The study, which was published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, analyzed information of eight million women aged 25 to 29 taken from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2007 and 2014. The data showed that 60 percent of the women who didn’t get the vaccine had gotten pregnant at least once, while just 35 percent of those who did get the shot had conceived. Three quarters of married women who didn’t get the shot were able to conceive, versus just half of those who did get the jab.
Birth rates among American women aged 25 to 29 have dropped from 118 per 1,000 women to just 105 per 1,000 women in recent years, and it’s believed that the HPV vaccine has played a role in this decline. Lots of reports of women suffering primary ovarian failure as a result of the vaccine started to emerge as soon as it went into circulation.
In light of these findings, the researchers calculated that if 100 percent of the women in the study had been given the HPV vaccine, the number of women who have ever conceived would have dropped by a remarkable 2 million. This prompted them to call for additional studies into the effects of the shot on fertility.
Negative effects of HPV vaccine extend far beyond fertility
Those who aren’t concerned about their chances of conceiving should still steer clear of the vaccine as its dangers don’t end at its threat to fertility. So far, more than 57,000 adverse events related to the vaccine have been reported to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, and 419 deaths have been blamed on the shot. This makes it the most dangerous vaccine in terms of adverse events, handily outnumbering those of other harmful vaccines….
To profit-mine another pint of blood from two ongoing wholesale tragedies, one of which they dare not speak:
MANASSAS, Va. — Lorena is very matter-of-fact about the whole thing. There, she said as she drove us around in her Kia on a recent afternoon, was the hospital where surgeons reattached John Wayne Bobbitt’s penis after she cut it off with a kitchen knife as he slept on the night of June 23, 1993….
These are the details everyone knows and the ones Lorena recites with the stoicism of the waiter at the Tortino Mare Italian restaurant who hours earlier had relayed the specials for us. It’s the actual story, she said — the one about a young immigrant who endured years of domestic violence, was raped by her husband that night, had nowhere to go and finally snapped — that she wanted to talk to me about.
“They always just focused on it …” — as in her husband’s detached and reattached and then, a couple of years later, surgically kind-of enlarged penis. That was all the media, before now, before the Women’s March and the #MeToo movement, when we were all less evolved as humans, wanted to talk about. “And it’s like they all missed or didn’t care why I did what I did,” she said….
Oh the irony of that T-shirt. And in the phrase “when we were all less evolved”. I wonder when the NYT will finally shed its horns and pointy tail and start evolving like the rest of us.
If John Bobbitt (omg) is like 75%-80% of the men in this country, his wife’s attack was not the first time he was sexually assaulted and mutilated. This is the tragedy that the NYT will not address, that in all likelihood tied into the events that they continue to profit-mine to this day. It’s a common business model for the disaster media: being blind to the tragedy that led to the tragedy which they pick apart under a microscope. Look at their coverage of latin american refugees from US corporate plunder. One eye open and teary, the other tightly closed. Their business is selling horror-porn, after all. There’s no profit in cures, only in treating symptoms. They must have learned that from medicine.
One in 20 american men have “peyronie’s disease”, https://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/16/business/16hand.html which is usually a euphemism for a botched circumcision (see below). And that’s probably a gross underestimate, since it’s not something mutilated men are likely to talk about or even understand that it’s not normal. Given the rate of such imprinted satanic ritual abuse in this society, american men are remarkable not for their “toxic masculity” but for their resilience in the face of the state-organized campaign of imprinted terror and pleasure lobotomy that they’ve suffered. Imprints and lobotomies both last a lifetime.
If I may be so bold:
The recent outbreak of Ebola in the Democratic Republic of Congo is the second worst in recorded history. So far, 743 people have been infected with the virus and 461 of those have died….
South Sudan has now begun using Merck’s unlicensed and trial vaccine on people as they fear the spread of the virus. The vaccination efforts began on Monday, according to ABC News. Health workers and other front-line responders are being vaccinated with the trial vaccine against Ebola amid fears the deadly disease could spread across the border….
Juan Guaidó is the product of a decade-long project overseen by Washington’s elite regime change trainers. While posing as a champion of democracy, he has spent years at the forefront of a violent campaign of destabilization.
Before the fateful day of January 22, fewer than one in five Venezuelans had heard of Juan Guaidó. Only a few months ago, the 35-year-old was an obscure character in a politically marginal far-right group closely associated with gruesome acts of street violence. Even in his own party, Guaidó had been a mid-level figure in the opposition-dominated National Assembly, which is now held under contempt according to Venezuela’s constitution.
But after a single phone call from from US Vice President Mike Pence, Guaidó proclaimed himself president of Venezuela. Anointed as the leader of his country by Washington, a previously unknown political bottom-dweller was vaulted onto the international stage as the US-selected leader of the nation with the world’s largest oil reserves….
The latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Report said we have only 12 years left to save the planet. It triggered the usual frantic and ridiculous reactions.
NBC News offered this gem: “A last-ditch global warming fix? A man-made ‘volcanic’ eruption” to cool the planet.” Its article proclaimed, “Scientists and some environmentalists believe nations might have to mimic volcanic gases as a last-ditch effort to protect Earth from extreme warming.”
Proposal like this are defined as geo-engineering – trying to artificially modify Earth’s climate to offset what are presented as unnatural events. The problem is, the events they are trying to offset are actually natural events. Any scientist or politician who doesn’t understand that will undoubtedly create worse problems than those they are trying to “fix.”
From 1940 to almost 1980, the average global temperature went down. Political concerns and the alleged scientific consensus focused on global cooling. Alarmists said it could be the end of agriculture and civilization. Journalist Lowell Ponte wrote in his 1976 book, The Cooling:
“It is cold fact: the global cooling presents humankind with the most important social, political and adaptive challenge we have had to deal with for ten thousand years. Your stake in the decisions we make concerning it is of ultimate importance; the survival of ourselves, our children, our species.”
Change the word “cooling” to warming and it applies to the alarmist threats today.
The problem then was – and still is now – that people are educated in the false philosophy of uniformitarianism: the misguided belief that conditions always were and always will be as they are now, and any natural changes will occur over long periods of time.
Consequently, most people did not understand that the cooling was part of the natural cycle of climate variability, or that changes are often huge and sudden. Just 18,000 years ago we were at the peak of an Ice Age. Then, most of the ice melted and sea levels rose 150 meters (490 feet), because it was warmer for almost all of the last 10,000 years than it is today….
In the early 1800s, the world was already colder than today, and was in the process of cooling still further as a result of low, and decreasing, solar activity. This was during the period of the low sunspot activity of the Dalton Minimum (1790-1830). The billions of tons volcanic dust injected by the Tambora eruption, the largest in force of ejection for over 10,000 years, reduced sunlight dramatically.
The eruption occurred in April 1815, but its full impact on temperature wasn’t felt until 1816 because the volcano erupted vertically at the Equator and the dust it ejected into the Stratosphere took several months to impact both Hemispheres.
Harvest failures were widespread, especially in the densely populated areas of the eastern US and western Europe. In 1816 it snowed as far south as the Carolinas in July, and the year was dubbed “Eighteen hundred and froze to death.” The US government pleaded with farmers not to eat their seed stock as they would have nothing for the following year. That’s hard to do when your children are starving….
Since the best climate experts say that we can expect a gradual cooling over the next few decades as the Sun weakens, the last thing we should be doing now is artificially cooling the planet still further. Consider that as recently as 1680, in the depths of the Little Ice Age, there was a meter of ice on the Thames River in London, something unimaginable today.
In approximately 90 years, the height up the side of the glens in Scotland to which you could farm lowered by 200 meters. That doesn’t sound like much, but such a vertical change took half of Scotland out of food production. That’s the real reason for the Highland Clearances, the forced evacuation of Scotland’s Highlands and western islands.
As always, government response was inadequate or inappropriate. It is setting up to be the same this time, because the government not only ignored science but attacked those who tried to practice proper science.
“Taking carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere,” as advocated by the IPCC in its October 8 news conference, is also foolish. Historic records show that, at about 410 parts per million (ppm), the level of CO2 supposedly in the atmosphere now, we are near the lowest in the last 280 million years. As plants evolved over that time, the average level was 1200 ppm. That is why commercial greenhouses boost CO2 to that level to increase plant growth and yields by a factor of four.
The IPCC has been wrong in every prediction it’s made since 1990. It would be a grave error to use its latest forecasts as the excuse to engage in geo-engineering experiments with the only planet we have.
Of course geoengineering via toxic stratospheric coal ash spraying is already happening on a global scale, but we’re not supposed to know that. In any case, as always, follow the money:
What are the tools the “elite” have used – and are still using – against we the people, to stir our emotions and steer our thinking?
VISIT MY (AD FREE) BLOG…(for snarky politically incorrect humor)
DALLAS, Jan. 30, 2019 — The risk of pregnancy-related stroke is much higher among black women than among white women, according to preliminary research to be presented in Honolulu at the American Stroke Association’s International Stroke Conference 2019, a world premier meeting for researchers and clinicians dedicated to the science and treatment of cerebrovascular disease.
Stroke is the fifth-leading cause of death and a major cause of long-term disability in the United States. Women are more likely than men to have a stroke and to die as a result, and pregnancy increases the risk. In addition, blacks are at greater risk than whites….
- Black women were at 64 percent higher risk for stroke during delivery and 66 percent higher risk for stroke during postpartum admissions than white women.
- Black and Hispanic women with pregnancy-related , such as preeclampsia, were twice as likely as white women to have a stroke during delivery.
- Postpartum stroke hospitalizations for Hispanic women did not differ from white women.
“Further research is needed to better understand if these high-risk groups would benefit from a more aggressive blood pressure control,” said Maria Daniela Zambrano, M.D., study lead author and fellow in vascular neurology at Columbia University in New York. “It is also important to carefully look at all of the modifiable risk factors that could help prevent stroke in these groups.”
Modifiable stroke risk factors include lifestyle changes, controlling high blood pressure, high cholesterol, weight, diabetes and healthy eating, smoking cessation and physically activity.
“We have to identify our obstetric patients at higher risk of cerebrovascular complications and develop an individualized prenatal care plan after considering all their predisposing factors including race,” Zambrano said….
Science marches on. But of course there’s no mention of the scandalous FDA RDA for vitamin D. How much longer can they keep chronic D deficiency (and the incompetence or culpability of taxpayer funded researchers in maintaining this deficiency) a secret? This is some kind of mind control. Or maybe just ordinary wholesale corruption.
Note: earthlings evolved to live in sunshine. As such, it should not be surprising that humans have grown accustomed to rely on sunshine to procure an essential nutrient. Since humans weren’t invented by medicine and aren’t assembled in medical factories, it should not be necessary to prove (to medical “standards”) that at minimum, humans need the amount of vitamin D normally generated by a minimum exposure to sunshine. I know it’s not “scientific”, but given the preponderance of ignorance in medical science (which still hasn’t figured out that babies need their mothers http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2015/02/effects-of-early-mother-infant-separation-one-year-later/ ), it seems only reasonable. On the other hand, given the medical profits generated by D deficiency, I’m not surprised that it’s not a popular topic in medical research.
- Dark skinned people are more D deficient than light skinned people, due to their skin pigmentation.
- D deficiency is linked to preeclampsia: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C26&anq=preeclampsia+vitamin+d&btnG=
- which is a major cause of stroke in pregnant women: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3034989/
Thank goodness we didn’t have to wait for medicine to prove the need for food and water! I doubt they could prove it to their vaunted standards even today.
For the record, D is involved in all kinds of metabolic pathways, from the immune system to antioxidants to cancer prevention. Yet the FDA’s RDA is still based on the prevention of rickets! Of course the immunity connection probably generates more doctor visits than any other health issue. Just a coincidence I’m sure.
I’m a white male about 180 lb with a (medically) compromised immune system (either vaccines or water fluoridation leading to hyperthyroidism), I’m constantly exposed to avian viruses via my chickens, and since I started taking 10,000 IU a day (which is about what a shirtless caucasian would generate by spending 30 minutes in the sunshine) I hardly ever get a cold any more. When I do feel something coming on, I might boost it to 30,000 in a day, inhale some colloidal silver mist (topical antiseptic for the respiratory system) and by the next morning it’s gone. No side effects, no doctors, no prescriptions, no wiping out of my gut microbiome.
Of course I’m not a doctor. Maybe they should have a diploma for that.
… The Atlantic’s Dick Polman actually suggested in a story published this week that more Americans needed to be slaughtered by a madman so that Democrats could use the “new massacre” to elevate gun control to “a first-tier story.”
It’s thinking like this that would have made “Uncle” Joe Stalin and Adolph Hitler blush. (Related: Dems’ gun control push won’t be enforceable without a national gun registry.)
As reported by Breitbart News, Polman, a contributor to the Left-wing magazine, acknowledged that Democrats took over control of the House in the November midterms with one of their political objectives being new restrictions on the Second Amendment.
Democrats have, indeed, begun their push, introducing legislation that criminalizes private gun sales by requiring Americans to get government permission, via a background check, beforehand.
Gun control fail
However, Breitbart’s Awr Hawkins reports:
Polman notes that the gun control bill did not garner major airplay in the establishment media, leading him to suggest a “new massacre” will be key in getting the push more attention. He wrote: “The Democrats’ championing of gun reform is not currently a first-tier story, but a new massacre would likely make it so.”
Polman lamented that the Jan. 23 SunTrust Bank shooting failed to elevate gun control to the top of Democrats’ political agenda. As Hawkins noted, the real lesson to glean from the murders is that once again, gun control failed to keep Americans safe — and in particular, Florida’s red flag law and waiting periods.
The Democrat Party has transformed itself into an authoritarian party of death. When it isn’t celebrating infanticide in New York, it is praying for Americans to be gunned down over a political agenda. Sick.
Read more about Democrats’ push for new gun control measures at Guns.news.
Isn’t that interesting. They aren’t against violence per se, they’re against our ability to defend ourselves from it. What did rockefeller say? Competition is a sin. Grassroots self defense is competition. They want all the power to themselves, centralized in washington or london or wherever they intend to sit in judgement of us and our continued existence. It will be so much more efficient that way.
I don’t know what he means by The Atlantic being leftist. It’s an orifice of
NATO (bzzt! I was thinking of the atlantic council) and the military industrial complex. But I don’t know what “leftist” means any more either. It’s certainly turning into something other than what I used to call myself. But genocidal maniacs have always been good at wearing whatever mask is expedient at any given time.
If they were serious about reducing gun violence they’d ban SSRI psych drugs whose approval began the era of senseless massacres by sleepwalking depressed people. (see ssristories.org) After that they might look at obstetrical violence and other types of medical atrocities against children. But I guess they don’t like kids either. In any case, like virtually all the media, they subscribe to the ludicrous 9/11 hoax and so are fine with mass murder in distant lands as long as it serves the empire’s strategic interests.
All hail the naked emperor!
Largely unbeknownst to the general public, executives and top journalists of almost all major US news outlets have long been members of the influential Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
Established in 1921 as a private, bipartisan organization to “awaken America to its worldwide responsibilities”, the CFR and its close to 5000 elite members have for decades shaped U.S. foreign policy and public discourse about it. As a well-known Council member famously explained, they transformed the American republic into a global empire, albeit a “benevolent” one.
Based on official membership rosters, the following illustration for the first time depicts the extensive media network of the CFR and its two main international affiliate organizations: the Bilderberg Group (covering mainly the U.S. and Europe) and the Trilateral Commission (covering North America, Europe and East Asia), both established by Council leaders to foster elite cooperation at the global level.
In a column entitled “Ruling Class Journalists”, former Washington Post senior editor and ombudsman Richard Harwood described the Council and its members approvingly as “the nearest thing we have to a ruling establishment in the United States”.
Harwood continued: “The membership of these journalists in the Council, however they may think of themselves, is an acknowledgment of their active and important role in public affairs and of their ascension into the American ruling class. They do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy for the United States; they help make it. () They are part of that establishment whether they like it or not, sharing most of its values and world views.”
However, media personalities constitute only about five percent of the overall CFR network. As the following illustration shows, key members of the private Council on Foreign Relations have included:
- several U.S. Presidents and Vice Presidents of both parties;
- almost all Secretaries of State, Defense, and the Treasury;
- many high-ranking commanders of the U.S. military and NATO;
- some of the most influential Members of Congress (notably in foreign & security policy);
- almost all National Security Advisors, CIA Directors, Ambassadors to the U.N., Chairs of the Federal Reserve, Presidents of the World Bank, and Directors of the National Economic Council;
- many prominent academics, especially in key fields such as Economics and Political Science;
- many top executives of Wall Street, policy think tanks, universities, and NGOs;
- as well as the key members of both the 9/11 Commission and the Warren Commission (JFK)
Harvard economist and Kennedy supporter, John K. Galbraith, confirmed the Council’s influence: “Those of us who had worked for the Kennedy election were tolerated in the government for that reason and had a say, but foreign policy was still with the Council on Foreign Relations people.”
Princeton University professor and former CFR member Stephen F. Cohen described the Council as “America’s single most important non-governmental foreign-policy organization”, whose primary role is to “define the accepted, legitimate, orthodox parameters of discussion.” According to Cohen, “the CFR really is what the Sowjets used to call the very top-level of the Nomenclatura.”
And no less than John J. McCloy, the longtime chairman of the Council and advisor to several U.S. presidents, recalled about his time in Washington: “Whenever we needed a man we thumbed through the roll of the Council members and put through a call to New York [i.e., the CFR headquarters].”
1945 to 2017: CFR members in key positions of the American Empire
Click to enlarge 🔎
German news magazine Der Spiegel once described the CFR as the “most influential private institution of the United States and the Western world” and a “politburo of capitalism”. Both the Roman-inspired logo of the Council (top right in the illustration above) as well as its slogan (ubique – omnipresent) appear to emphasize that ambition.
In his famous article about “The American Establishment”, political columnist Richard H. Rovere noted: “The directors of the CFR make up a sort of Presidium for that part of the Establishment that guides our destiny as a nation. () [I]t rarely fails to get one of its members, or at least one of its allies, into the White House. In fact, it generally is able to see to it that both nominees are men acceptable to it.”
Until recently, this assessment had indeed been justified. Thus, in 1993 former CFR director George H.W. Bush was followed by CFR member Bill Clinton, who in turn was followed by CFR “family member” George W. Bush. In 2008, CFR member John McCain lost against CFR candidate of choice, Barack Obama, who received the names of his entire Cabinet already one month prior to his election by CFR Senior Fellow (and Citigroup banker) Michael Froman. Froman later negotiated the TPP and TTIP free trade agreements, before returning to the CFR as a Distinguished Fellow.
It was not until the 2016 election that the Council couldn’t, apparently, prevail. At any rate, not yet.
Published in July 2017 (updated: January 2019)
- Council on Foreign Relations:
- Bilderberg conference: participant lists 1954 to 2014 and 2015-2017
- Trilateral Commission: membership lists of 1973; 1978; 1985; 1995; 2010; and 2017
- Laurence H. Shoup (2015): Wall Street’s Think Tank: The Council on Foreign Relations and the Empire of Neoliberal Geopolitics, 1976-2014, Monthly Review Press
- Wikipedia pages about the CFR, the Bilderberg Group, and the Trilateral Commission
About the authors
Swiss Propaganda Research (SPR) is an independent research group investigating geopolitical propaganda in Swiss and international media. You can contact us here.
In our last documentary we talked about powerful billionaire and registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and showed how Epstein and his co-conspirators, were able to escape punishment for their role in abusing over 40 young girls. We noted that Epstein and people like him do not act alone in their efforts to feed their depraved desires. In Epstein’s case, he had an inner circle of people who helped him acquire young girls. In other cases there exist networks of individuals helping to pressure or even kidnap young children and force them into sexual bondage.
This time, we are going to explore the story of a cult that was suspected of international human trafficking in 1987. The Finders cult was a young group of men, women, and children who claimed to be nothing more than former hippies living an alternative lifestyle and practicing alternative parenting. The Finders were founded by a mysterious man with military connections nicknamed “The Game Caller” who believed in turning his life, and the lives of those around him, into a constant game or experiment.
Although more than 30 years have passed since The Finders made their way to the front page of newspapers all over the United States, questions still remain. Did the Game Caller’s games involve trafficking of children? What exactly were the finders finding? Why did this story make mainstream headlines and then disappear in less than a week? Was the story part of the “moral panic” of the 1980’s, or something more? We will answer these questions, and most importantly, we ask,
Who Will Find What The Finders Hide?
As we examine the story of The Finders cult I would like to make all of our viewers aware that everything in this film is documented and can be confirmed by looking at our transcript and sources. This story deals with accusations of Satanic activity, child trafficking, and intelligence operations. We take these claims seriously and went to great lengths to confirm the information we are about to present to you….
Ted Gunderson’s report on The Finders