My best guess is that he’s right, there is no manmade global warming (or “climate change”, the sleight of hand they’ve substituted since the onset of more severe winters recently). Look people, they’ve constructed this tissue-thin facade of legitimacy around 9/11 and the “war on terror” and propped it up for 13 years with nothing but money and propaganda in order to justify massive war crimes in africa and the middle east and the impending police state at home. Clearly there is no pretense to human decency or fact-based reporting any more, and most people seem content to believe the “experts” without regard for the possibility that they’re being bought off in mass in order to justify an elite agenda, something which is clearly not beyond the realm of possibility given the vast concentration of wealth and convergence of financial interests that has occurred over the past 30 years.
I’m not a climate scientist but I’m not totally clueless about how the world works and I do have tools for throwing light on the darkness, including the published historical record of elite planning in the early 90’s which preceded the first mention of this “crisis” in the mass media by several years: http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/05/the-club-of-rome-agenda-for-social-control/. It’s the Hegelian Dialectic. http://www.infowars.com/the-hegelian-dialectic-and-its-use-in-controlling-modern-society/
I also know something about the near impossibility of accurately modeling chaotic systems like the climate over extended periods of time. It’s not a matter of good algorithms or measurements, it’s a matter of the exponential amplification of unavoidable measurement errors and random perturbations. When you see someone pointing to computer models to prove something about the climate, you probably need to take it with a grain of salt. Furthermore, the divergence beween global CO2 concentration and average global temperatures for the past 15 years is totally unaccounted for by these computer models or the handwaving arguments I’ve seen put forth to explain their failure. Admittedly there’s a possibility that there’s some kind of phase change going on (methane hydrate becoming gaseous?). But I’m cynical enough to avoid jumping on that hypothesis without some evidence. Al Gore’s Nobel prize-winning hockey stick hoax (the historical record is that CO2 follows global temperature change, not the other way around) is enough to reinforce my cynicism.
So what would be the motivation for such a massive propaganda mobilization? Something else that we can glean from published history: a long-term bankster plan for global governance, the very plan which is being pursued through the war on terror: http://www.wanttoknow.info/articles/tragedy_hope_banking_money_history. An integral part of this plan is the imposition of mass poverty as a tool of social control. And make no mistake, the “solutions” being put forth in order to address this “crisis” will lead to mass poverty and death through starvation, particularly in resource-rich enslaved countries such as those in Africa, which in all likelihood is currently under a bioweapon assault precisely to rid the continent of those pesky humans that get in the way of our corporate masters.
Remember, no matter how cynical you are, it’s not enough. Most people make the mistake of assuming that the powers that be have some human-based motivation. And they do, but like all humans their motivations are derived from their micro-environment, which just happens be a distillation of centuries of cumulative corruption, satanism and intergenerational child abuse among the invisible owners of the world. http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/05/reprise-how-they-live-2/