What is Psychopolitics?

What is Psychopolitics? According to Lavrentiy Beria, Psychopolitics is a lesser known division of Geopolitics and is used to maintain dominion and control over the thoughts of the masses, as well as the highly educated. How is Psychopolitics applied? Psychopolitics is a form of psychological warfare and its main purpose is creating the necessary chaos to make the population of the targeted nation view communism as the only alternative to the problems they face. In other words, it’s a deliberate campaign to turn the values, ethos and culture of enemy nations completely upside down so the people have no idea which leg to stand on when it comes to defending their nation. Psychopolitics is the deliberate infiltration of a nation’s institutions with the intent of incrementally changing the mindset of the population against their own country. America is the victim of a psychopolitical assault designed to keep us controlled in the parameters of fake political parties and identity politics. Race, sex, wealth, family life, media, religion and education are all weapons used against the masses to guide their opinions through a dialectical process so that they are favorable to the Psychopolitical agenda. Psychopolitics is a Democrat party feigning outrage at a Republican president for fake “Russian Collusion” who a few years earlier, donated money to their campaigns as a Democrat, while an entertainment addicted nation watches like its a soap opera. Psychopolitics is doing whatever is necessary to keep the people from understanding anything.

Psychopolitics is the art and science of asserting and maintaining dominion over the thoughts and loyalties of individuals, officers, bureaus and masses; and affecting of the conquest of enemy nations through “mental healing.” Lavtentiy Berea “A Synthesis on the Russian Textbook on Pyschopolitics.”

According to The Black Book of Communism, between eighty-five and one hundred million people were brutally murdered by Communist regimes in what has become known as the greatest carnage in human history. There are others however who would place that figure well above one hundred and fifty million. Communists, in their false worldview, believe that anyone who does not share in their idea that the state should be the ultimate authority, or the highest entity that explains human existence are “mentally ill.” The tragic result of this misguided belief is a need to be rid of those who stand in the way of their goal of complete and total equality…

Read more at https://freedomoutpost.com/defining-psychopolitics/

error

National Geographic: Island residents, on the brink of disaster, plants trees

The island of Kokota is home to 500 villagers who were struggling to provide themselves with food, water, and work after they had harvested the surrounding trees and resources. Because there was no longer a tree canopy to shade most of the island, the soil turned to dust and the freshwater rivers dried up…

Read more and watch video at: video.nationalgeographic.com/video/short-film-showcase/00000167-a8fc-d142-af67-fbfc97980000

error

Questions Raised about Validity of Neurological Tests on US Diplomats in ‘Sonic Attacks’

… A formal assessment of the American diplomats’ health commissioned by the US government was published in March by doctors at the University of Pennsylvania. The preliminary report in the Journal of the American Medical Association describes a new syndrome that resembles persistent concussion in people who have not received blows to the head.

But in a letter published in the Journal of Neurology, Sergio Della Sala and Robert McIntosh, both neuroscientists at the University of Edinburgh, claim the US report is seriously flawed.

Della Sala said much of the evidence the doctors used to propose a new concussion-like syndrome came from six diplomats who each took 37 cognitive tests. The tests looked at visual and auditory attention, working memory, language, reasoning, movement and other cognitive abilities.

In their report, the US doctors reveal that all six embassy staff who had the full battery of tests had some brain impairment or another. But Della Sala and McIntosh say anybody who took the tests would have been classed as impaired.

They point out that it is standard practice with cognitive tests to measure people’s performance against others in the population. Often, a person has to score in the bottom 5% to be considered impaired. But the US doctors set the threshold at 40%, meaning that by definition, four in 10 who take the test will be “impaired”.

Della Sala and McIntosh ran a simulation that looked at the probability of passing all 37 tests when the threshold for failure was set so high. “The chances that somebody will be without an impairment is zero,” Della Sala said. “We ran the simulation 1,000 times, and never, ever is there one single individual who appears to be normal. They are all classed as impaired.”

He added: “I’m not denying that they may have discovered a new syndrome, but the point is that the evidence they have provided is nonscientific. The paper is faulty. Even if the results are preliminary, a threshold that verges on half the population is unheard of. I cannot see how any reviewer could have looked at the data and said they are fine. This is not a little thing. It is a threshold unknown in science or clinical practice.”…

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/29/cuba-calls-on-us-and-canada-to-investigate-sonic-attack-mystery

error

Corbett: Know Your Enemy: The Royal Institute of International Affairs

Readers of this column will know all about the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) by now. The CFR’s influence in setting Washington’s foreign policy agenda was once derided as “conspiracy theory.” But, as is often the case, that “conspiracy theory” is now a simple truism that is openly joked about by the conspirators themselves.What you may not know, however, is that the CFR is in fact a branch of a slightly older, slightly less-known organization: the Royal Institute of International Affairs. The idea for the group was hammered out at an informal session during the 1919 Paris peace conference. The Institute was formalized the next year, first as the British Institute of International Affairs, and then, after receiving its Royal Charter, as the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

The group has become synonymous with Chatham House, its headquarters in St. James’ Square, London, and is widely recognized among foreign policy experts as the most influential think tank in the world.

In the years since its inception, the RIIA has opened branches in countries across the British Commonwealth and around the world, including the Council on Foreign Relations, born largely from the same 1919 Paris meeting that birthed the Institute itself, the Australian Institute of International Affairs, the South African Institute of International Affairs, the Pakistan Institute of International Affairs, the Canadian International Council, and similar organizations.

Officially, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, like its various branch organizations, is a non-profit, non-governmental think tank that promotes analysis of international issues and world affairs in topics such as energy, environment and resources, international economics, international security, and international law. Also like its branch organizations, the majority of the group’s publications and proceedings are open to the public and freely available via their website or their journal, International Affairs. (Of course, that’s “free” as in speech, not “free” as in pizza. You’ll need an “Oxford Academic” account if you want to access International Affairs online to read hot takes like “World politics 100 years after the Paris peace conference” by David Lloyd George’s great-granddaughter and former Rhodes Trustee Margaret MacMillan.)

The organization is funded by partners, patrons and a list of corporate members that read like a Who’s Who of the corporatocracy, including Chevron, AIG, Bloomberg, Toshiba, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Lockheed Martin, Royal Dutch Shell, ExxonMobil, and dozens of other corporations, institutions and foreign governments. Chatham House consistently attracts some of the best known speakers on a wide range of topics, releasing reports that set the global policy agenda, not only for Britain, but for much of the rest of the developed world as well.

Although the majority of its activities are publicly accessible, it is, perhaps tellingly, for its policy on keeping certain meetings private that the organization is best known. The policy is called The Chatham House Rule and states:

“When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.”….

https://steemit.com/world/@corbettreport/know-your-enemy-the-royal-institute-of-international-affairs

Brzezinski: It is infinitely easier to kill a million people than to control them

error

Social Engineering: The Exploitation of “Drag Kid” Desmond Is Amazing

Desmond Napoles (aka Desmond is Amazing) is an 11-year-old drag performer who rose to fame due to his appearances on national television, fashion magazines and LGBTQ-related events. He became an instant media darling when a video of him dancing at a gay pride parade became viral.

The Exploitation of "Drag Kid" Desmond Is Amazing

Desmond dancing at a gay pride parade at age 8.

According to his official website, Desmond is a “performer, drag kid, awarded LGBTQ advocate, outspoken gay youth, editorial model, public speaker, founder of his own drag house, fashion designer, muse, and icon”.

However, despite these lofty titles, many consider Desmond’s entire act to be little more than child abuse and exploitation by unscrupulous adult handlers. The controversy surrounding Desmond reached another level when a video of him dancing at a gay bar for tips surfaced online, sparking a bitter debate online and in the media.

At the center of it all is an 11-year-old child who has been exposed to the world of drag since he was a toddler.

Napoles identifies as gay and states that he has been out since a very early age. Napoles’s parents stated that at the age of two or three, they understood that he was “likely gay” and they exposed him to a variety of gay culture, including showing him drag performances and taking him to pride parades. Napoles’s parents stated that he was “openly gay” when he entered kindergarten. Napoles’s mother reports that he began gravitating towards drag performances when he was two and watched RuPaul’s Drag Race. According to Napoles’ parents, Napoles is on the autism spectrum and his drag activity helps him relieve symptoms of autism disorder.
– Wikipedia, Desmond Napoles

Is Desmond “expressing himself” or is he being exploited? A look his “career” provides the answers. Here are some examples.

On December 25th 2017, Desmond appeared in a YouTube video with Michael Alig – the founder and ringleader of the Club Kids, a group of young New York City clubgoers that became a cultural phenomenon during the late 1980s and early 1990s.

The Exploitation of "Drag Kid" Desmond Is Amazing

A screenshot from the YouTube video featuring Desmond with Michael Calig (left) and Ernie Glam (right). On the painting behind them: A child and the word Rohypnol – the name of a “date rape” drug….

Desmond was also featured in several fashion magazines. If you’ve read my series of articles Symbolic Pics of the Month, you will instantly recognize some of the symbolism going on there.

The Exploitation of "Drag Kid" Desmond Is Amazing

Desmond does the “one-eye sign” in Volition magazine.

The Exploitation of "Drag Kid" Desmond Is Amazing

Desmond and the one-eye sign in Refinery29.

The Exploitation of "Drag Kid" Desmond Is Amazing

Refinery29 also featured a video of Desmond dancing on a checkerboard pattern floor with red roses. This exact combination of symbols is extremely significant in the dark world of Monarch Mind Control.

The Exploitation of "Drag Kid" Desmond Is Amazing

This is a painting by Kim Noble – a survivor of trauma-based mind control. One series of paintings depict the abuse of an MK slave in a setting that features intense dualistic patterns and a rose.

The Exploitation of "Drag Kid" Desmond Is Amazing

One-eye pose in Blonde Magazine.

The Exploitation of "Drag Kid" Desmond Is Amazing

One eye hidden in Out Magazine. As stated in previous articles, the one-eye sign is used to represent elite control….

The Exploitation of "Drag Kid" Desmond Is Amazing

Desmond on a billboard in Times Squares. There’s a familiar symbol drawn on his face.

….

https://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/the-exploitation-of-drag-kid-desmond-is-amazing/

The normalization of endocrine disruptors and vaccine DNA manipulation

error

The FBI says Sandy Hook school shooting was on Dec. 13, 2012

Help! I’m losing faith in the establishment!

via https://governmentslaves.news/2019/01/18/the-fbi-says-sandy-hook-school-shooting-was-on-dec-13-2012/

We are told that on the morning of December 14, 2012, a lone gunman named Adam Lanza entered the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT, shot and killed 20 first-grade students and 6 adults, then shot himself dead in the back of his head.

Adam Lanza’s December 13, 2012 Date-of-Death

One of the many anomalies about Sandy Hook is Adam Lanza’s date of death.

As I had first reported, on January 20, 2013, I went on GenealogyBank.com and confirmed a net rumor that Adam Lanza’s Social Security Death Index (SSDI) was listed as December 13, 2012 — a day before the shooting massacre.

Belows is a screenshot I took of the SSDI record on GenealogyBank.com as proof, in case the site scrubs the page. Note that I underlined in red “Date of Death Thursday, December 13, 2012” and painted the red arrow pointing to the time (2:29 PM) and date (1/20/2013) when I took the screenshot.

The information of Lanza’s strange 12/13/2012 SSDI went viral in the Alternative Media.

13 days later, on February 2, 2013, I discovered that GenealogyBank.com had changed Adam Lanza’s SSDI from December 13 to December 14, 2012. However, another genealogy website, Ancestry.com, was slower on the take and still had Lanza’s SSDI as Dec. 13, 2012.

But it’s not just genealogy websites. John Greenewald, Jr., of the website The Black Vault, obtained a Statement of Death by the Funeral Director for Adam Lanza, which also shows Lanza’s date-of-death as December 13, 2012. Greenewald explains:

As part of the research effort, The Black Vault filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for all documents relating to Adam P. Lanza, his death, and the social security record. Almost two months later, a response was received.

The Social Security Administration sent Greenewald two pages, both statements of death for Lanza by the funeral director.

The first, dated 1/15/13, showed Adam P. Lanza’s death occurred on 12/13/12; the day prior to the shooting. The second document, dated 1/24/13, showed Lanza’s death as 12/14/12, with a handwritten statement at the top, “Amended 1/24/13” and the initials “SMO.”

Below is a screenshot of the original Statement of Death by the Funeral Director, showing Lanza’s date-of-death as 12-13-2012. You can also see the Statement on The Black Vault, here.

Stranger still, the FBI‘s web page on “Active Shooter Resources” also has the Sandy Hook school shooting — and thus, the date-of-death of Adam Lanza and the 26 people he shot at the school — as December 13, 2013.

This is what the page says:

The reports listed below were not authored by the FBI, but links to the reports are being provided for general public information.

Here’s a screenshot I took of the page, showing the date (1/18/2019) and time (6:23 AM) when I took it, in the event FBI “memory-holes” the page. I painted the red arrows and underlined in red “12/13/12”:

Lastly, let us not forget that according to the FBI’s own crime statistics, no one died in Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 13 or December 14, 2012. ……

See also:

https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/http-fellowshipoftheminds-com-p165857

FEMA Sandy Hook Crisis Drill Manual Online

error

US Withdrawal from NATO Would Benefit Americans Most of All

Alleged discussions between US President Donald Trump and his aides about a US withdrawal from NATO have been making headlines recently.

The New York Times in an article titled, “Trump Discussed Pulling U.S. From NATO, Aides Say Amid New Concerns Over Russia,” would claim:

There are few things that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia desires more than the weakening of NATO, the military alliance among the United States, Europe and Canada that has deterred Soviet and Russian aggression for 70 years. 

Last year, President Trump suggested a move tantamount to destroying NATO: the withdrawal of the United States.

And while the division or dissolving of NATO most certainly would benefit Russia – removing a malignant and aggressive rogue institution from its borders and the toxic atmosphere of perpetual confrontation it creates – it would also most certainly benefit each and every NATO member many times more.

Despite the many myths surrounding NATO’s role in “protecting” its individual members, nothing has undermined the security of NATO member states more than NATO itself.

https://journal-neo.org/2019/01/19/us-withdrawal-from-nato-would-benefit-americans-most-of-all/

error