Interview with Mind Control Victim Used to Blackmail Politicians as a Child

As an introduction, Claudia Mullen is the second woman to testify on the second video clip below, recorded at the presidential hearings on human radiation experiments in the mid-90s.


Wayne Morris interviews Claudia Mullen about her experience as a mind controlled slave for the US government. Claudia alleges that doctors at primarily Tulane University, New Orleans had experimented on her starting when she was 8 years old and trained her to be a sex slave for political blackmail purposes. She talks of being used to compromise military officers, politicians and other prominent officials in sex situations which was videotaped by CIA including being used to compromise Senator Frank Church during the time of the Church Committee Hearings looking into CIA wrongdoings. We discuss her testimony at the radiation hearings and her memories of experimentation including drugs, electroshock, severe traumatisation and abuse by CIA doctors such as Robert Heath, Martin Orne, Ewen Cameron, Sidney Gottlieb and others.

Three hours in 6 parts.   Main site is http://members.tranquility.net/~rwinkel/CKLN/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also see the links in the reference section starting at “Conspiracy of Silence”

Another TPP Whistleblower Comes Forward

The public criticisms of the TPP have been vague. That’s by design—anyone who has read the text of the agreement could be jailed for disclosing its contents. I’ve actually read the TPP text provided to the government’s own advisors, and I’ve given the president an earful about how this trade deal will damage this nation. But I can’t share my criticisms with you.

I can tell you that Elizabeth Warren is right about her criticism of the trade deal. We should be very concerned about what’s hidden in this trade deal—and particularly how the Obama administration is keeping information secret even from those of us who are supposed to provide advice.

So-called “cleared advisors” like me are prohibited from sharing publicly the criticisms we’ve lodged about specific proposals and approaches. The government has created a perfect Catch 22: The law prohibits us from talking about the specifics of what we’ve seen, allowing the president to criticize us for not being specific. Instead of simply admitting that he disagrees with me—and with many other cleared advisors—about the merits of the TPP, the president instead pretends that our specific, pointed criticisms don’t exist. ….

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/05/tpp-elizabeth-warren-labor-118068.html

UN spokesman cries on camera over Gaza school attack

Chris Gunness says he has no regrets over airing of moment of private grief if it focuses attention on plight of Gazan children

It was an unexpected moment of anguish, never intended to be seen by anyone other than his close colleagues. But a video of a United Nations official sobbing, with his head in his hands, over the plight of children in Gaza has become one of the many memorable images of the war.

Chris Gunness, spokesman for the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, was being interviewed by al-Jazeera Arabic on Wednesday about the shelling of one of the organisation’s schools in Gaza, in which at least 15 people died and scores were injured. The school was crammed with families who had fled their homes after warnings from the Israeli military to leave or be bombed. The interview was one of dozens Gunness gave on the incident.

“It was a live interview, and I just about got through it, just about held it together,” Gunness, 54, told the Guardian. “But what really makes my heart burst is the suffering of children, and I was so moved by the appalling attack on the school in Jabaliya that I couldn’t control myself any longer.”

Chris Gunness at the end of the al-Jazeera Arabic interview PR Gunness began sobbing after the presenter in Doha had signed off at the end of the live interview. Unknown to him, al-Jazeera’s camera kept rolling, and the station later broadcast the entire segment. “For me, it was a moment of private grief. I had no idea it had been broadcast until friends started calling and texting me,” he said.

But, he added, “if my tears focus attention on the wholesale denial of human dignity in Gaza, then I have no regrets.”

More at UN spokesman cries on camera over Gaza school attack | World news | The Guardian

Tsarnaev’s own lawyer ignores evidence he is innocent of Boston bombing

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev never had a chance.

While there is significant evidence supporting the accused Boston bomber’s innocence, none of it made it into his trial, which just concluded with guilty verdicts on all 30 counts against him. It seems that law enforcement, the media, and especially Tsarnaev’s own lawyer, Judy Clarke, were focused on suppressing any evidence that could have undermined the official story of the bombing. The truth has been covered up just as effectively as it was the day Lee Harvey Oswald was shot by Jack Ruby.

Clarke insured Tsarnaev’s conviction when she opened the trial by admitting that he had carried out the bombing on April 15, 2013 with his brother, 26-year-old Tamerlan, who was killed in the aftermath. Clarke painted Tamerlan as the instigator in an apparent effort to spare Dzhokhar from execution, but that may happen anyway as the trial now enters the sentencing phase.

Clarke is known for her ability to keep her clients off death row (including Unabomber Ted Kaczyinski; alleged 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui; and Jared Loughner, who was convicted of shooting Rep. Gabrielle Giffords), but given the weakness of the evidence against Tsarnaev, Clarke’s strategy amounted to throwing in the towel before the trial even started.

But what about making the prosecution prove guilt? To say that Clarke could have created reasonable doubt if she had wanted to is an understatement. In this article, we’ll look at the evidence that should have been introduced at Tsarnaev’s trial but wasn’t (Keep in mind that Dzhokhar had claimed his innocence, which conflicted with the supposed confession he wrote on the inside of the boat where he was captured on April 19, four days after the bombing). …

https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/04/10/justice-denied-examining-the-evidence-that-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-was-a-patsy-in-boston-bombing/

Great Depopulation Idea: Put Nuclear Timebomb Next to the Great Lakes

Ontario Power Generation plans to bury radioactive nuclear waste right beside Lake Huron

Would you bury poison beside your well?

Ontario Power Generation (OPG), a corporation wholly owned by the Province of Ontario, is asking the federal government to approve its proposal to bury and abandon low and intermediate level radioactive nuclear waste under the Bruce Nuclear Power Plant site, directly on the shore of Lake Huron, in the Municipality of Kincardine, Ontario.

Called a Deep Geological Repository, DGR or Nuclear Waste Dump, the 31 burial caverns are planned to be 680 metres below the ground carved out of limestone, and will extend to approximately 1 kilometre from shore of Lake Huron.

Low level radioactive nuclear waste includes contaminated mops, rags and industrial items. Intermediate level radioactive nuclear waste contains resins, filters, and irradiated components from within the nuclear reactors themselves. Intermediate level nuclear wastes are highly radioactive and many remain radioactive for over 100,000 years.

The Nuclear Waste Dump will be very large – OPG’s updated estimates indicate it will be approximately 74 acres on the surface and about 100 acres underground. The Dump will entomb very large amounts of radioactive wastes that have been generated during the operating life and refurbishment of Ontario’s 20 nuclear reactors.

PG’s original estimate was that 200,000 cubic metres (7.1 million cubic feet) of nuclear waste in 53,000 containers will be buried in the Dump over 35-40 years. However during the public hearings OPG admitted that they intend to double the size of the Dump to 400,000 cubic metres to also bury and abandon decommissioning nuclear waste leftover after Ontario’s nuclear plants reach the end of life and are dismantled. The Dump will eventually be sealed with a sand/clay mixture and concrete, and the plan is that within a decade of closure it will no longer be monitored for radioactive leaks. Ten years of pre-closure monitoring will be followed by potentially 300 years of institutional control, and then abandonment. OPG calls the period following institutional control the “Long Term.”

OPG suggests that the Nuclear Waste Dump will safely hold its radioactive contents for 100,000 years. Is it reasonable to conclude that an unmonitored Nuclear Waste Dump will contain its radioactive contents for 100,000 years? The Great Lakes were created only 12,000 years ago.

http://www.stopthegreatlakesnucleardump.com/

The biggest source of fresh water in north america.   Let’s be real.  All these reactors and waste dumps are going to leak uncontrollably at some point if north america goes 3rd world.  There will not even be a pretense to clean it up.  And that’s all we have right now: pretense and pretend.    Nuclear power is death to all life except maybe the bugs.   Its life support comes from the pathological desire of pathological governments to manufacture nuclear weapons.   This is the antithesis of national security.   Certifiably insane.

We need a paradigm shift.

How the US is Engineering its own Downfall

 … It seems that as we enter the world of the “new cold war” there is western backing behind every aspect of this new rivalry. And sure enough, the much-ballyhooed Cold War 2.0 is becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. China’s decision to abstain from the UN Security Council vote on Crimea’s annexation last month was a significant turning point in and of itself. Given China’s unease over its own territorial issues (Tibet, Xinjiang), the fact that they didn’t vote for the resolution condemning a nation’s right to unilaterally secede from a country speaks volumes about China and Russia’s increasing cooperation in geopolitical matters.

The inescapable conclusion is that the NATO powers have helped to create their own enemy. They have helped to arm and fund that enemy, and then poked and prodded him into reaction. We would do well to remember the true genesis of this conflict the next time we are told about the “New Cold War.”

https://www.corbettreport.com/the-great-decoupling-how-the-west-is-engineering-its-own-downfall/

A replay of covert US support of nazi germany and the USSR.  Who benefits?   The central banking cabal.