The Huge and Growing Disconnect Between IPCC Climate Forecasts and Reality

Day after day, year after year, the hole that climate scientists have buried themselves in gets deeper and deeper. The longer that they wait to admit their overheated forecasts were wrong, the more they are going to harm all of science.

The story is told in a simple graph, the same one that University of Alabama’s John Christy presented to the House Committee on Natural Resources on May 15.

The picture shows the remarkable disconnect between predicted global warming and the real world.

The red line is the 5-year running average temperature change forecast, beginning in 1979, predicted by the UN’s latest family of climate models, many of which are the handiwork of our own federal science establishment. The forecasts are for the average temperature change in the lower atmosphere, away from the confounding effects of cities, forestry, and agriculture.

The blue circles are the average lower-atmospheric temperature changes from four different analyses of global weather balloon data, and the green squares are the average of the two widely accepted analyses of satellite-sensed temperature. Both of these are thought to be pretty solid because they come from calibrated instruments. …

The question is what would the temperature be if they hadn’t been filling the sky with geoengineering contrails?   Oh yeah, I forgot, that’s a conspiracy theory.   Just keep your head down and you won’t notice.

Also see:

One thought on “The Huge and Growing Disconnect Between IPCC Climate Forecasts and Reality”

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.