The Federal Reserve’s Controlled Demolition Of The Economy Is Almost Complete

… In my article ‘Party While You Can – Central Bank Ready To Pop The Everything Bubble’, I outlined a process or tactic which the Fed has used on many occasions in the past: The creation of economic bubbles through inflation and artificially low interest rates, followed by abrupt tightening and higher interest rates into economic weakness. This tactic is highly effective in accomplishing ONE GOAL – financial collapse.

It is the same strategy the Fed used at the beginning of the Great Depression. It is also what the Fed used to trigger the crash of 2008. And, in 2018-2019, the Fed is doing it again.

For over two years now the Fed has been instituting tightening measures after inflating perhaps the largest economic bubble in modern history, also known as “the everything bubble”. The Fed did this despite extreme weakness in economic fundamentals, and is continuing forward until the fourth quarter of this year despite nearly every sector of the economy showing steep declines or a greatly reduced pace of growth.

It is perhaps not a coincidence that the Fed announced it would be cutting assets until September just as the Treasury Yield curve inverted for the first time since 2007.  The same thing happened just before the crash and recession that started in 2008. An inverted yield curve is generally a sure sign of a decelerating economy or recession/depression.

What bewilders me are the numerous claims in the mainstream and alternative media that the Fed is somehow oblivious to what it is doing. This is simply not true. Jerome Powell in his statements in the Fed Minutes of October 2012 explains plainly exactly what would happen if and when the Fed tightened policy into weakness. He essentially admits that a crash will occur….

http://www.alt-market.com/articles/3703-the-federal-reserves-controlled-demolition-of-the-economy-is-almost-complete

The owners of the fed are disaster capitalists.   They profit by inducing “business cycles”, riding up the bubbles and then buying up the real economy for pennies on the dollar after the crashes.   Even many fed critics don’t seem to get this.

A debt-based monetary system, where the production of money is recursively dependent on expectations of the future production of money, creates an inherently unstable feedback loop which gives the fed the leverage it needs to cause and exacerbate crashes and bubbles on demand.   There is an alternative with a history of huge successes, such as the “colonial scrip” in use in pre-revolutionary america, before the british started counterfeiting it.   See http://monetary.org and

Milton Friedman on the Origins of the Great Ripoff

Censored: Ben Franklin on the Real Cause of the American Revolution

error

Crazy Obstetricians Pulling Uteruses Out of Women

Because they know less than nothing about umbilical cords and placentas and birth and babies.   I remember a nurse recounting how she saw a doctor bracing himself with his foot up on the table trying to pull out the placenta by the umbilical cord.   This is mental illness, and it causes pathological imprints which result in further mental illness.

By immediately clamping the cord, they’re not only depriving the baby of blood, oxygen, iron, stem cells, immunological and hormonal inputs, they’re also blocking the process by which the placenta would naturally detach from the uterine wall. See the interview with Suzanne Humphries in the article linked below.

There’s something seriously wrong with medical education in this country.

Obstetrics hemorrhage remains one of the leading causes of maternal death in developed and developing countries 1. Acute uterine inversion is a rare and serious obstetrics emergency, estimated to occur in one in 3737 deliveries 2. This tends to happen at least once a year in our unit. In acute uterine inversion, the uterus has turned inside out and may protrude from the vagina. Often, this occurred when fundal massage and umbilical cord traction were performed incorrectly or overenthusiastically.

Uterine inversion is usually classified according to the degree of inversion. In incomplete inversion, the uterine fundus is inverted and lies within the endometrial cavity without extending beyond the external os, whereas a prolapsed inversion is one where the fundus protruded through the vaginal introitus. In complete uterine inversion, the uterus as well as the vagina is inverted. In this high‐risk group of patients, early recognition and prompt management in a multi‐disciplinary approach using standard guidelines will enable the safe delivery of a baby while saving the mother’s life. We described a case of acute uterine inversion following the delivery of placenta despite controlled cord traction from the perspective of an obstetrician and an anesthetist….

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4929810/

Medical Research Rediscovers Harm of Immediate Cord Clamping

WTF they’re teaching about birth in medical school

error

CNN Admits They Parrot the Powerful

Ok so they’re not investigators, they’re public relations outlets for whoever markets to them.    Nothing new here.   What’s new is that they’re not even embarrassed about it.   The people who should be embarrassed are their viewers.

‘We’re not investigators’: CNN chief ridiculed over defending coverage of Mueller probe

Netizens were up in arms this week grilling CNN boss Jeff Zucker who awkwardly defended his network’s coverage of the Mueller probe, saying their job was to report facts “as we know them,” rather than, you know, investigating.

“We are not investigators. We are journalists, and our role is to report the facts as we know them, which is exactly what we did,” Zucker said in light of the fact that the Robert Mueller investigation which CNN had harped on for the last two years found no evidence that Trump’s 2016 campaign colluded with Russia….

https://www.rt.com/usa/454822-cnn-not-investigators-mueller-zucker/

It’s very strange how they are not only incapable of investigation, they are incapable of commonsensical skepticism and rational evaluation.   If I mailed a letter to the CEO warning that his right hand intends to strangle him, I wonder if he’d handcuff himself to his desk?

error

Rappoport: Interview with Retired NIH Vaccine Researcher

… Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?

A: First of all, there is no “if.” They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn’t. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you’ve said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it’s true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network….

Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?

A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money. They don’t need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers — a few — might start leaking information….

Q: How long did you work with vaccines?

A: A long time. Longer than ten years.

Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?

A: No, I can’t. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I’m not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.

Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.

A: The operative word is “appear.” What about all the children who can’t focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.

Q: So we come to the level playing field.

A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.

Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don’t get shots.

A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person’s responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2019/03/13/interview-with-a-retired-vaccine-researcher/

Vaccines are a cash-cow for pharmaceutical interests, both directly through vaccine sales, and through drugs used to suppress the symptoms of chronic vaccine-induced diseases.   Unaddressed conflicts of interest tend to be destructive.

On the chemical, economic, social and political level, humanity is being harvested.

error

The Zionist Acculturation of Influential American Students

Going beyond the overt political and policy implications of this strategy, it’s interesting to note the role of the embedding of ambitious (reward-punishment oriented) and politically fluid people in the zionist milieu.   Their ideological conditioning will be reinforced by the social networks and economic ties established at such conferences.   The remarkable thing is that, since everyone and every group has an internally self-consistent human narrative, it really makes little difference whether the ideas presented are complete or even ultimately self-destructive.   At their core, humans are emotional, not rational creatures.    Rational narratives are invented to rationalize emotional perceptions.   This says a lot about the role of childhood circumcision in the social cohesion and potency of both the Jewish and Muslim cultures.

The unconscious identification of “self” with distinct social groupings is certainly a more powerful and manipulable tool of social control than any political or ideological argument that could be presented at this conference.     This psychological tool is consciously utilized by the MSM against their unconscious viewers.

This is how human societies work.   Mass social emergence feeds from mass unconscious compulsions.  Of course the same principle applies to the spontaneous emergence naturally formed in any human society.   The conscious manipulation of this phenomenon is what separates the peasants from the rulers.

Gunsandbutter: The Global Campaign to Criminalize Criticism of Israel

error

Gunsandbutter: The Global Campaign to Criminalize Criticism of Israel

We discuss Alison Weir’s extended essay, published as a pamphlet, “The International Campaign to Criminalize Criticism of Israel”; the traditional definition of anti-Semitism and the new “improved” 3-D definition of anti-Semitism; the history of the campaign to criminalize criticism of Israel; the many international and national organizations that have adopted and promote the new definition; policing the new anti-Semitism on college campuses; thought crime; AIPAC and ADL; the crack-down on pro-Palestinian political activity; the multiple hundreds of groups that lobby for Israel; current congressional legislation.


http://gunsandbutter.org/blog/2019/03/07/the-global-campaign-to-criminalize-criticism-of-israel

error