Lifton has done good work, but lest anyone think psychiatry is above fraud and abuse, think again. There is certainly a higher concentration of quacks in psychiatry than in psychology, not least due to the fact that the entire “profession” has made a business model built on the fraud of “chemical imbalances.”
You could say the idea of the so-called “Population Bomb” may have actually exploded in 1974. That was the year of the first World Population Conference in Bucharest. Effects of the 1973 oil crisis were being felt hard, with the price of oil quadrupled from $3 to nearly $12 a barrel. Oh, and speaking of war criminal Henry Kissinger, ’74 was also the year of his infamous National Security Study Memorandum 200, which listed the “population problem” of unchecked growth in “LDCs” (less developed countries) as a potential risk to U.S. national security.
The document is dated April 24, 1974.
Concentration on this “problem” of how to reduce the population was planned for 13 key countries, including India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Colombia. Of those, the document singled out Mexico as having one of the highest (and therefore, most worrisome) growth rates of all. The document read, “Perhaps the most significant population trend from the viewpoint of the United States is the prospect that Mexico’s population will increase from 50 million in 1970 to over 130 million by the year 2000.”…
And why did our authority drones conclude that population growth in LDC’s was an issue of national security? Was it because of environmental concerns? Poverty concerns? Carbon emissions? Of course not, we live in an empire (or more properly, the military headquarters of the central banking cabal). The concern was over maintaining access to natural resources in foreign countries. The concern was that populous countries are more difficult to control due to internal competition for resources.
Today James appears on the X22 Report to discuss the latest moves by the oligarchy to raise the New World Order from the ashes of the current world order. We also talk about the new “virtual false flag” paradigm of cyber attacks and cyber warfare, online censorship, martial law and much more.
Wall Street’s Council on Foreign Relations has issued a major report, alleging that China must be defeated because it threatens to become a bigger power in the world than the U.S.
This report, which is titled “Revising U.S. Grand Strategy Toward China,” is introduced by Richard Haass, the CFR’s President, who affirms the report’s view that, “no relationship will matter more when it comes to defining the twenty-first century than the one between the United States and China.” He says that the report he is publishing argues that “strategic rivalry is highly likely if not inevitable between the existing major power of the day and the principal rising power.” Haass says that the authors “also argue that China has not evolved into the ‘responsible stakeholder’ that many in the United States hoped it would.” In other words: “cooperation” with China will probably need to become replaced by, as the report’s authors put it, “intense U.S.-China strategic competition.
Haass gives this report his personal imprimatur by saying that it “deserves to become an important part of the debate about U.S. foreign policy and the pivotal U.S.-China relationship.” He acknowledges that some people won’t agree with the views it expresses.
The report itself then opens by saying: “Since its founding, the United States has consistently pursued a grand strategy focused on acquiring and maintaining preeminent power over various rivals, first on the North American continent, then in the Western hemisphere, and finally globally.” It praises “the American victory in the Cold War.” It then lavishes praise on America’s imperialistic dominance:
“The Department of Defense during the George H.W. Bush administration presciently contended that its ‘strategy must now refocus on precluding the emergence of any potential future global competitor’—thereby consciously pursuing the strategy of primacy that the United States successfully employed to outlast the Soviet Union.” ….
This is mind control on a national scale. It was the CFR’s sponsors which funded and directed the rise of china and the transfer of US industry and jobs to it. They first made it a serious contender and are now setting the stage for a showdown. But they will come out on top regardless of who wins. They only lose if both countries wake up to the game.
They are treading on very thin ice here. The stakes couldn’t be higher for everyone. If they win, they get to conjure and loan out (to all sides) the funds needed to fight WWIII, and buy up the pieces afterward including the fascist, eugenicist world government that they’ve sought for many decades. If they loose, there will be no gallows high enough for them.
This is Al Capone with horns and a PhD.
This is very relevant to where we are today:
On the brink of the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Lusitania, James Perloff of JamesPerloff.com joins us today to discuss his in-depth expose of the incident, “False Flag at Sea.” We talk about the sinking of the ship and how it was used to sway American public opinion on “The Great War,” how the event was planned and engineered, who masterminded the plan, and why it still matters a century later.
PREVIOUS CONVERSATIONS WITH JAMES PERLOFF:
Interview 901 – James Perloff Exposes the CFR Agenda
This film from the mid-80’s was my first real wakeup call to the danger we (and the rest of the world) face. And still most people I know are in denial. In the third reich they would have been called “good germans.” This is one of many mind-blowing items to be found in the reference section.
The U.S. government is on the verge of passing a surveillance bill that some are calling the Patriot Act 2.0. The Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act, aka CISA, will double down on all the bulk data the government has already been collecting on you. Plus now it’ll allow businesses to share your personal info with the government and with each other – if they deem what you’re doing a threat. But we all know that’s open to interpretation.
Full Bill Text: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/754