Who is Tulsi Gabbard’s Guru?

What’s not to like about Tulsi Gabbard?   She has great politics, great delivery, great looks, a winning smile, she’s young, energetic, adventuresome, unafraid of upsetting the status quo… she’s PERFECT!   Seriously.  Perfect in every way.  She’s presidential material.   If HIllary Clinton could transplant her brain (sans her personality) into Tulsi’s head it would already be done by now.   Must … get … out … vote … for … Tulsi … Gabbard …

And that’s what has me wondering.   Not about Tulsi, but about my instinctive reaction to her.   It’s a warning sign to me.  Am I being manipulated?   And I have to wonder how she wound up enlisting into the Iraq “war”.   Yes I know the standard story about 9/11 and all that.   Serving her country.  Fine.

Let’s have a refresher course in recent american politics.

GHW Bush: deep state operative, skull and bonesman, son of nazi traitor / money launderer / fascist putschist Prescott Bush who was never even indicted for his treason, allegedly involved with JFK assassination as a CIA field operative, appointed director of CIA, beneficiary of Reagan’s near assassination at the hands of the son of a bush family friend and apparently took over much of the white house afterward while reagan was maintained in a medically induced stupor.   Oversaw the USA’s nazi-like torture / death squad / sweat shop regimes imposed on latin america during the 80’s which led directly to the destruction of much of american manufacturing.   Ties to cocaine traffickers manuel noriega and barry seal.   Boss of oliver north during iran contra cocaine coverup.  Not hard to see through him.  But he was a veteran, so he appealed to that demographic at least well enough to get him elected to one term as president.

Bill Clinton, rhodes scholar, liberal pot smoker who didn’t inhale, easygoing, affable, young, good looking horatio alger type who came out of an obscure governorship to become, what, the answer to our dreams at the time?   Except he was a dud and worse.  He pushed through nafta.  He made the death penalty “popular” again via the OKC false flag which happened under his watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWwrEEP8EBk .  His atty general was totally hands-on with the Waco police state atrocity.   He maintained ties with bush’s buddies in latin america.   Oversaw the sanctions regime in iraq which killed around 500,000 children.  Worked for the CIA spying on dissident anti-war americans in london during the vietnam war.   He’s a violent rapist with a list of publicly proclaimed victims.   He protected bush’s CIA cocaine operation in mena arkansas during the 80’s.   He didn’t even BOTHER to try legalize pot.  Now he and his family party with the bush family when the media dimwits aren’t looking.

GW Bush, son of GHW Bush,  born sucking on a silver spoon.   Totally undistinguished death penalty governor of texas.  Did time in the texas air national guard during the vietnam “war”.   Beneficiary of a media sting operation against dan rather just before the 2004 election ( http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/276-74/10976-focus-dan-rather-was-right-about-george-w-bush )  Member of skull and bones.   Ran against “liberal” john kerry (another “vietnam veteran” hippie-PR-demographic type who claimed to speak for veterans during the congressional hearings but turned out to to be another bonesman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yOF713wOD4 and married into the heinz family fortune  ) 9/11 conspirator.   Mortgage fraudster controlled demolition insider http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021302783.html .Another obvious “machine-man” of the establishment.

Obama, the answer to our dreams (again).   Rocketed from “community organizer” (whatever that is) to senator to president to instant nobel peace prize winner to god, based on what, his skin color?   His easygoing, affable personality?   Or the deep state credentials of his genocidal mentor, zbigniew brzezinski?  http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2017/06/pilger-the-long-secret-alliance-uncle-sam-and-pol-pot/ Maintained our ruinous and nazi-like trade and foreign policies in latin america and the middle east.   Supported wall street’s mass theft in 2008 and 2009 while blocking defrauded homeowner bailouts https://www.democracynow.org/2008/9/29/is_this_the_united_states_congress , introduced and pushed through the NDAA’s police-state provisions allowing indefinite lockup of americans on american soil without charge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yO23HoRv6Ms .  Took the reigns to oversee the ongoing de-industrialization of the USA.   And again, didn’t even BOTHER to TRY to legalize pot or grant amnesty to the hundreds of thousands (millions?) of non-violent pot “offenders” locked up in american gulags.  Actually laughed about it when asked.  The big O.

Let me just point out that despite the above people’s particular PR demographics and public platforms, they all supported the systematic looting of main street for the benefit of wall street.   “Obamacare” for instance, beneath its humanitarian facade, functions to enforce massive payouts to wealthy insurance conglomerates without even addressing the massively exploitative and destructive compulsions of the medical establishment, all while not even being economically sustainable.  When it crashes and burns, who will be “bailed out”?  You can guess.  This is an economic false-flag in the making.  In general, all the PR platitudes in the universe are worthless without economically rational policies to implement them.   These are not stupid people.  If they don’t understand economics they can certainly hire economists as consultants.  In the absence of economic rationality, one has to question underlying motives.  http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/theclowardpivenstrategypoe.html

Trump.  Trump seems to be a genuine wildcard in all this.  He was obviously not the anointed one, judging from the media hysteria even on the establishment right.   His nomination was apparently a pedosta ploy (the DNC didn’t think he had a chance)  His platform was one of economic nationalism (kinda like the founders, yay!) although whether he was sincere or will be able to be effective remains to be seen.   Maybe not rabidly pro WWIII.  Maybe not an al qaeda supporter.  Silver spoon fed wealthy insider, but maybe not a deep-state insider.  Maybe not a satanist.

Anyway, given the advanced state of propaganda, economic control, social control and actual manchurian-candidate-type mind control which the permanent government has demonstrated over the years, you’ll pardon my alarm bells ringing wrt Tulsi.  Maybe there’s nothing to see here.  Maybe.

Vegetarian Cult Monkeys Armed To The Teeth

Chris Butler Displays Homosexual Proclivities

Tulsi Gabbard, Cult Born And Raised.

Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War

Of the many myths that befog the modern political mind, none is so corrupting of the understanding or so incongruent with historical fact as the notion that the wealthy and the powerful do not conspire.

They do.

They conspire continually, habitually, effectively, diabolically and on a scale that beggars the imagination. To deny this conspiracy fact is to deny both overwhelming empirical evidence and elementary reason.

Nevertheless, for the astute observer of the ‘Great Game’ of politics, it is an unending source of wonderment to stumble across ever more astounding examples of the monstrous machinations of which wealthy and powerful elites are capable. Indeed, it is precisely here that authors Docherty and Macgregor enter the fray and threaten to take our breath away entirely.

Thus, the official, canonized history of the origins of the First World War, so they tell us, is one long, unmitigated lie from start to finish. Even more to the conspiratorial point is the authors’ thesis that – and to paraphrase a later Churchill who figures prominently in this earlier story – never were so many murdered, so needlessly, for the ambitions and profit of so few.

In demolishing the many shibboleths surrounding the origins of the ‘Great War’ (including ‘German responsibility’, ‘British peace efforts‘, ‘Belgian neutrality’ and the ‘inevitability’ of the war), Docherty and Macgregor point the finger at what they argue is the real source of the conflict: a more or less secret cabal of British imperialists whose entire political existence for a decade and a half was dedicated to the fashioning of a European war in aid of destroying the British Empire’s newly emerging commercial, industrial and military competitor, Germany.

In short, far from “sleepwalking into a global tragedy, the unsuspecting world”, Docherty and Macgregor contend, “was ambushed by a secret cabal of warmongers” originating not in Berlin, but “in London”.

I must confess at this juncture to a certain bias in granting credence to such a striking thesis, this if only on general principle alone. After all, one straight look at present day political reality is to look square into the maw of Orwell’s nightmare. Moreover, three decades of independent journalism have led me to conclude not only that virtually nothing of what is presented as ‘news’ is remotely true, but that the conventional writing and presentation of history itself is as phoney as a three dollar bill. Still, one does demand a credible argument or two. Let’s look at a few of those contained in ‘Hidden History’. …

http://www.globalresearch.ca/hidden-history-the-secret-origins-of-the-first-world-war/5600090

America’s Militarized Police. Made in Israel?

… The various levels of government that make up the United States seem to be preparing for some kind of insurrection, which may indeed be the case somewhere down the road if the frustrations of the public are not somehow dealt with. But there is another factor that has, in my opinion, become a key element in the militarization of the police in the United States. That would be the role of the security organs of the state of Israel in training American cops, a lucrative business that has developed since 9/11 and which inter alia gives the “students” a whole different perspective on the connection of the police with those who are being policed, making the relationship much more one of an occupier and the occupied.

The engagement of American police forces with Israeli security services began modestly enough in the wake of 9/11. The panic response in the United States to a major terrorist act led to a search for resources to confront what was perceived as a new type of threat that normal law-and-order training did not address.

Israel, which, in its current occupation of much of Palestine and the Golan Heights as well as former stints in Gaza, southern Lebanon and Sinai, admittedly has considerable experience in dealing with the resistance to its expansion manifested as what it describes as terrorism. Jewish organizations in the United States dedicated to providing cover for Israeli’s bad behavior, saw an opportunity to get their hooks into a sizable and respected community within the U.S. that was ripe for conversion to the Israeli point of view, so they began funding “exchanges.”

Since 2002 there have been hundreds of all-expenses-paid trips including officers from every major American city as well as state and local police departments. Some have been sponsored by the American Jewish Committee (AJC) and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has also been directly funding trips since 2008, explaining that “As a people living under constant threat of attack, the Israelis are leading experts in security enforcement and response strategies.” The intent? To “learn” and “draw from the latest developments” so the American cops can “bring these methods back home to implement in their communities.”

http://www.globalresearch.ca/americas-militarized-police/5601102