During his three day summit on Countering Violent Extremism, Obama continued to reject the notion that the West is at war with radical Islam.
Instead, Obama said the greatest threat to America is its own citizens, or as Obama likes to refer to them as right-wing extremists.A new intelligence assessment circulated by the Department of Homeland Security, focuses on the domestic terror threat from ‘right-wing sovereign citizen extremists,’ and comes as the Obama administration holds a White House conference to focus efforts to fight violent extremism. …
In the state-managed leftright paradigm, when the current puppet is “left” the state enemy is “right”. Do you see how that works? But he’s correct in that the state is not at war with radical islam, it CREATED radical islam as its own tool to justify its conquest of the middle east. If they wanted to invade mars, the tool of choice would be radical martians. The domestic approach is a little different because the magicians need to demonize dissenters while maintaining the illusion of benevolence to its primary audience, the increasingly narrow demographic that still believe the hocus pocus but have some residual sense of community with their fellow citizens. So if they want to clamp down on domestic dissent, the tool of choice would be the puppet at the “extreme” end of the OTHER arm. But certainly not the gentlemen/colleagues across the aisle.
So here’s what the domestic extremists have been up to and why you should be so terrified of the enemy. They are capable of anything:
By the way, it’s interesting how people of widely divergent political philosophies are converging on a very simple but apparently “radical” idea that was at the heart of the american revolution: self governance. Wikipedia says
Sovereignty is understood in jurisprudence as the full right and power of a governing body to govern itself without any interference from outside sources or bodies.
In the context of the “sovereign citizens” movement the “governing body” is defined as the individual, simply a claim of the right to determine your own destiny. Sounds a lot like anarchism. And they both sound a lot like:
… We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. …
You’re supposed to know that this passage is from the american declaration of independence, but it’s ok if you don’t, just read it and understand what it says: there is no higher authority in your life than yourself, that you have the right to determine how to live your life as an individual and (if you choose to) as part of a community of your brothers and sisters. This simple, vastly empowering understanding of what it means to be human was the fruit of centuries of very slow and painful human progress and led to a precious couple of centuries of something approaching a decent society in the united states. But now the descendents of the aristocrats who enslaved europe long before the declaration was written want you to believe it’s a dead philosophy, they want you to join their cult and tear it all down, for the best of reasons of course, such as external and internal threats of their own creation, and an economic collapse, also of their own creation. It seems aristocrats were the original organized criminals.