“The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself – when things become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those whose differences from the majority are disturbing. … Every state has been so used to classifying its neighbors as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new weapons devised. … In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”
The First Global Revolution. The Club of Rome (1991) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_of_Rome
Which came first, “anthropogenic global warming” or the political class’s need for enemies? It’s telling that AGW only became a well-funded media concern after the publication of this report despite global temps being in a distinct uptrend since the little ice age of the 1600’s, with a distinct breakout since the mid-1900’s, followed by a now 15 year long plateau despite a deluge of CO2 from newly industrialized China. http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2013/09/climate-scientists-told-to-cover-up-the-fact-that-the-earths-temperature-hasnt-risen-for-15-years/ But incredibly, the IPCC ignores solar wind variability and its impact on earth’s cloud cover in its search for causes. This factor would seem to argue that we are heading into a period of global cooling, not warming. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/08/160825113235.htm https://phys.org/news/2015-08-solar-decliningwhat.html http://notrickszone.com/2013/12/01/ipcc-finds-the-important-natural-climate-driver-solar-surface-radiation-intensity-but-then-ignores-and-buries-it/ And then there’s the “climate gate” emails which show researchers chasing grant dollars by doctoring the temperature data, and the MSM hyping computer models whose predictions (predictably given the nature of chaotic systems) have proven worthless. But that’s just my cynic speaking. I’m sure the club wants what’s best even for starving children in africa. As long as they get a cut of the profit.
A careful examination of Al Gore’s “hockey stick” graph, which shows the strong correlation between global temps and global CO2 concentrations, shows that in the few places where the curves diverge, it’s always temperature that leads CO2. Historically, it seems temperature drives CO2 production, not the other way around, and there are known mechanisms for how this might be occurring: temp related CO2 ocean solubility (which decreases with increasing temp, forcing CO2 out of solution) and temp related soil CO2 production. http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2018/02/al-gores-credibility-on-global-warming/
In any case assumptions make the conclusions. The unspoken assumption here is the “club’s” fervent desire to preserve existing power structures, including existing monetary and financial structures such as debt-based money, fractional reserve banking and “sovereign” debt (i.e. enslavement of an entire nation based on decisions made by a few privileged members of that nation), which are apparently considered laws of nature. They are not. They are not even morally justifiable, and they impose needless constraints on possible solutions to maintaining social (as opposed to political) order. The fact is that WE DON’T KNOW what the carrying capacity of this planet would be if had an honest money supply. What we do know is that the present system generates massive amounts of waste, destruction and toxic chemical, radiological and genetic pollution that the same media establishment which hypes AGW seems oddly oblivious to. http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2012/11/video-the-light-bulb-conspiracy/
How would an honest money system modify the problem? For one, it would remove important levers of social control and economic harvesting utilized for centuries by the bankster class to impose economic cycles and war, the two most proximate causes of famine and ecological catastrophe. Here’s what monetary.org has to say about honest money:
Professor Yamaguchi (Berkeley, Doshisha Universities) shows that Kucinich’s HR 2990 NEED Act: (1) Provides the funding for infrastructure repair (which solves the unemployment crisis) (2) Pays off the national debt as it comes due (3) Does this without inflation! Click here to watch a video of Professor Yamaguchi’s presentation to the 2010 AMI Conference. Wow!
The deliberate imposition of poverty is probably the most useful tool at the bankster’s disposal. http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2015/02/milton-friedman-on-the-origins-of-the-great-ripoff/ It satisfies both population control and social control functions. The need for an enemy is also self evident and provides the cover for both centralized political control and episodic orgies of profitable violence, depopulation and (surprise!) “public debt” creation, with the added function of wealth destruction as needed to maintain the desired level of poverty. The taxation of CO2 emissions would be a useful addition to this arsenal, providing a finely tunable control lever for suppressing or channeling economic activity in accordance with elite objectives while providing a funding mechanism for its enforcement mechanism, the military arm of their “new world order”.
What the luciferian central banksters DON’T want is the social, economic and intellectual synergy which would result from a sufficient level of grassroots social interaction coupled with a sufficient level of grassroots wealth to provide a real alternative to centralized economics and centralized political control. The idea is to prevent the formation of such “crystals” from the solution of the socioeconomic system by managing the concentration of solution (economic diversity density, a function of population density and grassroots wealth) and temperature (level of social chaos). Both poverty and war suffice to provide such management, but there are other tools, such as the deliberate destruction of the family, which allows for a higher population density while maintaining an adequate level of poverty, atomization and chaos at the street level:
The social control utility of government sponsored drug running is also important to the status quo, providing both street-level chaos and one of the few remaining props for the dollar given the ongoing deindustrialization of the USA. Drug profits are laundered through wall street, just as petrodollars are used to buy US treasuries. Both create a demand for US dollars. That’s why the USA has essentially granted immunity to certain latin american drug gangs: those are the gangs which have agreed to do precisely that. The ones that don’t, such as the FARC in colombia, are the ones that are targetted ( see: http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2012/09/fitts-the-ultimate-cold-call/ http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2015/07/mexico-drug-war-explained/ http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/04/why-arent-we-putting-us-agencies-on-trial-for-financing-mexican-drug-cartels/ http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2012/11/mexican-drug-cartel-assassins-bought-guns-from-u-s-border-patrol/ http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2012/10/mexican-diplomat-says-u-s-government-works-with-mexican-cartels-to-traffic-drugs-into-the-united-states/ )