I wonder whether I could get legal immunity if I sell liquid laundry detergent as a vaccine? Apparently all that is needed to label something as a vaccine is that it contain toxins and comes in a hypodermic syringe. At that point the standard vaccine legal immunity laws should apply. See http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2019/04/researchers-uncover-fake-vaccine-being-marketed-for-infants/
It seems the first prerequisite for a career in the medical “arts” is psychopathy.
I keep telling people that MGM is medicine’s Achilles heel. Pull on that thread and the whole shiny “scientific” facade comes tumbling down.
New post at my website (Psychology Today doesn’t allow commentary on infant circumcision anymore).
The 2017 film, American Circumcision, should be watched by everyone who will have a boy in the future, everyone whose family will have a baby boy in the future, every medical professional that has a say on child treatment, and all parent educators. It is filled with important information, from history to research studies, and with interesting details about male anatomy and the horrific circumcision practices (and accidents) themselves.
Here are some of the movie’s points.
Circumcision as a cultural practice started with a minimal clipping as instructed by God to Abraham in the Jewish Torah. When Jews started competing in athletic games with the Greeks, they started to stretch the foreskin so they would look like the Greeks. This disgruntled Jewish leaders who then changed the practice to remove the entire foreskin.
Outside of the middle east, Victorian England started it as a means to prevent masturbation, considered to be related to madness and ill health.
Indeed, the foreskin is highly sensitive in all sorts of ways. Sorrel study shows that the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis (10,000-100,000 nerve endings). Note: A number of researchers who published tests of sensitivity did not test the foreskin.
Lots more on its English history, where circumcision was correlated with wealth (upper classes did it more), here.
Americans, with puritanical roots, adopted it as a means to curtail social pleasure. Though circumcision largely died out in England by the 1950s and health services never paid for it, the USA continues the practice still today.
More on history of circumcision in USA, here.
THE EFFECTS OF INFANT CIRCUMCISION
As John Geisheker, director of Doctors Opposing Circumcision (DOC), explained, there is a massive literature on the topic, in multiple disciplines. As he awakened to the issue, he reports becoming more and more horrified at what he learned. Lots of studies show there is no good effect.
PAIN. Only about 50% of are anesthetized. Anesthesia doesn’t always work, doctors don’t wait long enough for it to work, and the best anesthesia takes several injections into the penis (painful!)
The younger the baby, the more exquisitely the pain of circumcision is felt (Anand & Hickey, 1987).
PTSD. The Taddio study showed that circumcised infants reacted more hysterically to vaccinations, which was interpreted as PTSD. Babies might look like they are sleeping but they would withdraw into catatonic shock. Distrust is potential aspect of the PTSD that results.
INABILITY TO EXPRESS FEELINGS (alexithymia). Boys go into shock and dissociate during the procedure which can lead to an inability to express their feelings.
LONGTERM. Flashbacks in dreams. Rage, particularly toward women.
SEXUAL ABUSE. Baby gets erection and then circumcision occurs. When Marilyn Milos saw this she realized it was sexual abuse, where sexual and violence are brought together.
SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION. Intact penises appreciate the same kind of motions that vaginas prefer. Circumcision changes that. Problems increase with age.
BOTCHED PROCEDURES. Botched circumcisions happen frequently. A malpractice lawyer said in the film, “there is a lot of malpractice.”
POLITICS AND EXCUSES
In the USA, the sexual revolution of the 1960s countered the anti-pleasure view of a good life. As a result, decade by decade, other rationales have been promoted to continue the practice of circumcision, making it a political not medical issue…..
What does infant circumcision look like?
Here are some videos of infants being circumcised that are very disturbing.
Social destabilization is extremely profitable if you’re a central banker. There’s your motive. Money creation is the means. The invisibility of money flows, particularly money flows into the “cerebral” businesses like science and propaganda, is the opportunity.
Who owns your doctor? S/he probably doesn’t even know.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:12 PM, John Podesta <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Agree. Happy to talk to the David’s. Call me crazy, but I think if we can survive the next month, it will be possible, maybe even straightforward to get our arms around this once there is an actual campaign.I’m definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it. JP > –Sent from my iPad
GSK MMRV Vaccine (Priorix Tetra) found to contain a massive amount of foreign viruses. None of which appear related to the supposed purpose of the vaccine itself.
In a previous article shared here on Real News Australia, Dr Sherri Tenpenny discussed the results of an independent analysis carried out by Italian laboratory Corvelva on the GlaxoSmithKline vaccine Infanrix Hexa, a six-in-one vaccine.
To the shock of researchers and anyone seeing the results it was discovered that this particular vaccine contained traces of 65 cross contaminants. Contaminants that are being regularly injected by Doctors and Nurses into infants around the world. [and it contains no antigens, so it’s not even a vaccine, just a shot full of toxins!! -rw]
It has now been revealed the results of their next vaccine analysis is now available.
And it’s even more explosive than the first!
You will need to run it through a translator as it’s in Italian however here’s a portion below that’s been done already.
CORVELVA Experts wrote: “We have continued the investigation, both chemical and biological, on the Priorix Tetra, quadrivalent against measles, rubella, mumps and varicella and we have also found …Within the GlaxoSmithKline Priorix Tetra vaccine, Proteobacteria, Platyhelminthes and Nematoda worms, 10 other viruses to ssRNA, Microviridae (bacterial or phage viruses) and numerous retroviruses including endogenous human and avian retroviruses, avian viruses, human immunodeficiency and immunodeficiency virus of monkeys (fragments that if inserted into the database detect fragments of HIV and SIV), murine virus, horse infectious anemia virus, lymphoproliferative disease virus, Rous sarcoma virus. Other viruses like alphaendornavirus and hepatitis b virus, yeast virus.”
Yes, you read that correctly. All of those substances were detected in the GSK Vaccine for Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella, Priorix Tetra which is on the Australian Immunization Schedule for all children at 18 months of age.
Once again we have now seen independent testing of a vaccine turn up absolutely shocking findings. Findings that NO Doctor or Nurse whom administers vaccines would have any idea about. Let alone the parents of children worldwide whom are routinely lining up to get the jabs.
Ethan Nash of TOTTnews.com and myself recently released episode 6 of the General Knowledge Podcast, where we discussed how vaccines are being used as a depopulation tool. This new report on yet another vaccine which shows a whole host of serious contaminants including horse and even simian viruses as well as worms lends even more credence to that claim.
Governments will not test the vaccines they push on the public nor will they call for independent testing of the vaccines on the current schedule. The big pharmaceutical companies also are against independent testing of their products however Corvelva has been able to carry out 2 tests so far. It’ll be interesting to see their next one.
SANTIAGO, CHILE — A recently declassified CIA document has revealed that members of the intelligence agencies of France, the United Kingdom and West Germany discussed how to establish “an anti-subversive organization similar to [the CIA’s Operation] Condor” in their own countries. Described by the CIA as “a cooperative effort by the intelligence/security services of several South American countries to combat terrorism and subversion,” Operation Condor was a campaign of state terrorism originally planned by the CIA that targeted leftists, suspected leftists and their “sympathizers” and resulted in the forced disappearances, torture and brutal murders of an estimated 60,000 people, as well as the political imprisonment of around half a million people. Around half of the estimated murders occurred in Argentina.
The document, released last Friday as part of a release of newly declassified U.S. government documents related to the U.S.-backed military dictatorship that ruled Argentina from 1976 to 1983, states that:
Representatives of West German, French and British intelligence services had visited the Condor organization secretariat in Buenos Aires during the month of September 1977 in order to discuss methods for establishment of an anti-subversion organization similar to Condor” due to their view that “the terrorist/subversive threat had reached such dangerous levels in Europe.”
The representatives from the three countries then stated that they felt that pooling “their intelligence resources in a cooperative organization such as Condor” would be an important way of combating the “subversive threat.” Notably, England at the time was already involved in an international “intelligence sharing” program known as ECHELON, a program between the “Five Eyes” intelligence pact between the U.K., the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand that continues in a different form today.
The document, which was written in 1978, came two years after Operation Condor targeted left-wing Latin American exiles living in Europe. Several other documents in the recent release discuss a decision made by Condor member countries in May 1976 to train and send a military unit to “conduct physical attacks” against left-wing Latin American exiles and their supporters in France, in what was codenamed “Teseo.” Several Condor countries, aside from Brazil and Bolivia, were eager to participate and the training of the “Teseo” unit did occur, though the CIA was apparently unaware whether the unit was actually sent to France.
European interest in bringing home a state-sponsored terror campaign may seem shocking, given Europe’s publicly stated concerns at the time regarding Condor member countries’ mind-boggling human rights abuses and state-sponsored murders. But it will hardly surprise those who have studied Operation Condor, as the operation itself was a Western invention that was imposed on Latin America through a series of military coups, which again were backed by Western governments.
Operation Condor officially began in 1975, though CIA documents in this recent release suggest that the inter-country intelligence-sharing aspect had likely begun a year earlier in 1974. The countries involved — Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Ecuador, and Bolivia — were all backed and supported by the U.S., which was also incidentally the largest weapons dealer to these government over this same time frame. During the latter portion of Operation Condor, one of the recently declassified documents claims that Israel took over key roles played by the U.S. in Operation Condor, including the “training of local personnel and sales of certain types of advanced military equipment,” despite the many innocent Jews murdered by several of the Condor dictatorships.
Several of the Condor countries had seen their military dictatorships installed with U.S. government involvement, as was the case in Chile and Brazil, with the U.S. government suspected in other coups that preceded Operation Condor by only a few years, such as the 1971 coup in Bolivia and the 1973 coup in Uruguay. After the 1976 coup in Argentina — Argentina’s sixth and final coup of the 20th century — it too joined Operation Condor.
The U.S. provided planning, training, funding and arms for Operation Condor, and European nations also provided a significant number of weapons. France — one of the countries interested in creating a Condor-style program for Europe — was noted in one of the recently declassified documents for its “excellent prospects for sales of jet aircraft and air defense systems” to Condor dictatorships; while West Germany, another country interested in a European Condor, “should be able to market missiles, ground force equipment and submarines.”
U.S. and European intelligence agencies were well aware of what Condor dictatorships were doing with those weapons, as indicated by past and recent document releases that detail horrific descriptions of the torture and murder of those suspected of being left-wing and those suspected of sympathizing with the left, as well as those who opposed the neoliberal economic policies imposed by all of the U.S.-backed Condor dictatorships.
Some of the more infamous tactics used by Condor nations had also been inspired by past European and U.S. war crimes. This includes the “death flights,” where victims were drugged, bound and placed in plastic body bags, and/or had their stomachs cut open before being thrown out of a plane or helicopter over the ocean. This tactic was said to have been inspired by the actions of French armed forces during the Algerian war and, according to the 2003 documentary The Death Squads: The French School, French intelligence had taught these and other methods to Argentine military officials during the dictatorship….