So I’ve been going under the assumption that thermite and conventional explosives were sufficient to explain the available evidence at the WTC site on 9/11. I still think this is most likely the case, and such a position does have the appeal of not resorting to exotic mechanisms for the destruction of WTC 1,2 and 7. The presence of unburned thermite and thermite residue on site is well established https://web.archive.org/web/20141201114254/http://benthamopen.com/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm as is the flood of molten metal both above ground http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmuzyWC60eE and underground https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbcbsTiUhGk . The eyewitness accounts and videos of huge explosions are still out there https://www.youtube.com/user/ff911truth and the kinematic display of the controlled demolition of WTC7 is obvious if you know what to look for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6qwijRSdfo . In fact the evidence of an orchestrated western-sponsored false flag is so overwhelming on so many fronts that it’s ridiculous that anyone still needs to blog about it (see the reference section here for a bare tip of the iceberg) and personally I’d like to move on.
At this point the big lie is propped up solely by the skeletal remains of the “credibility” of the MSM still remaining in some people’s minds. It’s gone from comedy to farce to the disgusting immaturity and selfishness of far too many “adults” who are literally begging for their kids to be shepherded into an orwellian hell just so they don’t have to face uncomfortable facts. It’s no wonder kids lives are being wrecked on a wholesale basis. They have been abandoned to the state by their “parents”. They are on their own.
In any case, this site goes to some lengths to present evidence for an additional mechanism at play. Interesting stuff but not something that would be useful in forcing a credible public inquiry. But I find it intriguing: