Obama considers allowing torture overseas

The White House is reportedly wrestling over how to interpret a ban on “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” ahead of a meeting in Geneva next month concerning the United Nations charter on torture.

According to the New York Times, the Obama administration remains divided over what stance a Washington delegation will officially take at the UN-sponsored Committee Against Torture panel early next month in the Swiss city.

Although Barack Obama said before and after being elected to the White House that United States officials should never engage in torturous activity, Times national security journalist Charlie Savage reported on Sunday this week that administration officials might formally adopt another stance — one on par with the policies of Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush — when the panel convenes in a couple of weeks.

The Times reported that the attorneys who answer to the president are conflicted over whether or not the White House should revisit the Bush administration’s interpretation of a UN treaty, the likes of which authorized the use of enhanced interrogation tactics, like waterboarding and sleep deprivation, on individuals detained by military and intelligence agencies in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks at facilities such as the Guantanamo Bay detention center and CIA so-called “black sites.” …

http://rt.com/usa/197552-obama-torture-geneva-treaty/

Waterboarding and sleep deprivation???  How about rape with broomsticks dipped in battery acid and electric shocks to the genitals?   Hours tied up in “stress positions” (psychological torture).   That’s just a small sample of what US personnel are reported to have engaged in in south vietnam, latin america, africa, iraq and iran.  This is what they really mean by torture, it’s what they do as a matter of course and it’s what they’re terrified will get out.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.