Fake Supplements: Eugenics and Codex Alimentarius by Covert Means

4 Major Retailers Caught Selling Fake Supplements

We all know that labeling is deceptive and you have to be careful where you buy supplements these days. But this really has got to make people wake up and realize how bad things have really gotten. The findings in New York State after an independent study of 24 supplements offered in Target, Walmart, Walgreens and GNC reveal a gross negligence and outright mockery of honesty and integrity.  The state’s Attorney General found these items didn’t even contain the main ingredient stated and instead were chock full of cheap rice and other not so healthy fillers.

The attorney general’s team tested 24 products in total. Roughly four out of five supplements tested did not contain the medicinal herbs they were supposed to, and were instead rife with “cheap fillers like powdered rice, asparagus and houseplants, and in some cases substances that could be dangerous to those with allergies,” according to a New York Times report.

There are now four cease-and-desist letters from the attorney general’s office to demanding an explanation on how these potentially hazardous supplements could have been sold in the stores. “Mislabeling, contamination and false advertising are illegal,” says Eric T. Schneiderman, the state attorney general, according to The Times. “They also pose unacceptable risks to New York families — especially those with allergies to hidden ingredients.” …

GNC, Target, Walgreens, Walmart

http://blogs.naturalnews.com/4-major-retailers-caught-selling-fake-supplements-check-list/

Europe has been deprived of supplements via signing on to the eugenicist Codex Alimentarius treaty which, if adopted here, would essentially treat all non-FDA approved substances as hazardous by default regardless of their history of theraputic usage or knowledge of being an essential trace element or vitamin.   It costs millions of dollars to get FDA approval, especially with the added cost of bribery.    Only corporate behemoths can afford such an undertaking, and they hardly have to worry about the quality of what they sell.   Their business model is based on advertising and ignorance, and their network of corporate ownership ensures that what they sell is under the control of a few insiders despite the illusion of diversity in consumer products.  http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2012/12/the-illusion-of-choice/

The popular backlash to this agenda in the USA resulted in the passage of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994.  This act is the only reason you can go to the store and buy vitamin D, without which you would otherwise need to drink 32oz of milk daily to get the FDA’s miniscule RDA (which will only prevent  rickets) or (perish the thought!) go outside in the sunshine on a regular basis.

Do you see the pattern here?  Vitamin D is essential for immune regulation and detoxifying free radicals.   Kids who are deficient in vitamin D are more likely to develop autism due to dietary glyphosate (roundup) and the CDC’s vacccination assault schedule.   Black kids are more likely to be deficient because of their skin pigment.  Poor kids are less likely to have regular doctor visits, and the CDC’s vaccination schedule promotes “catch-up” regimes where multiple vaccinations are given at once when they do visit a doctor.   An artificial gradient is created where poor black kids are being selectively targeted for autism.

A similar approach is employed by the WHO in africa, where “charitable” vaccination campaigns are combined with an insufficient supply of disposable needles or sterilization facilities.  The result is that dirty needles are probably the dominant vector for HIV among the poor in africa.  See: http://members.tranquility.net/~rwinkel/MGM/oldrefs/www.rsm.ac.uk/new/pr126.htm and http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/DEADLY-NEEDLES-Fast-Track-to-Global-Disaster-2982689.php

Meanwhile the american diet is full of aluminum from soda cans, aluminum cookware, aluminum-based bread leavening, aluminum based artificial colors (blue lake) etc.  We also get a high dose of fluoride from the water and from teflon coatings on aluminum cookware.   Fluoride transports aluminum across the blood brain barrier.   A minor oversight I’m sure.

Baby “formula” water which is “fortified” with fluoride is being mixed with powders which are high in aluminum and fed to babies as a substitute for breast milk which is the only safe food for babies.   See http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2012/10/omg-aluminum-contamination-in-baby-formula/
and http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/06/baby-formula-fluoridated-water-brain-damage/ There is no RDA for fluoride because, like lead and arsenic and 9mm bullets, it’s not a necessary nutrient. To the extent that fluoride prevents tooth decay it only works topically, not systemically, and in any case children don’t get their permanent teeth until years after infancy. But none of this matters because the agenda is not prevention of tooth decay. It’s prevention of high IQ.

This is the modern face of eugenics.  The selection criteria is based on ignorance and poverty instead of outright racially based mass roundups.

Researcher says Army scientists secretly sprayed cities with radioactive particles for years

ddeeschemtrail family-500x444

Have you looked up recently? They still spray: aluminum, barium (say that one aloud) and strontium.

According to Lisa Martino-Taylor, a sociologist, the United States military carried out top secret experiments involving the spraying of radioactive particles on residents of St. Louis, Missouri for years.

This is hardly surprising given the fact that the entire United States is currently engaged in a massive human experiment when we already know that the results will be nothing short of horrific. Let’s also not forget that we continue to support the use of dangerous substances and technologies, even though we know that disaster is a certainty.

It is public knowledge that the government sprayed zinc cadmium sulfide particles – which are supposedly harmless – over St. Louis, but Professor Martino-Taylor says that her research indicates a radioactive additive was also mixed in with the compound.

The targets of these experiments were primarily minorities and low-income communities – again, hardly surprising given the U.S. government’s history of conducting brutal tests on disadvantaged populations – who had no clue that they were being subjected to dangerous chemicals from 1953-1954 and 1963-1965.

Martino-Taylor’s research uncovered photographs showing just how these particles were distributed as well as detailed descriptions of how the public was exposed to these substances in the name of keeping America safe.

In Corpus Christi, Texas the chemical was dispersed over large portions of the city from airplanes while in St. Louis, the U.S. Army placed chemical sprayers on schools and public housing projects, among other buildings, as well as on station wagons for mobile spraying.

Even local politicians were kept totally out of the loop with St. Louis residents simply being told that the Army was testing smoke screen technology to protect American cities from a potential Russian attack.

“The study was secretive for reason,” said Martino-Taylor to St. Louis’ KSDK. “They didn’t have volunteers stepping up and saying yeah, I’ll breathe zinc cadmium sulfide with radioactive particles.”

“It was pretty shocking. The level of duplicity and secrecy. Clearly they went to great lengths to deceive people,” she said…

Read more at Researcher says Army scientists secretly sprayed cities with radioactive particles for years – End the Lie – Independent News | End the Lie – Independent News.

How the vaccine-autism link is statistically obscured

It’s very simple: when autism first began to be widely recognized,  there was a careful and commonsensical delineation of early vs late onset autism in the literature, for obvious reasons: late-onset children were entirely normal until the onset of symptoms (typically between the age of 1 and 2), whereas early onset children were never normal.    This clear difference points to entirely differing causes: in early onset the brain damage happens before or at the time of birth (often, as it turns out, from immediate umbilical cord clamping, see my “munchausen obstetrics” letter above).  In late onset the brain damage occurs sometime after birth.

Today, these two groups are no longer recognized as distinct, and are lumped together for the purposes of statistical analysis.   So instead of perhaps 75% of late-onset children becoming symptomatic shortly after vaccination, the statistic becomes maybe 40% of all autistic children become symptomatic shortly after vaccination. Viola!   The correlation fades and another lucrative medical research industry is born.

The claim being made today is that the parents of late-onset kids simply didn’t notice that their children were autistic at first.   The fact that this claim has been taken seriously in the research community is symptomatic of a seriously autistic and conflicted medical culture.

And by the way, the typical age of late onset autism correlates very well with the CDC’s militantly aggressive vaccination schedule, which calls for the equivalent of up to 13 vaccines to be administered simultaneously at the age of 15 months.   http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-child-combined-schedule.pdf

Where is the research showing that multiple simultaneous vaccinations act independently in the body?  There is none that I know of, and it’s entirely plausible that multiple foreign proteins introduced simultaneously in conjunction with the cumulative dose of preservatives and adjuvants might create a broad immunological scattershot response that is more likely to target the body’s own proteins, leading to autoimmune disease which has already been associated with autism.

But heck, I’m not a PhD medical researcher or even a fascist eugenicist masquerading as one.    What do I know?