Military draft: Judge rules male-only draft is unconstitutional

A federal judge in Texas has declared that an all-male military draft is unconstitutional, ruling that “the time has passed” for a debate on whether women belong in the military.

The decision deals the biggest legal blow to the Selective Service System since the Supreme Court upheld the draft registration process in 1981. In Rostker v. Goldberg, the court ruled that a male-only draft was “fully justified” because women were ineligible for combat roles.

But U.S. District Judge Gray Miller ruled late Friday that while historical restrictions on women serving in combat “may have justified past discrimination,” men and women are now equally able to fight. In 2015, the Pentagon lifted all restrictions for women in military service….

Drafting Women Means Equality in Slavery

Last week the House Armed Services Committee approved an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act requiring women to register with Selective Service. This means that if Congress ever brings back the draft, women will be forcibly sent to war.

The amendment is a response to the Pentagon’s decision to allow women to serve in combat. Supporters of drafting women point out that the ban on women in combat was the reason the Supreme Court upheld a male-only draft. Therefore, they argue, it is only logical to now force women to register for Selective Service. Besides, supporters of extending the draft point out, not all draftees are sent into combat.

Most of those who opposed drafting women did so because they disagreed with women being eligible for combat positions, not because they opposed the military draft. Few, if any, in Congress are questioning the morality, constitutionality, and necessity of Selective Service registration. Thus, this debate is just another example of how few of our so-called “representatives” actually care about our liberty….

The logic of the state continues its centuries-long pattern of  dismantling the structure of the human family.   Draft age women will be fertile women (unless they’ve gotten the HPV vaccine anyway).   Who will look after the kids?   The nanny state of course.   And who will look after the adult survivors of state-mananged child rearing?   The police state of course.   Democrat/republican, good cop/bad cop, Jekyll/Hyde.

The state is an emergent, self-organized entity with organelles like mitochondria (corporations) a nucleus (government), a bilipid layer (internal police and external military, similar in function) and the few remaining enzymes and expendable molecules which haven’t yet been swept up in the organelles or excreted through the cell wall.

And most importantly, the state has INTERESTS, which transcend generations and national identity and public justifications, which tend to grow and consume every resource available, such as human families, which are dissolved and restructured into the organs of the state as with any digestive process.    The USA’s founders knew this instinctively.   They also knew the malignant horror of a privately controlled  blood supply (the transnational fictional reserve banking system), and attempted (unsuccessfully) to prevent that malignancy from infecting the state via the 1st article of the constitution.

The mechanical logic of this will continue until people organize against it or complete their incorporation into it.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.