A whistleblower has revealed extraordinary information on the U.S. government’s support for international terrorist networks and organised crime. The government has denied the allegations yet gone to extraordinary lengths to silence her. Her critics have derided her as a fabulist and fabricator. But now comes word that some of her most serious allegations were confirmed by a major European newspaper only to be squashed at the request of the U.S. government.
In a recent book Classified Woman, Sibel Edmonds, a former translator for the FBI, describes how the Pentagon, CIA and State Department maintained intimate ties to al-Qaeda militants as late as 2001. Her memoir, Classified Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story, published last year, charged senior government officials with negligence, corruption and collaboration with al Qaeda in illegal arms smuggling and drugs trafficking in Central Asia.
In interviews with this author in early March, Edmonds claimed that Ayman al-Zawahiri, current head of al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden’s deputy at the time, had innumerable, regular meetings at the U.S. embassy in Baku, Azerbaijan, with U.S. military and intelligence officials between 1997 and 2001, as part of an operation known as ‘Gladio B’. Al-Zawahiri, she charged, as well as various members of the bin Laden family and other mujahideen, were transported on NATO planes to various parts of Central Asia and the Balkans to participate in Pentagon-backed destabilisation operations.
According to two Sunday Times journalists speaking on condition of anonymity, this and related revelations had been confirmed by senior Pentagon and MI6 officials as part of a four-part investigative series that were supposed to run in 2008. The Sunday Times journalists described how the story was inexplicably dropped under the pressure of undisclosed “interest groups”, which, they suggest, were associated with the U.S. State Department. …
The real capabilities and behavior of the US surveillance state are almost entirely unknown to the American public because, like most things of significance done by the US government, it operates behind an impenetrable wall of secrecy. But a seemingly spontaneous admission this week by a former FBI counterterrorism agent provides a rather startling acknowledgment of just how vast and invasive these surveillance activities are.
Over the past couple days, cable news tabloid shows such as CNN’s Out Front with Erin Burnett have been excitingly focused on the possible involvement in the Boston Marathon attack of Katherine Russell, the 24-year-old American widow of the deceased suspect, Tamerlan Tsarnaev. As part of their relentless stream of leaks uncritically disseminated by our Adversarial Press Corps, anonymous government officials are claiming that they are now focused on telephone calls between Russell and Tsarnaev that took place both before and after the attack to determine if she had prior knowledge of the plot or participated in any way.
On Wednesday night, Burnett interviewed Tim Clemente, a former FBI counterterrorism agent, about whether the FBI would be able to discover the contents of past telephone conversations between the two. He quite clearly insisted that they could:
BURNETT: Tim, is there any way, obviously, there is a voice mail they can try to get the phone companies to give that up at this point. It’s not a voice mail. It’s just a conversation. There’s no way they actually can find out what happened, right, unless she tells them?
CLEMENTE: “No, there is a way. We certainly have ways in national security investigations to find out exactly what was said in that conversation. It’s not necessarily something that the FBI is going to want to present in court, but it may help lead the investigation and/or lead to questioning of her. We certainly can find that out.
BURNETT: “So they can actually get that? People are saying, look, that is incredible.
CLEMENTE: “No, welcome to America. All of that stuff is being captured as we speak whether we know it or like it or not.”
“All of that stuff” – meaning every telephone conversation Americans have with one another on US soil, with or without a search warrant – “is being captured as we speak”.
The very idea that breast cancer is a “percent risk” is a complete lie. In reality, everyone has cancer micro-tumors in their bodies, including myself. Cancer is not a disease you just “get” like being randomly struck by lightning. It’s something you must “manage” or “prevent” day by day, meal by meal, through a lifestyle choice that involves vitamin D supplementation, nutrition, superfoods, vegetable juices and avoidance of cancer-causing chemicals and radiation.
So when a doctor says you have a “chance” of getting cancer, what he’s implying is that you have no control over cancer, and that’s an outright lie. Cancer quackery, in other words.
Even Jolie with her BRCA1 gene that’s linked to breast cancer can quite easily follow a dietary and lifestyle plan that suppresses BRCA1 gene expression. It’s not rocket science. It’s not even difficult. It can be done with simple foods that cost a few dollars a day. Those foods include raw citrus, resveratrol (red grapes or red wine), raw cruciferous vegetables, omega-3 oils and much more. Those same foods also help prevent heart disease, diabetes, Alzheimer’s and other chronic diseases. …
So the whole “chance” argument is pure quackery. There is no chance involved in whether you get cancer. It’s all cause and effect. You are either living a pro-cancer lifestyle and therefore growing cancer, or you’re living an anti-cancer lifestyle and keeping cancer in check so that it never becomes a problem. Cause and effect is what results in either the growth of cancer tumors or the prevention of cancer tumors. There is no “luck” involved.
It’s fascinating, isn’t it, that medical doctors don’t believe in luck or voodoo on any topic other than cancer. But when it comes to cancer, they want all women to be suckered into the victim mentality that cancer is purely a matter of “luck” and therefore women have no control over their own health outcomes. How dis-empowering! How sick! How incredibly exploitive of women!
The video is entertaining and alarming, but the satanists are already way ahead of optical laser technology.
Star Wars in Iraq (Italian documentary)
Hafnium isomer gamma laser superweapon described in use in above documentary
YouTube, owned by corporate giant Google, has banned our video discussing the corporate ownership of patents on human genes. This video, which featured nothing more than myself and Robert Scott Bell criticizing Angelina Jolie for hyping up BRCA breast cancer gene tests and being part of the trillion-dollar industry of “human genomics” apparently ran afoul of the content desires of YouTube, and they slapped our account with a “Community Guidelines warning strike.”
The video was censored within hours of it being posted. “Within an hour of it going live on Infowars, the video was quickly taken down by YouTube,” writes Steve Watson of InfoWars.com. “Viewers now clicking on the play button are presented with a static filled screen informing them that the video ‘has been removed as a violation of YouTube’s policy against spam, scams and commercially deceptive content.” …
It’s concerning that they’re marketing the pre-emptive amputation of one of the most important connections between mothers and their babies, especially based on the implicitly eugenic assumption that environmental influences need not be considered in such decisions. This is the bias in virtually all medical guidance: blame the gene, blame the brain, blame anything other than the increasingly toxic physical and social environment that we find ourselves in. A very convenient and profitable means of blaming the victim. Medicine is a creature of the status quo after all, and its “science” reflects that.
I suppose Jolie thinks she’ll never want children of her own. I wonder where that mindset comes from?
Few young people have the experience of growing up in intact, happy families any more. It’s as if such things never existed. This is becoming a society of lonely orphans.
The human body is not just a dynamic sophisticated biochemical and genetic system; there are strong energetic, emotional and psychological aspects that interact decisively with the physical counterparts of the body and can make a very measurable difference in our physiological functions.
A valid proof of this comes from the neonatal Kangaroo care method (K method), which requires skin to skin contact between the mother and the newborn baby. While this simple intervention provides superior support for preterm, low-weight babies, in comparison to conventional practices, such as the use of incubator, it is rarely included in official hospital policies or recommended to mothers by mainstream experts.
Pediatricians have expressed fears that keeping a preterm baby outside of an incubator during the Kangaroo interaction, may expose the infant to cold with subsequent loss of body heat and lower body temperatures, which can be critical to the survival and wellbeing of weak babies. Research however shows that the exact opposite is happening during the K care method. A study involving low-weight preterm babies (less than 1.5 Kg) and their mothers, published in the Journal of Pediatrics, found that the body temperature of the newborn actually rises when the infant is skin to skin in touch with the mother’s chest.
Perhaps the most remarkable story that was brought to the public’s attention is the miraculous revival of premature baby boy Jamie Ogg, who, following his birth was pronounced dead by doctors after 20 minutes of resuscitation efforts. His mother put him on her chest and held him for 2 hours, when he suddenly started to gasp for air and was soon breathing normally. …
Can there be any doubt that obstetrics has been turned into a weapon against human community? What better tool of social control than wholesale trauma-imprinting, isolation and subtle (or not so subtle) brain damage?
In an unprecedented challenge to American sovereignty, the United Nations has ordered the American states of Colorado and Washington to repeal laws passed by popular referendum legalizing the use of marijuana, claiming that these violate American treaty obligations. The global group has ordered the federal government to use force, if necessary, to bring the two Western states into compliance. …
The FRANKLIN SCANDAL is the story of a nationwide pedophile ring that pandered children to a cabal of the rich and powerful. The ring’s pimps were a pair of political powerbrokers who had access to the highest levels of our government. Nebraska legislators nearly exposed the ring in 1990, but its unveiling had the potential to produce seismic political aftershocks.The legislators’ efforts resulted in rash of mysterious deaths and the overpowering corruption of federal and local law enforcement, including the FBI, Secret Service, and Justice Department, effecting an immaculate cover-up of the trafficking network. …
It wasn’t a pair of “political powerbrokers”. It’s a long term multigenerational project of the network, which uses these brainwashed children and the brainwashed adults they become as powerful tools of political control, “manchurian candidates”. In any case, see extensive material on this site.
AMERICAN soldiers fighting in World War II had barely laid down their guns when hundreds of German and Austrian scientists, including a number implicated in Nazi war crimes, began immigrating to the United States. They were brought here under a secret intelligence project code-named “Paperclip.” Ever since, the U.S. government has successfully promoted the lie that Paperclip was a short-term operation limited to a few postwar raids on Hitler’s hoard of scientific talent. The General Accounting Office even claims that the project ended in 1947.1
All of which is sheer propaganda. For the first time ever, this’ book reveals that Paperclip was the biggest, longest-running operation involving Nazis in our country’s history. The project continued nonstop until 1973- decades longer than was previously thought. And remnants of it are still in operation today.2
At least sixteen hundred scientific and research specialists and thousands of their dependents were brought to the U. S. under Operation Paperclip. Hundreds of others arrived under two other Paperclip-relate d projects and went to work for universities, defense contractors, and CIA fronts. The Paperclip ope ration eventually became such a juggernaut that in 1956 one American ambassador characterized it as “a continuing U.S. recruitment program which has no parallel in any other Allied country.”3 …
The legacy of Paperclip is said to be the m oon rockets, jet planes, and other scientific achievements that were a product of postwar research in this c ountry. This is true-as far as it goes. What the project’s defenders fail to mention is that its legacy also includes the horrific psychochemical experiments conduc ted on American soldiers at Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland, the U.S. Army center for chemic al warfare research. In this book you’ll meet eight Paperclip scientists who worked at Edgewood between 1947 and 1966 developing nerve gas and psychochemicals such as LSD. But Edgewood’s co ntribution to the Paperclip legacy could not have been made by the Germans alone. The dist urbing truth is that American doctors were the ones who sifted through grim concentration camp re ports and ultimately us ed Nazi science as a basis for Dachau-like experiments on over seven thousand U.S. soldiers.6
Paperclip’s legacy has its roots in the cold war philosophy espoused by the intelligence officers who ran the operation. Their motives, schemes, and coverup efforts are a logical focus for this book, since those are what shaped Paperclip from the beginning. Moreover, the military’s secret agenda was far different fro m the one foisted on the American public. At its heart was an unshakable conviction that the e nd justified the means. The officers who ran Paperclip were determined to use any means necessary to keep Nazi scientists out of Russian hands, even if that meant violati ng U. S. laws and foreign policy. …
In hindsight it appears the project had a far darker dynamic than simply fighting the cold war. The nazis were largely a social control experiment of the robber barons and aristocrats who were and are in control of the global economy. Systematic application of child abuse, mother deprivation and military-style regimentation in german schools, all mediated through the german medical and educational establishments of the day, produced a generation of highly accomplished psychopaths. The german experiment was a success in all but the final military takeover of the world, which had to be postponed until now. Paperclip was just harvesting the fruits of the seeds planted during the earlier years of the 20’th century.
Many of the techniques which gave rise to the nazi phenomenon have been in use in american obstetrical wards for some time. But the plague has spread elsewhere as well. For some context, see:
The very spirit and quality of human life is being warped by these satanists. The earth is being turned into a planetary beehive through systematic severing of mother-child bonding and child abuse.
Unfortunately it gets even worse. Nazi researchers into trauma based mind control were also imported under paperclip and such research was incorporated into the cia’s mk-ultra project and deployed in the field as early as the 1960’s. There’s some evidence that perhaps as much as 2% of the US population (trend setters and opinion leaders) were under direct mind control as of 1992.