… The NIDA reveals that drugs taken during pregnancy affect the mother and the growing fetus because these substances “pass easily through the placenta.”
The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development explains that the placenta is “a temporary organ linking mother and fetus [which] brings nutrients and oxygen to the fetus and moves harmful waste and materials away.” It performs the same duties as many internal organs not yet fully formed—like the lungs, liver, and kidneys—and, if problems develop, can create lifelong issues for the mother and child.
What are some of those potential issues? The answer to that question depends largely on which drug or type of drug is consumed….
[list of legal and illegal drugs and their affects on pregnant women and fetuses]….
The Impact of Addiction on a Newborn Baby
When a drug is taken regularly during pregnancy, the baby may become dependent on it, creating a withdrawal effect after birth. This is called neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and is most common if the baby is born addicted to opiates. If NAS exists, this typically requires that the baby be hospitalized in an effort to effectively treat the withdrawal symptoms.
According to the NIDA, these withdrawal symptoms can appear up to 14 days post-birth and often include:
- Excessive crying
- High-pitched crying
- Trouble sleeping
- Increased heart rate
- Diarrhea and other gastrointestinal issues
- Slow weight gain
Long-term effects of drug use by the mother during pregnancy can also create lasting effects for the baby, such as those that occur as a result of birth defects, premature birth, or low birth weight. In severe cases, it can even lead to SIDS….
History books may never tell the full story of the dictatorship that terrorized Argentina from 1976 to 1984.
But newly declassified United States military and intelligence documents recently delivered to Argentina offer new details about the country’s brutal military junta.
The archival documents were the fourth and final batch of 43,000 declassified U.S. telegrams, military records, intelligence and confidential memos given to Argentina following an extraordinary 2016 agreement between Argentine President Mauricio Macri and former U.S. President Barack Obama.
“Argentines now have more information about a dark period of our history that will allow us to continue strengthening justice, seeking and finding the truth,” Macri said on Twitter after receiving the 7,500-document report on April 12.
The archives narrate the human rights abuses committed by Argentina’s military government, often with the assistance of the United States. They include the forced disappearances of 30,000 people, international assassination squads that stalked their victims abroad and the kidnapping of hundreds of babies born in detention.
Bloody history of US intervention
The U.S. declassification effort began under persistent pressure from Argentine human rights groups founded to uncover the atrocities of the dictatorship – a period I have spent my academic career studying.
Argentine democracy was interrupted by military coups six times in the 20th century.
The declassified documents outline what happened after the last coup, staged in 1976 by Gen. Jorge Rafael Videla. It gave way to the cruelest, most repressive and violent eight years of Argentina’s history.
In August 2000 representatives from Argentina’s Center for Legal and Social Studies and the original Grandmothers and Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo – a human rights group that locates the lost children of the dictatorship, which has since splintered into several factions – met with U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.
That encounter led to the declassification of 4,700 State Department documents in 2002. Those documents included U.S. diplomatic cables, memoranda, reports and meeting notes related to the Argentine dictatorship, and revealed clear U.S. involvement in the junta’s “dirty war.”
Now, Argentina has the military and intelligence archives behind these operations, too.
The declassified documents show that U.S. intervention in Latin America went well beyond giving “a little encouragement” to Latin American military regimes, as Secretary of State Henry Kissinger put it in 1976.
Argentina was the operations center for Plan Condor, a U.S-organized alliance between the dictatorships of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay, created in 1975 and operational until around 1980.
With U.S. support, Argentina’s junta kidnapped leftists, dissidents, union leaders and anyone who looked remotely like a threat. They tortured detainees, and then threw them alive and conscious out of airplanes into the River Plate, near Buenos Aires, or dumped their bodies in mass graves.
Pregnant women were killed after giving birth, their babies adopted by the families of childless generals. Neighbors under police surveillance informed on other neighbors to appease the junta, then were abducted and tortured anyway.
The USA is long overdue for some honesty about its own history.
The AAP is one of the gangs that refuses to back down from the medical mafia’s position on infant male genital mutilation.
This is what passes for professional ethics in medicine.
… Repeating: No “relationship between vaccines and permanent injury”.
This is probably the most glaring falsehood that I have heard in the vaccine debate yet, stated by the chief pediatrician in the US, to whom all other pediatricians look to for guidance in how to treat their patients.
Has Dr. Tayloe has never heard of the Federal Program called the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, the sole purpose of which it to compensate people for the permanent injuries that they sustain from approved vaccines?
From the VICP section of the HRSA web site that shows the vaccine injuries that are covered:
“The Vaccine Injury Table (Table) makes it easier for some people to get compensation. The Table lists and explains injuries/conditions that are presumed to be caused by vaccines. It also lists time periods in which the first symptom of these injuries/conditions must occur after receiving the vaccine. If the first symptom of these injuries/conditions occurs within the listed time periods, it is presumed that the vaccine was the cause of the injury or condition unless another cause is found. For example, if you received the tetanus vaccines and had a severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis) within 4 hours after receiving the vaccine, then it is presumed that the tetanus vaccine caused the injury if no other cause is found.”
A quick rundown of a few of the covered reactions:
DTaP, Tdap, DTP-Hib, MMR, MR, R – Anaphylactic shock, encephalopathy, any accute complication or sequela of above events(including death).
Rubella vaccines – Chronic arthritis, any acute complication or sequela (including death) of above event.
Measles vaccines – Thrombocytopenic purpura, Mealses, any acute complication or sequela (including death) of above event.
Live Virus Polio vaccines – Polio.
Inactivated Virus Polio vaccines – Anaphylactic shock, any acute complication or sequela of above events(including death).
I am pretty sure that “Death” could be considered permanent injury.
Additionally, Dr. Tayloe has apparently never read a package insert in a box of vaccine….
Why are we still having this discussion? Because it’s not a discussion, it’s a well funded mass delusion which is immune from scientific skepticism.
March 31, 2008
This weekend Julie Gerberding, the head of the CDC, appeared on Dr. Sanjay Gupta’s show, House Call, and explained that vaccines can trigger autism in a vulnerable subset of children. This is the claim that parents like me have been making since at least the 80’s, and have been dismissed and even mocked for making it.
But no one in the main stream media seems to have noticed. Not even CNN. Not even Dr. Gupta who was sitting right in front of her.
Apparently, if you dress in soft pink and speak in dulcet, reassuring tones, you can indict yourself in the biggest international health crisis of the times and not even your interviewer will notice….
This obfuscation and double speak must end.
*For more on this interview, read these:
Early Thursday morning, the Department of Justice unsealed an indictment against Daniel Everette Hale — a former intelligence analyst for the U.S. Air Force and National Security Agency (NSA) and later a defense contractor working for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) — for providing a reporter with classified government information. The reporter in question, although unnamed in the indictment, is Jeremy Scahill, co-founder of and journalist for the online publication The Intercept.
The indictment against Hale makes him the third Intercept source to be charged with leaking classified information to the outlet in less than two years. Notably, both of the government whistleblowers that have already been prosecuted and convicted by the Trump administration – Reality Winner and Terry Albury – were Intercept sources who were outed as whistleblowers by reporters working for the online publication.
The publication, which has long been associated with the documents shared by whistleblower Edward Snowden, has yet to fire any of the reporters responsible for these breaches that have seen two whistleblowers already imprisoned and third, Daniel Hale, likely to be imprisoned….
The Trump campaign launched a propaganda campaign to prepare the public for a war on Iran. The campaign is similar to the one the Bush administration ran in 2002 and 2003 preparation for the war on Iraq.
Anonymous officials make claims about alleged ‘intelligence’ that is said to show ‘Iranian threats’ against U.S. ‘interests’. Iran, it is claimed, has this or that malign motive to do such. Routine military rotations to the Middle East are then declared to be ‘in response’ to the claimed ‘threats’.
The media, either played like a fiddle by the administration or willing accomplices, repeat each and any such nugget thrown at them without any second thought. Anti-Iranian lobbyist are presented as ‘experts’ to reinforce the messaging.
Here are some examples of the above methods….
This meme is making the rounds. You can see who NOT to support by the prominence of the candidates’ faces. Of course the smallest one of all, off in the background, is Tulsi Gabbard.
I fear we’re going to have a replay of 2016, but we’ll be lucky if we get Trump again, given who the DNC is promoting.
Why do I say that? The 4 candidates in the foreground are all into the AGW religion, random immigration and “gun control”, which are codewords for bankster globalization and the new world order. Job one of the new world order project is the abolishment of national sovereignty. But national governments are institutionally incapable of surrendering sovereignty to anyone. It’s a systems dynamic thing, the power of the establishment is based in invisible, multigenerational networks. The only way to accomplish the project is to impose catastrophe, to make people desperate for any “helping hand”. This is the purpose of the shock doctrine. In other words, a vote for the NWO is a vote for destitution, mass starvation, war and global fascism. With a liberal face of course.
At least Trump represents a facet of a national interest, as toxic as it may be.
Unfortunately no one, not even Tulsi, is talking about the federal reserve disaster capitalists and fractional (fictional) reserve banking.