Interviewed by German TV in Russia:
If you want a clear and simple understanding of the attitude you need to have to free yourself from the Illuminati’s mind control which they have been imposing upon the world, you should listen to David Icke’s youtube video–a link for which is listed below.
David Icke’s youtube video
IF YOU’RE INTERESTED IN HOW YOU CAN DEFEAT THE ILLUMINATI BY DEVELOPING YOUR MENTAL POWERS BELOW IS A LINK TO A FREE PSYCHIC TECH HANDBOOK PRESENTED BY KERTH.
FREE PSYCHIC TECH HANDBOOK
Also I’ve written an article on a deprogramming technique for persons who have been subjected to trauma-based mind control such as MK Ultra, Monarch, and Satanic Ritual Abuse. I call this Fabian Therapy–the link to which is below.
Fabian Therapy for Mind Control
The pecking order places power above powerlessness. After the once powerless take power, they overpower the new generation. Passing on the ritual of child sexual abuse…
Since ancient times the Luciferian Aristocrats have controlled the masses by creating mythological stories. If you buy into this type of fictional story–you basically become a character in an Illuminati fairy tale. This acceptance of their lie as if it were truth is actually a form of brainwashing because it causes the victim to disassociate from reality. Believing Illuminati propaganda is a form of mental illness, and most Americans are disassociated from reality in this way. Telling the truth is an attempt to heal the mental illness of others. I’m not a journalist so much as I am a deprogrammer. IN REALITY the Illuminati does exist and is behind all that is wrong with this world. People who cannot accept reality are mentally ill. Such persons are harmful to themselves and others. It is a moral responsibility of all human beings to know the truth of the Illuminati and to tell that truth to others. Skull and Bones is a branch of the Illuminati. The CIA is controlled by Skull and Bones. The mythological story that is told to the public is that the CIA is protecting the American people. The truth is that after WWII the CIA brought Nazi war criminals into the USA and made them into citizens. They were given new IDs and worked for the Illuminati in various functions. Some worked for NASA. Modern psychiatry is a creation of Nazi war criminals brought into the USA under Project Paperclip. Some Paperclip Nazis turned obstetrics into a form of torture for women and children. One woman brought over in Project Paperclip was personally known to me. I knew her as Shotzy. She was a short woman with German accent. She wore her long black hair in a bun on top of her head. She had met an Illuminati member relative in New York City where she was studying Theosophy. Later she decided that she preferred the hard core Satanism of Crowley. She had been involved in the Nazi Youth Program in Germany before and during WWII. She knew of every way to torture a child which did not leave scars, and at one time or another she used them all on me and other American children. It’s ironic that when my father fought in Europe during WWII he probably didn’t think that the same Nazis that he was fighting would be brought over to the USA after the war and put into positions of power. I was able to get away from Shotzy, and persons in a resistance movement against the Illuminati were able to help me. I was healed emotionally and mentally by something I call FABIAN THERAPY. There is a LINK to an article which explains this below.
Fabian Therapy for Mind Control
Recently I did a television interview on the People’s Voice show Birth of a New Earth, the link to which is below.
KERTH TALKS ABOUT SATANIC ABUSE–TV INTERVIEW
One mythological story that virtually everyone has been brainwashed into believing is that human beings don’t have psychic ability when in fact everyone does. You’ve just been brainwashed into thinking that you don’t have psychic powers. If you’d like to develop your latent psychic abilities, there is a LINK BELOW for a FREE PSYCHIC TECH HANDBOOK.
FREE PSYCHIC TECH HANDBOOK
The Financial Times joins the “conspiracy theorists:”
A year ago the Bundesbank announced that it intended to repatriate 700 tons of Germany’s gold from Paris and New York. Although a couple of jumbo jets could have managed the transatlantic removal, it made security sense to ship the load in smaller consignments. Just how small, and over how long, has only just become apparent.
Last month Jens Weidmann, Bundesbank president, admitted that just 37 tons had arrived in Frankfurt. The original timescale, to complete the transfer by 2020, was leisurely enough, but at this rate it would take 20 years for a simple operation. Well, perhaps not so simple. While he awaits delivery, Herr Weidmann is welcome to come and look through the bars in the Federal Reserve’s vaults, but the question is: whose bars are they?
In the “armchair farmer” fraud you are told: “Look, this is your pig, in the sty.” It works until everyone wants physical delivery of their pig, which is why Buba’s move last year caused such a stir. After all nobody knows whether there are really 260m ounces of gold in Fort Knox, because the US government won’t let auditors inside.
The delivery problem for the Fed is a different breed of pig. The gold market is far more than exchanging paper money for precious metal. Indeed the metal seems something of a sideshow. In June last year the average volume of gold cleared in London hit 29m ounces per day. The world’s mines are producing 90m ounces per year. The traded volume was many times the cleared volume.
The paper gold in the London Bullion Market takes the familiar forms that bankers have turned into profit machines: futures, options, leveraged trades, collateralised obligations, ETFs . . . a storm of exotic instruments, each of which is carefully logged, cross-checked and audited.
Or perhaps not. High-flying traders find such backroom work tedious, and prefer to let some drone do it, just as they did with those money-market instruments that fuelled the banking crisis. The drones will have full control of the paper trail, won’t they? There’s surely no chance that the Fed’s little delivery difficulty has anything to do with the cat’s-cradle of pledges based on the gold in its vaults?
John Hathaway suspects there is. He worries about all the paper (and pixels) linked to gold. He runs the Tocqueville gold fund (the clue is in the name) and doesn’t share the near-universal gloom of London’s gold analysts, who a year ago forecast an average $1700 for 2013. It is currently $1,260.
As has been remarked here before, forecasting the price is for mugs and bugs. But one day the ties that bind this pixelated gold may break, with potentially catastrophic results. So if you fancy gold at today’s depressed price, learn from Buba and demand delivery.
When the first cave painter scratched an animal on a stone wall, he was undertaking a unique action. He was expressing his own consciousness beyond living his life.
He was inventing beyond his experience.
Suddenly, his experience had another use. It could be gathered up and transformed into painting, creation.
The first artist was the first alchemist.
So it is with all art. You can transmute your own past, your own experience, your own knowledge, your own emotions into works of imagination.
Art is a spiritual path.
From its dynamic perspective, everything that has ever happened to you can take on absolutely new meaning.
This also happens to be the goal of all therapies.
But with art, the goal is fulfilled.
It is no exaggeration to say that the artist can reinvent his past.
Civilizations rise and fall, come and go, and their fate is decided by untold millions of people who refrain from taking the path of the artist.
Ordinary life as we know it doesn’t resolve into a grand solution. It never has. Through alchemical persuasion, however, it can. And that alchemy is art.
The chain of cause and effect, threading from past into present, breaks. Instead, imagination/consciousness invents new realities and new futures, utilizing the energy of past events.
But this energy is no longer connected to those events. It’s brand new, it’s fuel for the fire.
As soon as imagination/invention/creation becomes the leading prow of action for an individual, the energy conversion and liberation begins….
Over time I’ve written articles and made videos which talk about solutions to the problem of living in a world run by Luciferian Secret Societies. These are listed below.
Below is a link to an article I’ve written which describes a therapy system which helps to deprogram the victims of trauma-based mind control such as MK Ultra and Monarch mind control as well as Satanic Ritual Abuse.
Fabian Therapy for Mind Control
In some of the more extreme forms of Satanism there is the phenomena of persons getting addicted to drinking adrenalized blood. The link to an article discussing this is below.
BLOOD DRINKING ADDICTION RECOVERY PROCESS
Below is a link to a youtube video about how the Illuminati make their money.
Illuminati evil wealth secrets
Below is a link to a youtube video that explains the root to all evil in this world.
Illuminati Doctrine video
Just to make a point clear. What makes prosperity possible is complexity. Complexity creates stability. This can be proven with math–as if it isn’t obvious. Democracy is a check and balance on the militant power of China. If the West falls, as some think it should, there will be no check and balance on China’s militancy. If you invest in the Ghost Cities of China under those circumstances, you will lose money. But if the West survives and thrives, it will be safe to invest in the Ghost Cities of China and they will come to life. Without the balance of Western power, an american or european moving to a city in China would have the life expectancy of a democracy protester in Tiananmen Square. Democracy in the West means prosperity in the East.
Remember a researcher named Gilles-Eric Seralini, his 2012 GMO study, and the controversy that swirled around it?
He fed rats GMOs, in the form of Monsanto’s Roundup Ready corn, and they developed tumors. Some died. The study was published in the journal, Food and Chemical Toxicology (wikipedia). Pictures of the rats were published.
A wave of biotech-industry criticism ensued. Pressure built. “Experts” said the study was grossly unscientific, its methods were unprofessional, and Seralini was biased against GMOs from the get-go. Monsanto didn’t like Seralini at all.
The journal which published the Seralini study caved in and retracted it.
Why? Not because Seralini did anything unethical, not because he plagiarized material, not because he was dishonest in any way, but because:
He used rats which (supposedly) had an inherent tendency to develop tumors (the Sprague-Dawley strain), and because he used too few rats (10). That’s it. Those were Seralini’s errors.
Well, guess what? Eight years prior to Seralini, Monsanto also did a rat-tumor-GMO study and published it in the very same journal. Monsanto’s study showed there were no tumor problems in the rats. But here’s the explosive kicker. Monsanto used the same strain of rats that Seralini did and same number of rats (10). And nobody complained about it.
Michael Hansen, senior scientist at Consumer’s Union, explains in an interview with Steve Curwood at loe.org (click here for the full article):
“Well, basically what Dr. Séralini did was he did the same feeding study that Monsanto did and published in the same journal eight years prior, and in that study, they [Monsanto] used the same number of rats, and the same strain of rats, and came to a conclusion there was no [tumor] problem. So all of a sudden, eight years later, when somebody [Seralini] does that same experiment, only runs it for two years rather than just 90 days, and their data suggests there are problems, [then] all of a sudden the number of rats is too small? Well, if it’s too small to show that there’s a [tumor] problem, wouldn’t it be too small to show there’s no problem? They already said there should be a larger study, and it turns out the European Commission is spending 3 million Euros to actually do that Séralini study again, run it for two years, use 50 or more rats and look at the carcinogenicity. So they’re actually going to do the full-blown cancer study, which suggests that Séralini’s work was important, because you wouldn’t follow it up with a 3 million Euro study if it was a completely worthless study. …
CURWOOD: Now as I understand it, the Séralini work is one of among only very few studies that have been conducted by independent scientists as opposed to industry scientists when it comes to the question of Roundup. How correct is that?
HANSEN: Well, that is actually fairly correct. There was an article published in 2011 in the Journal of Food Policy that was actually very interesting because it looked at this issue of conflict of interest, both financial conflict and professional conflict of interest. And for articles in which there was a professional conflict of interest, there were 41 studies, and that means one or more of the authors in each of the studies worked in the industry. Of those 41 studies, every single one of them found no problem. For studies where there was not a professional conflict, that is where none of the authors came from industry, there were 51 studies, 12 of them found problems. That was a highly statistically significant difference, the probability of that happening by chance was less than one in 1000, was less than .001. So what that suggests is that if a study on GMOs involves an industry scientist, if they’re an author on it, it will invariably find no problem at all with the GMO….
The health effects of a Roundup-tolerant NK603 genetically modified (GM) maize(from 11% in the diet), cultivated with or without Roundup application and Roundupalone (from 0.1 ppb of the full pesticide containing glyphosate and adjuvants) indrinking water, were evaluated for 2 years in rats. This study constitutes afollow-up investigation of a 90-day feeding study conducted by Monsanto in orderto obtain commercial release of this GMO, employing the same rat strain andanalyzing biochemical parameters on the same number of animals per group as ourinvestigation. Our research represents the first chronic study on thesesubstances, in which all observations including tumors are reportedchronologically. Thus, it was not designed as a carcinogenicity study. We reportthe major findings with 34 organs observed and 56 parameters analyzed at 11 timepoints for most organs.
Biochemical analyses confirmed very significant chronic kidney deficiencies, forall treatments and both sexes; 76% of the altered parameters were kidney-related.In treated males, liver congestions and necrosis were 2.5 to 5.5 times higher.Marked and severe nephropathies were also generally 1.3 to 2.3 times greater. Infemales, all treatment groups showed a two- to threefold increase in mortality,and deaths were earlier. This difference was also evident in three male groups fedwith GM maize. All results were hormone- and sex-dependent, and the pathologicalprofiles were comparable. Females developed large mammary tumors more frequentlyand before controls; the pituitary was the second most disabled organ; the sexhormonal balance was modified by consumption of GM maize and Roundup treatments.Males presented up to four times more large palpable tumors starting 600 daysearlier than in the control group, in which only one tumor was noted. Theseresults may be explained by not only the non-linear endocrine-disrupting effectsof Roundup but also by the overexpression of the EPSPS transgene or othermutational effects in the GM maize and their metabolic consequences.
Our findings imply that long-term (2 year) feeding trials need to be conducted to thoroughly evaluate the safety of GM foods and pesticides in their full commercial formulations….
CORETTA SCOTT KING: There is abundant evidence of a major high level conspiracy in the assassination of my husband, Martin Luther King, Jr. And the civil court’s unanimous verdict has validated our belief. I wholeheartedly applaud the verdict of the jury and I feel that justice has been well served in their deliberations. This verdict is not only a great victory for my family, but also a great victory for America. It is a great victory for truth itself. It is important to know that this was a SWIFT verdict, delivered after about an hour of jury deliberation. The jury was clearly convinced by the extensive evidence that was presented during the trial that, in addition to Mr. Jowers, the conspiracy of the Mafia, local, state and federal government agencies, were deeply involved in the assassination of my husband. The jury also affirmed overwhelming evidence that identified someone else, not James Earl Ray, as the shooter, and that Mr. Ray was set up to take the blame. I want to make it clear that my family has no interest in retribution. Instead, our sole concern has been that the full truth of the assassination has been revealed and adjudicated in a court of law….