Elite Traitors Circle Wagons Re: Boston Bombing False Flag

The coverup continues:

In Boston Bombing, FBI Fights for Public’s Right to Know… Nothing

Secrecy has become the rule. In Boston, the prosecutor of accused bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has asked the judge to withhold filings from the media. The FBI won’t even identify the agent who shot and killed a key witness in the investigation in Orlando, Florida, let alone clear up the muddy circumstances around the shooting. And the Bureau has ordered the sealing of a county coroner’s completed autopsy report of that killing.

And it’s not only the media that is being stonewalled. Politicians are being shut out, as well.

U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley, a reliably conservative Republican from Iowa, is now demanding answers from the FBI about its bombing investigation. In a letter to bureau Director James Comey, Grassley criticized the FBI’s lack of transparency and asked for answers to a series of questions about the bombing he first asked in June.

Three months ago, U.S. Rep. William Keating, a Massachusetts Democrat, asked his own questions in a scathing letter to Comey.

Favored Reporters Are Fed Leaks

The information blackout of the past six months stands in stark contrast to the FBI’s river of leaks to pet reporters during the week following the April 15 bombing.

This tactic of handing out selective “scoops” gave the FBI control of the narrative as it steered public opinion toward viewing the Boston Bombing as an open-and-shut case against the Tsarnaev brothers, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar….

http://whowhatwhy.com/2013/11/04/monday-morning-skeptic-in-boston-bombing-fbi-fights-for-publics-right-to-know-nothing/

Does US “Death Sentence” in Boston Case Equal Silence?

On January 30, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the federal government would seek the death penalty against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the Boston Marathon bombing suspect. The media by and large did not seem to find the move worth scrutinizing.

At WhoWhatWhy, we disagree.  Since the first week following the tragedy, we’ve been raising issues about the way in which a story riddled with improbabilities, anomalies and question marks (see, for example, this, this, this, and this.) was turned quickly into a “solved crime” and a done deal—with nary a question about whether a government that has lied to the American people time and again over the years could possibly be up to something.

One thing we pointed out: We ought to be wary of claims that the brothers should be given the ubiquitous moniker of “lone wolves”—even if it is proven that they planted the bombs. This is especially true, given the confirmed pre-Marathon interactions between the Tsarnaev family and the federal government (including contacts with the FBI), an uncle tied to the CIA, Russian intelligence interest, complaints from the parents that their children were set up, and more.

We also noted how the only people who could shed light on what actually happened were being silenced, by fate or design. First, Tamerlan Tsarnaev died in a hail of gunfire. Then his brother Dzhokhar was nearly killed in a massive strafing of the boat in which he was hiding, unarmed. Then a friend of Tamerlan’s, Ibragim Todashev, was killed in a still-unexplained shooting while unarmed and in FBI custody. Then Todashev’s girlfriend and friends were told to stop talking about what had happened or be deported, and then harassed, and, in at least her case, actually deported….

http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/02/03/does-us-death-sentence-in-boston-case-equal-silence/

This blog has been covering the boston case since the beginning and there’s no question it involved a government sponsored exercise, a mercenary security company (Craft) and the CIA.  There was also every indication that a constitutionalist libertarian type was initially set up to be the fall guy, in keeping with the ongoing campaign to demonize that demographic to facilitate the disarmament of the american people in the face of a long history of US government sponsored mass murder and torture in many parts of the world, a history which has yet to be admitted or prosecuted.  Disarming in the face of such a historical pattern would be like disarming under hitler.  See: http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/?s=boston&submit=Search Also see the reference section for some real history.

error

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.