Russia’s Reaction to the Insults of the West is Political Suicide

Another pop IQ test for the western sheep. Washington really seems to think it can manufacture out of whole cloth and win a nuclear war with both russia and china, apparently with tolerable “collateral damage” among the brainwashed and increasingly impoverished american taxpayers.

People really need to start asking why washington is not making civilian survival preparations for the nuclear war which they intend to start.   No revamped fallout shelters, no distribution of iodine tablets, no designated evacuation routes etc.   Meanwhile both russia and china are frantically preparing their populations for the attacks they fully expect to see in the near future.

Are you starting to get the picture?

The onslaught of western Russia bashing in the past days, since the alleged poison attack by a Soviet-era nerve agent, Novichok (the inventor of which, by the way, lives in the US), on a Russian double agent, Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia, has been just horrifying. Especially by the UK. Starting with PM May, who outright accused Russia of using chemical weapons (CW) on UK grounds, without delivering any evidence. Strangely, there is no indication where Skripal and his daughter are, in which hospital the pair is being treated, no poison analysis is being published, they cannot be visited; there is absolutely no evidence of the substance they allegedly have been poisoned with – do Sergei and Yulia actually exist?

As a consequence, Theresa May expels 23 Russian diplomats, who have to leave the UK within a week. Then came Boris Johnson, the Foreign Minister clown, also an abject liar. He said, no he yelled, at his fellow parliamentarians that it was “Overwhelmingly likely, that Putin personally ordered the spy attack.” This accusation out of nothing against the Russian President is way more than a deep breach in diplomatic behavior, it is a shameful insult. – And no evidence is provided. Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, in fact, said that Johnson’s personal attack on President Putin was “unforgivable”.

Not to miss out on the bashing theatre, UK Defense Secretary, Gavin Williamson, got even more insolent, Russia “should go away and shut up”. In response to all this demonizing Russia for an alleged crime, for which absolutely no proof has been provided, Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, said that the undiplomatic comments meant that the British authorities are nervous and have “something to hide,”. Lavrov also strongly objected, wanted to initiate a joint UK-Russia investigation into the case – is he dreaming? – and responded to a question of diplomatic retaliation, yes, that Russia will also expel UK diplomates ‘soon’.

There is no doubt that the UK acted as Washington’s poodle. In the course of this anti-Russia tirade, Trump twittered that he fully supported UK’s position. Indeed, the European puppets, Macron, Merkel, May and their chief, The Donald, signed a joint statement blaming Russia for the nerve gas attack on the former double agent, “There is no plausible alternative explanation than that Russia was to blame for the attack”. Bingo, that says it all. The presstitute picks it up and airs it to the seven corners of this globe – and the western sheeple are brainwashed once again: The Russian did it….

http://thesaker.is/russias-reaction-to-the-insults-of-the-west-is-political-suicide/

When the west gets around to staging a false flag cyberattack to blame on the villan of the moment we will finally be down the rabbit hole.  9/11 was so untidy because of the need to actually crash planes and demolish buildings, leaving a trail of evidence they were not able to contain.   But when false flags happen in the virtual world there won’t be any evidence (supporting or otherwise)  to conceal.   When the “intelligence community” says russia ate their homework, asking for proof wouldn’t just be pointless, it would be meaningless.

It appears hillary hasn’t drunk her usual pint of blood this morning:

Georgia secretary of state says cyberattacks traced to DHS addresses

Clinton foundation took $145M from Russians to sell out the U.S. uranium supply to Russia

Gaddafi Warned of CIA-Sponsored Islamic Terror in Europe 6 Years Ago

 

Feds Plot War on Natural Health, Boosting Big Pharma Profits

Under the guise of keeping Americans safe by restricting their choices, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is plotting a massive power-grab that could crush the popular natural-health industry under an avalanche of regulatory red tape and policy uncertainty. Consumers could also lose access to an array of natural remedies. The controversial federal plot, which critics say has no basis in law or the Constitution, comes as Americans become increasingly disillusioned with “Big Pharma” and establishment medicine generally. The FDA schemes would protect the profits of well-connected pharmaceutical companies while further aligning U.S. policy with the United Nations “Codex Alimentarius” regime. Criticism of the FDA’s proposed scheme is growing louder, though. The public has a week left to comment on the looming regulations.

The controversial federal agency first released the draft of the proposed new “guidelines” in December of 2017. However, like the overwhelming majority of federal regulations — tens of thousands of pages were being added each year under Obama and previous presidents — the scheme to put natural remedies under a federal boot flew largely under the radar until recently. Essentially, the FDA wants to treat natural homeopathic remedies as “drugs,” and regulate them as such. Claiming that the FDA’s regulations play “an essential role” in ensuring that substances are “safe and effective,” the agency argued that the growing popularity of non-FDA approved homeopathic remedies was a “public health concern” that required its urgent attention.

“Recent years have seen an increase in the sale of products labeled as homeopathic,” the FDA said in an eight-page document outlining its desired schemes and the purported rationale behind them. “In the past, these products were mostly prepared by homeopathic physicians for individual patients. Today they are frequently mass manufactured and widely marketed as over-the-counter (OTC) products.” And that growth in consumer interest, according to the militarized food and drug bureaucracy, is cause for concern — so much so that new “enforcement actions” are needed to crush natural-health companies and protect Big Pharma and its lobbyists from free-market competition.

Currently, homeopathic remedies are governed under a “Compliance Policy Guide” regime disgorged by the FDA in 1988 titled “Conditions Under Which Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed.” But supposedly, due to the growth of the industry and the passage of time, the agency decided it needed to re-examine the “regulatory framework” it had previously created for such products. “As a result of the Agency’s evaluation, … FDA has determined that it is in the best interest of public health to issue a new guidance that applies a risk-based enforcement approach to drug products labeled as homeopathic and marketed without the required FDA approval,” states the agency’s new proposal.

Under the proposed plan, the FDA would claim for itself the power to determine that some products labeled homeopathic are “being marketed illegally.” Then, without being required or expected to even give notice to its targets, the agency would swoop in with vaguely defined “enforcement action.” Whether heavily armed and militarized FDA goon squads would be used, as they have been to terrorize farmers and grocers selling raw milk, was not immediately clear from the proposal. In fact, the agency seems to be trying to be as vague as possible, thereby allowing subjectivity and individual whim to govern its “enforcement actions.”

“In recent years, we’ve seen a large uptick in products labeled as homeopathic that are being marketed for a wide array of diseases and conditions, from the common cold to cancer,” said FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, who made big bucks with Big Pharma before taking his new post. “In many cases, people may be placing their trust and money in therapies that may bring little to no benefit in combating serious ailments, or worse — that may cause significant and even irreparable harm because the products are poorly manufactured, or contain active ingredients that aren’t adequately tested or disclosed to patients.”

The FDA’s approach to regulation of homeopathic products must “evolve to reflect the current complexity of the market,” Gottlieb continued. “We respect that some individuals want to use alternative treatments, but the FDA has a responsibility to protect the public from products that may not deliver any benefit and have the potential to cause harm.” What section of the U.S. Constitution the FDA believes gives it a “responsibility” to restrict the choices of consumers to use alternative treatments was not specified. Instead, the FDA often cites itself or unconstitutional federal statutes as its authority for doing what it wants.

The self-styled overseers of America’s foods and medicines promised to prioritize a number of areas in their “enforcement actions.” Among those being targeted: Products with alleged “safety concerns,” products that contain or purport to contain ingredients with “safety concerns,” products that are not taken by mouth or applied on skin, products that are intended to prevent or treat serious diseases, products for vulnerable populations such as children or the elderly, and products that have been adulterated. Especially concerning, the FDA said, is that homeopathic remedies might cause people to forgo “medical treatments” that the FDA believes to be “safe and effective.” If the FDA decides it does not like a product, the agency would make it unavailable to willing consumers.

Critics, though, are crying foul. Professional homeopath Patricia Feijo, in a brief for the Center for Medical Freedom about the proposed FDA power-grab, blasted the agency for “disregarding federal law and usurping the right of American people to use historically available health-enhancing products of their choosing.” While the scheme would be a major boon for Big Pharma, it would harm Americans “who should continue to have unregulated access to these healing products,” she added, saying the regulations would injure “countless individuals and the nation’s health.”

“Federal law does not give the FDA the authority to apply the rules designed only for toxic pharmaceuticals to nontoxic Homeopathic remedies,” she explained at the CMF, a project of the Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund. “The FDA’s only job is to ensure that products are manufactured according to legal standards and are properly labeled. The rules and regulations governing Homeopathic remedies that have been in place for most of the last century are more than adequate to protect the public.”

Feijo also blasted the FDA for assuming that the increased use of homeopathic remedies was due to ignorance. Instead, she said, citing data, it is a result of consumers being more informed. “For 200 years, Homeopathic remedies have survived attempts by proponents of pharmaceutical drugs to suppress Homeopathy time and again, but the threat here is real and must be taken seriously,” she continued. “It is not the job of FDA employees to place their value judgment on this system of medicine, but only to ensure that such drugs are manufactured according to legal standards and are properly labeled…. This new attack on homeopathy by Big Pharma and its friends must be defeated.”

The FDA notes on its website the influence of UN “guidelines” on these issues developed by the Codex Alimentarius Commission, a UN body that seeks to develop an Orwellian global regulatory regime over food, vitamins, drugs, and more. “Pursuant to its obligations under the World Trade Organization (WTO), the FDA works with foreign governments and international standard-setting bodies to harmonize food safety laws, regulations and standards based on science,” the FDA boasts on its website. “The FDA also establishes arrangements with regulatory partners to harmonize food safety standards and eliminate duplication or overlap in  food safety controls.” The FDA also notes that “WTO obligations are codified in U.S. law.”

Whether homeopathic remedies work better than conventional medical treatments — or not at all — is not the issue here. The issue, rather, is who will make healthcare decisions for Americans, individuals and families in consultation with their healthcare providers, or unaccountable federal bureaucrats beholden to Big Pharma and its lobbyists. Ironically, though, a great deal of evidence suggests that the FDA and the Pharmaceutical-Industrial Complex that dominates it through the infamous “revolving door” have a terrible track record when it comes to accurately assessing drug safety and efficacy. When little-known data such as the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and Number Needed to Harm (NNH) are considered, it appears that the FDA is often worse than clueless.

Instead of fighting back each time a rogue federal bureaucracy proposes more infringements on the rights of Americans, a better strategy would be to ensure adherence to the U.S. Constitution by all three branches of government. Because the document that created the U.S. government does not authorize federal intervention in “health,” “human services,” food, or drugs, the FDA and the broader U.S. “Department of Health and Human Services” (HHS) should be abolished. The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees that all powers not delegated to the feds under the Constitution are reserved for the states or the people. The free market remains the most powerful and reliable regulator of all. But any health regulations the public believes are needed ought to be established at the state and local level — not by unelected bureaucrats in Washington beholden to special interests.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/28523-feds-plot-war-on-natural-health-boosting-big-pharma-profits

RT Covers Central Banking Cabal Gold Suppression

Central banks manipulating & suppressing gold prices – industry expert to RT

Gold price suppression by the world’s central banks is a well-documented fact, according to Singapore’s BullionStar precious metals expert Ronan Manly. He explained to RT.com why that’s the case.

Central banks have a long and colorful history of manipulating the gold price. This manipulation has taken many shapes and forms over the years. It also shouldn’t be surprising that central banks intervene in the gold market given that they also intervene in all other financial markets. It would be naive to think that the gold market should be any different.

In fact, gold is a special case. Gold to central bankers is like the sun to vampires. They are terrified of it, yet in some ways they are in awe of it. Terrified since gold is an inflation barometer and an indicator of the relative strength of fiat currencies. The gold price influences interest rates and bond prices. But central bankers (who know their job) are also in awe of gold since they respect and understand gold’s value and power within the international monetary system and the importance of gold as a reserve asset.

So central banks are keenly aware of gold, they hold large quantities of it in their vaults as a store of value and as financial insurance, but they are also permanently on guard against allowing a fully free market for gold in which they would not have at least some form of influence over price direction and market sentiment.

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) crops up frequently in gold price manipulation as the central coordination venue and the guiding hand behind a lot of the gold price suppression plans. This is true in all decades from the 1960s right the way through to the 2000s. If you want to know about central bank gold price manipulation, the BIS is a good place to start. Unfortunately the BIS is a law onto itself and does not answer to anyone, except its central banks members.

In the 1960s, central bank manipulation of the gold price was conducted in the public domain, predominantly through the London Gold Pool. This was in the era of a fixed official gold price of $35 an ounce. Here the US Treasury and a consortium of central banks from Western Europe explicitly kept the gold price near $35 an ounce, coordinating their operation from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland, while using the Bank of England in London as a transaction agent. This price manipulation broke down in March 1968 when the US Treasury ran out of good delivery gold, which triggered the move to a “free market” gold price.

Central banks continued to surpress gold prices in the 1970s both through efforts to demonetize gold and also dump physical gold into the market to dampen price action. These sales were unilateral e.g. US Treasury gold sales in 1975 and over 1978-1979, and also coordinated (and orchestrated by the US) e.g. IMF gold sales across 1976-1980.

Collusion to manipulate the price also went underground, for example in late 1979 and early 1980 when the gold price was rocketing higher, the same central banks from the London Gold Pool again met at the opaque BIS in Switzerland at the behest of the US Treasury and Federal Reserve in an attempt to launch a new and secretive Gold Pool to reign in the gold price. This was essentially a revival of the old gold pool, or Gold Pool 2.0.

These meetings, which are not very well known about, were of the G10 central bank governors, i.e. at the highest levels of world finance. All of the discussions are documented in black and white in the Bank of England archives and can be read on the BullionStar website.

The wording in these discussions is very revealing and show the contempt which central bankers feel about a freely functioning gold market.

Phrases used in these meetings include:

there is a need to break the psychology of the market” and “no question of any permanent stabilisation of the gold price, merely at a critical time holding it within a target area” and  “to stabilise the price within a moving band” and “it would be easy and nice for central banks to force the price down hard and quickly“.

And these meetings of top central bankers were in early 1980, 11 years after the London Gold Pool and 8 years after the US Treasury reneged on its commitment in August 1971 to convert foreign holdings of US dollars into gold…..

https://www.rt.com/business/421618-central-banks-manipulating-suppressing-gold/

It should be emphasized that their fear of gold is nothing compared to their fear of publicly controlled currency.   After all, they’re already stolen much of the world’s gold via their price suppression scam.

Treasury Secretary Seeks to Reassure Everyone About Ft. Knox Gold

Censored: Ben Franklin on the Real Cause of the American Revolution

The Real Enemy: YOU

Doctor Bullying Results in Kidnapping of Newborn from Mother

Iowa City — A mother who went to the hospital to give birth was forced to spend four days in a psych ward and her newborn child was kept from her after she criticized the doctor for invading her privacy and he accused her of refusing to take medication from an outdated prescription.

Cheryl Cantaberry gave birth to a healthy baby at the University of Iowa Hospital late last month—but the visit was far from routine. While Cantaberry was recovering in the hospital she complained that one of the doctors on staff, Dr. Vesselin, was making her feel uncomfortable by entering her room without knocking and was not respecting her personal space.

Vesselin accused Cantaberry of being hysterical and began to question her about her former bipolar diagnosis. He asked her if she had been taking medication that was prescribed to her several years ago. Cantaberry informed the doctor that she had not taken the medication in years, and instead manages her mental discomfort with holistic alternatives. She also told him that her history of mental distress was tied to domestic violence, which is why his invasions of her personal space made her feel so uncomfortable.

Vesselin then accused Cantaberry of having an episode and ordered her to take psych medication. But she refused because she wanted to breastfeed her baby and did not want to poison the milk. The refusal sparked an argument with the doctor, in which he insisted that she take the medication, or he would not allow her to see her baby. Cantaberry naturally became extremely upset by the threat as any mother would.

Next, Vesselin called the Johnson County Sheriff’s Department and told them that the baby would not be safe to go home with her mother and that Cantaberry needed to be committed to the hospital’s psychiatric ward.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/mother-detained-after-giving-birth-psych-meds/

Remember, doctors know best.  That’s why they continue imprinting newborn males with sexual torture.  It’s for their own good.

Effects of Early Mother-Infant Separation One Year Later

Google Caught Propagandizing on Controversial Search Terms

Google may be the world’s most popular search engine, but it has also been the subject of a number of accusations in recent years that it is purposefully censoring searches and influencing results. In the case of search results related to the Parkland shooting, that alleged influence is becoming even more apparent.

This week, the staff at The Free Thought Project began testing various keywords related to the Parkland shooting on different search engines, and we noticed that if our search terms were controversial, the first page of Google results was filled with entirely different information than the other search engines. The information showed on Google was often not relevant to our search, and the results always seemed to support the official narrative.

The most striking of these results came when we searched for the words “girl says 3 shooters parkland,” expecting the news footage of an eyewitness from the school saying that there were multiple shooters.

On Google this video did not come up, nor did any articles about the statement that the student made to the news, despite the fact that our search was extremely specific….

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/google-caught-censoring-search-results-parkland-shooting/

Gargle has also been caught putting users in personally customized “information bubbles” by delivering results which adhere to profiles generated automatically by prior search histories, keying on the users’ cookies.   In other words, if you frequent mainstream news sources you’ll get different results than people with a more diverse input.  In this way the peasants can be kept ignorant while those who aren’t totally clueless can still be channeled in specific directions as needed.   Everyone gets a personal echo chamber which isolates them from different perspectives.  This is the problem which startpage is supposedly designed to avoid.

At this point it’s probably not even sufficient to use big alternatives like duckduckgo.   If you’re serious about avoiding censorship you need to actively seek out search engines from different countries, especially if you’re researching topics relevant to power centers in your home country.