(NaturalNews) It is increasingly common for parents of children with one or more of the triad of symptoms associated with so-called “Shaken Baby Syndrome” (SBS) to be automatically accused of committing child abuse. But often missing from this causal equation is any investigation into the vaccinations that children diagnosed with SBS received prior to developing this very serious condition, a condition that copious scientific research has shown can, indeed, be caused by vaccines.
Writing for VacTruth.com, investigative journalist Christina England explores this issue in a recent piece, looking at an array of both former and recently published studies involving children who developed cerebral edemas, a type of swelling or inflammation inside the brain, following routine vaccinations. England looks at a 2010 review published by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, for instance, which contains hundreds of cases dating back to the early 1980s in which children developed encephalitis or meningitis following vaccination.
As we covered back in January, Dr. Tomljenovic’s extensive research into the subject of vaccine-induced brain damage has unveiled a vast conspiracy, of sorts, in which governments have been exposed for deliberately covering up data linking vaccines to the types of symptoms commonly attributed with SBS. These links, of course, have also been observed by many other researchers, including a handful of doctors and researchers in India who published a paper in 2012 exposing the DTP (diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus) vaccine as a cause of encephalopathy.
But the rabbit hole goes deeper, as papers published back in the 1990s and even earlier have identified vaccines as a probable cause of SBS. In a 1998 paper entitled “Shaken Baby Syndrome: The Vaccination Link,” for instance, Dr. Viera Scheibner addresses a problem that at the time was only just beginning to explode into the epidemic it is today — parents being falsely accused of abusing their children when vaccines are what actually caused their SBS.
“Some time ago I started getting requests from lawyers or the accused parents themselves for expert reports,” writes Dr. Scheibner about how falsely-accused parents sought her out for expert analysis into the real cause of their children’s SBS diagnoses. “A close study of the history of these cases revealed something distinctly sinister: in every single case, the symptoms appeared shortly after the baby’s vaccinations.”
How many parents are being falsely accused of abusing their vaccine-damaged children?
Since that time, many others in the field have also come to the same conclusions as Dr. Scheibner, as it is now clear that many cases of SBS lack any evidence of physically-induced trauma, which clearly points to another culprit. A more recent study published in the journal Clinical Medicine Research, for example, found that many of the symptoms attributed to SBS are actually caused by a vaccine-induced autoimmune reaction in certain genetically susceptible children….
AAP also pushes infant circumcision, a profitable bit of violent quackery which is almost certainly tied to violent crime and psychopathy in the population. Yet incredibly, the FBI’s crime database has no data on the rate of genital mutilation among violent criminals.
Problem, reaction, solution.
(Natural News) The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), a rabidly pro-vaccine front group working on behalf of Big Pharma, recently mailed out a deceptive survey to its members asking them to explain how they are engaging in “Firearm Injury Prevention” – as if it’s part of the normal job description of doctors and pediatricians to somehow encourage their patients to avoid owning guns under any circumstances.
As reported by “Dr. LateBloomer,” a firearms owner and pediatrician who writes under this alias for her own protection, the AAP survey – which she personally received as one of the organization’s members – asks all sorts of invasive and biased questions about how AAP pediatricians are addressing the “issue” of firearms ownership among their patients.
One of the questions trickily asks AAP doctors to reveal how frequently they or members of their staff identify families who own firearms, as well as how often they follow up by recommending to said families that they remove all firearms from their homes – and all of this for the stated purpose of “providing health supervision.”
A corresponding question suggests that not identifying families that own firearms represents the converse of this, in that it fails to provide proper “health supervision.” To those who fall into this category, AAP plainly asks why, and what are the reasons for not doing so?…
In other words, the whole thing is one giant anti-gun propaganda effort by the AAP, whose apparent aim is to implant the idea into its members that being a doctor or pediatrician is somehow inextricably linked to policing patient gun ownership – which is ironic, considering the AAP essentially believes that people should be forcibly vaccinated, at gunpoint if necessary….