Does it involve a non-disclosure agreement?
Two questions, one answer.
- What does a global fascist system like that to be created in the US and the EU via the pending TTIP “free trade” agreement need to remain in power and to thrive in spite of it’s undemocratic, totalitarian and corporatecentric rule?
- What has the CIA and State Department built in every single nation they overthrew over the past 60 years in order to install a pro-Western, fascist dictator of their choosing?
The answer to both of those questions is a brutal, over-reaching police state that can and will erase dissidents in the dead of the night who espouse “radicalized” ideas of individual’s “rights, liberties and democracy” being trampled upon by our New Corporate World Order. These kinds of voices have been and will be silenced via midnight raids on homes where unnamed “terrorism suspects” are rounded up and disappeared into the labyrinth of the global Industrial Intelligence Industry for crimes unknown and never specified for reasons of “national security”
The democracy-crushing Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) with it’s disastrous Investor-state dispute settlement apparatus, is quietly worming it’s way through the European Union (EU) on route to being implemented sometime in the end of this year.
It is extremely unpopular, both abroad and here in the States and that is why it wont be finalized until after the US “election” and most likely will be signed by President Peace Prize after another is made ready to take his place and during the lame duck session of congress.
But before that happens, a security system has to be put in place over the whole of the area affected by this agreement: all of the European Union. A security agreement which just happens to include the United States, the other partner of the TTIP.
Thanks to the “ISIS™” attacks in Paris and now in Brussels, there is a substantial push to bring the intelligence operations of all the member states of the future TTIP agreement under one banner, something like the Department of Homeland Security which was created here in the US after the false flag event that was 9/11 and the follow-up anthrax attacks which sealed the deal.
- EU pledges to better share information on terrorism after Brussels attacks – EUROPE
- Brussels attack: Why can’t Europe close the gap in its intelligence sharing?
- Brussels Attacks Expose Europe’s Scant Progress on Security
Before, I asked you two questions. Now I’m going to give you three quotes:
“We are on the verge of global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” David Rockefeller
“As America (Europe?) becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat” Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book, The Grand Chessboard
“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” Project for the New American Century
“What is terrifying in these assertions is that they emanate from the architects of US foreign policy. In other words, America’s leaders in Washington and Wall Street firmly believe in the righteousness of war and authoritarian forms of government as a means to “safeguarding democratic values”.
The repeal of democracy is portrayed as a means to providing “domestic security” and upholding civil liberties. Truth is falsehood and falsehood is truth. Realities are turned upside down. Acts of war are heralded as “humanitarian interventions” geared towards upholding democracy. Military occupation and the killing of civilians are presented as “peace-keeping operations.”
This dominant viewpoint is also shared by the mainstream media, which constitutes the cornerstone of the propaganda and disinformation campaign. Any attempt by antiwar critics to reveal the lies underlying these statements is defined as a “criminal act”.” Michel Chossudovsky, 2004
The change they are looking to bring in this case is clear: they want a security apparatus put in place across the whole of Europe which will allow the corporate-backed intelligence agencies the ability to lock-down anyone who dares oppose their New Corporate World Order. This is something they have been working on for a couple of months, starting in the wake of the Paris attacks. They weren’t getting enough traction, so it appears they more than ready to use the Brussels attacks to their advantage. …