Dr. Kelly Brogan, M.D.
What happens when the government tells us that something is safe, supports sanctions increasing our exposure, and then the overwhelming weight of scientific evidence begins to loom like a flashing neon sign?
It should, because it is what has happened with our industrial chemical exposures, with vaccination, and with pesticides, to name a few examples.
It’s called cognitive dissonance: the distress that should be experienced when faced simultaneously with two contradictory statements.
We are expected, as citizens, however, to slip comfortably into a conformist haze. No questions. No dissent. No room for outrage that the fox guarding our hen house has been systematically digging a hole so that his entire pack can sneak in without warning.
In March of this year, 17 experts from 11 countries met at the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer to discuss the cancer-causing effects of organophosphate pesticides including glyphosate, the active ingredient (but only one of many) in Monsanto’s Roundup. Glyphosate, used in more than 750 products, and ever more so because of its role in the production of genetically modified crops such as soy, canola, and corn, is now present in our air, water, and soil. Despite Seralini et al.’s evidence for dramatic oncologic processes manifesting after 4 months of exposure in rodents, scant trials have been done.
This is because the dilutional effect of post-marketing injury, chronic disease, and death allows for all of the chemical exposures to hide under a large blanket of denial. Pharma, Big Ag, and Big Chem all get to say, “it wasn’t me” while no one is conducting the most basic research to substantiate these claims, and our government turns a blind eye.
What data has been amassed supports a signal in rodent studies for pancreatic, kidney, skin, and hemangiosarcoma and for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma based on human case-control studies.
They state, plainly:
Glyphosate and glyphosate formulations induced DNA and chromosomal damage in mammals, and in human and animal cells in vitro. The Working Group classified glyphosate as ‘probably carcinogenic to humans”.
The latest salvo in the battle over Africa’s seed systems has been fired with the Gates Foundation and USAID playing puppet-masters to Africa’s governments – now meeting in Addis Ababa – as they drive forward corporation-friendly seed regulations that exclude and marginalize the small farmers whose seeds and labour feed the continent.
A battle is currently being waged over Africa’s seed systems. After decades of neglect and weak investment in African agriculture, there is renewed interest in funding African agriculture.
These new investments take the form of philanthropic and international development aid as well as private investment funds. They are based on the potentially huge profitability of African agriculture – and seed systems are a key target.
Right now ministers are co-ordinating their next steps at the 34th COMESA (Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa) Intergovernmental Committee meeting that kicked off March 22, in preparation for the main Summit that started yesterday and ends today.
COMESA’s key aim is to pave the way for a “Continental Free Trade Area (CFTA) in 2017 under the auspices of the African Union” with uniform regulations, including on agricultural products, seeds and GMOs.
A recent meeting on biotechnology and biosafety was held to establish a “COMESA biotechnology and biosafety policy implementation plan” (COMBIP) to roll out from 2015-2019, “leading to increased biotechnology applications and agricultural commodity trade in the region.”
But read between the lines and its real purpose was to facilitate the planting and commercialization of GMO crops in Africa all at one go, instead of country by country. USAID Regional representatives for East Africa, based in Nairobi, were present to monitor the process and ensure the desired outcome. ….
This is a huge win for corporate whistle blowers and those who have seen the harm of vaccines in their own families and all who are working hard to prevent such harm in the future.
In a story late in 2014 that no mainstream media outlet reported, a Pennsylvania federal judge ruled in favor of whistleblowers who have accused Merck of lying about the efficacy of its mumps vaccine (currently only available in combo with MMR). We had to find this story posted on a couple of websites servicing attorneys.
This story did garner mainstream news coverage back in 2012, before Merck’s attorneys appealed and tried to get the case thrown out of court. Here is a report Forbes wrote on it back in 2012. Some quotes:
Anyone who falls on either side of the debate about vaccines’ alleged potential to cause harm is sure to have heard the big news this week — the unsealing of a whistleblower suit against Merck, filed back in 2010 by two former employees accusing the drugmaker of overstating the effectiveness of its mumps, measles, and rubella vaccine.
The scientists claim Merck defrauded the U.S. government by causing it to purchase an estimated four million doses of mislabeled and misbranded MMR vaccine per year for at least a decade, and helped ignite two recent mumps outbreaks that the allegedly ineffective vaccine was intended to prevent in the first place.
“As the single largest purchaser of childhood vaccines (accounting for more than 50 percent of all vaccine purchasers), the United States is by far the largest financial victim of Merck’s fraud. But the ultimate victims here are the millions of children who every year are being injected with a mumps vaccine that is not providing them with an adequate level of protection against mumps. And while this is a disease the CDC targeted to eradicate by now, the failure in Merck’s vaccine has allowed this disease to linger with significant outbreaks continuing to occur,” the suit alleges. (Source – emphasis added.)
The Wall Street Journal also covered the story back in 2012, but according to a report by Dr. Mercola, the Wall Street Journal’s “elite” network of CFOs from the world’s top corporations met 3 days later (including executives from Merck), and the story was removed from their website.
This week, U.S. District Judge C. Darnell Jones II ruled that the whistleblowers had sufficiently pled that Merck might have provided false statements to the government and that the direct purchasers had shown enough evidence to establish that these falsehoods could have helped the company gain a monopoly.
Most people in the U.S. do not even realize that U.S. law prevents anyone damaged by vaccines from suing the manufacturer. In 1986, Congress passed a law preventing legal liability to vaccine damages, because the drug companies manufacturing vaccines blackmailed them, by threatening to stop manufacturing vaccines without legal protection. There were so many lawsuits resulting from vaccine injuries and deaths prior to this time, that it was no longer profitable for them to continue marketing vaccines without legal protection. So instead of Congress requiring that drug companies manufacture safer vaccines, they complied with the drug companies’ requests and passed legislation protecting the drug companies. In 2011 this law was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Therefore, any lawsuit against a pharmaceutical company for allegedly producing faulty vaccines is huge news. This current lawsuit is brought by two whistleblowers, virologists who worked for Merck and are accusing Merck of lying about the effectiveness of the mumps vaccine. There is also a class action suit related, brought by Alabama-based Chatom Primary Care and two individual doctors from New York and New Jersey who allege Merck’s monopoly on the drug caused them to pay more for the drug.
More details from the whistleblower lawsuit claiming fraud… here: Judge: Lawsuit Against Merck’s MMR Vaccine Fraud to Continue.
Is the scientist in you wondering exactly how some vaccines harm? Here’s one explanation…
L-Histidine + Injection = Histamine Release + Excess Histamine Excess Inflammation = Histamine Intolerance?
By Cynthia Janak
There are times in our lives when it seems like we come full circle in our findings. This is one of those times for me. Early on in my research into the HPV vaccines I knew that the L-Histidine which is unique to this vaccine played a major role in what I was hearing from parents and girls adversely injured by Gardasil®. I made the connection between Histamine and IgE release. I was able to make the connection with all the variety of symptoms to the various components of this vaccine. Because of personal experiences I found that the majority of the injured experienced an anaphylactic type incident. The adverse events experienced from the HPV vaccines nearly mirror those of an autistic child even down to the regression. Now I find that not only do the components of this vaccine play an integral part but the main player in this scenario is the probable excessive histamine released because of injected L-Histidine. So basically I am at the beginning but with a sobering twist. Be prepared to be as shocked as I was, because of the simple answer that lay in front of me all these years.
NOTE: The information I am going to share with you has been extracted from peer reviewed studies and articles. References will be at the end of this article and definitions will be within brackets [ ] throughout the article. I have also underlined and italicized items I feel are of importance.
First, let me give you a little history about histamine…
Read much more at Vaccine Mechanism of Harm Exposed | The Liberty Beacon.