Pentagon Concludes America Is Not Safe Unless It Conquers The World, Plans War against Russia

The Pentagon has released its “National Military Strategy of the United States of America 2015,” June 2015. http://news.usni.org/2015/07/02/document-2015-u-s-national-military-strategy  

The document announces a shift in focus from terrorists to “state actors” that “are challenging international norms.” It is important to understand what these words mean. Governments that challenge international norms are sovereign countries that pursue policies independently of Washington’s policies.  These “revisionist states” are threats, not because they plan to attack the US, which the Pentagon admits neither Russia nor China intend, but because they are independent.

Be sure to grasp the point: The threat is the existence of sovereign states, whose independence of action makes them “revisionist states.”  In other words, their independence is out of step with the neoconservative Uni-Power doctrine that declares independent action to be the right of Washington alone. Washington’s History-given hegemony precludes any other country being independent in its actions. By definition, a country with a foreign policy independent of Washington is a threat.

The Pentagon’s report defines the foremost “revisionist states” as Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea. The focus is primarily on Russia. Washington hopes to co-opt China, despite the “tension to the Asia-Pacific region” that China’s defense of its sphere of influence causes, a defense “inconsistent with international law” (this from Washington, the great violator of international law), by turning over what remains of the American consumer market to China.  It is not yet certain that Iran has escaped the fate that Washington imposed on Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, Ukraine, and by complicity Palestine. …

http://www.globalresearch.ca/pentagon-concludes-america-is-not-safe-unless-it-conquers-the-world-us-plans-war-against-russia/5461706

When they say “america” they’re talking about luciferianism, because that’s what controls most of the major world institutions.  Luciferianism can’t openly and peacefully co-exist in the open with alternatives because it’s obscene and disgusting, and real people (as opposed to colonized puppets) are naturally repelled by it.  It can only either live in secret or destroy all alternatives.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.