Study Confirms Babies Are Right: Circumcision is Mutilation

Those clever babies seem to have been right all along!  But that doesn’t mean medicine is corrupt to the core.   Correlation is not causation, after all.   Syence dictates that parents must accept whatever else (other than MGM) doctors have to offer, if they don’t want to be branded stupid or have their kids kidnapped by syentists for their own good.

A new study in the British Journal of Urology International shows that men with normal, intact penises enjoy more sexual sensitivity — as much as four times more — than those who have been circumcised. Circumcising slices off more of a male’s sensitivity than is normally present in all ten fingertips.

In every site tested, intact men have as much or more fine-touch skin sensitivity on their penis and foreskin than a man who has been circumcised. Circumcision removes the most sensitive portions of the penis.

This new [2007] study demonstrates what we have suspected for decades, that circumcision’s result — if not its intent — is reduced sexual pleasure for men. As such, it is a violation of a male’s right to bodily integrity. In large part, female circumcision does the same; even the mildest forms remove the most sensitive portions of the female genitalia. Females in the USA and many other countries are protected by law from all forms of genital cutting. …

Of COURSE the intent of MGM is reduction of pleasure.  Even ancient texts show that they’ve known about the sensitivity of the foreskin for many centuries.   It’s the unspoken understanding of modern-day doctors too.   Pleasure is verboten for statists because it diverts human motivation away from war and industrial production to love and family.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.