(Natural News) One of the greatest scams of the 21st century started with former vice president Al Gore, who influentially introduced the concept of “global warming” to the world. Now, the truth about Gore’s “global warming” scam is documented in a new book by Marc Morano, titled, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change, available at Barnes and Noble.
At the turn of the century, Al Gore’s assets totaled between $780,000 and $1.9 million. After years of scaring the public with “threat of global warming” and convincing legislators to invest taxpayer money into climate change initiatives, Gore’s wealth multiplied. By 2007, Gore’s net worth was “well in excess” of $100 million. Gore had successfully used a climate panic to sway the government to invest in the economic sectors he was poised and ready to profit from. Under the Obama administration, taxpayer money flooded Gore’s investments, with energy stimulus packages awarding Gore’s tremendous hoodwink on the public.
Al Gore, the world’s first “carbon billionaire”
MIT scientist Richard Lindzen called Gore out for wanting to become the first “carbon billionaire.” By 2008, Gore put $300 million into a campaign to promote climate fears while offering carbon reduction solutions that benefited the firms he was invested in. In fact, when the Obama Administration introduced a “renewable energy” solution for the economy, fourteen of the tech firms Gore was invested in had received and/or benefited from over $2.5 billion in loans, grants, and tax breaks. Indeed, Gore had become the first “carbon billionaire.”
Congressman Fred Upton from Michigan called out Gore for using his circle of influence within the investment world and in Washington to profit off taxpayer funds. “Global warming” had done nothing but make Al Gore and his friends rich, while siphoning off billions of dollars from the taxpayers of the U.S. (For more on this topic, visit ClimateScienceNews.com.)
Global warming beneficiaries threaten skeptics while the future looks bright for more “carbon billionaires” looking to benefit from geoengineering
Where there is a great amount of money to uphold a dogma, there are threats to silence those who challenge that dogma. That’s exactly what has happened over the years when scientists disagree with the theory of “global warming.” In 2014, the Gawker website urged that climate denialists should face jail time. Headlines such as “Arrest Climate-Change Deniers” attacked global warming skeptics by calling them “Criminally negligent” and demanding that “It’s time to punish the climate-change liars.” Fake environmentalist David Suzuki called for government leaders who are skeptical of global warming to be “thrown in jail.” “I really believe that people like the former prime minister of Canada should be thrown in jail for willful blindness,” he mouthed off.
The dogmatic war on carbon will lead to more calculated investments. The newest solutions for combating “global warming” are geoengineering schemes. Scientists, such as David Keith from Harvard University are proposing ways to spray the Earth’s upper atmosphere with light-reflecting particles to block the sun’s heat. The firms that will benefit from the blanketing of the Earth’s skies will deal in sulfur, aluminum, lithium, and barium. Chemtrails are being witnessed in many places as geoengineering becomes public knowledge, exiting the realm of conspiracy theory. Even though the UN is no longer backing “infeasible” geoengineering projects, investors will be looking for new ways to be the “solution” to global warming by spraying the world’s skies with chemicals. The corruption of Al Gore’s global warming crusade will continue on into the future, as nefarious forces attempt to cash in on the fears by spraying the Earth’s skies.
Follow more news on climate science at Climate.news.
It’s instructive (for me at least) to contrast the genocidal implications of the AGW scam and its solutions, including planet-wide neurotoxic spraying with aluminum and drastically increasing the economic skim off the top which increases impoverishment and hunger at the bottom, with gore’s friendly easygoing TV persona. Satanism and psychopathy wear many convincing masks. By their fruits you will know them.
If there is such a thing as legally defined “hate speech” (a slippery slope if there ever was one) then gore’s hatred of all life would certainly fit the bill.