Infant Body Parts for Sale: Foreskins

Medical Journal Articles from 1969 to 1998 DocumentingThe Use of Human Foreskins in Medical,
Pharmaceutical, and Other Commercial Enterprises
A universal MEDLINE search on 25 April 1998 using the key words “Foreskin Fibroblasts” (the term used for harvested foreskins after they are processed for sale) yielded 471 articles. The articles with “human foreskin fibroblasts” in their titles are listed below. …

[24 entries listed]

Foreskins For Sale

… The after market for human foreskin is where the real money is made. Foreskins are sold to biomedical companies, which use them in the manufacture of insulin. They’re also sold to middlemen, who package them for sale to research companies that in turn use them for biochemical analysis. Corporations such as Advanced Tissue Sciences (ATS), Organogenesis, BioSurface Technology, Genzyme, and Ortec International are taking cells from amputated foreskins and experimenting with artificial skin. Products like Dermagraft-TC, which sells for about $3,000 per square foot, are grown from the cells in infant foreskins and used as a temporary wound covering for burn patients. One foreskin contains enough genetic material to grow 250,000 square feet of skin….

ICCPR’s [International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, UN GA Resolution 2200 A (XXI)] slavery, forced labor, and traffic in persons includes the industry of a growing number of American medical hospitals and medical professionals colluding with scientific agencies harvesting neonatal foreskins for skin grafts, i.e., as compulsory organ donation.

Associations like Organogenesis (Canton, MA) have received approval from the USA’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for its foreskin-based GraftskinTM, and has served Western Pennsylvania Hospital, with additional studies conducted at Yale University and Boston University (Stephen Brewer, New Skin Twin Life- and Look-Saver. Longevity September 1992: 18).

Another profit-oriented tissue engineering company, Advanced Tissue Sciences (La Jolla, CA), retrieves foreskins from hospitals so one foreskin can create 250,000 square feet of dermis … [T]he annual market for dermis could be $1 billion to $2 billion. Advanced Tissue Sciences has sold about $1 million worth of cultured dermis to Proctor & Gamble, Helene Curtis, and other such businesses for pre-market testing. Advanced Tissue Science’s foreskin-derived merchandise held a $32 million stock offering in the beginning of 1992 (Julie Pitta.

Biosynthetics. Forbes 10 May 1993: 170-171). [The 32-page Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. 1997 Annual Report refers to “fibroblasts” but does not contain the word “foreskin.”]

A Boston Globe frontispiece to its Business section reads: Companies See $1.5b Market in Replacement Skin Products. This article reveals another enterprise of genital mutilation-cum-scientific advance: BioSurface Technology of Cambridge, MA. All three companies face no shortage of hoarding and retailing foreskins, and are motivated by individuals like Dr. Tania Phillips, professor of dermatology at Boston University of Medicine, insisting foreskin gathering and cultivating is scientifically and technologically “very promising.” (Ronald Rosenberg. 19 October 1992: 22-23). …..

In Memory of the Sexually Mutilated Child

In memory of all the children throughout history
who have died at the hands of sexual mutilators;
and in memory of those who almost died,
those who wanted to die,
and those who wished they had died;
and in memory of those who never knew
that a sexual mutilator killed
a beautiful, wondrous, irreplaceable part of them….

The IMF formula for taking over a nation

The formula involves printing money out of thin air, …Loan money to a country well beyond it’s ability to repay, preferably to corrupt oligarchs, … wait for the country to fall into financial trouble, then make a deal to transfer all the valuable infrastructure assets of that country to its international creditors.

Now the oligarchs own the highways, bridges, water treatment plants, ports, beaches and national monuments and can CHARGE the citizens RENT for their use and control every aspect.  Legally.

Summed up in my favorite 3 minute video from “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man,”

Vaccine Court Awarded Millions To Two Children With Autism. So What Changed?


As the debate rages on about finding a link between autism and vaccines, we need only to look back a short couple of years in history to find where Pharmaceutical companies, the medical associations and the Government have admitted to wrong doing. In this particular case in 2013, their admission came with a payout that soared into the millions of dollars.

The federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, or “vaccine court,” awarded millions of dollars under the name of pain and suffering, as well as caring for the needs of two children for lifelong injuries, to two kids who were found to have autism after being vaccinated.

The Government, though, didn’t want to admit guilt (likely a part of the huge settlement). And the case facts weren’t disclosed (they were hidden). This was one item in a long list of admissions by the Government. The Government, via this case and others, all but admits that vaccines cause encephalopathy, which produces a permanent injury and creates symptoms of autism (not a full admission, but the facts are what they are)…

Wide Variation in Cesarian Rates Indicates Pervasive Quackery

The rate of Cesarean surgeries in the U.S. varies by state to state from a low of 22.6% in Utah to a high of 40.2% in Louisiana.

Variability like this is concerning to consumers because it may mean that factors are in play other than what evidence shows is best for patients. Even within these states, you’ll see incredible variations from hospital to hospital and provider to provider. Where I live, in Kentucky, the lowest hospital-level Cesarean rate in the state is below 12% and the highest is over 67%.

From “What is Practice Variation in Obstetrics and Why Should I Care?” by Adriana Arcia, PhD, RN:

“So, why should you care about practice variation? Because, “…one of the most fundamental principles in quality assessment and control is that unwarranted variation in a product or process generally equates to poor quality. Conversely, as quality improves, variation will diminish” (Clark, Belfort, Hankins, Meyers, & Houser, 2007, p. 526.e1). In other words, wide variations in care are problematic because they mean that some practitioners are making decisions that deviate from accepted best practices and therefore their patients are not getting the best quality care. Individuality of style may be good in fashion but when it comes to healthcare, consistency is a virtue.”

This map shows 2012 rates and rankings for U.S. states, with the states in five groups of ten (plus D.C.). The lowest rates of Cesarean are in the lightest color, to the highest rates in the darkest….

Monsanto Protection Act Clears House Committee

Monsanto’s eugenicists have a cure for the disease of life.

Want some more proof that Monsanto and other biotech giants are deathly afraid of GMO labeling initiatives passing within the United States? A new bill introduced by Monsanto’s star representative, Mike Pompeo, could soon ban all mandatory GMO labeling in the US.

The worst part? It was just approved by the House Agriculture Committee, which means it’s one step closer to becoming a full-fledged law. The bill is formally known as H.R. 1599, or the ‘Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015.’

More precisely, it has been dubbed to be the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’ on steroids.

And there’s a big reason for that. We’re talking about a bill that was drafted up by the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), and pushed on us by all the usual suspects. All the ones who are afraid of you actually knowing what’s in your food. Because even if you don’t care about the genetic alteration of your food, you most certainly should be concerned as to whether or not it has been doused in Monsanto’s cancer-linked herbicides.

Banning GMO Labeling: A Desperate Attack

I wanted to bring this bill to your attention because it’s essential that we spread the word on the issue and stop this legislation. The time to act is now, before the GMO industry lobbyists shove a legal wrench into the fast-moving gears of the anti-Monsanto movement. It’s the perfect ‘brute force’ defense against a population whose mind has been made up in the GMO debate.

It has been made clear time and time again that over 90% of the US public is in full support of GMO labeling, and that scares a lot of processed food corporations.

I also believe it’s important to highlight this bill in order to show the true desperation of Monsanto defenders when it comes to their deceptive tactics. Instead of actually allowing consumers to know what they’re eating and make their own decisions, individuals like Mike Pompeo choose to strip away this ability through sneaky legislation. …