The FBI head agent in charge of the anthrax investigation – Richard Lambert – has just filed a federal whistleblower lawsuit calling the entire FBI investigation bullsh!t:
In the fall of 2001, following the 9/11 attacks, a series of anthrax mailings occurred which killed five Americans and sickened 17 others. Four anthrax-laden envelopes were recovered which were addressed to two news media outlets in New York City (the New York Post and Tom Brokaw at NBC) and two senators in Washington D.C. (Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle). The anthrax letters addressed to New York were mailed on September 18, 2001, just seven days after the 9/11 attacks. The letters addressed to the senators were mailed 21 days later on October 9, 2001. A fifth mailing of anthrax is believed to have been directed to American Media, Inc. (AMI) in Boca Raton, Florida based upon the death of one AMI employee from anthrax poisoning and heavy spore contamination in the building.
Executive management at FBI Headquarters assigned responsibility for the anthrax investigation (code named “AMERITHRAX”) to the Washington Field Office (WFO), dubbing it the single most important case in the FBI at that time. In October 2002, in the wake of surging media criticism, White House impatience with a seeming lack of investigative progress by WFO, and a concerned Congress that was considering revoking the FBI’s charter to investigate terrorism cases, Defendant FBI Director Mueller reassigned Plaintiff from the FBI’s San Diego Field Office to the Inspection Division at FBI Headquarters and placed Plaintiff in charge of the AMERITHRAX case as an “Inspector.” While leading the investigation for the next four years, Plaintiff’s efforts to advance the case met with intransigence from WFO’s executive management, apathy and error from the FBI Laboratory, politically motivated communication embargos from FBI Headquarters, and yet another preceding and equally erroneous legal opinion from Defendant Kelley – all of which greatly obstructed and impeded the investigation. …
Earlier this week Michael Snyder warned that the bottom of our food chain is going through a catastrophic collapse with sea creatures dying in absolutely massive numbers. The cause of the problem is a mystery to scientists who claim that they can’t pinpoint how or why it’s happening.
What’s worse, the collapse of sea life in the Pacific Ocean isn’t something that will affect us several decades into the future. The implications are being seen right now, as evidenced by an emergency closure of fisheries along the West coast this week.
On Wednesday federal regulators announced the early closure of sardine fisheries in California, Oregon and Washington. According to the most recent data, the sardine populations has been wiped out with populations seeing a decline of 91% in just the last eight years. …
And since british petroleum (largely owned by the british royal family) has quite deliberately destroyed the gulf of mexico through massive chemical dumping of corexit, and california is undergoing a drought that could easily be lifted by cloud seeding (the military owns the weather by its own admission, that’s probably why the drought is there to begin with – it’s probably due to the constant geoengineering flights to the west of the coast) it’s clear that mass starvation is part of the satanists’ agenda for the clueless US population.
About 300 US paratroopers have arrived in Ukraine to train the Ukrainian National Guard which is fighting pro-Russian rebels in the east, the US Army said in a statement.
The troops from the 173rd Airborne Brigade arrived on Tuesday and Wednesday in Yavoriv, western Ukraine, to spend six months training three battalions of Ukrainian troops, said the statement dated Thursday. …
Here we go again… of course Ukraine ceased to exist when it was overthrown in a US sponsored coup. It is now a zombie engorged with monetary embalming fluid acting out the desires of its owners. Kinda like the USA. When any entity is puppeted by another it ceases to be a discrete entity and becomes something else.
World Bank ventures in less developed countries are hurting the people the organization has sworn to protect, with almost four million people across the globe left homeless, forcefully evicted and relocated as a result of World Bank-funded projects.
A probe by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), which examined World Bank’s records in 14 countries, discovered that some 3.4 million of the “most vulnerable people” were forced off their land in the last decade.
The World Bank “has regularly failed to live up to its own policies for protecting people harmed by projects it finances,” ICIJ states as one of its key findings.
The World Bank as well as the International Finance Corporation (IFC), which distributes the funds, have invested $455 billion in nearly 7,200 projects between 2004 and 2013 in the developing world, ICIJ says. More than 400 were confirmed to have caused the permanent displacement of local communities, while another 550 may have made locals homeless.
“An ICIJ analysis found that between 20 and 30 percent of all projects the bank funded from 2004 to 2013 were deemed likely to cause resettlement,” report’s summary reads. ….
OMG are we still debating whether these consequences are unintended? Of course they’re intended. The owners of the WB are satanist gangsters. Seriously, can we please dispense with the pleasant delusions? Monetary reform is job one if we are to survive as a species.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank are run by their member governments, but not on the basis of one-country-one-vote. Instead, governments have votes based on the amount of money they pay in to the organizations. In this sense, they operate much like private corporations, except that the owners of shares are governments instead of individuals.
The U.S. government has by far the largest share of votes in both the IMF and World Bank and, along with its closest allies, effectively controls their operations. In 1998, the U.S. held 18% of the votes in the IMF and 15% in the World Bank. Together, the United States, Germany, Japan, the U.K. and France control about 40% of the shares in both institutions. With the rest of the shares spread among 175 other member governments, some holding a tiny number of votes, the United States is effectively in charge.
So the people running the IMF and the World Bank are the same folks who run the U.S. government and the governments of its closest allies. Since the institutions were founded at the end of World War II, the president of the World Bank has always been a U.S. citizen, and the head of the IMF has always been a European. These are all men, generally coming from the top of the financial industry.
While the IMF and the Bank operate as extensions of the U.S. government’s foreign policy, they are well insulated from democratic accountability. Congress, to say nothing of the populace in general, has no role overseeing their operations, and they operate largely outside the public eye (though Congressional ire sometimes appears in response to a request for more funds).
What the IMF and the World Bank do is lend money to governments. Because many governments, especially governments of poor countries, are often in dire need of loans and cannot readily obtain funds through financial markets, they turn to these institutions. And if the IMF and World
Bank will not loan to a country, international banks certainly won’t. As a result, the IMF and the World Bank have great power, and are able to insist that governments adopt certain policies as a condition for receiving funds.
The IMF and the Bank make sure that U.S. allies get the financial support they need to stay in power, abuses of human rights, labor, and the environment notwithstanding; that big banks get paid back, no matter how irresponsible their loans may have been; and that other governments continually reduce barriers to the operations of U.S. business in their countries, whether or not this conflicts with the economic needs of their own people.
The EU is expected to permit over a dozen new genetically modified agricultural products into its market. Individual countries would reportedly be able to ban GM products, as long as they don’t challenge the science behind authorizations.
At the moment EU imports around 58 GM products, mostly from the US. On April 22 at a meeting of the Commissioner’s College it is poised to introduce 13 more, including five soybean varieties, three GM maize, two oilseed rape and three cotton, Feed Navigator reports.
The new products have passed through the EU’s scientific assessment and risk management process. Their introduction would break an 18-month import approvals deadlock.
The approval comes amid foreign pressure on European officials, Marco Contiero, Greenpeace EU’s agriculture director, told the Guardian.
“With transatlantic trade talks ongoing, pressure has been mounting from the biotech industry and the US government to break open the EU market to GM imports and to speed up authorization procedures,” he said.
The newspaper says 17 rather than 13 new GM products would be allowed into EU markets.
The new European Commission rules say that future authorizations would automatically follow approval of new strains by the European Food and Safety Agency, streamlining the process, indicates a proposed amendment published by Eurpolitics, the European affairs publisher. But they would give individual countries the right to opt out of new products the way they can now opt out of GM seeds meant for cultivation.
“It will be up to each member state wanting to make use of this ‘opt-out’ to develop this justification on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the GMO in question, the type of measure envisaged and the specific circumstances at national or regional level that can justify such an opt-out,” the draft said.
But the justification may not be based on health and environmental issues under the new rules, as those concerns would have already been addressed by EU’s checks. Opposition from individual countries is “usually not based on science but on other considerations reflecting the societal debate existing in the country,” the draft explained. …
Yes of course EVERYONE KNOWS there’s no scientific basis for questioning the health and environmental impact of eating or cultivating GMO’s. That’s what debt-based money can buy: tobacco science. And of course there’s no way to contain it to a region. It’s a genetic plague.
On April 8, 2015, Robert Kennedy Jr. stood on the State Capitol steps and delivered this address in support of the SB277 rally. He explained how the powerful pharmaceutical cartel has captured the U.S. scientific, regulatory, and legislature processes, as well as the corporate news media, which relies heavily on drug advertising. Big pharma dictates vaccine talking points that contradict scientific fact.
He concluded his remarks by emphasizing that legislation such as California’s SB277 takes away the last barrier between the pharmaceutical companies’ monetary mentality and innocent children.
The pentagon has long bragged of their ability to manipulate the weather (owning the weather is what they call it). During the vietnam war they turned the ho chi minh trail into a mud river through cloud seeding. One would think they would at least try to do so for california. Who is even asking this question?
Spokane public schools in Washington state began to audit the vaccine records of students this week to identify those who are not in compliance with the recommended required vaccine schedule.
Once identified, the students will be detained along with their parents to be re-educated about vaccines, as well as to receive free jabs to get in compliance with vaccine schedules.
I wish this was satire…