A study in Sri Lanka by the World Health Organization detected both cadmium and glyphosate, as well as other pesticides and heavy metals, in the environment of endemic areas, and in kidney patients’ urine.

The missing step, contends Jayasumana, is the compound formed by glyphosate and one or more heavy metals. He notes that glyphosate was initially patented as a chelating agent, a substance useful in industrial processes for its ability to form strong chemical bonds with metals.

“Glyphosate acts as a carrier or a vector of these heavy metals to the kidney,” Jayasumana told ICIJ in March.

Monsanto disputes the idea that glyphosate is uniquely suited to bond with heavy metals. “There is no evidence that glyphosate complexes effectively with arsenic, cadmium, or other nephrotoxic metals,” said Monsanto’s Director of Corporate Affairs Thomas Helscher. “Glyphosate is actually a relatively poor chelator for heavy metals when compared to pharmacological chelation agents.”

Yet glyphosate does form strong bonds with heavy metals, according to scientists and academic studies consulted by ICIJ.

Glyphosate is a highly versatile chelator because its molecule includes three different chemical groups capable of bonding with metals. Studies indicate that it forms strong bonds with heavy metals including calcium, manganese and iron. A study by Monsanto using computer modeling found that glyphosate is a less potent chelator for these metals than certain compounds found within plants, but it is unclear how this applies to glyphosate’s interactions with the broader environment.

Paul Capel, a hydrologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, said glyphosate formed stronger bonds with metals than those formed by other herbicides. “As far as I know, there are no other common herbicides that would have this same sort of strength of interactions with metals,” Capel said.

There is less scientific data regarding glyphosate’s capacity to bond with cadmium or arsenic. One study indicated that glyphosate does form strong bonds with cadmium, and Capel said that based on glyphosate’s chemical structure, it was likely to bond with cadmium and its strength if binding to arsenic is unknown.

Disputed evidence

An even more fundamental issue is raised by Jayasumana’s research: Proving the existence of the glyphosate-heavy metal compounds said to be at fault.

Jayasumana’s paper proposes a possible structure for such a compound, and says his team’s preliminary tests of well water used by kidney patients in Sri Lanka found glyphosate with high levels of calcium and other metals. The paper does not describe finding a compound containing cadmium or arsenic, the metals thought to be at fault, and data from the tests has yet to be published.

Jayasumana said his team has found the key compound in its lab tests, and plans to publish its findings. “We experimentally detected [the compound] in drinking water samples, some food items and in urine samples of CKDu patients,” Jayasumana said.

Sri Lanka pesticide official Wijesekara points to another flaw in the glyphosate theory, in his assessment: He maintains that glyphosate did not become popular in Sri Lanka until the late 1990s, after the onset of the epidemic, and that it was not until 2003 or 2004 that it became the leading herbicide in the affected regions.

“At the beginning of the disease, glyphosate was not there in the [rice] paddy fields,” Wijesekara said. “All the paddy farmers used paraquat at that time.”

Jayasumana disputes this point, saying glyphosate has been available in the affected areas of Sri Lanka since the 1980s.

His results – and Sri Lanka’s decision of whether to go forward with banning the world’s top-selling herbicide – will have repercussions beyond the island’s borders.

El Salvador recently elected a new president, Salvador Sánchez-Cerén, and proponents of the pesticide ban passed by El Salvador’s legislature last year hope the former guerilla commander will sign a prohibition into law. President-elect Sánchez-Cerén’s office did not respond to ICIJ’s inquiries.

In Brazil, a prosecutor recently requested a ban on glyphosate and other agrichemicals because he said the government had not fully reviewed their health and safety effects. Prosecutor Anselmo Lopes of Brazil’s Federal District told ICIJ that his request was unrelated to chronic kidney disease among agricultural workers, which has not been reported in Brazil.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said it is now engaged in a registration review process for glyphosate, but has “not seen any pattern of kidney health effects” in its study of scientific literature. The U.S., like Brazil, has not had reports of unexplained kidney failure among agricultural workers. The EPA said it would act promptly if urgent public health risks emerged.

Monsanto’s Roundup Linked to Fatal Kidney Disease Epidemic

Monsanto Roundup Contains Arsenic, other Toxins: Alarming New Research Study

Glyphosate, Hard Water and Nephrotoxic Metals: Are They the Culprits Behind the Epidemic of Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Etiology in Sri Lanka?

Trojan Horse: Monsanto’s Roundup is MUCH Worse than Glyphosate

Farmers Spraying Crops with Arsenic, Chromium, Cobalt, Lead & Glyphosate Just Before Harvest

GMO BT corn may also be involved

Judicial Watch Sues CIA for IG Report on Mena, Arkansas Airport Drug, Arms Smuggling Allegations

Judicial Watch chief investigative reporter Micah Morrison has written extensively on the activities surrounding the Mena airport. In an October 18, 1994, editorial feature for The Wall Street Journal titled “The Mena Coverup” Morrison wrote: “What do Bill Clinton and Oliver North have in common, along with the Arkansas State Police and the Central Intelligence Agency? All probably wish they had never heard of Mena.”

Morrison noted that Seal, who by 1984 was a DEA informant, “flew at least one sting operation to Nicaragua for the CIA.” Seal was murdered in 1986 by Colombian hitmen in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

“The CIA has for over 20 years stonewalled the release of information now sought by Judicial Watch on the Mena Airport controversy,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.


AFP: Italy arrests 18 for allegedly brainwashing and selling children

A new business model for the CPS racket:

Italian police have arrested 18 people including a mayor, doctors and social workers for allegedly brainwashing vulnerable children into thinking their parents had abused them so they could then be sold to foster parents.

Police in the northern city of Reggio Emilia made the arrests after an investigation started in 2018 revealed an alleged network of carers who used methods including electroshock to make the children believe they had been sexually abused.

The network then allegedly gave the children to foster families in exchange for cash, while keeping gifts and letters sent to the children by their real parents hidden in a warehouse that was discovered by police.

The alleged abuse was reported by Italian media and confirmed to AFP by police in Bibbiano, near Reggio Emilia, on Thursday.

“These accusations, if confirmed, are frightening and shocking,” Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte said at the G20 meeting in Japan.

The accused include psychotherapists working for a social work association in Moncalieri, near Turin, and the mayor of Bibbiano.

To brainwash the children, those arrested allegedly forged child-like drawings with sexual connotations and used electroshock therapy as a “little memory machine” to create fake abuse memories, while the therapists are accused of dressing up as “wicked” children’s story characters.

The probe codenamed “Angels and Demons” revealed a scheme to “pass off as a model welfare system for abused minors what was in reality an illegal business to the children’s detriment,” La Repubblica newspaper reported.

“According to investigators, the aim of the arrested group was to take children away from families in difficult social situations and to give them, for money, to other parents,” said the Corriere della Sera newspaper.

Some of the foster parents have been accused of sexually abusing the children they paid money for, La Repubblica reported.

Police declined to say how many children were involved, or of what age.

Hundreds of thousands of euros were involved, Italian media reported.

I suppose it’s predictable that they’re still using the word “therapy” for terrorizing and brain damaging children with electricity.   It’s hard to get over the medical mystique, but it’s no more theraputic when it’s done in a “hospital” than when they do it in back alleys.   In any case, this lucrative business model demonstrates the massive profits to be made by joining the satanic plague, as well as the vulnerability of governmental structures to this social infection.

Flagrant Medical Child Abuse and Quackery on Display

Interview with Mind Control Victim Used to Blackmail Politicians as a Child

Health Outcomes of Fully Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Children

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has repeatedly asked CDC to create studies which explain, “How do child health outcomes compare between fully vaccinated and unvaccinated children?”

During a November 2012 Congressional hearing on autism before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Dr. Coleen Boyle, the Director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, gave evasive answers to lawmakers pressing her on this point. After considerable badgering, she finally stated, “We have not studied vaccinated versus unvaccinated [children].” That was perjury.

Boyle knew that CDC had commissioned an in-house researcher, Thomas Verstraeten to perform vaccinated/unvaccinated study on CDC’s giant Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) in 1999 (I summarize Verstraeten’s secret findings on slide 2). Verstraeten found a dramatic link between mercury-containing hepatitis B vaccines and several neurological injuries including autism and prepared the study for publication. CDC shared Verstraeten’s analysis with the then four vaccine makers but kept it secret from the American public.

The world’s largest vaccine maker GSK whisked Verstraeten off to a sinecure in Brussels and CDC handed his raw data to his CDC boss Frank DeStefano and another researcher, Robert Davis who served as a vaccine industry consultant. Those two men tortured the data for 4 years, removing all unvaccinated children, to bury the autism signal before publishing a sanitized version purporting to exculpate the vaccine. The CDC then cut off public access to the VSD and to this day aggressively blocks any attempts by researchers to study health outcomes in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated populations.

Despite CDC’s efforts at suppression, independent scientists and research institutions (including UCLA) have managed to conduct and publish several additional vaccinated/unvaccinated studies since 1999. Those studies indicate high incidence of chronic diseases and brain and immune system injuries among vaccinated compared to unvaccinated cohorts. I summarize some of these reports in the following slides….

View/Download PDF

Congressional Hearing Showcases Boldfaced Lies About Vaccines

More shots fired in war on vitamin D

Vitamin D Supplementation and Cardiovascular Disease Risks in More Than 83 000 Individuals in 21 Randomized Clinical Trials: A Meta-analysis

Taking vitamin D supplements may not reduce cardiovascular disease risk, a meta-analysis of randomized trials found.

Vitamin D supplementation didn’t reduce major adverse cardiovascular events compared with placebo (P=0.85), reported Mahmoud Barbarawi, MD, of the Hurley Medical Center in Flint, Michigan, and colleagues in JAMA Cardiology.

Nor were significant differences found between the two arms for all-cause mortality, stroke, cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, or myocardial infarction.

The findings follow on the heels of the randomized D2d study showing no benefit from vitamin D for prevention of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals.

In cardiovascular disease prevention, observational studies have linked low serum vitamin D to higher risk but the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force said there’s too little data to support its use for CVD prevention among people without known deficiency.

“The popularity of vitamin D supplementation is at least partly owing to the misinterpretation of impressive epidemiologic associations between vitamin D status and a breadth of health metrics, leading to a potentially flawed assumption of causality,” noted Arshed Quyyumi, MD, FRCP, and Ibhar Al Mheid, MD, both of the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, in an accompanying editorial….

Barbarawi’s group assessed 21 randomized clinical trials that reported cardiovascular outcomes with vitamin D supplementation of at least 1 year duration. The trials together included 41,622 patients who received a placebo and 41,669 patients who took vitamin D supplements. Trial participants were 74.4% female and had a mean age of 65.8 years….

The study was supported by BASF, Pronova BioPharma, and Pharmavite.

D requirements are a function of skin pigmentation (black people need more D supplementation to obtain the same serum level of D) but oddly there seems to be no breakdown by skin color.    That’s because medical research isn’t funded by racists (or eugenicists).  It’s funded by corporate “liberals”.  You know, the kind of  liberals who faked autism rates among MMR-injected black boys at the CDC,  or continue to plead ignorance about the human consequences of injecting aluminum and human DNA  into young children, or the equally dire human consequences of destroying the dollar after gutting and exporting our industrial infrastructure, which after all are important steps toward  achieving their final solution to the “global warming” problem:  Depopulation.    When the predictable disasters do happen, they need only shrug their shoulders and plead ignorance or statistical anomalies in their very learned studies and complicated computer models and still retain some semblance of credibility, at least among their clueless audience.   Fabians require infinite gullibility among the peasants, not a problem if they work with the professionals in the MSM.

The mean age, gender and implicitly medicalized demographic of the test subjects practically guarantees that many of them are already on D supplementation for treatment or prevention of osteoporosis.   There goes your random selection.  If the null hypothesis is that D has no effect on CV events, this a poor choice of subjects.

I note that nowhere in the PR blurbs or the abstract did they bother to mention the actual dosages of D used in the 21 studies, despite other impressive sounding numbers like relative risks and confidence intervals.     This crucial omission renders the PR  completely meaningless.  If history is any guide, the average dose is probably somewhere between 1000 and 4000 IU, hardly comparable to the dose of sunlight experienced by humans during 99+% of our evolutionary history.  This is incomplete science masquerading as a definitive statement, asking an irrelevant question for an obvious purpose (follow the money), but pending further information it’s hard to know just how irrelevant this study actually is.  Unfortunately I don’t have access to the full text.

BTW: For some additional humor, read the medpage study linked above about vit D and type 2 diabetes:

“The authors intentionally did not target patients with vitamin D deficiencies because in prior studies the intervention worked regardless of baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, said co-author Myrlene Staten, MD, of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.”

In other words, they avoided asking the question they purport to answer.    In the subgroup which WAS deficient:

Wexler also allowed that patients with vitamin D deficiency might be expected to see the most benefit from supplementation.  Indeed, a post hoc analysis of 103 participants in the current study showed those with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels under 12 ng/mL did get significant benefit from supplementation compared to placebo (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.80).

Rarely are the conflicts of interest in medicine more glaring than in their official recommendation for D.   With the possible exception of their recommendation for routine infant male genital mutilation.

D is involved in all kids of metabolic processes, from pregnancy maintenance (see below for  a more explicitly bigoted example of medical “science”) to infection fighting to cancer prevention, which probably explains a lot about medicine’s hostility toward D.    The FDA’s RDA is a joke, a prescription for doctor visits, a form of demographic plunder.   If you’re white, then going shirtless outside for 30 minutes a day gives you about 25 times more D than the RDA. This  gives you an idea of what humans have adapted to rely on for millennia.  Of course nowdays it’s best to use toxic sunscreen ( )  if you really do need to go outdoors for some reason, such as running to your car.   You’ll need an umbrella, rain or shine.  Doctors’ orders.

I’ve been taking 10,000 IU a day for years,* and somehow I haven’t died a horrible agonizing death.   I’m not sure why, especially since I don’t go to doctors.  As in EVER, unless absolutely necessary (broken bones etc).  But when I do die, most likely as punishment for my starry eyed trust in doctors at a younger age, maybe my hard-learned skepticism of the satanic church of medicine will get me a pass into the higher realms.

In this day and age, parents are risking the wrath of CPS if they veer too far from medical dictates regarding birth, breastfeeding, circumcision, vaccination, sleep-isolation, carrying, sunlight or just plain boredom at public school.    I thought things were bad when I was a kid.  God help these innocents.

* IU’s of D are not defined in terms of human requirements, in fact they have nothing at all to do with benchmarking the nutrients contained in a normal organic diet or the normal sunlight exposure which humans have evolved with and adapted to for millennia.   In other words, they are totally arbitrary.   One has to wonder why they chose a measure which results in numbers like 10,000 units per day for a normal dose.

One IU of D is equivalent to 0.025 MICROGRAMS of D.   If they had decided to measure it in nanograms or picograms then I’d be taking 2.5 million or 2.5 trillion death-units per day and herr doktor could conclude that I’m even more of a nutcase for gulping down  such an outlandishly large number.   But it’s still only about 20 minutes in the sun for a shirtless white person no matter how else you measure it.   So, like, WTF?   What’s wrong with sunshine?

Finally, here’s a second opinion which does try to account for racial differences in vitamin D metabolism.

Nanomedical studies of the restoration of nitric oxide/peroxynitrite balance in dysfunctional endothelium by 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 – clinical implications for cardiovascular diseases

Vitamin D3 helps improve cardiovascular health by balancing Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite.

International Journal of Nanomedicine » Volume 13


Published 19 January 2018 Volume 2018

What is it about?

This study is about the correlation of Vitamin D3 and its effect on the restoration of endothelial function suffered from damage in hypertension and diabetes. Our study shows that Vitamin D3 – which is made by the body naturally when skin is exposed to the sun – can significantly restore the damage to the cardiovascular system caused by several diseases, including hypertension, diabetes and atherosclerosis. Generally, Vitamin D3 is associated with the bones. However, in recent years, in clinical settings people recognize that many patients who have a heart attack will have a deficiency of D3. It doesn’t mean that the deficiency caused the heart attack, but it increased the risk of heart attack. We showed for the first time through use of nanosensors to see why Vitamin D3 can be beneficial, especially for the function and restoration of the cardiovascular system.

Why is it important?

There is no direct method to detect in real-time release of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in biological milieu. We have developed unique methods and systems of measurements using nanosensors, which are about 1,000 times smaller in diameter than a human hair, to track the impacts of Vitamin D3 on single endothelial cells, a vital regulatory component of the cardiovascular system. A major discovery from these studies is that vitamin D3 is a powerful stimulator of nitric oxide (NO), which is a major signaling molecule in the regulation of blood flow and the prevention of the formation of clots in the cardiovasculature. Additionally, vitamin D3 significantly reduced the level of oxidative stress in the cardiovascular system. This study is the first to identify the molecular mechanism of vitamin D3-triggered restoration of the function of damaged endothelium in the cardiovasculature….

Research Coverup of Vitamin D Scandal Continues

Corbett Report – The 5G Dragnet

Telecom companies are currently scrambling to implement fifth-generation cellular network technology. But the world of 5G is a world where all objects are wired and constantly communicating data to one another. The dark truth is that the development of 5G networks and the various networked products that they will give rise to in the global smart city infrastructure, represent the greatest threat to freedom in the history of humanity.

Barack Obama’s ICE Chief: Don’t Blame Trump, ‘Cages’ For Illegals Were Built By Obama Administration

The man who was the Obama administration’s chief of removing illegal immigrants said on Wednesday that it was his boss, President Barack Obama, who had the idea of putting illegal immigrant children in the “cages” that Democrats have used as a bludgeon against President Trump.

Thomas Homan, Obama’s executive associate director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement between May 2013 and January 2017, was responsible for “promoting public safety and national security by maintaining direct oversight of critical ICE programs and operations to identify, locate, arrest, detain and remove illegal aliens from the United States,” according to his LinkedIn profile. Since January 2017, he has served as Acting Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

He stated on Wednesday, “I’ve been to that facility, where they talk about cages. That facility was built under President Obama under (Homeland Security) Secretary Jeh Johnson. I was there because I was there when it was built,” according to The Washington Examiner.

Rule of thumb: whenever the MSM is in anguish about any human rights issue at all, look for another agenda.

Sanders admits he would raise taxes on the middle class to pay for “health care”

Sen. Bernie Sanders, challenged at Thursday night’s Democratic presidential debate on how he would pay for universal health care and his other proposed programs, admitted income taxes on the middle class would have to go up — but maintained that the savings in medical expenses would more than offset the tax hike.

The vast majority would need no “health care” at all except for emergency care, if not for the public “health” establishment’s induction of chronic illness via vaccines, toxic medical advice, toxic food and the psychological consequences of obstetrical abuse and circumcision. We are being milked.   But somehow this enormous scandal and its enormous costs are never discussed by any national politician.