CDC Sez: “Circumcision Benefits Outweigh Risks”

When does such blatant unscientific fraud qualify as an overt admission of criminal intent?   Clearly, the agenda is not to reduce HIV infection because it does the opposite via increased M->F transmission due to vaginal abrasion.    This is yet more evidence of a covert agenda.

It’s a short step from here to mandatory MGM of infants under obamacare.

U.S. health officials on Tuesday released a draft of long-awaited federal guidelines on circumcision, saying medical evidence supports the procedure and health insurers should pay for it.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines stop short of telling parents to have their newborn sons circumcised. That is a personal decision that may involve religious or cultural preferences, said the CDC’s Dr. Jonathan Mermin.

But “the scientific evidence is clear that the benefits outweigh the risks,” added Mermin, who oversees the agency’s programs on HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.

These are the first federal guidelines on circumcision, a brief medical procedure that involves cutting away the foreskin around the tip of the penis. Germs can grow underneath the foreskin, and CDC officials say the procedure can lower a male’s risk of sexually-transmitted diseases, penile cancer and even urinary tract infections.

The CDC started working on the guidelines about seven years ago, when a cluster of influential studies in Africa indicated circumcision might help stop spread of the AIDS virus.

“The benefits of male circumcision have become more and more clear over the last 10 years,” said Dr. Aaron Tobian, a Johns Hopkins University researcher involved in one of the African studies.

But the guidelines are important, because the rates of newborn male circumcision have been dropping, he added. …

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/cdc-circumcision-benefits-outweigh-risks-27301210

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.