Can We Continue To Justify Injecting Aluminum Into Children?

Aluminum and mercury both are in most vaccines. Both are known to affect the brain – detrimentally.

A new report published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology raises a disturbing possibility: that aluminum hydroxide, the dominant metal-based adjuvant used in vaccines today, is causing aluminum overload at injection sites, and contributing to the pathogenesis of diseases such as chronic fatigue syndrome, macrophagic myofasciitis and subcutaneous pseudolymphoma. [i]

Discussed is the case of a 45-year old woman with vaccine-induced subcutaneous pseudolymphoma, a type of skin lesion characterized by collections of lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells in the skin.  The researchers performed a skin biopsy at the injection site and found aluminum (AI) deposits in her macrophages. When the skin sample was assayed for AI and quantified, it was found to contain 768.1 micrograms per gram, dry weight, versus 5.61 and 9.13 in two control patients – up to 153-fold higher concentrations.

Read more at Can We Continue To Justify Injecting Aluminum Into Children?.

PLAGUE – The Book – a must Read!

Plague book cover

Could the connection between retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, or Autism be the scientific story of the century?

Do you know what it feels like to stumble into the scientific story of the century?  It is exhilarating and terrifying at the same time.  For those of you who don’t know me, I’m a science teacher, an attorney, and an autism dad.  My daughter’s autism has made me an advocate, and I’ve written lots of articles for the blog, “Age of Autism,” trying to find out what hope science can offer my daughter, both as a treatment, and an explanation for what happened to her.

In 2009, I stumbled across an interview Dr. Judy Mikovits had given in a television show in Nevada called “Nevada Newsmakers.”  Mikovits was talking about the publication of her article in the journal Science which showed that a recently discovered retrovirus, XMRV (xenotropic murine leukemia virus related virus) had been found in 67% of chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) patients and at 3.75% in healthy patients.

If these findings help up, it meant that these patients who had been shunned by the medical community for decades with diagnoses such as “yuppie flu” or “hysterical type A women” who one day fell apart, it meant that they were suffering from something very similar to HIV/AIDS.  And that 3.75% number meant that somewhere around ten million Americans were harboring a retrovirus of unknown pathogenic potential.

Then she started talking about a potential link to autism, as they had done some early research into the question.

Here is what she said on that television show:

“There’s always the hypothesis that my child was fine, then they got sick, and then they got autism.  Interestingly, on that note, if I might speculate a little bit.  This might explain why vaccines lead to autism in some children because these viruses live and divide in the lymphocytes, the immune response cells, the B and T cells.  So when you give a vaccine you send your B and T cells into overdrive.  That’s its job.”

Well, if you’re harboring one virus, and you replicate it a whole bunch, you’ve now broken the balance between the immune response and the virus.  So you could have had the underlying virus and them amplified it with the vaccine and then set off the disease, such that your immune system could no longer control the infection and create an immune deficiency.

That got my attention.  Being a curious person and wanting to find out if any of this made sense, I put in a call to the Pediatric AIDS Unit at the University of San Francisco.  I got their press person, and brought up the idea of a retrovirus in autism and whether there might be tests available, and what thoughts were on an anti-retroviral regimen if a retrovirus could be found.

But that isn’t where the UCSF employee’s attention went.  He immediately said something like, “Well, that might explain why a vaccine could lead to autism.”

If I was a cartoon character, this would have been the moment my head exploded.  But instead, I stayed calm and asked, “Could you explain that?”

Read more at PLAGUE – The Book America MUST Read! | GreenMedInfo.

Measles Transmitted By The Vaccinated, Govt Researchers Confirm

A remarkable study reveals that a vaccinated individual not only can become infected with measles, but can spread it to others who are also vaccinated against it – doubly disproving two doses of MMR vaccine is “99% effective,” as widely claimed.

One of the fundamental errors in thinking about measles vaccine effectiveness is that receipt of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine equates to bona fide immunity against these pathogens. Indeed, it is commonly claimed that receiving two doses of the MMR vaccine is “99 percent effective in preventing measles,”1 despite a voluminous body of contradictory evidence from epidemiology and clinical experience.

This erroneous thinking has led the public, media and government alike to attribute the origin of measles outbreaks, such as the one recently reported at Disney, to the non-vaccinated, even though 18% of the measles cases occurred in those who had been vaccinated against it — hardly the vaccine’s claimed “99% effective.” The vaccine’s obvious fallibility is also indicated by the fact that that the CDC now requires two doses.

But the problems surrounding the failing MMR vaccine go much deeper. First, they carry profound health risks (over 25 of which we have indexed here: MMR vaccine dangers), including increased autism risk, which a senior CDC scientist confessed his agency covered up. Second, not only does the MMR vaccine fail to consistently confer immunity, but those who have been “immunized” with two doses of MMR vaccine can still transmit the infection to others — a phenomena no one is reporting on in the rush to blame the non- or minimally-vaccinated for the outbreak.

MMR Vaccinated Can Still Spread Measles

Last year, a groundbreaking study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, whose authorship includes scientists working for the Bureau of Immunization, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, looked at evidence from the 2011 New York measles outbreak that individuals with prior evidence of measles vaccination and vaccine immunity were both capable of being infected with measles and infecting others with it (secondary transmission).

Read much more at Measles Transmitted By The Vaccinated, Gov. Researchers Confirm.

Shots In The Dark: Silence on Vaccine

Shots In The Dark: Silence on Vaccine – YouTube.

Uploaded on Aug 3, 2011

Following the increase in cases of autism and other immune disorders among some particularly vulnerable people, several recognized specialists are questioning the safety of large-scale vaccination. Despite the serious side effects, pharmaceutical companies, the medical profession and government authorities continue to bury their heads in the sand, refusing to see a serious problem. In Quebec, the United States and France, as in most industrialized countries, victims are almost without recourse despite the high toxicity of substances such as mercury and aluminum contained in vaccines. With this hard-hitting documentary, Lina B. Moreco highlights a very worrying public health problem.

Since they were introduced in the early 20th century, vaccines have been a tremendous medical and scientific success. Today perceived as a necessity, they are so familiar to us that their potential risks are rarely mentioned.

However, the stakes are significant. Based on recommendations of health agencies, North American children receive about 48 doses of 14 different vaccines before the age of 6 — double the amount prescribed 25 years earlier. Despite this extraordinary increase, few studies independent of the pharmaceutical industry have been conducted into their long-term side effects. This is a disturbing situation given the numerous toxins, including mercury and aluminum, contained in some commonly administered vaccines.

Several worried pediatricians and scientists are sounding the alarm. Some of the research underway indicates that vaccination is directly responsible for immune or neurological disorders among certain people genetically or neurologically predisposed to react badly to vaccine components. Cases of autism, multiple sclerosis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, macrophagic myofasciitis, encephalitis, paralysis and neuropathies indicate the seriousness of the situation.

Despite these findings, the pharmaceutical industry and government authorities deny there is a serious problem. Relying on perfunctory studies, some of which date back to the late 1920s, they reject out of hand any cause-and-effect relationship. Given the known fact that adding preservatives such as thimerosal (mercury) helps reduce production costs, the reaction of the pharmaceutical industry is at the very least puzzling. Preferring not to question a system that has proved its worth, a majority of the medical profession’s members reject any potential toxicity in vaccines.

http://films.nfb.ca/shots-in-the-dark/

 

CDC’s Own Data: Vaccine-SIDS Infant Death Link

snake venom vaccines

The CDC’s own research has found that the long denied vaccine-SIDS link is real.

If you believe the official pronouncements of top governmental health agencies like the CDC and FDA, all the vaccines in the present day schedule are a priori safe and effective.

Not only are you told that they can’t harm you, but that not taking them can kill you.

Parents are under even more pressure. They are told that refraining from vaccinating their infants or children will greatly increase their risk of dying or being disabled. Worse, they are increasingly labeled as ‘crazy’ and ‘irresponsible’ anti-vaccine zealots who are putting the lives of others in danger.

But what happens when the actual evidence from the scientific and clinical literature produced by these very agencies contradicts their own vaccine policies?

This is exactly what has happened with the publication of a new study in the Journal of Pediatrics titled ,”Adverse Events following Haemophilus influenzae Type b Vaccines in the Vaccine Adverse Event ReportingSystem, 1990-2013,” wherein CDC and FDA researchers identify 749 deaths linked to the administration of the Hib vaccine, 51% of which were sudden infant death linked to the administration of Hib vaccine.

The CDC has boldly denied that there is any evidence supporting a causal link between vaccines and infant death, despite the fact that their own webpage on the topic acknowledges that “From 2 to 4 months old, babies begin their primary course of vaccinations. This is also the peak age for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).” Written off as coincidence, the CDC suggests that stomach sleeping is the primary modifiable risk factor.

Because SIDS is the 3rd leading cause of death in infants, and because the U.S. has one of the highest infant mortality rates in the developed world, one would think that more progress would have been made toward understanding its causes. Perhaps, as explored in this past article, the signal of harm is being ignored. Neglect and suppression of available data has recently been exposed with the confession of a top CDC vaccine scientist who was compelled to covered up data revealing an autism-MMR link in African-American boys.

In the new study, the CDC and FDA researchers themselves acknowledge “the scarcity” of postlicensure safety data on HiB vaccines in today’s vaccination schedule. They evaluated reports involving the currently licensed Hib vaccines received from January 1, 1990, through December 1, 2013 available on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

Presently, the CDC recommends 4 doses of the HiB vaccine at the following ages: 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 12 months through 15 months…

Read more at CDC’s Own Data: Vaccine-Infant Death Link | GreenMedInfo | Blog Entry.

Connett: 12 Arguments Against Water Fluoridation

Guns and Butter

“Water Fluoridation” with Dr. Paul Connett. Twelve arguments against the fluoridation of drinking water; fluoride not a nutrient; fluoridation not pharmaceutical grade, but toxic waste product from industry; harmful effects to human tissue, including, but not limited to, bones, joints, thyroid, brain, pineal gland; fluoridation not effective in fighting tooth decay; concentration versus dose; no adequate margin of safety to known health effects.

http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/96882

Bulgarian Demolished His House Just Before the Bank Could Repossess it

I have heard stories of people who wrecked their houses as they moved out, forced out by the banks, but this is the first one I heard of someone actually demolishing the entire house. I guess the loan was for the building materials and labor needed to build the house, so only the house actually belonged to the bank.

At the end of 2013 a man from Lovech-Bulgaria could not afford to pay the mortgage for his house, so he spent his last penny to have it demolished it right before the bankers took it away.

The land the house was built on was not included in the mortgage so the family decided to destroy the house and give it to its new owner. The remains of the building were loaded on a big truck and moved to the central district office of the bank in the city of Teteven, where the contract for the mortgage had been signed.

The man and his whole family entered the office and started crying and begging for mercy, but the director said that they couldn’t make exceptions and the family had a week to vacant the house.

Imagine the director’s face after the family left the office and his precious new house was unloaded in front of the bank’s main entrance…

*Translated from Bulgarian by Yela Cado. See www.dnesplus.bg

Story at He Demolished His House Just Before the Bank Could Take it Away – A Truck Delievered the Remains in Front of the Bank | Humans Are Free.

Oil Collapse Could Cause Biggest Catastrophe Since Great Depression

With the price of oil hovering around $44 and U.S. oil inventories at record highs the general consensus is that the economy will soon see a boost in consumer spending as Americans will take their gas savings and spend it at retail stores.

But there’s a lot more going on with oil on a geo-political scale than can be pumped into a 30-second propaganda soundbite from financial pundits and talking heads. While lower prices may seem like a boon for the American economy, what’s been missing from mainstream assessments are the fundamental data points that show just how serious a problem we may be facing.

As you’ll see in the succinct breakdown by Future Money Trends in the micro-documentary below, we’ve got some big problems coming our way. It all starts with the fact that debt in the energy sector over the last six years has exploded to $1.7 Trillion on the hopes that oil would continue to trade at around $80 to $100. As we know, that’s no longer the case, which means that all of the companies who took out large loans are no longer able to service their debt.

The end result will be widespread defaults in the oil industry. It’s a recipe for disaster and one that will likely play out right before our eyes in coming months.

In the context of current central bank money printing, deflation scares and currency wars; this could cause the most destructive economic situation since the Great Depression. We could see the oil price spike and crash in wild swings of volatility; further scaring already timid capital markets and destroying any thoughts of economic recovery. This will be felt the worst in the United States. …

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/oil-collapse-this-could-cause-the-most-destructive-economic-situation-since-the-great-depression_01282015
As usual, our dependence on the kindness of strangers isn’t panning out so well.  It’s not like we can’t have sane government policies like tariffs on oil imports which could be channeled into something useful like passenger railways and energy conservation efforts.  But no, that’s blasphemy against the sacred church of economic centralization and monopoly.  Diversity is the most robust form of stability, whether you’re talking about economics or sociology.