Studies Outside the U.S. Show Unvaccinated Children Healthier than Vaccinated Children

The ages of the children ranged between the ages of two weeks – 46 years (obviously some friends were older with older children). Of the children studied, 273 were males and 216 were females. (Six children were unclassified.) Sue Claridge, who reported on the study, wrote:

“Respondents were asked to provide the year of birth, gender, vaccinations received, whether or not the child suffered from a range of chronic conditions (asthma, eczema, ear infections/glue ear, recurring tonsillitis, hyperactivity, diabetes or epilepsy) whether or not he or she needed grommets, had had a tonsillectomy, or were shown to develop motor skills (walking, crawling, sitting-up etc.). Parents also provided information on breastfeeding and bottle feeding and when a child was weaned if breastfed.”

During the study, another interesting fact emerged. Researchers discovered that 92 percent of the children requiring a tonsillectomy operation had received the measles vaccination, indicating that the vaccination for measles may have made some of the children more susceptible to tonsillitis. The study also revealed that 81 of the families had both vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Many of these families had vaccinated their older children but had grown more reluctant to vaccinate their younger children, due to their growing concerns regarding vaccine safety. Researchers concluded that:

“While this was a very limited study, particularly in terms of the numbers of unvaccinated children that were involved and the range of chronic conditions investigated, it provides solid scientific evidence in support of considerable anecdotal evidence that unvaccinated children are healthier that their vaccinated peers.”

Read more here: http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/studies-outside-the-u-s-show-unvaccinated-children-healthier-than-vaccinated-children/

Eugenicists Begin Culling the Homeless With Vaccine

CBS: Nurses hit the street to vaccinate homeless with flu shot

Yes this is really on the front of  Hawaii News Now – aka KGMB and KHNL (CBS and NBC news, respectfully [respectively -rw]).

Straight out of an Orwellian novel, this is going down in Hawaii.

From the article:

On a drizzly Friday, an IHS outreach team walked the streets of Waikiki looking for people to vaccinate.

“Would you be interested in a flu vaccine?” said Justin Phillips asked a homeless person. (SIC)

The traveling clinic was a first — so it wasn’t clear how many people would accept the vaccination.

Turned out, the majority of people who were offered the shot agreed to get one. In the first hour, outreach nurses went through half of their supply.

But it’s not just happening in the Aloha state. Big cities like Atlanta are vaccinating the homeless too.

Interestingly the mainstream Hawaii source says they’re now approaching homeless people (who knows their physical or mental state of being) to help “stop ER visits”. and keep them “healthy” with the flu shot.

That’s funny because the flu shot is ineffective and the CDC stated Hawaii is the only place not having a “flu epidemic” this season. Even if they now think there is an epidemic there, is this the way to solve it?  Oh and they appear to have announced that well before this “vaccinate the homeless on the street” campaign.

See all our sources at the bottom of the article.

All that is needed is a short consent form, a few questions and a signature by the homeless folks.

One must wonder what repercussions could happen from giving people with no medical history available, a potentially dangerous vaccine.  They are living in the streets, after all.

We did use several different browsers to try and watch the video of their heavy usage site, but alas their video player would not play, and the site, despite it’s wild popularity, wasn’t working so well.

We here at HNN feel giving random homeless strangers vaccines is unethical at best.

They say they plan to have more clinics in the near future, as this has been such a big hit.  We can only wonder what other vaccinations they’ll have in store.

Again, the flu shot is proven to be ineffective this year, (like just about every year) and has side effects listed on the insert such as paralysis and death.

HNN

SOURE IS RIGHT HERE: NBC/ABC Hawaii News Now (KGMB and KHNL)

Even their own paper stated there was no “outbreak” http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/37308116/hawaii-remains-the-only-state-where-the-flu-isnt-widespread

https://www.ajc.com/news/local/atlanta-homeless-receive-flu-vaccinations-from-fulton-board-health/aoexnq9Xu2YGZznYQulRxO/

https://www.healthnutnews.com/cbs-nurses-hit-the-street-to-vaccinate-homeless-with-flu-shot/

Anyone who is still in doubt that american medicine is a brainwashed cult need only look at this: http://members.tranquility.net/~rwinkel/MGM/primer.html

victory for natural medicine in Australia as nation rejects pharma-engineered attempt to outlaw nearly all herbs

(Natural News) Australia is one of the most oppressive medical police state regimes in the world. The medical tyranny in Australia has even led to the government denying entitlement checks to parents who refuse to have their children subjected to an endless battery of dangerous vaccine injections. Deranged pharma trolls in Australia have been pushing hard to outlaw herbal medicine and force all the citizens of Australia to use toxic, overpriced chemical prescription medications to treat everything.

Jon Rappoport from NoMoreFakeNews.com cites Crazz Files, reporting that the Australian government has rejected the pharma-funded attempt to outlaw natural medicine, reaffirming the efficacy of traditional remedies. This is a surprising and important win for health freedom in Australia, and it reveals that even the “Greens” party in Australia has someone become anti-natural medicine.

Here’s the story from Rappoport (original source link) …

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-03-10-rehuge-victory-for-natural-medicine-in-australia-as-nation-rejects-outlaw-herbs.html

http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/?s=codex

Election interference ALERT: Google / YouTube now blatantly trying to steal the 2018 elections

(Natural News) The realization is suddenly obvious: The Google / YouTube selective “censorship rampage” that has targeted conservative websites and content creators is a brazen, illegal scheme to interfere with U.S. elections and steal the 2018 mid-terms.

(Related: Read 10 powerful things you can do NOW to take back your freedom from the “techno tyrants”…)

The systematic silencing of conservative views is necessary, of course, for Democrats to win enough seats to gain control of the U.S. House of Representatives after the mid-term elections. Once control is established, Democrats will immediately move to impeach President Trump. Although the Senate would not likely prosecute that impeachment, the mere achievement of the U.S. House declaring “impeachment” would be enough to convince most brainwashed news consumers that Trump is somehow a guilty criminal (nobody will remember that Bill Clinton was also impeached by the House). From there, the 2020 presidential election is also stolen, and Democrats land their selected tyrant in the White House just in time for Ginsberg’s retirement from SCOTUS…..

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-03-07-election-interference-alert-google-youtube-now-blatantly-trying-to-steal-the-2018-elections.html

Mommy, aren’t corporations just people?

No Jimmy, corporations are constructed of people (and legal fictions) but they are a form of emergent AI intelligence based on legally constructed and enforced psychopathy via maximization of share value to the exclusion of all else, and the principle of limited liability for harm.   It’s very similar to how human bodies are constructed of protein and must consume protein for survival.

We are all meat to our corporate overlords, who must constantly monitor the herd and prevent stampedes and other mass movements which interfere with the harvest.   They might as well be alien invaders who are obsessed with terraforming the planet to their liking.

Don’t tell your Uncle Sam what I said ok?   He still believes corporations are the epitome of evolution instead of an aberrant infection of the human culture which will ultimately destroy all the fruits of evolution.

NYT Hysterically Shrieking for WWIII

It must be hard on The New York Times editors to set their hair on fire day after day in their effort to start World War Three. Today’s lead story, Russian Threat on Two Fronts Meets Strategic Void in the U.S., aims to keep ramping up twin hysterias over a new missile gap and fear of Russian “meddling” in the 2018 midterm elections.

The Times’s world-view begins to look like the script of a Batman sequel with Vlad Putin cast in The Joker role of the cackling psychopath who must be stopped at all costs! America’s generals have switched on the Batman signal beacon, but Donald Trump in the role of the Caped Crusader, merely dithers and broods in the splendid isolation of his 1600 Penn Avenue Bat Cave, suffering yet another of his endless bipolar identity crises. For God’s sake, The Times shrieks, do something! The Russians are coming! (Gotham City’s Chief of Police Hillary said exactly that last week in a Tweet!)

I think they misunderstood Mr. Putin’s recent message when he announced a new hypersonic missile technology that would, supposedly, cut through any imaginable US missile defense. The actual message, for the non mental defectives left in this drooling idiocracy of a republic, was as follows: Nuclear war remains unthinkable, so kindly stop thinking about it.

Mr. Putin’s other strategic position is also misrepresented — actually, not even acknowledged — in Monday’s NYT propaganda blast, namely, to discourage the USA’s decades-long policy of regime change here, there, and everywhere on the planet, creating a debris trail of one failed state after another. As a true-blue American, I must say these are two admirable propositions. Is it fatuous to add that atomic war is unlikely to benefit anyone? Or that the world has had enough of US military “meddling” in foreign lands?

Of course the shopworn trope of Russian “meddling” in the 2016 election still occupies the center ring of the American political circus. Today’s Times story includes another clumsy attempt to set up expectations that the 2018 midterm elections will be hacked by Russia, in order to keep the hysteria at code-red level. As usual, the proposition assumes that the alleged 2016 hacking is both proven and significant when, going on two years, there is no evidence of hacking besides the obviously amateurish Facebook troll farm. (And, by the way, how does that compare to the USA’s 2014 covert toppling of Ukraine’s president Viktor Yanukovych?  Talk about “meddling!”)…

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/48932.htm

Even the CFR is having second thoughts on the US coup in Ukraine

The Real Election Hack: Black Box Voting

 

Social Services Worker Fired, Escorted Out by Cops for Having a Gun Permit—NOT a GUN

via govtslaves.info

A social services worker is claiming that she was fired from her job and escorted out of the building by police after her employer learned that she had a concealed handgun license—even though she had never brought a gun to work.

A social worker took to Facebook and Twitter to share that she was fired from her job at Roanoke City Social Services in Virginia and escorted from the building by three police officers—not because she came to work with a gun, but because her employer learned that she had a concealed handgun license.

Storm Durham claimed that she went from working as “a damn good social worker” to being escorted out by police officers who claimed she was a “safety risk to the building.”…

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/social-services-worker-fired-escorted-cops-gun-permit/

New Orleans And Detroit Are Models For The Urban Police State

Detroit and New Orleans are quickly becoming examples of a city under total surveillance. How can you prevent your hometown from becoming a Surveillance State?

New reports on the increasing amount of surveillance conducted by police in New Orleans and Detroit are causing concern among local residents. The Intercept recently reported on the $40 million surveillance grid being erected in the city under the guise of a “public safety plan.” This plan includes a massive closed-circuit camera system, as well as automatic license plate readers and a city ordinance requiring owners of bars and liquor stores to install cameras outside their businesses. Despite a lack of evidence showing that the surveillance programs actually reduce crime, city officials are pushing forth with little oversight.

The Intercept reports:

It seems that the only oversight will come from the city’s Office of Homeland Security and from within the police department itself, which is currently under a federal consent decree for a myriad of violations including “a pattern of stops, searches, and arrests that violate the Fourth Amendment.

A spokesperson for the New Orleans Police Department insisted that the department had controls on access to its systems, and that all activity on the system is logged and monitored, leaving an audit trail in cases of abuse. But beyond that, the department has failed to answer basic questions about how the cameras will be used, what technology it will incorporate, how long the footage will be stored, and who will have access to the footage.

Further, The Intercept notes that New Orleans civilians were largely left out of the conversation and planning for the mass surveillance grid. Other than representatives from the tourism and service industries, New Orleans residents were provided with zero public hearings or opportunity to discuss the implications of the plan. With the recent addition of the Real Time Crime Monitoring Center, New Orleans joins cities like Los Angeles and Houston who have access to hundreds (if not thousands) of cameras that are constantly watching the public. The controversial city ordinance would feed all the footage from the cameras outside businesses that sell alcohol to the monitoring center. In early February, New Orleans City Council delayed the vote on the ordinance until late March.

Unfortunately, these new programs are only the latest form of surveillance facing the people of New Orleans. Activist Post recently reported,

New Orleans residents might have been swept up in a dragnet of data collection without their knowledge. The private global data collection and analysis corporation, Palantir Technologies, helped launch a secret software program in 2012 with New Orleans police to track connections between gang members. Palantir was founded by the CIA’s venture capital firm, making the current findings exponentially worse for those who value civil liberties. Moreover, Winston documents the lengths that the partnership went to cover up the program’s disclosure.

Detroit residents are also facing invasive security measures promoted as tools for fighting crime. The American Civil Liberties Union is one of the main critics and opponents of Detroit’s program, known as Project Green Light.

“If you’ve been to Detroit recently, you may have seen flashing green lights outside liquor stores, gas stations, and other businesses. The lights, according to police, are supposed to act as a deterrent, warning criminals that cameras are present, streaming real-time images of everyone entering or leaving the premises straight into police headquarters,” the ACLU writes. “This is the Motor City’s two-year-old surveillance program, Project Green Light, which its evangelists argue reduces crime at minimal expense to the city’s taxpayers.”

The program offers businesses preferential treatment in exchange for giving up privacy, including first priority for 911 calls. However, in order to receive this apparent benefit, business owners must pay between $4,000 to $6,000 to participate in Project Green Light. The money goes towards the purchase of a minimum of four high-definition surveillance cameras and other recording equipment. In addition, business owners must pay $150 a month to store the recordings in the Cloud. This means that Detroit business owners are literally subsidizing the construction of a massive surveillance apparatus across Detroit.

As the ACLU notes, “Programs like these violate our constitutional right to privacy by allowing police to peer into our lives without having to bother to get a search warrant.” Not to mention, the constant video streaming will give state and federal law enforcement agencies access to 24 hour recordings of innocent people. “This means that even when not open to the public, cameras would capture the inside and outside of restaurants, book stores, and coffee shops, which are common meeting places for many organizations, such as unions, immigrant rights advocates, and religious congregations,” the ACLU reported.

The ACLU also notes that National Geographic has published an analysis of surveillance networks from around the world which concluded that there is no evidence that these types of programs prevent crimes. NatGeo also mentions that cities with no history of terror attacks and relatively low crime rates are also embracing surveillance tech.

The reality is that mass surveillance grids like the ones in London, Hong Kong, New Orleans, L.A., New York City, and Houston are the future for all major cities and, eventually, every corner of the world. Is there any way to combat the growth of this invasive technology? Can the people put forth any reasonable resistance?

Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for ActivistPost.com and the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter. Derrick is the author of three books: The Conscious Resistance: Reflections on Anarchy and Spirituality and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 1, Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 2 and Manifesto of the Free Humans.

https://www.activistpost.com/2018/03/new-orleans-detroit-models-urban-police-state.html