According to Donald Trump and his partisans, Democrats—Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Democrats in Congress, the liberal media—are the Deep State. They also selectively include some Republicans, those who don’t support Trump. This characterization serves to hide the real Deep State—the bankers, transnational corporatists, their foundations, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the intelligence community, and the military industrial and surveillance complex. The reason the Deep State remains submerged, so to speak, is to diminish accountability and give the appearance the political class, the public state, is responsible for decisions. After he assumed office, Trump staffed his administration with Deep State operatives. He courted many prior to his win. For instance, he met with Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations. He also met with uber globalist and Rockefeller associate Henry Kissinger. The misunderstanding by his supporters of the true nature of the Deep State serves one singular purpose—to keep alive the partisan diversion that has dominated public state politics for more than a generation while obscuring the real masters of influence and power.
(Originally published March 17, 2014, but worth repeating.)
Dear Congress, Mr. President and the American public,
In 1975 the public learned that the National Security Agency had been collecting and analyzing international telegrams of U.S. citizens since the 1940s under secret agreements with all the major telegram companies. Years later, the NSA instituted another watch list program to intercept the international communications of key figures in the civil rights and anti–Vietnam War movements among other prominent citizens. Innocent Americans were targeted by their government. These actions were uncovered — and stopped — only because of a special Senate investigative committee known as the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, commonly known as the Church Committee.
We are former Church Committee members and staffers and write today as witnesses to history and as citizens with decades of collective experience in Congress, the federal courts, the executive branch and the intelligence community. We write today to encourage Congress to create a Church Committee for the 21st century — a special investigatory committee to undertake a thorough and public examination of current intelligence community practices affecting the rights of Americans and to make specific recommendations for future oversight and reform. Such a committee would work in good faith with the president, hold public and private hearings and be empowered to obtain documents. Such congressional action is urgently needed to restore the faith of citizens in the intelligence community and in our federal government.
The actions uncovered by the Church Committee in the 1970s bear striking similarities to the actions we’ve learned about over the past year. In the early 1970s, allegations of impropriety and illegal activity concerning the intelligence community spurred Congress to create committees to investigate those allegations. Our committee, chaired by Sen. Frank Church, was charged with investigating illegal and unethical conduct of the intelligence community and with making legislative recommendations to govern the intelligence community’s conduct. The bipartisan committee’s reports remain one of the most searching reviews of intelligence agency practices in our nation’s history.
Our findings were startling. Broadly speaking, we determined that sweeping domestic surveillance programs, conducted under the guise of foreign intelligence collection, had repeatedly undermined the privacy rights of U.S. citizens. A number of reforms were implemented as a result, including the creation of permanent intelligence oversight committees in Congress and the passage of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Even though our work was over 30 years ago, our conclusions seem eerily prescient today….
Actually the church committee had its own problems:
Here’s what we can look forward to if the invisible government manages to disarm us with 2 decades of staged or pharmaceutically-enabled massacres. Australia and the UK should also be paying close attention because even though they’ve already been disarmed, the mirage of their country’s democratic government is only needed in order to preserve the illusion that self defense has nothing to do with avoiding genocide. Once the USA falls, Dr. Jekyll will no longer be needed and the reign of emperor Hyde can begin.
(Natural News) Psychiatric drug use is on the rise in the U.S., with one out of every six Americans now taking some type of medication in this category. This is highly concerning given the scary side effects and poor effectiveness of many of these drugs, but there is one particularly disturbing aspect of this trend that seems to get glossed over, and that is the extraordinary number of children who are taking such drugs.
Mental health watchdog group Citizens Commission on Human Rights is drawing attention to the concerning fact that more than a million kids younger than six in our nation are currently taking psychiatric drugs.
While around half of these children are four to five years old, an incredible 274,804 of them are younger than a year old. That’s right: babies are being given psychiatric drugs. The number rises for toddlers aged two to three, with 370,778 kids in this category taking psychiatric drugs overall.
Data from IMS Health shows that the situation only gets worse as kids get older, with 4,130,340 kids aged 6 to 12 taking some type of psychiatric drug.
You might be forgiven for assuming that most of these statistics are made up by kids taking ADHD drugs given how common that approach seems to be nowadays, but it really only accounts for a small portion of it, with 1,422 of those younger than a year old and just over 181,000 of those aged four to five taking ADHD drugs.
Antidepressants and antipsychotics put forth some surprising figures, but the biggest category of psychotic drugs given to children appears to be anti-anxiety drugs. Just over 227,132 babies under one and nearly 248,000 of those aged four to five take these medications.
These numbers are even more shocking when you consider the fact that experts believe these estimates are far too low and the real numbers are actually much higher, due in part to the tendency for some doctors to hand out psychiatric medications for “off-label” uses. This risky practice entails giving out a drug to treat something that it is not indicated for, and the long-term effects of such an approach are completely unknown….
There was a secret meeting of CDC, FDA and pharmaceutical industry representatives in June of 2000 to discuss the “mercury problem” soon after they discovered a 760% increase in diagnoses of autism in children who received 25 micrograms of mercury via vaccination in their first month of life compared to those who received none in that time period.
Through the Freedom of Information Act we have the transcripts of this meeting (known as “The Simpsonwood Transcripts”) and they are CHILLING.
These CDC doctors KNEW that Mercury vaccines were causing neurological and renal (kidney) problems in kids. They KNEW Mercury was associated with speech delays, tics and more.
They discussed the need to water down the data so the Mercury/Autism link was no longer statistically significant. (Resulting in the study released by the CDC in 2003 where they excluded the African American boys from the study to get the outcomes they wanted.)
I just found this site that has excerpted important passages from that meeting – making it easier to read than wading through the entire transcript.
Any skeptics out there can look up the entire document with the FOIA number.
The U.S. government has known since 2000 that Mercury in the vaccines is toxic and causes SERIOUS problems for MANY individuals.
They try to say, “see we took the Mercury out of the childhood vaccine schedule and Autism rates didn’t change.” But they fail to mention that there is STILL Mercury in the vaccines recommended for pregnant women and babies starting as young as 6 months old.
They also fail to mention that Thimerosal is STILL used in the manufacturing process of MANY of the childhood vaccines and is “removed” before packaging – which leaves trace amounts of Mercury! It’s impossible to get it ALL out!
AND it makes the Aluminum in those shots MORE toxic than the Aluminum already is by itself.
The government’s handling of the vaccine program has basically been a shell game. Making it almost impossible for the average person to follow along and figure out what’s really happening.
Luckily, there are brave medical professionals and scientists like Dr. Boyd Haley and Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny who are willing to stick their necks out and help us “regular” folks understand the science and put the pieces together in this ruse.
But you don’t have to be able to understand scientific studies in order to read and understand the #SimpsonwoodTranscripts
He’s in agreement with William Binney, ex technical director of the NSA. See the last article linked below.
Kim Dotcom has once again chimed in on the DNC hack, following a Sunday morning tweet from President Trump clarifying his previous comments on Russian meddling in the 2016 election.
In response, Dotcom tweeted “Let me assure you, the DNC hack wasn’t even a hack. It was an insider with a memory stick. I know this because I know who did it and why,” adding “Special Counsel Mueller is not interested in my evidence. My lawyers wrote to him twice. He never replied. 360 pounds!” alluding of course to Trump’s “400 pound genius” comment.
Dotcom’s assertion is backed up by an analysis done last year by a researcher who goes by the name Forensicator, who determined that the DNC files were copied at 22.6 MB/s – a speed virtually impossible to achieve from halfway around the world, much less over a local network – yet a speed typical of file transfers to a memory stick.
The local transfer theory of course blows the Russian hacking narrative out of the water, lending credibility to the theory that the DNC “hack” was in fact an inside job, potentially implicating late DNC IT staffer, Seth Rich….
Who killed Seth Rich?
FLASHBACK=>John Podesta: ‘I’m Definitely For Making an Example of a Suspected Leaker’
On July 8, 2016, 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich was murdered in Washington DC. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.
The (Rich) family hired Rod Wheeler to investigate their son’s murder. Wheeler told FOX 5 DC on Monday there is tangible evidence on Rich’s laptop that confirms he was communicating with WikiLeaks prior to his death.
A flashback to an email chain extracted from the ‘Podesta emails’ via Wikileaks in February of 2015, shows just how paranoid the Clinton campaign was about leaks to the press. John Podesta said in an email that he’s ‘definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have a real basis for it’ and that there are ‘stiff consequences for leaking’….