Global Internet Freedom On The Decline In 2014

A recent Freedom House report stated that Internet freedom dropped in 2014 because of new laws in many countries that criminalize certain Internet content and dissent. Freedom House is worried that this will create a snowball effect, with more and more countries wanting to pass similar laws. Eventually, a restrictive Internet could be the new status quo, globally.

According to the organization, between May 2013 and May 2014, 41 countries passed laws to restrict free speech online, increase their governments’ control over the Internet, or expand their surveillance capabilities.

In 38 of the 65 surveyed countries, there have been arrests related to social or political speech online. This has been happening especially in the Middle East and North African areas, where 10 out of the 11 countries surveyed from that region had detained people for online political speech.

In countries such as Syria, Turkey, Ukraine and Egypt, citizen journalists have been attacked when trying to document anti-government protests. In other countries, governments stepped up Web regulation to identify who posts online. Russia and Vietnam passed laws that allow their prosecutor general to block “extremist” content without any judicial oversight. In the U.S., some states are using the NSA spying revelations as an excuse to augment their own surveillance capabilities…

Read more at Global Internet Freedom On The Decline In 2014.

Vaccines Will be Made from Human Cancer Tumors

Notice how the conversation is manipulated by a “Dr.D” who obviously has the job of making sure this idea is approved. Is this how they intend to reduce the population by 80% in 12 years? Has Dr.D been promoted or given a generous raise or bonus since this meeting?

Unbelievably, the method of producing vaccines using cells that are derived directly from human cancer tumors has been approved even though the vaccines may induce cancer in recipients. This method is cheaper and faster than breeding animals for the culture media – and human cancer tumors are readily available.

At a meeting of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in September 2012, the discussion which led to approval was no less than a scandal. [1]

The health authorities and vaccine manufacturers blatantly revealed their uncertainty regarding the safety of vaccines made from cancer tumors. Some of the incredible statements from the meeting are quoted directly. A more detailed account is given in this article. [2]

The statements in italics are directly quoted from the meeting. [The bolded headlines are the essence of the statements.]

The vaccines may cause tumors in recipients
“We have really identified three major factors that could potentially convey risk from tumor derived cells. And these include the cells themselves … and if they were tumor-derived cells then maybe they themselves could form tumors in a vaccine recipient.” (Dr. K)

A fact: tumor cell lines can cause tumors
“What I think is qualitatively different about the tumor cell lines is the fact that they can cause tumors.” (Dr.L)

Tumors may occur decades after vaccinations
“But certainly, if you are going to address this question about tumor risk of vaccines made in tumor cell lines, it’s going to have to be a decade’s question.” (Dr.C)

FDA is there to help vaccine manufacturers
“… but we are here to consider the issues that we would like to advise the agency to consider in helping the company continue the manufacturing process, what should they be concerned about, what should they be watching for.” (Dr. D, leader of the meeting)

Doubt regarding test animals for assessing oncogenicity
“I’m not optimistic that we’re going to find animal models to assess oncogenicity of DNA. That’s why I’m feeling that maybe it’s the clearance aspect that we have to deal with, with respect to DNA.” (Dr.P)

Uncertainty about length of time for safety testing
“Are they watching these animals long enough? Should it be longer?” (Dr.D)
“Is it relevant to safety that a cell forms a tumor after a year, a year and a half?” (Dr.P)

Poor testing for prions including mad cow disease
“There are a lot of things to be done in post-licensure. The field of the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, mad cow disease) is really, in terms of sensitivity, of detection, pretty poor” (Dr.C)

Doctors and the public may say “Oh, my God”!
“How is this group (of vaccines) going to be able to be accepted by the consumers … As soon as you hear “a tumor-derived cell line”, how do you explain that, put the public at ease?” (Dr.B)
“… the practicing medical community and also the lay public. They are going to hear that we are recommending or that the manufacturers are making vaccines with tumorigenic cell lines and say, oh, my God, even if there’s no scientific basis to say, oh, my God.” (Dr.D)

Framing information to convince doctors and the public
“… because it’s a discussion of how one communicates these issues and how the public will perceive them. But I’m not completely sure that we have a complete answer on the fundamental scientific question. So how can you communicate a scientific concensus that the product is safe unless we’re sure that you, the experts we are asking to advise us are convinced that it’s safe?” (Dr.K)

Plan to hide information and omit it from package inserts
“The minute you describe something in the package insert in terms of potential clinical safety concerns, I think that really precludes using these cell substrates.” (Dr. G)

“When it gets right down to what’s in the vial and what the patient is going to ask me about, whether it’s safe, I’m not going to say, well, you know, HeLa cells kill nude mice.” (Dr. C)

“I don’t know that our charge is to micromanage the package insert today. I think that’s a new discussion, with lots of issues that we haven’t really aired completely.” ( Dr.D)

Authorities uncertain about safety
“So I’m not sure that we can give a certainty – there’s no risk, don’t worry about this. – It’s sort of a brave new world. We’re all doing it together. But I think that you are doing a beautiful job.” (Dr. D)

Will learn about the risks as time goes by
“… even though there are challenges to using the new technologies, they have to be embraced and we have to continue to try to learn from them and struggle through that learning curve.” (Dr.M)

Leader of the committee says “I’m a vaccine guy”, then suggests approval
“I’m a vaccine guy. They are wonderful to prevent infectious diseases … I hope that I’m speaking for everybody when I say that’s the answer to your question. If not, please chime in now.” (Dr.D)

The committee formally approves the method of making vaccines from human cancer tumors

“To come back to the agency’s question of whether this Committee believes it’s correct scientifically to go forward with the development of these vaccines, our answer is yes.” (Dr.D)

Conclusion

  • Making vaccines with cells that are directly derived from human cancer tumors is faster and cheaper than breeding animals for the culture media.
  • Millions of potentially cancer-causing vaccines will be produced.
  • The vaccines may possibly cause genetic mutations.
  • Millions of dollars will be made by vaccine promoters.
  • The health of millions of consumers may be jeopardized.
  • Information about how these vaccines are made will be hidden from doctors and consumers.

Sometimes reality is even more frightening than horrific science fiction

Millions of consumers will be injected with vaccines which may cause cancer tumors, then cancer tumors will be used to make millions of vaccines. Think about it.

References

  • https://www.scribd.com/doc/246682536/FDA-Meeting-Human-Tumors-for-Vaccine-Manufacture
  • http://sanevax.org/making-vaccines-cancer-cells-safe/

From Vaccines Will be Made from Human Cancer Tumors.

Wall Street Demands Derivatives Deregulation, Taxpayer Backing In Government Shutdown Bill

Wall Street lobbyists are trying to secure taxpayer backing for many derivatives trades as part of budget talks to avert a government shutdown.

According to multiple Democratic sources, banks are pushing hard to include the controversial provision in funding legislation that would keep the government operating after Dec. 11. Top negotiators in the House are taking the derivatives provision seriously, and may include it in the final bill, the sources said.

The bank perks are not a traditional budget item. They would allow financial institutions to trade certain financial derivatives from subsidiaries that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. — potentially putting taxpayers on the hook for losses caused by the risky contracts. Big Wall Street banks had typically traded derivatives from these FDIC-backed units, but the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law required them to move many of the transactions to other subsidiaries that are not insured by taxpayers. …

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/04/wall-street-government-shutdown_n_6272776.html

Russ Baker Interview on Bush/CIA Connections to JFK Assassination

One question about JFK’s assassination that’s never gotten enough attention: former President George H.W. Bush’s connection to it.

That’s the topic of WhoWhatWhy Founder and Editor-in-Chief Russ Baker’s discussion with popular KGO radio host Pat Thurston, taped on the 51st anniversary of the assassination. And the facts are all the more relevant, now that plans may be afoot for a third President Bush.

For more in-depth insight into the Bush-JFK connection and the assassination itself, please take a look at the following reading list. It starts with the first of 10 excerpts from Russ’ best-selling book Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, America’s Invisible Government and the Hidden History of the Last Fifty YearsAfter that is a collection of our independent investigations and coverage of one of America’s most enduring mysteries: the JFK hit.

Audio of this amazing interview is here: http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/11/23/radiowho-russ-baker-51st-anniversary-jfks-assassination/

Relevant footnotes:

GHW Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 1

Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 2: Skull and Bones Forever

Bush and The JFK Hit, Part 3: Where was Poppy November 22, 1963?

Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 4: Barbara’s Hair-Raising Day

Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 5: The Mysterious Mr. de Mohrenschildt

Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 6: The Cold War Comes to Dallas

Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 7: Empire Strikes Back

Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 8: Prepping a Patsy?

Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 9: Planning a Nightmare on Elm Street

Bush and the JFK Hit, Part 10: After Camelot

MORE ON JFK

The Hidden Government Group Linking JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra and 9/11

The Deaths of JFK, RFK—and the Silence of the Lambs

JFK-RFK-MLK??? The Questions Remain

JFK Umbrella Man—More Doubts

JFK: The Never-Ending Wait for Answers

Is the Government Holding Back Crucial Documents?

TVWHO: Obama Admin Bottles JFK Assassination Records

The JFK Factor: Bill O’Reilly on the Assassination, Then and Now

Dallas Diminishes JFK, His Legacy, And Those Who Care About Democracy

Letters to Jackie, But What About Jack? How to Avoid the Heart of the JFK Assassination

A Closer Look at the Secret Service

Secret Service Vet With Very Strange JFK Story

Must-Watch Video: JFK Motorcade and Odd Secret Service Behavior

The NY Times’ Ostrich Act on JFK Assassination Getting Old

Carlyle Group’s Latest Acquisition: the JFK Library (!)

Battle over Dealey Plaza Presence on 11/22/13

Boston Bombing Prosecutor Sez Witnesses ‘Afraid’ to Testify

The Boston Marathon bombing is much more important than has been acknowledged, principally because it is the defining domestic national security event since 9/11—and has played a major role in expanding the power of the security state. For that reason, WhoWhatWhy is continuing to investigate troubling aspects of this story and the establishment media treatment of it. We will be exploring new elements of the story regularly as the January trial of the accused co-conspirator Dzhokhar Tsarnaev approaches.

The defense witnesses in the Boston Bombing trial certainly have reason to be afraid to testify, given the long official intimidation campaign against them.

Yet, ironically, it is now the government that is claiming its witnesses are scared and even unwilling to testify. Unsurprisingly, the judge overseeing the trial against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has agreed with the prosecutors.

Since the Boston Marathon bombing last year, WhoWhatWhy has reported on a pattern of intimidation towards people associated with the accused bombers, Dzhokhar and his late elder brother, Tamerlan. Those connected to the case have been intimidated, deported, jailed, and even killed.

It got so bad that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s defense asked U.S. District Court Judge George A. O’Toole Jr. for permission to conceal the names of individual witnesses until the day before they’re due to testify. That’s because, the defense argues, they fear the witnesses will be subject to further FBI harassment.

Unusual Request

Judy Clarke, a member of the defense team, admitted it was an unusual request. “We don’t want to do it,” Clarke told the court. “We’re already struggling to get people to talk to us. We are really worried about losing the slim list of real potential witnesses we have.”

The government countered that it was having trouble convincing bombing victims to cooperate. They are “afraid, if not unwilling, to testify against the man accused of dismembering or traumatizing them in a terrorist attack.” Further, the prosecution argued, keeping Tsarnaev’s witnesses under wraps would hand him an unfair advantage.

On Nov. 12, O’Toole sided with the prosecution, ordering the defense to disclose its preliminary witness list by Dec. 29. …

http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/11/18/boston-bombing-prosecutor-witnesses-afraid-testify/