Success: First Ebola Infection Contracted in the USA

A Texas health care worker who treated the first state’s Ebola patient, has been tested positive for the virus, officials said blaming a breach in of treatment protocols for the new case.

A health care worker at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital who provided care for the Ebola patient hospitalized there has tested positive for Ebola in a preliminary test at the state public health laboratory in Austin,said a statement from Texas Department of State Health Services.

According to the state’s health services, the woman had “a low grade fever Friday night and was isolated and referred for testing.

The Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital worker has tested positive for Ebola in a preliminary exam.

“Confirmatory testing will be conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta,” the state public health laboratory in Austin said.

We knew a second case could be a reality, and we’ve been preparing for this possibility,” said Dr. David Lakey, commissioner of the Texas Department of State Health Services. “We are broadening our team in Dallas and working with extreme diligence to prevent further spread.”

Health officials have interviewed the patient to find out who he had been in contact with, or whether there were any potential exposures. They said that those who had contact with him “will be monitored based on the nature of their interactions and the potential they were exposed to the virus.

The care worker had been treating the Liberian national, Thomas Eric Duncan,who became the first man to be diagnosed in the United States with Ebola. The man died October 8 in the Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas.

Although no further cases of the often fatal disease have been discovered yet in the US, health officials in Texas were still monitoring 48 people on Wednesday who might have been previously exposed to the virus through Duncan.

“This is a very critical week,” Dr. David Lakey, the Texas health commissioner, told the Associated Press. “We’re at a very sensitive period when a contact could develop symptoms. We’re monitoring with extreme vigilance.”

A total of 18 employees are currently being monitored, officials at the Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas said at a briefing.

A top federal health official said that the Ebola diagnosis in a health worker shows there was a clear breach of safety protocol.

Dr. Tom Frieden, head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, says the worker had treated Duncan multiple times after the Liberian man was diagnosed.

All those who treated deceased Duncan are now considered to be potentially exposed. Testing of the second Ebola patient in Dallas will be completed later Sunday.

CDC will look for possible breaches during Duncan’s dialysis and incubation, Frieden said….

Walmart, Sears, Amazon, Ebay et al sell Do-It-Yourself Circumcision Torture Devices

What is it about sexually torturing babies?  This is some kind of sado-pedophilic cult. Walmart has removed it in response to an online petition, but the others are still there.

It seems there’s no end to the abundance and variety of DIY MGM devices available online:….0…1ac.1.55.products-cc..4.8.895.mCe_pcVZNm4

Of course the US government has long been peddling this snake oil, most recently in africa:

And it’s always been a hit among pedophiles.  See and

Why  not?  It helps make the trains run on time in the USA:

And it provides an outlet for the boundless imaginations of our medical engineers:



Finally, the centerpiece of the whole gruesome spectacle:


The restraints are to keep him from wriggling too much in his joy and playfulness.  And when he “falls to sleep” it will keep the target conveniently accessible.

And even more:

Can we call this a sado-pedophilic compulsion yet?

But the real money is in the foreskin trade:

But to see what MGM is really all about, see:

It’s not an accident that it was the mark of slavery in biblical times.

The endgame has begun

Perhaps the single most important thing to know about power in the world today is that most nations do not have control over their own currencies. Instead privately owned, for-profit central banks – such as the Federal Reserve Bank in the US – create money out of nothing and then loan it at interest to their respective governments. This is an incredibly profitable scam, but that’s not the worst of it.

Not only do the central banks have the power to create money for free, they also have the power to set interest rates, to decide how much credit is issued, and to decide how much money is put into circulation. With this power central banks can – and do – orchestrate boom and bust cycles, enabling the super-wealthy owners of the banks to profit from investments during the booms, and buy up assets at bargain prices during the busts. And that still isn’t the whole story.

The most profitable of all central bank activities has been the financing of major wars, particularly the two World Wars. When nations are engaged in warfare, with their very survival at stake, the governments stretch their resources to the limit in the competition to prevail. The struggle to get more financing becomes as important as the competition on the battlefield. Moneylenders love a desperate borrower, and vast fortunes have been made by extending credit to both sides in conflicts: the longer a war continues, the more profit for the central bankers.

A very good introduction to the history of central banking, and in particular the Rothschild dynasty:

The Money Masters (1996) [FULL DOCUMENTARY]

Centralized wealth leads to centralized power

 “Some of the biggest men in the United States are afraid of something. They know there is a power somewhere, so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

– Woodrow Wilson

Our political systems, based on parties competing to get elected, are inherently prone to corruption. Just as the struggle for financing is important in military campaigns, so is it important in political campaigns. Wealthy donors are able to get special treatment, when it comes to legislation and regulation that affects their business interests. This kind of corruption, however, is only the tip of the iceberg.

A more effective way that wealth translates into power is by the placing of agents – individuals loyal to wealthy backers – into positions of influence and power. For example, when the Rothschilds and Rockefellers joined forces to establish the Federal Reserve, they recruited an unknown professor, Woodrow Wilson, promised to make him President, and secured a return promise that he would sign the Federal Reserve bill when the time came. With their influence over party bosses, their control of newspapers, and unlimited funding, they were able to get Wilson elected. He may have later regretted his bargain with the devil, as suggested in the above quotation.

A more modern example is Obama, long time protégé of Henry Kissinger, himself a key agent of the Rockefellers. Like Wilson, Obama appeared out of political nowhere, was rocketed into the Presidency, and proved his loyalty in office. In Obama’s case, this involved promptly turning the White House over to central-banker agents from Wall Street – Timothy Geithner and his buddies. They make the policy; Obama makes the speeches.

This kind of thing has been going on for centuries, first in Europe and later in the US. What began as the placement of a few key agents has evolved over time. What we have now is an international web of control, with key agents placed in political parties, governments and their agencies, the media, corporate boards, intelligence services, and the military. At the center of the web are the central banking dynasties – the Gods of Money – who remain mostly behind the scenes, pulling the strands of real power.

The engineering of transformation

“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”

– Franklin D. Roosevelt

Have you ever daydreamed about what you would do, if you had wealth and power? For some the answer might be a life of leisure and indulgence, but for many their thoughts would turn to changing the world, making the world ‘better’. An iconic example would be Bill Gates, who would rather use the bulk of his fortune for making changes in the world,primarily to do with population reduction – than devote it to amassing still more wealth.

The Gods of Money are like that. They’ve had wealth and power, in great excess, for generations, and unlike you and me, they can do more than daydream. The business they have been engaged in for the past couple of centuries has not been to accumulate more wealth, rather it has been to transform the world into their own desired kind of private fiefdom. They have been accomplishing this in a series of transformational projects on a global scale. What is referred to as ‘The New World Order’ is simply the latest in this series of projects. ….

US, UK Do Wargames About Economic Collapse

Britain and America will hold ‘war games’ next week to test their response to the collapse of a major bank on either side of the Atlantic.

Chancellor George Osborne and Bank of England governor Mark Carney will join US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew and Federal Reserve chief Janet Yellen in a Washington war room on Monday.

The simulated exercise will look at two scenarios – a major US bank with UK operations at risk and a major UK bank with US operations about to go under. …

CIA-Drugs: Can the MSM Handle Reality?

The mainstream news media’s reaction to the new movie, “Kill the Messenger,” has been tepid, perhaps not surprising given that the MSM comes across as the film’s most unsympathetic villain as it crushes journalist Gary Webb for digging up the Contra-cocaine scandal in the mid-1990s after the major newspapers thought they had buried it in the 1980s.

Not that the movie is without other villains, including drug traffickers and “men in black” government agents. But the drug lords show some humanity and even honesty as they describe how they smuggled drugs and shared the proceeds with the Nicaraguan Contra rebels, President Ronald Reagan’s beloved “freedom fighters.”

By contrast, the news executives for the big newspapers, such as the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times, come across as soulless careerists determined to maintain their cozy relations with the CIA’s press office and set on shielding their failure to take on this shocking scandal when it was playing out in the 1980s. …

Neocons Think They Can Win a Nuclear War with Russia

Former Assistant Treasury Secretary Dr. Paul Craig Roberts says the U.S. has plans for nuclear war with our rivals.  Dr. Roberts explains, “Washington not only has war plans for launching a preemptive nuclear attack on Russia, and also possibly China, but Washington has a cadre of people who advocate nuclear war.  We have people running around Washington saying things such as ‘What’s the good of nuclear weapons if you can’t use them.’  . . . These weapons are so lethal that if just one percent of the inventory of the U.S. and Russia were used, the death toll would be at least 2 billion people. Also, if less than half of the inventory of either the U.S. or Russia were used, life would cease to exist on planet earth.”  Dr. Roberts goes on to say, “I have been warning about this for some years.  I pointed out years ago that the Bush regime had changed U.S. war doctrine such that the role of nuclear weapons was no longer retaliatory to be used in the event of a nuclear attack on the United States.  It was elevated to a first strike position.  It is now our war doctrine that we can initiate a nuclear war on somebody we don’t like, or who we think might not agree with us, or who we think might be prepared to go to war against us.  This doctrine applies to countries that do not have nuclear weapons.”

Why is Russia the target for U.S. nukes?  Roberts says, “Russia is a country that is large enough and has sufficient resources that it could rise to the position to being a barrier to Washington’s exercise of hegemony over the world.  So, Russia has always been the target of this nuclear war doctrine.  How are they implementing this?  The United States is now putting, on the border of Russia, anti-ballistic missile bases, or ABM’s.  In the Reagan years, it was called ‘Star Wars.’  These missiles are designed for intercepting intercontinental ballistic missiles.  So, if we were to attack Russia, and Russia were nuclear devastated and pushed the button and sent ICBM’s headed to the U.S. for retaliation, the anti- ballistic bases would shoot down the incoming Russian ICBM’s and leave America untouched.  The doctrine is now prevalent in Washington that the United States can win a nuclear war because we have the shield of anti-ballistic missiles.” …

What about Russia and China making a first strike of their own?  Do you think that is far-fetched?  Dr. Roberts points out, “What I am telling you is in the public record.  This isn’t an opinion.  This is all in the public record. Anyone can read it.  The Russians and the Chinese are both fully aware of it. . . . This is very dangerous for Washington to have this doctrine and to be implementing it by putting ABM bases in Poland. . . . The bases are already established in Poland and there will be more.  The Polish government has signed the death warrant for humanity. . . . It gives Washington the confidence that we can attack Russia without any consequences. . . . Of course, these systems never work like people think they will work, they never do.  There are no winners.  It is impossible to win.  This is ignorance, and the belief you can win a nuclear war makes it possible, makes it likely.”

The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy