EARLIER TODAY RICH POSTED INFORMATION ABOUT CHINA’S GHOST CITIES, THIS MAY GIVE YOU A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE. MONTHS AGO I PASSED ON SOME INFORMATION ON THIS WEBSITE, BUT I’LL REPEAT IT. I WAS TOLD THIS STORY BY SOME INSIDERS. A GROUP OF WORKERS IN CHINA WERE WORKING ON ONE OF THESE GHOST CITIES, BUT THEIR EMPLOYERS REFUSED TO PAY WHEN THE JOB WAS DONE AND THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT DIDN’T HELP THEM. SO THEY SNUCK INTO THE BIG EMPTY CITY AND TOOK SOME PHOTOS WHICH THEY SOLD TO AN AMERICAN. EVENTUALLY SOME OF THESE PHOTOS WERE SHOWN TO ME BY SOMEONE WHO HAD HIS OWN MOTIVATIONS FOR DOING SO. BASICALLY HE WAS HOPING TO GET RUMORS STARTED ON THE INTERNET ABOUT WHAT’S REALLY GOING ON IN THESE GHOST CITIES SO THAT HE COULD SELL THE PHOTOS TO WEALTHY INVESTORS IN LONDON’S FINANCIAL DISTRICT WHO HAVE INVESTED HEAVILY IN THESE GHOST CITIES AND WOULD BE HURT IF THESE PHOTOS WERE RELEASED. MY ONLY INTEREST IN SHARING THIS INFORMATION IS THAT I HOPE THAT SOME PEOPLE WILL FINALLY GET A CLUE ABOUT WHAT’S GOING ON. THESE PHOTOS SHOWED THAT SOME OF THE BUILDINGS IN THE CITY WERE EMPTY SHELLS. THERE WERE PHOTOS OF A FOUR STORY BUILDING WHICH LOOKED REAL FROM A DISTANCE, BUT UP CLOSE YOU COULD SEE THAT SOMETHING WASN’T RIGHT, INSTEAD OF BEING A BRICK BUILDING, IT HAD BRICKS PAINTED ON THE OUTSIDE. PHOTOS ON THE INSIDE SHOWED THAT IT WAS AN EMPTY SHELL MADE OUT OF PLYWOOD AND HELD UP WITH WOODEN FRAMES. THERE ALSO WAS A LARGER SKYSCRAPER WITH A GOOD EXTERIOR AND STEEL FRAME CONSTRUCTION ON THE INSIDE, BUT NOTHING ELSE–NO FLOORS, NO WALLS, NO PLUMBING, NO ELECTRICAL–AN EMPTY SHELL. BUT IT GETS WORSE. THERE WERE PHOTOS OF BUILDINGS WHICH WERE PERFECTLY GOOD–EXCEPT FOR ONE THING–THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM COULD BE SWITCHED OVER FROM WATER TO GAS–AS IN POISONOUS GAS. THESE WERE SMART BUILDING WITH DOORS THAT COULD BE LOCKED DOWN FROM THE OUTSIDE WITH COMPUTERS. IN OTHER WORDS, IT LOOKS LIKE AN APARTMENT OR OFFICE BUILDING, BUT IT’S REALLY A HIGH TECH GAS CHAMBER. RIGHT NOW, THERE SEEMS TO BE NO MARKET FOR THE BUILDINGS IN THESE GHOST CITIES, BUT ALL OF THAT COULD CHANGE. THIS IS WHERE FUKUSHIMA COMES IN. KEEP IN MIND THAT WHAT’S GOING ON THERE ISN’T AN ACCIDENT. IT’S BEEN DESIGNED TO LOOK LIKE AN ACCIDENT BUT IT’S BEING ENGINEERED. HAARP AND NUKES ON THE SEA FLOOR WERE USED TO CAUSE THE TIDAL WAVES. NOW THE RADIATION LEAKS ARE INTENTIONALLY BEING DONE. OUR NATION IS UNDER ATTACK, THIS ISN’T AN ACCIDENT, IT’S WAR. THE RADIATION LEAKS ARE INTENDED TO DRIVE PEOPLE OUT OF AMERICA. THE WEALTHY ELETES WILL BE SOLD BUILDINGS IN CHINA, THINKING THAT THEY WILL BE SAFE THERE. AFTER ALL, EVERYONE SAYS THAT CHINA IS THE NEW SUPER POWER. BUT WHEN YOU ABANDON AMERICA AND GET YOUR NICE NEW HOME IN CHINA, YOU WILL BE ENTERING A KILLING FIELD. PERSONALLY, I RESPECT THE CHINESE PEOPLE AND THEIR CULTURE, BUT THEIR GOVERNMENT IS A CORRUPT AND VIOLENT DICTATORSHIP. IF YOU THINK THAT CHINA IS SAFE, REMEMBER TIANANMEN SQUARE. THOSE WHO FORGET HISTORY ARE CONDEMNED TO RELIVE IT. REMEMBER ALL THE CHINESE TROOPS KILLING THE UNARMED STUDENTS? THIS IS YOUR FUTURE IF YOU ESCAPE THE RADIATION CLOUDS IN AMERICA TO GO TO CHINA. YOU MIGHT THINK THAT, IF YOU ARE A WEALTHY INSIDER, YOU AND YOUR FAMILY IS SAFE, BUT NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH. THE ILLUMINATI LEADERS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER DON’T WANT EQUAL PARTNERS, THEY WANT SLAVES, AND IF YOU ARE AN ILLUMINATI INSIDER YOU KNOW TOO MUCH. YOUR ONLY SHIELD IS DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA, IF THAT SHIELD GOES, YOU HAVE NO SAFE PLACE. REMEMBER THE ROACH MOTELS? THEIR SLOGAN IS “ROACHES CHECK IN BUT THEY DON’T CHECK OUT!” THESE WORDS ARE WRITTEN OVER THE GATES THAT LEAD INTO THE GHOST CITIES OF CHINA. THE DEEP UNDERGROUND MILITARY BASES AREN’T SAFE AND THE FEMA CAMPS CERTAINLY AREN’T SAFE. IF YOU GO TO ANY OF THESE PLACES WITH YOUR FAMILIES YOU’LL BE LIKE THE ROACHES WHO MARCH INTO THE ROACH MOTELS. YOU MAY CHECK IN, BUT YOU WON’T CHECK OUT. THIS COMES TO THE MEANING OF 322. THIS IS THE NUMBER SPECIAL IN THE HEARTS OF SKULL AND BONE MEMBERS WHO LOVE THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA. ON 3/22 THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES WERE ERECTED WITH THEIR MANDATE THAT THE EARTH’S POPULATION BE REDUCED TO HALF A BILLION PEOPLE. OBAME CARE WAS PASSED ON 3/22, WHICH MAKES ONE WONDER. THERE ARE RUMORS ON THE GRAPEVINE THAT THE ILLUMINATI PLANS TO BEGIN IT’S DEPOPULATION PROGRAM IN ERNEST ON 3/22/2014. BUT WHO WOULD PLAN SUCH AN EVIL THING? THE FREEMASONS USE THE WORD “JAHBULON” WHICH IN HEBREW LITERALLY MEANS “I AM BAAL STRENGTH.” IN OTHER WORDS “I AM THE STRENGTH OF BAAL.” YOU REMEMBER THE STORY OF ELIJAH, COMING AT THE END TIMES AND SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THE PRIESTS OF BAAL. YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT BAAL=SATURN=SATAN. THIS IS SATAN’S LAST PLAY TO KILL EVERYONE ON THE PLANET AND DESTROY GOD’S BEAUTIFUL CREATION. IF YOU DON’T BELIEVE IN GOD AND END TIME PROPHETS, DO YOU BELIEVE IN YOUR OWN EYES? WHAT ARE ALL THOSE CHEM TRAILS IN THE SKY? THE SYSTEMATIC DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA IS BEING PURCHASED BY SATAN WORSHIPING BILLIONAIRES, BUT THOSE WHO COOPERATE WITH THEM DON’T REALIZE THAT THEY TOO WILL BE BETRAYED BY THEIR OWN ILLUMINATI LEADERS. MANY OF THE PEOPLE WHO COOPERATE WITH THE ILLUMINATI LEADERS DO SO BECAUSE OF MONEY. IT ISN’T DIFFICULT TO FIGURE OUT THEIR MOTIVATIONS, MONEY–MONEY–MONEY. I’VE DONE A YOUTUBE VIDEO THAT SPEAKS TO THIS ISSUE, IT’S CALLED “ILLUMINATI EVIL WEATLH SECRETS” AND THE LINK TO IT IS BELOW.
ILLUMINATI EVIL WEALTH SECRETS YOUTUBE
The abusive quackery being dished out as advice to parents in this country has at least one precedent: in pre-nazi germany. It illustrates how devastating such early cruelty can be to an entire culture, and it seems to me male circumcision goes a long way toward achieving what the prussian doctors were trying to achieve in germany, in a more covert but brutal way.
Although centuries of novels and autobiographies have dealt with the subject of child abuse in all its forms, society has been slow in recognizing the frequency with which this assault is committed. Only in the last twenty years has there been any real progress in this respect, and most of it is due to the efforts of a small number of researchers and above all to the media. Still underestimated and sometimes contested are the consequences very early abuse will have for the victims in their adult lives. The issues involved have been largely ignored, and there is correspondingly little mention of them in historical and anthropological studies. Thus sociologist Wolfgang Sovsky is able to write an otherwise impressive work on forms of violence without making one single reference to the childhood dimension. He gives very considerable space to the willful infliction of suffering, calling it “mysterious,” although it is readily explicable once we countenance the idea that the bodies of the executioners, torturers and the orchestrators of organized manhunts may have learned their fateful lessons very early and thus very effectively.
Also Goldhagen restricts himself to a phenomenological discussion of the people who volunteered to torture and humiliate others, without giving any consideration to their childhood. He does devote much attention to the emotions of the perpetrators, a subject hitherto largely ignored, but without the background of their early upbringing their behavior still remains mysterious. The reader seeks in vain for an explanation. What made respected members of society suddenly act like monsters? How could a former teacher like Klaus Barbie, and other men described by their daughters as kind, caring fathers, have innocent people tortured or indeed do the torturing themselves? Goldhagen does not address this question. He is obviously convinced that references to traditional anti–Semitism in Germany provide a satisfactory answer. They do not.
The hypothesis that German anti–Semitism was the real reason for the Holocaust has been rightly criticized by urging a comparison with the First World War. At that time anti–Semitism was just as strong in Germany but no organized genocide resulted. And why no Holocaust in the other anti–Semitic countries‹Poland, Russia and other parts of Europe? The argument that in the Weimar Republic unemployment and poverty caused immense general frustration that was discharged via the mass murder of the Jews is hardly convincing, given that Hitler was quickly successful in getting unemployment under control.
There must have been other factors at play which have hitherto been ignored, factors going some way to explaining why the Holocaust happened in Germany and why it happened at this particular time rather than another. In my view, one possible operative factor is the destructive child–rearing style practiced widely on infants around the turn of the century in Germany, a style I have no hesitation in referring to as a universal abuse of infants.
Of course children in other countries have been and still are mistreated in the name of upbringing or caregiving, but hardly already as babies and hardly with the systematic thoroughness characteristic of the Prussian pedagogy. In the two generations before Hitler’s rise to power, the implementation of this method was brought to a high degree of perfection in Germany. With this foundation to build on, Hitler finally achieved what he wanted: “My ideal of education is hard. Whatever is weak must be hammered away. In the fortresses of my militant order a generation of young people will grow to strike fear into the heart of the world. Violent, masterful, unafraid, cruel youth is what I want. Young people must be all that. They must withstand pain. There must be nothing weak or tender about them. The free–magnificent predator must flash from their eyes again. I want them strong and beautiful…That way I can fashion things anew.” This education program revolving on the extermination of everything life–giving was the forerunner of Hitler’s plans for the extermination of an entire nation. Indeed it was the prerequisite for the ultimate success of his designs.
The numerous and widely–read tracts by Dr. Daniel Gottlieb Moritz Schreber, the inventor of the Schrebergärten (the German world for small allotments) are of major interest here. Some of them ran to as many as 40 editions, and their central concern was to instruct parents in the systematic upbringing of infants from the very first day of life. Many people motivated by what they thought to be the best of intentions complied with the advice given them by Schreber and other authors about how best to raise their children if they wanted to make them into model subjects of the German Reich. They did this without even remotely suspecting that they were exposing their children to a systematic form of torture with long–term effects. Germany sayings and catch–phrases like “Praise be to the things that make us tough” and “What doesn’t kill us will strengthen us,” still to be heard from educationists of the old school, probably originated in this period.
Morton Schatzman, who quotes highly enlightening passages from Schreber’s writings, is of the opinion that here we are in the presence not of child–raising methods but of systematic instruction in child persecution. One of Schreber’s convictions is that when babies cry they should be made to desist by the use of “physically perceptible admonitions,” assuring his readers that “such a procedure is only necessary one, or at the most twice, and then one is master of the child for all time. From then on, one look, one single threatening gesture will suffice to subjugate the child.” Above all, the newborn child should be drilled from the very first day to obey and to refrain from crying.
Today, people who have been brought up in anything even remotely approaching a humane way will hardly be able to imagine the rigor and tenacity with which Schreber himself implemented this program. Psychoanalyst Wilhelm G. Niederland quotes examples that cast light on the everyday practical conduct of child–rearing in those decades‹for example, recipes for inculcating the “art of self–denial” into infants. “The method should be simple and effective: the child is placed on the lap of its nanny while the latter is eating or drinking whatever takes her fancy. However urgent the infant’s oral needs may become in this situation, they must not be gratified.”
Niederland quotes an account by Schreber from his own family life. A nanny eating pears while holding one of his children on her lap was unable to resist the temptation of giving the infant a slice. She was immediately dismissed. The news of this draconian measure quickly spread to all the other nannies in Leipzig, and from that time on, writes Schreber, he “never again encountered such insubordination, neither with that child nor with any of the others that came later.”
Contrary to received opinion prevalent as recently as 15 years ago, the human brain at birth is not fully developed. The abilities a person’s brain develops depend on experiences in the first three years of life. Studies on abandoned and severely mistreated Romanian children revealed striking lesions in certain areas of the brain and marked emotional and cognitive insufficiencies in later life. According to very recent neurobiological findings, repeated traumatization leads to an increased release of stress hormones that attack the sensitive tissue of the brain and destroy existing neurons. Other studies of mistreated children have revealed that the areas of the brain responsible for the “management” of emotions are 20 to 30 percent smaller than in normal persons.
The children systematically subjected to obedience drill around the turn of the century were not only exposed to corporal “correction” but also to severe emotional deprivation. The upbringing manuals of the day described physical demonstrations of affection such as stroking, cuddling and kissing as indications of a doting, mollycoddling attitude. Parents were warned of the disastrous effects of spoiling their children, a form of indulgence entirely incompatible with the prevalent ideal of rigor and severity. As a result, infants suffered from the absence of direct loving contact with the parents. The best they could hope for was to find some kind of substitute from the servants, who in numerous cases used and exploited them as objects of pleasure, thus frequently adding to the children’s emotional confusion.
Since the experiments conducted on monkeys by Dr. Harlow in the Fifties, we know that animals raised by artificial “robot” mothers later turned aggressive and showed no interest in their own offspring. New research on macaque monkeys revealed that they kill even members of their own species if they were brought up without appropriate care. John Bowlby’s studies on the absence of early attachment in delinquents and René Spitz’ descriptions of small children dying of hospitalism following emotional neglect during hospitalization under extremely hygienic conditions are indications that not only animal but also human babies require reassuring sensory contact with their parents if socialization is to take a normal course.
These findings presented by Bowlby and Spitz almost 40 years ago are corroborated by recent neurobiological research. The studies in question suggest that not only active battering but also the absence of loving physical contact between child and parent will cause certain areas of the brain, notably those responsible for the emotions, to remain underdeveloped. Hence the children “subjugated by looks” suffered emotional harm that was only to develop its full destructive potential in the next generation….
You should download and save this article, it seems to be vanishing from the net.
There’s no better indication of the destroyer’s future plans than the massive over-construction of uninhabited cities in china. Even if they are empty shells as rumored, they are clearly being marketed to an expected influx of wealthy expatriates.
The fact that China has an unprecedented excess capacity glut, also known as an epic overinvestment/construction bubble, is by now well-known and acknowledged by even the most ardent Chinaphiles. Perhaps nowhere is China’s outlier nature in this regard more obvious than in the following chart showing per capita cement consumption vs GDP.
Look at where the USA is on this chart. Clearly we are to be turned into a ghost country, probably to be dominated by extraction industries like mining and oil.
There is a controversial idea that I’ve heard of, which you may being hearing of in the future. This is called Voter-qualified democracy. This means that the right to vote would not be given automatically once someone becomes an adult. Voter Qualification means that citizens would have to in some way prove to the State that they deserve to be a voter. In the Old South after the Civil War, this type of technique was used to keep blacks and poor whites from having the vote. Because most slaves had been compelled by their circumstances to be illiterate, even after being freed, they still couldn’t read. So some districts in the Old South passed laws saying that a citizen had to pass a literacy test in order to earn the right to vote. This kept blacks from having the right to vote. The racism behind such laws was obvious, and they were repealed. The Sci-Fi story by Robert Heinlein, STARSHIP TROOPERS, is set in a world of the future where only those who have served in the military have the right to vote. Such a form of Voter Qualification would only make sense in an oppressive military police state. What I’ve heard about recently on the grapevine is that wealthy aristocrats are going to promote the idea of Voter Qualification based upon wealth. This idea will be that only the wealthiest 1% of the world’s population would be allowed to vote. This would make the Global Government into a permanent plutocracy. People who are born into wealth would be born into voting rights and people who were born into poverty would never have the right to vote. In such a world there would only be aristocrats and peasants. I think the injustice of such an idea is obvious, and this is why I distrust any idea for democracy based on voter qualification. There seems to be a planned economic crash which will take place in 2014. If and when it happens, it could be the end of the American middle class. The final suppression of the American middle class could open the door to Global Government–and what is being planned is a Global Government of the wealthiest 1%. In such a government, only the wealthy would have rights. However, it is predictable that such a government would be unstable for many reasons, and it would eventually collapse. In such a case, the question would come up as to how to build up a democratic system in American after the Global Plutocracy fails. There have been some people in think tanks who do analysis of the future trends using computers, games theory and advanced economic theory. I’ve talked with such persons who believe that the scenario which I’ve just described here will take place. In the rebuilding of civilization after an economic collapse in America and after the collapse of the Global Plutocracy (which presently rules the world covertly) there might be a reasonable use of voter qualification. The rebuilding of democracy might have to be done step by step after the collapse of civilization. In the first step the vote would be given only to those persons that the new democracy needs to rebuild a society: the military, the police, the judges, the doctors, the nurses, the teachers and other people with vital skills. Once civilization based on authentic democracy has been given a foothold again, then the right to vote could be extended to others as they are able to rejoin society in a useful way. Personally I hope it doesn’t come to that–I hope that the economy doesn’t collapse in the near future. Whatever happens, I believe that democracy will prevail.
The reason our system of government has become so corrupted is because people have been deceived with propaganda and also in many cases brainwashed with MK Ultra type mind control. There is a system for deprogramming the victims of mind control, I call this system Fabian Therapy and I’ve written an article on it, the link to which is below.
Fabian Therapy for Mind Control
The ancient philosopher Socrates fought, lived and died for his belief in democracy. He was a soldier who fought for Athens. He vigorously participated in the government of Athens, although some corrupt officials didn’t like his criticisms. However, in spite of his criticisms of the government of Athens, when his political enemies used a mob rule mentality to have him unjustly sentenced to death, he accepted the sentence rather than run away. A student of Socrates, Plato, didn’t like democracy, perhaps in part because of what he saw happen to his teacher. THE REPUBLIC by Plato is a written work that, among other things, encourages an aristocracy of philosophers rather than a democracy. Plato saw democracy as the mob rule of uneducated peasants. Adam Weishaupt drew from some of the ideas for his Illuminati Doctrine from this work by Plato. The Illuminati Doctrine calls for the creation of a global government run by illuminated aristocrats. Albert Pike’s plan for three world wars would put the aristocrats in power as the masses are economically and morally beaten down by unending wars. The Club of Rome developed plans which would divide the world into Ten Kingdoms; this another grand vision for a world run by wealthy aristocrats in which democracy is banished. Agenda 21 in the U.N. is yet another grand plan to put a small group of aristocrats in power over the world. In response to all these grand aristocratic plans, I think that those of us who believe in democracy need a grand plan of our own to reinstate authentic democracy in America. It’s obvious that our once great democracy has become so corrupted that it no longer functions. Once we reform America we need a plan to spread democracy to the entire world to create an international alliance of independent democratic nations. But who should come up with such a plan? The nature of democracy is that people should work and think together. The ancient philosopher Socrates had a method which evoked the collective intelligence of his students. He had a technique for teaching his students which consisted of thesis, antithesis and then metamorphosis. A student puts forward a thesis, then another student challenges that thesis with an antithesis. The discussion and debate which follows results in a metamorphosis of thought. This metamorphosis will always be an idea or set of ideas which no one person could have come up with alone. I worked for years as a professional political fund raiser. I was involved with a political talk show for years on KOPN. I’ve studied and posted on this website for years as well. I’ve written a thesis–my idea of a grand plan for restoring democracy in America then spreading it throughout the world and finally throughout the Cosmos. I didn’t write it with the intention that other people would just take my word and follow my plan. I thought of it as something which might stimulate discussion and creative thinking in others. If enough people think and talk about how to reform democracy, a metamorphosis of thought might take place. A metamorphosis of collective ideas from many people could cause the emergence of a practical plan for democracy. I call my thesis, THE PROTOCOLS OF LIBERTY, the link to which is below.
The Protocols of Liberty
I have to admit that I have mixed feelings about Barack Obama’s presidency. Nevertheless, my disagreements with his policies are off set by my respect for some of his achievements. So I feel that I need to be balanced in reporting this. Yesterday on 12/17/13 an anonymous information source who has given me information in the past (he claims to be an Illuminati insider who is disillusioned with the Illuminati) told me that Barack Obama has an exact body double who looks virtually the same as him. I had a bad feeling when I was told this, a premonition if you will. I’ve received information from this anonymous source and his friends before, and they’ve turned out to be accurate in the past, but I’ve never really completely trusted them because they seem to have an unspoken agenda. I’m reporting on what they told me because I’m concerned that this might be the beginning of a smear campaign against Obama. I WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT I WAS OFFERED NO PROOF THAT THIS RUMOR WAS TRUE. I was a professional fundraiser who worked on Obama’s first presidential election campaign from the day he announced until it was obvious to me that he was going to be the winner. I respect the fact that Barack Obama did a great deal to help put an end to America’s long history of racism. However I felt disappointed when he endorsed the policy of Too Big to Fail. The tragic results of this wrong minded bailout, first start by the Bush administration, are that our 10.6 Trillion dollar national debt which existed when Obama first took office was reported in Oct. 2013 to have grown to 16.7 Trillion dollars. Some experts believe that the debt may have doubled from the debt he inherited by the time he leaves office. I have mixed feelings about Obama Care as well. The bill that was passed is significantly different than what he promised in his campaign speeches. However it cannot be underestimated how important it is that people be not refused for health insurance because of preexisting conditions. Obama Care might actually save some lives. It may turn out that when Obama Care is enacted, it will be a good thing for the American people. It’s enactment may turn out to be something that enhances Obama’s approval. Only history will show if this is the case. My concern in hearing what I was told yesterday is this–it may happen that on the eve of Obama Care enactment all types of rumor mongering about Obama may take place as a distraction to the perceived success of Obama Care. There are legitimate criticisms about the Obama administration which can be made, but rumors that are unproven serve no purpose.
Having said that I want to point out that the idea that Obama might have a body double is nothing new. On the Telegraph, on 20 JAN 2009 Nick Allen reported that security experts had proposed the idea of using a body double for Obama during high risk photo ops where he was not to speak. Obama rejected the idea at that time because body doubles had been used for such purposes by dictators such as Saddam Hussein. Rumors of this sort surfaced again when an Indonesian photographer, Iham Anas, became a Barack look-a-like in ads.
On a more humorous note, I recall that Princess Amadala’s life was saved when her body double took a lazar bolt for her at the beginning of Star War’s episode III thus saving the Princess from assassination. I liked the fact that the Princess was an outspoken defender of democracy.
I have some ideas about democracy myself. I’ve written down these ideas in an article called THE PROTOCOLS OF LIBERTY, the link to which is below.
The Protocols of Liberty
USA and Mexico, two neighboring countries, one rich, one poor, who blame each other for weapons and drugs, may be surprised to learn that they are not very different after all. Both countries share health crises.
- Breast cancer. In the USA, nearly 40,000 women die each year due to this type of cancer, being the second leading cause of cancer death1-2. In Mexico, it’s the first cause of death in women older than 25, with more than 5,000 deaths each year3.
- Infant mortality. The USA has the 7th highest infant mortality among the world’s largest economies (OECD), with a rate of 6 deaths per 1000 children, while Mexico has a rate of 17 per 10004-5.
- Obesity. The USA and Mexico are the most obese countries among the world’s largest economies (OECD), where 31.8% and 32.8% of their population is fat, respectively6-8.
- Diabetes. The prevalence of this disease is 9.4% in the US population and 15.6% in Mexico. Approximately, 183,000 American deaths and 73,000 Mexican deaths are related to diabetes, becoming one of the main causes of deaths in both countries last year9-10.
- They are part of the region with second highest rate of ovarian cancer in the world11. Every year, more than 14,000 American women and 2,500 Mexican women die due to this cancer12-14.
- Arthritis, osteoporosis and Alzheimer. Millions of people in both countries suffer from these illnesses15-20.
Both governments have implemented some campaigns and actions trying to curb a little bit the existing crisis, but there has not been any plan to prevent these problems from the moment a new citizen is born. Because one thing is to try to solve a problem, when is already there, and another thing is to prevent it so it does not arise. For instance, there has been a lot of promotion of the pink ribbon in relation with the breast cancer early-detection, but there is really not much information about how to avoid the formation of the tumor itself. But, is it really possible to prevent these diseases?
Research demonstrates that there is a common denominator for all these illnesses: the lack of breastfeeding. Only 16% of American women exclusively breastfeed their infants at 6 months of age. In Mexico, only 14% does. In this regard, it is important to mention that the percentage in US has increased in the last years; however, Mexico unfortunately shows a decrement year after year21-22. Breastfeeding is linked to less breast cancer in mothers. Breastmilk protects infants from early death, and protects them as they grow from diabetes, obesity, arthritis, osteoporosis and Alzheimer’s disease.
Because of its beneficial effects on gut bacteria and the immune system, breast milk should be an exclusive diet for at least 6 if not 12 months, with continued breastfeeding along with appropriate complementary foods up to two years or beyond23. Breast milk is beneficial for both the child and the mother:
- Reduces 50% breast cancer24-27.
- Reduces 45% infant mortality28-30.
- Prevents child obesity31-34.
- Prevents diabetes type I (infant) and type II (mother) 35-37.
- Prevents arthritis, osteoporosis and Alzheimer’s (mothers) 38-43.
- Immunizes the new born from sickness and allergies44.
- Benefits the development of the baby’s brain45-47 (e.g., night breastmilk has tryptophan which is a precursor of serotonin, whose function is linked to intelligence and (not getting) depression).
- Besides all benefits, breast milk also represents love, closeness and bonds, keys for a better human development.
- Furthermore, breastmilk free and ecological.
Why is it then that breastfeeding rates are so low in both countries? The reasons are grave:
1. Breastfeeding-unfriendly medical establishments. …
2. Uneducated health professionals. …
3. Insufficient maternity leave. …
4. Cultural. …
It’s hard to believe such obvious medical arrogance and stupidity could be innocent when it’s so good for business. And in the context of the medically driven HIV epidemic in africa and covert WHO sterility campaigns around the world, the total picture is pretty sinister. To paraphrase stalin, individual child abuse is a tragedy, an epidemic of child abuse is just human resource management.