Vitamin C — A Game Changer in Treatment of Deadly Sepsis

CCR17 Cure for Sepsis from Critical Care Reviews on Vimeo.

By Dr. Mercola

Story at-a-glance

  • Each year, an estimated 1 million Americans get sepsis and up to half die. Giving patients IV vitamin C with hydrocortisone and thiamine reduced mortality nearly fivefold, from 40 percent to 8.5 percent

  • A leading sepsis researcher is now planning a multicenter trial to put this novel vitamin C treatment to the test across the nation

  • Research shows IV vitamin C following a course of antibiotics effectively kills cancer stem cells responsible for metastasis of lethal

Read full story at

Trump Lays Groundwork to Ban Mandatory Vaccinations across U.S.

Nov 14 2018
This new division at HHS is a home run for all those who believe in liberty and health freedom….

President Trump has created a new division within the Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights, with the express purpose of banning mandatory vaccinations across the country, and ensuring citizens have a right to choose their own healthcare.

With the establishment of the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division division on Thursday, Trump has laid the groundwork to dismantle each and every vaccine mandate across the country. Big Pharma’s choke-hold on the nation’s health has been released…



Reductionism is the philosophy of the psychopath and of the luciferian hierarchy, at least at the lower levels.   It is rapidly wrecking this world in every conceivable way.   You could even think of it as an evil spirit.  This essay couldn’t be more applicable to our current predicament.

My aim is to reinvent the sacred. I present a new view of a fully natural God and of the sacred, based on a new, emerging scientifc worldview. This new worldview reaches further than science itself and invites a new view of God, the sacred, and ourselves—ultimately including our science, art, ethics, politics, and spirituality. My field of research, complexity theory, is leading toward the reintegration of science with the ancient Greek ideal of the good life, well lived. It is not some tortured interpretation of fundamentally lifeless facts that prompts me to say this; the science itself compels it.

This is not the outlook science has presented up to now. Our current scientific worldview, derived from Galileo, Newton, and their followers, is the foundation of modern secular society, itself the child of the Enlightenment. At base, our contemporary perspective is reductionist: all phenomena are ultimately to be explained in terms of the interactions of fundamental particles. Perhaps the simplest statement of reductionism is due to Simon Pierre Laplace early in the nineteenth century, who said that a sufficient intelligence, if given the positions and velocities of all the particles in the universe, could compute the universe’s entire future and past. As Nobel laureate physicist Stephen Weinberg famously says, “All the explanatory arrows point downward, from societies to people, to organs, to cells, to biochemistry, to chemistry, and ultimately to physics.” Weinberg also says, “The more we know of the universe, the more meaningless it appears.”

Reductionism has led to very powerful science. One has only to think of Einstein’s general relativity and the current standard model in quantum physics, the twin pillars of twentieth century physics. Molecular biology is a product of reductionism, as is the Human Genome Project.

But Laplace’s particles in motion allow only happenings. There are no meanings, no values, no doings. The reductionist worldview led the existentialists in the mid-twentieth century to try to [find] value in an absurd, meaningless universe, in our human choices. But to the reductionist, the existentialists’ arguments are as void as the spacetime in which their particles move. Our human choices, made by ourselves as human agents, are still, when the full science shall have been done, mere happenings, ultimately to be explained by physics.

Reductionism is inadequate reductionism. Even major physicists now doubt its full legitimacy. Biology and its evolution cannot be reduced to physics alone but stand in their own right. Life, and with it agency, came naturally to exist in the universe. With agency came values, meaning, and doing, all of which are as real in the universe as particles in motion. “Real” here has a particular meaning: while life, agency, value, and doing presumably have physical explanations in any specific organism, the evolutionary emergence of these cannot be derived from or reduced to physics alone. Thus, life, agency, value, and doing are real in the universe. This stance is called emergence. Weinberg notwithstanding, there are explanatory arrows in the universe that do not point downward. A couple in love walking along the banks of the Seine are, in real fact, a couple in love walking along the banks of the Seine, not mere particles in motion. More, all this came to exist without our need to call upon a Creator God.

Emergence is therefore a major part of the new scientific worldview. Emergence says that, while no laws of physics are violated, life in the biosphere, the evolution of the biosphere, the fullness of our human historicity, and our practical everyday worlds are also real, are not reducible to physics nor explicable from it, and are central to our lives. Emergence, already both contentious and transformative, is but one part of the new scienti?c worldview I embrace.

Even deeper than emergence and its challenge to reductionism in this new scientific worldview is what I call breaking the Galilean spell. Galileo rolled balls down incline planes and showed that the distance traveled varied as the square of the time elapsed. From this he obtained a universal law of motion. Newton followed with his Principia, setting the stage for all of modern science. With these triumphs, the Western world came to the view that all that happens in the universe is governed by natural law. Indeed, this is the heart of reductionism. Another Nobel laureate physicist, Murray Gell-Mann, has defined a natural law as a compressed description, available beforehand, of the regularities of a phenomenon. The Galilean spell that has driven so much science is the faith that all aspects of the natural world can be described by such laws. Perhaps my most radical scienti?c claim is that we can and must break the Galilean spell. Evolution of the biosphere, human economic life, and human history are partially indescribable by natural law. This claim ?ies in the face of our settled convictions since Galileo, Newton, and the Enlightenment.

If no natural law sufices to describe the evolution of the biosphere, of technological evolution, of human history, what replaces it? In its place is a wondrous radical creativity without a supernatural Creator. Look out your window at the life teeming about you. All that has been going on is that the sun has been shining on the earth for some 5 billion years. Life is about 3.8 billion years old. The vast tangled bank of life, as Darwin phrased it, arose all on its own. This web of life, the most complex system we know of in the universe, breaks no law of physics, yet is partially lawless, ceaselessly creative. So, too, are human history and human lives. This creativity is stunning, awesome, and worthy of reverence. One view of God is that God is our chosen name for the ceaseless creativity in the natural universe, biosphere, and human cultures.

Because of this ceaseless creativity, we typically do not and cannot know what will happen. We live our lives forward, as Kierkegaard said. We live as if we knew, as Nietzsche said. We live our lives forward into mystery, and do so with faith and courage, for that is the mandate of life itself. But the fact that we must live our lives forward into a ceaseless creativity that we cannot fully understand means that reason alone is an insufficient guide to living our lives. Reason, the center of the Enlightenment, is but one of the evolved, fully human means we use to live our lives. Reason itself has finally led us to see the inadequacy of reason. We must therefore reunite our full humanity. We must see ourselves whole, living in a creative world we can never fully know….

At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity by Stuart Kauffman

Measures to Reduce EMF Exposure

The link at the end of this article steers you to a page that is a good resource for minimizing your exposure to electromagnetic frequencies/ radiation (EMF/EMR), so you don’t have to reinvent the wheel. Excellent bits of advice. Save the page in your computer or print it out… just in case of a power outage.

Years ago, I purchased a meter that was advertised on as a “ghost meter” to measure the EMF/EMR in my environment. It was an education to walk around my home and see what was causing my discomfort. One of the first things to go was the electric alarm clock.  Anything that makes sound, light, heat or motion, produces unnatural EMR. I bought a battery-operated clock that still serves me well. I removed all the rheostats and timers and replaced them with regular “on/off” switches. I moved from wifi to wired ethernet (which is actually faster than wifi).

Pray they switch soon from the microwave frequency to a safer system for electrical and electronic equipment. This stuff is not only undermining YOUR health, but also the health of your pets, plants and property. See “California wildfires”… how did they really begin? People in CA are very aware of the dangers of “smart meters” and PG&E is facing many, many lawsuits. Oh, and by the way, a head decision-maker at PG&E is also Vice-Chairman of Rothschild, Inc. Look it up.